Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
| Τίτλος: |
4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update |
| Συγγραφείς: |
Malenka M. Bissell, Francesca Raimondi, Lamia Ait Ali, Bradley D. Allen, Alex J. Barker, Ann Bolger, Nicholas Burris, Carl-Johan Carhäll, Jeremy D. Collins, Tino Ebbers, Christopher J. Francois, Alex Frydrychowicz, Pankaj Garg, Julia Geiger, Hojin Ha, Anja Hennemuth, Michael D. Hope, Albert Hsiao, Kevin Johnson, Sebastian Kozerke, Liliana E. Ma, Michael Markl, Duarte Martins, Marci Messina, Thekla H. Oechtering, Pim van Ooij, Cynthia Rigsby, Jose Rodriguez-Palomares, Arno A. W. Roest, Alejandro Roldán-Alzate, Susanne Schnell, Julio Sotelo, Matthias Stuber, Ali B. Syed, Johannes Töger, Rob van der Geest, Jos Westenberg, Liang Zhong, Yumin Zhong, Oliver Wieben, Petter Dyverfeldt |
| Πηγή: |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-24 (2023) |
| Στοιχεία εκδότη: |
Elsevier, 2023. |
| Έτος έκδοσης: |
2023 |
| Συλλογή: |
LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system |
| Θεματικοί όροι: |
4D Flow CMR, 4D Flow MRI, Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging, MR flow imaging, Hemodynamics, Flow visualization, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701 |
| Περιγραφή: |
Abstract Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 ‘4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement’. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards. |
| Τύπος εγγράφου: |
article |
| Περιγραφή αρχείου: |
electronic resource |
| Γλώσσα: |
English |
| ISSN: |
1532-429X |
| Relation: |
https://doaj.org/toc/1532-429X |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z |
| Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: |
https://doaj.org/article/0bf30c9762104afdbd3dfaf14312dc36 |
| Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: |
edsdoj.0bf30c9762104afdbd3dfaf14312dc36 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |