Mixed Materials

Prioritized Process Test : An Alternative to Current Process Testing Strategies

Bibliographic Details
Title: Prioritized Process Test : An Alternative to Current Process Testing Strategies
Authors: Bures, Miroslav, Ahmed, Bestoun S., Zamli, Kamal Z.
Publisher Information: Czech Tech Univ, Software Testing Intelligent Lab STILL, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Elect Engn, Karlovo Nam 13, Prague 12135 2, Czech Republic. CZE Czech Tech Univ, Software Testing Intelligent Lab STILL, Dept Comp Sci, Fac Elect Engn, Karlovo Nam 13, Prague 12135 2, Czech Republic. CZE Univ Malaysia Pahang, IBM Ctr Excellence, Fac Comp Syst & Software Engn, Gambang, Malaysia. MYS World Scientific Publishing 2019
Document Type: Mixed materials
Abstract: Testing processes and workflows in information and Internet of Things systems is a major part of the typical software testing effort. Consistent and efficient path-based test cases are desired to support these tests. Because certain parts of software system workflows have a higher business priority than others, this fact has to be involved in the generation of test cases. In this paper, we propose a Prioritized Process Test (PPT), which is a model-based test case generation algorithm that represents an alternative to currently established algorithms that use directed graphs and test requirements to model the system under test. The PPT accepts a directed multigraph as a model to express priorities, and edge weights are used instead of test requirements. To determine the test-coverage level of test cases, a test-depth-level concept is used. We compared the presented PPT with five alternatives (i.e. the Process Cycle Test (PCT), a naive reduction of test set created by the PCT, Brute Force algorithm, Set-covering-Based Solution and Matching-based Prefix Graph Solution) for edge coverage and edge-pair coverage. To assess the optimality of the path-based test cases produced by these strategies, we used 14 metrics based on the properties of these test cases and 59 models that were created for three real-world systems. For all edge coverage, the PPT produced more optimal test cases than the alternatives in terms of the majority of the metrics. For edge-pair coverage, the PPT strategy yielded similar results to those of the alternatives. Thus, the PPT strategy is an applicable alternative as it reflects both the required test coverage level and the business priority in parallel.
Index Terms: Software testing, model-based testing, process testing, path-based testing, Computer Sciences, Datavetenskap (datalogi), Article in journal, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, text
DOI: 10.1142.S0218194019500335
URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-86827
International journal of software engineering and knowledge engineering, 0218-1940, 2019, 29:7, s. 997-1028
Availability: Open access content. Open access content
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Note: English
Other Numbers: UPE oai:DiVA.org:kau-86827
0000-0002-2994-7826
0000-0001-9051-7609
0000-0003-4626-0513
doi:10.1142/S0218194019500335
ISI:000479114500005
1293937448
Contributing Source: UPPSALA UNIV LIBR
From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
Accession Number: edsoai.on1293937448
Database: OAIster
Description
DOI:10.1142.S0218194019500335