Academic Journal

A secondary analysis of the TESTING trial predicted individual patient response to corticosteroid treatment in IgA nephropathy

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: A secondary analysis of the TESTING trial predicted individual patient response to corticosteroid treatment in IgA nephropathy
Συγγραφείς: Canney, M, Shan, S, Er, L, Billot, L, Han, J, Wong, MG, Monaghan, H, Hladunewich, M, Hooi, LS, Jha, V, Lv, J, Perkovic, V, Zhang, H, Cattran, DC, Barbour, SJ, Jha, Vivekanand
Πηγή: urn:ISSN:0085-2538 ; urn:ISSN:1523-1755 ; Kidney International, 109, 4, 738-749
Στοιχεία εκδότη: Elsevier
Έτος έκδοσης: 2026
Συλλογή: UNSW Sydney (The University of New South Wales): UNSWorks
Θεματικοί όροι: 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, 3202 Clinical Sciences, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Kidney Disease, Clinical Research, Precision Medicine, 6.1 Pharmaceuticals, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Glomerulonephritis, IGA, Glucocorticoids, Methylprednisolone, Proportional Hazards Models, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Data Analysis, IgA nephropathy, clinical trial, corticosteroids, kidney failure, prediction, response, TESTING trial steering committee, anzsrc-for: 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Περιγραφή: Introduction: Corticosteroids are effective for treating IgA nephropathy but have important adverse effects. In this secondary analysis of the TESTING cohort, we generated a model to predict, for an individual patient, the probability that they will respond to corticosteroids. Methods: Time to the primary outcome (40% reduction in eGFR, kidney failure or death due to kidney disease) was evaluated in a Cox proportional hazards model including all potential treatment modifiers as main effects. Selected variables were forced into a model with treatment exposure and interaction terms between treatment and each included variable. The predicted four-year absolute risk of the primary outcome was generated for every patient individually under separate scenarios of being treated with methylprednisolone or placebo. The difference between the two scenarios was the predicted individual treatment effect on absolute risk reduction (ARR). Model performance was assessed using discrimination plots, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and the C-statistic for benefit. Results: During a median of 43 months follow-up, 176 of 483 participants experienced the primary outcome. Selected treatment modifiers were eGFR, age, proteinuria, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system blockade dose, ethnicity, time from biopsy to enrollment, systolic blood pressure, sex, body mass index, and MEST-C T-score and C-score. Compared to the average ARR associated with methylprednisolone (16.1%), the predicted individual-level ARR was highly variable (-10% to 40%). Patients with predicted ARR over 10% had greater observed benefit from methylprednisolone (ARR 24%) versus those with predicted ARR 10% or less (observed ARR -5%). A policy of treating only patients with higher anticipated benefit had a longer RMST than using random treatment allocation (1,194 v 1,028 days). The C-statistic for benefit was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.70). The frequency of adverse events was similar across tertiles of ARR. Conclusions: We have generated a model that can ...
Τύπος εγγράφου: article in journal/newspaper
Γλώσσα: unknown
Relation: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/107822; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2025.12.024
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2025.12.024
Διαθεσιμότητα: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/107822
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2025.12.024
Rights: open access ; https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 ; CC BY ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: edsbas.CDCF2A0C
Βάση Δεδομένων: BASE
Περιγραφή
DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2025.12.024