Academic Journal
About the Unauthorized and Incomplete Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events That Led to the Jeanne Clery Act - # Zenodo Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8022592 - # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri)
| Τίτλος: | About the Unauthorized and Incomplete Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events That Led to the Jeanne Clery Act - # Zenodo Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8022592 - # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 as a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree Graduate of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W |
| Στοιχεία εκδότη: | Zenodo, 2024. |
| Έτος έκδοσης: | 2024 |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | # Unauthorized and Incorrect Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events That Led To the Jeanne Clery Act, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 09th 2024, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the City of Gardena – California About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W September 27th 2024, # CONSENT IS REVERSIBLE, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 27th 2025, # European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) - Zenodo Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8022592, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W October 21st 2024, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W October 03rd 2023, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 26th 2025, # Kane County – Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 24 – 699, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With Kane County – Illinois About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # CONSENT IS FREELY GIVEN, # Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Reference : F – 2021 – 01641, # Department of Education (DoED) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 21 – 00102 – F, # Emma Roberts July 05th 2024, # Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer Records Request Case No.: 24 – 100, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With Zenodo About the Filtering of Journal Articles on Internet Search Engines (ISE) Such as AOL – Bing/MSN & Yahoo, # National Council on Disability (NCD) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 2023 – 01, # National Council on Disability (NCD) October 04th 2011 Report is Entitled 'The Power of Digital Inclusion : Technology's Impact on Employment Opportunity for People With Disabilities', # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W October 04th 2023, # Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence with the National Council on Disability (NCD) on the Circumstances Leading Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act, # Kane County – Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 24 – 700, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the City of Medina – Washington About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Medina – Washington Public Records Request (PRR) Request Case No.: 24 – 166, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 21st 2025, # CONSENT IS SPECIFIC, # Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence with the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on the Circumstances Leading Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act, # Carlsbad – New Mexico Public Records Request (PRR) Case No.: 24 – 3107, # Unauthorized and Incorrect Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the City of Camdenton – Missouri About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Department of Education (DoED) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 21 – 00103 – F, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the Village of Round Lake Beach – Illinois About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W November 09th 2024, # CONSENT IS INFORMED, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 20th 2025, # Unauthorized and Incomplete Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Key Questions on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 06th 2025, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W March 22nd 2025, # National Council on Disability (NCD) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 2021 – 05, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 15th 2024, # National Council on Disability (NCD) October 04th 2011 Statement : 'The Value Created in a Commons Based Model of Peer Production Implies More Open and Accountable Relationships', # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 15th 2025, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W September 19th 2024, # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FOIPA Request No.: 1511415 – 000, # CONSENT IS AS EASY AS FRIES, # 'Web' Unwelcome and Incorrect Efforts to Obscure Zenodo Journal Article With Digital Object Identifier (DOI).: 10.5281/zenodo.8022592, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W August 24th 2024, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W August 28th 2024, # Round Lake Beach – Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Case No.: 24 – 503, # CONSENT IS ENTHUSIASTIC, # Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 14th 2025, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 13th 2025, # Emma Roberts February 10th 2011, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 16th 2025, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 03rd 2025, # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) File Number 100 – KC – 13743, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 23rd 2025, # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) File Number 100 – KC – 14235, # Unauthorized and Incorrect Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events Leading Up to American Post-Secondary Academic Education With Regards to Sexual Consent, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W December 26th 2024, # Camdenton – Missouri Sunshine Request Case No.: 24 – 249, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With OpenAIRE About Jeanne Ann Clery and the Jeanne Clery Act, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W October 02nd 2024, # National Council on Disability (NCD) October 04th 2011 Statement : 'Commons Based Publishing Implies the Removal or the Diminishment of the Professional Middleman from Communications like Blogs That Can Aid in Personal Career Development', # OpenAIRE Ticket Number .: 843660, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 10th 2025, # Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FOIPA Request No.: 1480829 – 000, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W October 22nd 2024, # Unauthorized and Incomplete Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events That Led To the Jeanne Clery Act, # Emma Roberts August 30th 2011, # National Council on Disability (NCD) October 04th 2011 Statement : 'The Value Created in a Commons Based Model of Peer Production Implies a Respect for the Autonomy of the People in a Given Commons', # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W January 30th 2025, # Unauthorized and Incomplete Redistribution of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Review of Events Leading Up to American Post-Secondary Academic Education With Regards to Sexual Consent, # Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence with the Department of Education (DoED) on the Circumstances Leading Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W June 10th 2023, # Gardena – California Public Records Request (PRR) Case No.: 24 – 522, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W October 07th 2024, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W March 26th 2025, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 16th 2025, # Emma Roberts January 05th 2012, # National Council on Disability (NCD) October 04th 2011 Statement.: 'Open or Peer Publishing (…) Opens Doors to the Most Important Factors of Production in the Networked Information Economy', # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W September 26th 2024, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 12th 2024, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the City of Carlsbad – New Mexico About the Defamation of Emma Roberts Following Her Decision to Attend Sarah Lawrence College When She Was 20 Years Old, # Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on the Circumstances Leading Up to the Enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act, # Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W February 18th 2025 |
| Περιγραφή: | Even though Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has never sought nor ever solicited the approbation and validation of anyone to publish his correspondence with the United States government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08th 1990, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has uncovered many instances where his written content were filtered, distorted, misused and misattributed. Regrettably, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Zenodo journal article with the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.5281/zenodo.8022592 is an instance where unknown others aided by Artificial Intelligence (AI) have redistributed the correspondence of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W with the United States government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act in a manner that was inconsistent with DataCite Commons guidelines. Via email dated February 15th 2024, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W had informed ResearchHub that many of his journal articles published on Zenodo were being redistributed and modified on ResearchHub in a manner that was inconsistent with the original article, which was published on Zenodo. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W would like to take this opportunity to reiterate that he was made unhappy upon finding out that his journal articles published on Zenodo were being redistributed on ResearchHub after being modified in a manner that was inconsistent with the original journal article published on Zenodo. According to DataCite Commons, journal articles published on Zenodo “maximize their usefulness to the entire research and scholarly communication community” when the data published within is not modified on the outside in a manner that would be characterized as “false, incomplete, defamatory or misleading.” When publishing their January 30th 2018 report, the National Council on Disability (NCD) had recognized that [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to (domestic and international) college and university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their freshmen year; [2] college and university students in America (whether domestic or international) are informed about “healthy sexual relationships” during the course of their 1st year of post-secondary academic education; [3] 20% of women were sexually assaulted in a college or university setting (of the U.S.A) by the time they reached their Senior Year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] 32% of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Years 2014 and 2015 in a college or university setting (of the U.S.A); [5] sexual assault “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” [6] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” [7] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders.” The NCD have also noted that their January 30th 2018 report sought to “raise awareness of sexual assault (…) on college campuses by examining college policies and practices.” Furthermore, they write that “Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity that receives federal funding. Under Title IX, discrimination on the basis of sex can include sexual harassment, rape and sexual assault. A college or university that receives federal funds may be held legally responsible when it knows about and ignores sexual harassment or assault in its programs or activities. As of September 22nd 2017, colleges can adopt various standards of proof in sexual assault cases, from the lowest standard of proof (preponderance of evidence) to a higher standard of proof (clear and convincing evidence). Title IX, like the Clery Act, also requires college employers that address sexual assault to have proper training and to train the campus community in its policies and procedures regarding sexual assault.” Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College (located in Fulton, Missouri) who was in January 2010 informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” in healthy sexual relationships. Via email dated March 07th 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that (his alma mater) Westminster College had extended an invitation to their then Director William Webster to “deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17th 1987 at 2:30 P.M.” The invitation extended by Westminster College on August 29th 1986 came approximately 5 months after the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania). In other emails beginning November 12th 2020, the FBI had informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had transferred the case of Jeanne Ann Clery rape and murder to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on (or around) June 11th 1992. However, via postal mail correspondence that was addressed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, the CIA have denied ever being “assigned” the case of Jeanne Ann Clery on (or around) June 11th 1992. It is the opinion of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the letters sent to him by the FBI (beginning November 12th 2020) and the CIA (on or around May 21st 2021) were inconsistent with one another. For your information, William Webster was Director of the FBI from 1978 to 1987. He was also Director of the CIA from 1987 to 1991. His father Thomas Webster is an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). According to the 2019 – 2020 Student Handbook published by Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri), “the college has comprehensive, intentional, and integrated programming, initiatives, strategies, and campaigns that are intended to end sexual misconduct, dating / domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Programs to prevent sexual misconduct, dating/domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking include both primary prevention and awareness programs directed at incoming students and new employees and ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns directed at students and employees. The ongoing educational programs are overseen by the Title IX Coordinator / Director of Human Resources and Vice-President / Dean of Student Life. All prevention programs are [1] culturally relevant, inclusive of diverse communities and identities, sustainable, responsive to community needs, and empirically based and assessed for value, effectiveness, or outcome; [2] in consideration of environmental risk and protective factors as they occur on the individual relationship, institutional community and societal levels; [3] accessible to students, faculty and staff and accommodated based upon one’s ability status, language, and/or learning style.” The key questions asked by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 include but are not limited to the following. 1) What were American colleges and universities obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were American colleges and universities required by law to condemn violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins and/or their disability status following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were American colleges and universities required to inform their students (beginning Calendar Year 1973) what constitutes appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did American colleges and universities begin informing their students what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did American colleges and universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen and transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent?” Did American colleges and universities begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (on April 5th 1986)? If yes, why have American colleges and universities waited so long following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 to inform their students what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent?” 3) Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black or an African American man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black or African American man (in American colleges and universities); [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)?As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against girls and women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their disability status or their age groups. Still, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is exasperated by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [3] his correspondence with agents of the U.S government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08th 1990; [4] his inquiry on the exact year American colleges and universities began teaching their undergraduate students what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships. According to a December 27th 2023 complaint filed by the New York Times (NYT), Microsoft and OpenAI generative artificial intelligence (“GENAI”) tools rely on large-language models (“LLMs”) that were built “by copying and using millions of NYT copyrighted news articles, in-depth investigations, opinion pieces, reviews, how-to guides and more. (…) Through Microsoft’s Bing Chat (recently rebranded as ‘Copilot’) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, both Microsoft and OpenAI seek to free-ride on the NYT massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive product without permission or payment. (…) At the same time as Microsoft and OpenAI models are copying, reproducing, and paraphrasing NYT content without consent or compensation, they are also causing the NYT commercial and competitive injury by misattributing content to the NYT that it did not, in fact, publish. In AI parlance, this is called a ‘hallucination.’ In plain English, it’s misinformation. ChatGPT defines a ’hallucination’ as the ‘phenomenon of a machine, such as a chatbot, generating seemingly realistic sensory experiences that do not correspond to any real-world input.’ Instead of saying, ‘I don’t know,’ Microsoft and OpenAI GPT models will confidently provide information that is, at best, not quite accurate, and, at worst, demonstrably (but not recognizably) false. And human reviewers find it very difficult to distinguish ‘hallucinations’ from truthful output. These ‘hallucinations’ mislead users as to the source of the information they are obtaining, leading them to incorrectly believe that the information provided has been vetted and published by the NYT. Users who ask a search engine what the NYT has written on a subject should be provided with neither an unauthorized copy nor an inaccurate forgery of a NYT article, but a link to the article itself.” The NYT have also noted in their December 27th 2023 complaint that “it takes enormous resources to publish, on average, more than 250 original articles every day. Many of these articles take months – and sometimes longer – to report. That output is the work of approximately 5,800 full-time equivalent Times employees (as of December 31st 2022), some 2,600 of whom are directly involved in the Time’s journalism operation. Quite often, the most vital news reporting for society is the most resource-intensive. Some of The Time’s most important journalism requires deploying teams of journalists at great cost to report on the ground around the world, providing best-in-class-security and support, filing lawsuits against government entities to bring information to light, and supporting journalists through investigations that can take months or years. (…) Making great journalism is harder than ever. Over the past two decades, the traditional business models that supported quality journalism have collapsed, forcing the shuttering of newspapers all over the country. It has become more difficult for the public to sort fact from fiction in today’s information ecosystem, as misinformation floods the internet, television, and other media. If The Times and other news organizations cannot produce and protect their independent journalism, there will be a vacuum that no computer or artificial intelligence can fill. The protection of the Time’s intellectual property is critical to its continued ability to fund world-class journalism in the public interest. If The Times and its peers cannot control the use of their content, their ability to monetize that content will be harmed. With less revenue, news organizations will have fewer journalists able to dedicate time and resources to important, in-depth stories, which creates a risk that those stories will go untold. Less journalism will be produced and the cost to society will be enormous. The Times depends on its exclusive rights of reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance, and display under copyright law to resist these forces. (…) The Times requires third parties to obtain permission before using Times content and trademarks for commercial purposes, and for decades The Times has licensed its content under negotiated licensing agreements. These agreements help ensure that The Times controls how, where, and for how long its content and brand appears and that it receives fair compensation for third-party use. Third-parties, including large tech platforms, pay The Times significant royalties under these agreements in exchange for the right to use Times content for narrowly defined purposes. The agreements prohibit uses beyond those authorized purposes. (…) In 2019, the Times published a Pulitzer-prize winning, five-part series on predatory lending in New York City’s taxi industry. The 18-month investigation included 600 interviews, with more than 100 records requests, large scale data analysis, and the review of thousands of pages of internal bank records and other documents, and ultimately led to criminal probes and the enactment of new laws to prevent future abuse. OpenAI had no role in the creation of this content, yet with minimal prompting, will recite large portions of it verbatim.” If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf . Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W takes full-responsibility for all the statements he has made at the time he decided to publish his journal article entitled: "Conflicting Information About Jeanne Ann Clery and What Happened to Her Case After June 11th 1992: August 29th 1986 at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri)." Be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance.Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) WAnti-Racist Human Rights ActivistAudio-Visual Media AnalystAnti-Propaganda Journalist When publishing their January 30th 2018 report, the National Council on Disability (NCD) had recognized that [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to (domestic and international) college and university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their freshmen year; [2] college and university students in America (whether domestic or international) are informed about “healthy sexual relationships” during the course of their 1st year of post-secondary academic education; [3] 20% of women were sexually assaulted in a college or university setting (of the U.S.A) by the time they reached their Senior Year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] 32% of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Years 2014 and 2015 in a college or university setting (of the U.S.A); [5] sexual assault “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” [6] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” [7] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders.” The NCD have also noted that their January 30th 2018 report sought to “raise awareness of sexual assault (…) on college campuses by examining college policies and practices.” Furthermore, they write that “Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity that receives federal funding. Under Title IX, discrimination on the basis of sex can include sexual harassment, rape and sexual assault. A college or university that receives federal funds may be held legally responsible when it knows about and ignores sexual harassment or assault in its programs or activities. As of September 22nd 2017, colleges can adopt various standards of proof in sexual assault cases, from the lowest standard of proof (preponderance of evidence) to a higher standard of proof (clear and convincing evidence). Title IX, like the Clery Act, also requires college employers that address sexual assault to have proper training and to train the campus community in its policies and procedures regarding sexual assault.” Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Bachelor of Arts (B.A) Degree graduate of Westminster College (located in Fulton, Missouri) who was in January 2010 informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” in healthy sexual relationships. Via email dated March 07th 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that (his alma mater) Westminster College had extended an invitation to their then Director William Webster to “deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17th 1987 at 2:30 P.M.” The invitation extended by Westminster College on August 29th 1986 came approximately 5 months after the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania). In other emails beginning November 12th 2020, the FBI had informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had transferred the case of Jeanne Ann Clery rape and murder to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on (or around) June 11th 1992. However, via postal mail correspondence that was addressed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W, the CIA have denied ever being “assigned” the case of Jeanne Ann Clery on (or around) June 11th 1992. It is the opinion of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the letters sent to him by the FBI (beginning November 12th 2020) and the CIA (on or around May 21st 2021) were inconsistent with one another. For your information, William Webster was Director of the FBI from 1978 to 1987. He was also Director of the CIA from 1987 to 1991. His father Thomas Webster is an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri). According to the 2019 – 2020 Student Handbook published by Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri), “the college has comprehensive, intentional, and integrated programming, initiatives, strategies, and campaigns that are intended to end sexual misconduct, dating / domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Programs to prevent sexual misconduct, dating/domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking include both primary prevention and awareness programs directed at incoming students and new employees and ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns directed at students and employees. The ongoing educational programs are overseen by the Title IX Coordinator / Director of Human Resources and Vice-President / Dean of Student Life. All prevention programs are [1] culturally relevant, inclusive of diverse communities and identities, sustainable, responsive to community needs, and empirically based and assessed for value, effectiveness, or outcome; [2] in consideration of environmental risk and protective factors as they occur on the individual relationship, institutional community and societal levels; [3] accessible to students, faculty and staff and accommodated based upon one’s ability status, language, and/or learning style.” The key questions asked by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 include but are not limited to the following. 1) What were American colleges and universities obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were American colleges and universities required by law to condemn violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations, their national origins and/or their disability status following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were American colleges and universities required to inform their students (beginning Calendar Year 1973) what constitutes appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did American colleges and universities begin informing their students what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” in the years following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did American colleges and universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen and transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent?” Did American colleges and universities begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (on April 5th 1986)? If yes, why have American colleges and universities waited so long following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 to inform their students what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent?” 3) Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are American colleges and universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming new students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black or an African American man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black or African American man (in American colleges and universities); [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)?As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against girls and women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their disability status or their age groups. Still, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is vexed by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [3] his correspondence with agents of the U.S government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08th 1990; [4] his inquiry on the exact year American colleges and universities began teaching their undergraduate students what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships. Regrettably, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Zenodo journal article with the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.5281/zenodo.8022592 is an instance where unknown others aided by Artificial Intelligence (AI) have redistributed the correspondence of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W with the United States government on the circumstances that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act in a manner that was inconsistent with DataCite Commons guidelines. Via email dated October 03rd 2023, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W had informed OpenAIRE that many of his journal articles published on Zenodo were being redistributed and incorrectly attributed to others who have in no way shape or form participated in the writing and publication of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W review of events that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act. Via email dated October 04th 2023, OpenAIRE have recognized that Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W journal articles published on Zenodo were being redistributed and incorrectly attributed to others who have in no way shape or form participated in the writing and publication of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W review of events that led up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act. According to a December 27th 2023 complaint filed by the New York Times (NYT), Microsoft and OpenAI generative artificial intelligence (“GENAI”) tools rely on large-language models (“LLMs”) that were built “by copying and using millions of NYT copyrighted news articles, in-depth investigations, opinion pieces, reviews, how-to guides and more. (…) Through Microsoft’s Bing Chat (recently rebranded as ‘Copilot’) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, both Microsoft and OpenAI seek to free-ride on the NYT massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive product without permission or payment. (…) At the same time as Microsoft and OpenAI models are copying, reproducing, and paraphrasing NYT content without consent or compensation, they are also causing the NYT commercial and competitive injury by misattributing content to the NYT that it did not, in fact, publish. In AI parlance, this is called a ‘hallucination.’ In plain English, it’s misinformation. ChatGPT defines a ’hallucination’ as the ‘phenomenon of a machine, such as a chatbot, generating seemingly realistic sensory experiences that do not correspond to any real-world input.’ Instead of saying, ‘I don’t know,’ Microsoft and OpenAI GPT models will confidently provide information that is, at best, not quite accurate, and, at worst, demonstrably (but not recognizably) false. And human reviewers find it very difficult to distinguish ‘hallucinations’ from truthful output. These ‘hallucinations’ mislead users as to the source of the information they are obtaining, leading them to incorrectly believe that the information provided has been vetted and published by the NYT. Users who ask a search engine what the NYT has written on a subject should be provided with neither an unauthorized copy nor an inaccurate forgery of a NYT article, but a link to the article itself.” The NYT have also noted in their December 27th 2023 complaint that “it takes enormous resources to publish, on average, more than 250 original articles every day. Many of these articles take months – and sometimes longer – to report. That output is the work of approximately 5,800 full-time equivalent Times employees (as of December 31st 2022), some 2,600 of whom are directly involved in the Time’s journalism operation. Quite often, the most vital news reporting for society is the most resource-intensive. Some of The Time’s most important journalism requires deploying teams of journalists at great cost to report on the ground around the world, providing best-in-class-security and support, filing lawsuits against government entities to bring information to light, and supporting journalists through investigations that can take months or years. (…) Making great journalism is harder than ever. Over the past two decades, the traditional business models that supported quality journalism have collapsed, forcing the shuttering of newspapers all over the country. It has become more difficult for the public to sort fact from fiction in today’s information ecosystem, as misinformation floods the internet, television, and other media. If The Times and other news organizations cannot produce and protect their independent journalism, there will be a vacuum that no computer or artificial intelligence can fill. The protection of the Time’s intellectual property is critical to its continued ability to fund world-class journalism in the public interest. If The Times and its peers cannot control the use of their content, their ability to monetize that content will be harmed. With less revenue, news organizations will have fewer journalists able to dedicate time and resources to important, in-depth stories, which creates a risk that those stories will go untold. Less journalism will be produced and the cost to society will be enormous. The Times depends on its exclusive rights of reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance, and display under copyright law to resist these forces. (…) The Times requires third parties to obtain permission before using Times content and trademarks for commercial purposes, and for decades The Times has licensed its content under negotiated licensing agreements. These agreements help ensure that The Times controls how, where, and for how long its content and brand appears and that it receives fair compensation for third-party use. Third-parties, including large tech platforms, pay The Times significant royalties under these agreements in exchange for the right to use Times content for narrowly defined purposes. The agreements prohibit uses beyond those authorized purposes. (…) In 2019, the Times published a Pulitzer-prize winning, five-part series on predatory lending in New York City’s taxi industry. The 18-month investigation included 600 interviews, with more than 100 records requests, large scale data analysis, and the review of thousands of pages of internal bank records and other documents, and ultimately led to criminal probes and the enactment of new laws to prevent future abuse. OpenAI had no role in the creation of this content, yet with minimal prompting, will recite large portions of it verbatim.” If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: If you wish, you may access the full complaint filed by the NYT here.: https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf . Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W takes full-responsibility for all the statements he has made at the time he decided to publish his journal article entitled: "Conflicting Information About Jeanne Ann Clery and What Happened to Her Case After June 11th 1992: August 29th 1986 at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri)." Be well. Stay well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance.Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) WAnti-Racist Human Rights ActivistAudio-Visual Media AnalystAnti-Propaganda Journalist Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is responsible for the publications of the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL): a non-profit organization primarily engaged in the dissemination of public records. The recent publications/written content of the AACL encompass a wide range of intertwined issues, which include but are not limited to [1] the life and death of Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986); [2] the decision of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) to extend an invitation to then-Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director William Webster on August 29th 1986, approximately 5 (five) months after the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [3] the decision of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to initiate contact with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on June 11th 1992 about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [4] the circumstances leading up to the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act on (or around) November 08th 1990; [5] Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [6] American post-secondary academic education with regards to affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [7] sexual abuse as a factor increasing the risk of suicide among girls/women; [8] California’s Sexual Abuse and Cover Up Accountability Act; [9] the September 12th 2012 suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott; [10] the August 04th 2020 suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman; [11] the January 30th 2022 suicide of former Miss United States of America (U.S.A) Cheslie Corrinne Kryst; [12] the commemoration of September 10th as World Suicide Prevention Day (WSPD) by the United States government; [13] the commemoration of the month of May as Mental Health Awareness Month; [14] the commemoration of the month of April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month; [15] the commemoration of the month of March as Women’s History Month; [16] the commemoration of the month of February as Black History Month; [17] the forcible administration of psychotropic drugs in mental asylums and elsewhere; [18] the impact of wiretap on mental health; [19] the defamation and wiretap of Jean Seberg; [20] Kristen Stewart portrayal of Jean Seberg in the 2019 biopic entitled “Seberg;” [21] the induction of Josephine Baker in France’s Pantheon; [22] the defamation complaint filed by Eva Lopez against the New York Police Department (NYPD); [23] the bogus mental illness of “schizophrenia” being extensively linked with Black/African American people after the total and complete discredit of the “drapetomania” diagnosis; [24] the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and it’s applicability in cases of suicides after a documented incident of sexual violence as well as other incidents of racism and/or sexism; [25] the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); [26] Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitations Act; [27] the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA); [28] the prison rape culture within the Missouri Department of Correction (MODOC); [29] the prison rape culture at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI), located in Dublin, California; [30] the Sixth (6th) Amendment Rights implications of filing a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act; [31] the Second (2nd) Amendment Rights implications of filing a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act; [32] the decision of Tara Cable not to file a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to the provisions Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act against the Village of Suffern, New York; [33] the August 03rd 2021 report published by the New York Attorney General (NYAG) Letitia James, which made several explicit references to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act in relations to Alyssa McGrath, Ana Liss, Charlotte Bennett, Lindsey Boylan and other women employed by the New York State government; [34] the Equal Pay Complaint filed by the United States Women’s National Soccer Team (USWNT) in Calendar Year 2016; [35] Eliza Dushku forced arbitration after experiencing sexual harassment at the workplace; [36] the November 29th 2021 employment related murder of Delfina Pan in Miami Beach, Florida; [37] the June 11th 2022 employment related murder of Riley Whitelaw in the State of Colorado; [38] the decision of Teresa Williams to file a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act; [39] the decision of the University of Missouri to formally and publicly admit on October 05th 2015 that they “need help changing” the racist culture within their university’s system; [40] the decision of Greenfield High School (located Greenfield, Missouri) to terminate the employment English teacher Kim Morrisson (sometime in mid-March 2022) for teaching the book entitled “Dear Martin;” [41] the decision of Greenfield High School (located Greenfield, Missouri) to terminate the employment of English teacher Kim Morrison without taking into account the formal and public October 05th 2015 statement of the University of Missouri, wherein they admitted that they “needed