Academic Journal

Biosimilar Versus Innovator Ranibizumab in Myopic CNVM: Comparative Real-World Outcomes- The BRIM Study

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Biosimilar Versus Innovator Ranibizumab in Myopic CNVM: Comparative Real-World Outcomes- The BRIM Study
Συγγραφείς: Chakraborty D, Sinha TK, Sinha S, Biswas RK, Maiti A, Nandi K, Rungta D, Bhattacharya R
Πηγή: Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol 19, Iss Issue 1, Pp 3741-3747 (2025)
Στοιχεία εκδότη: Dove Medical Press, 2025.
Έτος έκδοσης: 2025
Συλλογή: LCC:Ophthalmology
Θεματικοί όροι: Myopia, Myopic CNVM, Anti VEGF, Ranibizumab, Biosimilar ranibizumab, Ophthalmology, RE1-994
Περιγραφή: Debdulal Chakraborty,1 Tushar Kanti Sinha,1 Sourav Sinha,2 Rupak Kanti Biswas,2 Aniruddha Maiti,3 Krishnendu Nandi,2 Dinesh Rungta,1 Ranabir Bhattacharya1 1Vitreo-Retina Services, Disha Eye Hospitals, Kolkata, WB, India; 2Vitreo-retina Services, Nethralayam Superspeciality Eye Care, Kolkata, WB, India; 3Vitreo-Retina Services Global Eye Hospital, Kolkata, WB, IndiaCorrespondence: Debdulal Chakraborty, Vitreo-retinal Services, Disha Eye Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, Tel +91 33 6636 0000, Email devdc@rediffmail.comPurpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of biosimilar ranibizumab (Razumab®) versus innovator ranibizumab (Lucentis®/Accentrix®) in the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascular membrane (mCNVM).Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included treatment-naïve patients with mCNVM between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients received intravitreal injections of either innovator or biosimilar ranibizumab, following a pro re nata (PRN) protocol. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18years, axial length > 26.5 mm or spherical equivalent ≥ – 6.00 D, diagnosis confirmed by multimodal imaging, and a minimum 12-month follow-up. Outcomes assessed included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; ETDRS letters), central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure (IOP), injection frequency, and safety profile.Results: A total of 80 eyes were analyzed (Group A: Innovator, n=38; Group B: Biosimilar, n=42). Mean BCVA improved from 51.0 ± 16.5 to 64.5 ± 5.5 ETDRS letters in the Innovator group and from 52.5 ± 16.5 to 64.5 ± 4.5 in the Biosimilar group at 12 months (p > 0.05). CMT reduced significantly in both groups (Innovator: from 332.03 ± 39.22 μm to 268.32 ± 18.78 μm; Biosimilar: from 315.03 ± 44.20 μm to 271.12 ± 20.39 μm; (p > 0.05). The mean number of injections was 2.68 ± 0.51 in the Innovator Ranibizumab group and 2.71 ± 0.49 in the Biosimilar Ranibizumab group. IOP remained stable in both cohorts, and no significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed.Conclusion: Biosimilar ranibizumab demonstrated non-inferior visual and anatomical outcomes compared to innovator ranibizumab in the treatment of mCNVM, with a similar safety profile and treatment burden.Keywords: myopia, myopic CNVM, anti VEGF, ranibizumab, biosimilar ranibizumab
Τύπος εγγράφου: article
Περιγραφή αρχείου: electronic resource
Γλώσσα: English
ISSN: 1177-5483
Relation: https://www.dovepress.com/biosimilar-versus-innovator-ranibizumab-in-myopic-cnvm-comparative-rea-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH; https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483
Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://doaj.org/article/705f38986a7446dda08e6ceecad11694
Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: edsdoj.705f38986a7446dda08e6ceecad11694
Βάση Δεδομένων: Directory of Open Access Journals