help changing” the racist culture of their university system; [42] California’s Fast Food Accountability Standards & Recovery Act (a.k.a) FAST Recovery Act; [43] the working conditions of tipped workers in the accommodation and food services (AFS) sector; [44] the police harassment of Amelia Powell for wearing bikinis in the City of Everett, Washington; [45] the Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair (CROWN) Act; [46] the double standards in the United States of America (U.S.A) criminal justice system; [47] the race factor in wrongful convictions issued by the judicial branch of the U.S government (the courts); [48] the June 02nd 2016 decision of the California court that handed Brock Turner a 90 (ninety) day prison sentence for the January 18th 2015 rape of Chanel Miller on the campus of Stanford University; [49] the formal/informal ties between Chanel Miller and the San Francisco Public Library (SFPL); [50] the September 06th 2022 interview of Jennifer Lawrence with Vogue Magazine (in part) on the subject of sex-offender Harvey Weinstein; [51] the #MeToo movement; [52] the Genetics Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA); [53] the urgent need to abolish the death penalty particularly in light of the October 05th 2021 state sponsored execution of Ernest Lee Johnson in Missouri; [54] the likely impact of the Emmett Till Antilynching Act in decreasing and eliminating hate crimes in the future; [55] the use of “cancel culture” for the purpose of exacerbating racism in polite company and on social networks such as Twitter; [56] cybersecurity at Michigan State University (MSU) after their extensive links with the child-pornography of sex-offender Lawrence Gerard Nassar; [57] the August 31st 1994 child-marriage license of Aaliyah Dana Haughton in the State of Illinois; [58] the “influx of child-brides” from Afghanistan to the United States of America (U.S.A) following the U.S military withdrawal from Afghanistan on August 30th 2021; [59] the definition in use by the United Nations International Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF) for what constitutes “child-marriage;” [60] the folly of the eugenics movement; [61] the terrible decision of the United States Supreme Court to overturn the landmark 1973 ruling of Roe v Wade (particularly in light of the publicized murders of Alexandria Kostial and Jennifer Rothwell); [62] the urgent need to restore abortion rights in the U.S.A for the purpose of not exacerbating the public health crisis created as a direct consequence of Roe v Wade being overturned; [63] previously “Missing” Alexis Tiara Murphy; [64] the systemic misogyny and sexism fueling the U.S.A gun violence public health epidemic; [65] the systemic discrimination and racism fueling the U.S.A gun violence public health epidemic; [66] the entitlement of the “involuntary celibate” community in America; [67] the March 15th 2022 report of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) United States Secret Service (USSS) that went on to summarize the life of racist and sexist Scott Paul Beierle; [68] the applicability of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in cases involving gun violence on (or near) the campuses of American colleges and universities; [69] the anti-feminist rhetoric, which has in the 21st Century been vocalized through the traditional wife (“trad-wife”) movement; [70] the employment related mass-shooting at Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on May 26th 2021; [71] the May 24th 2022 mass-shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas; [72] the January 14th 2013 recommendations of the National Council on Disability (NCD) on gun violence following the December 14th 2012 mass-shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, located in the State of Connecticut; [73] income inequality among Bachelor Degree graduates on the basis of race; [74] the U.S.A conflicting domestic/foreign policy on marijuana; [75] Brittney Griner’s incarceration in Russia; [76] the U.S.A counterproductive and unconditional support to the State of Israel; [77] the U.S.A foreign policy towards disability; [78] the perturbing conservatorship of Britney Spears; [79] the vital records of Jessica Alba given her May 16th 2023 public admission that she was previously referred to as “delusional” and “paranoid;” [80] the American Psychological Association (APA) October 29th 2021 apology for promoting racial discrimination and pseudoscience in healthcare services; [81] the xenophobia on WordPress, which has in the past been linked with the name, the image, the likeness and the correspondence of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W; [82] the September 07th 2022 report of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), which has gone on to interpret the letter and spirit of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA); [83] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W strategy for combating the fraudulent “white replacement theory” with the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI); [84] the decision of Emma Roberts to condemn America’s culture of anonymous Internet trolling on (or around) July 05th 2024; [85] the freshman undergraduate retention rate at Sarah Lawrence College (located in Bronxville, New York); [86] the freshman undergraduate retention rate among American colleges/universities; [87] the December 27th 2023 complaint filed by the New York Times against Microsoft and Open Artificial Intelligence (AI)… |
| Τύπος εγγράφου: | Article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.15166188 |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.14263748 |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.14263747 |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.15166187 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC ND URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
| Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: | edsair.doi.dedup.....c0fabe4f2dcbfd3d3f45ec1508819a78 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | OpenAIRE |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.15166188 |
|---|