Academic Journal

Evaluation of an online health promotion program for vocational rehabilitation consumers

Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of an online health promotion program for vocational rehabilitation consumers
Authors: Duncan G. Campbell, Nancy Arnold, Casey Nicole Ruggiero, Catherine Ipsen, Bethany Rigles
Source: Rehabilitation Psychology. 59:125-135
Publisher Information: American Psychological Association (APA), 2014.
Publication Year: 2014
Subject Terms: Male, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Internet, Health Behavior, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Health Promotion, Motivational Interviewing, Middle Aged, 3. Good health, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Humans, Female, 10. No inequality, Life Style, Follow-Up Studies, Program Evaluation
Description: The purpose of this study was to test the comparative effectiveness of three variations of an online-based health promotion program for improving health and employment outcomes in a sample of Vocational Rehabilitation consumers.A total of 222 VR consumers participated in a randomized trial of three health promotion variations and provided baseline, 2-, 4-, and 6-month data. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The three health promotion variations included (a) FACTSHEETS-a series of four electronic factsheets; (b) HPE-an online interactive health promotion website that included health behavior content and tailored action planning, and (c) HPE + MI-the online health promotion website plus two 30-minute calls with a trained motivational interviewer.Contrary to expectations, evidence did not support between-group differences based on intervention intensity. In fact, the Factsheet, HPE, and HPE + MI participants all experienced significant reductions in secondary conditions, F(2.85, 489) = 7.808, p < .001, HRQoL symptom days, F(2.7, 495) = 4.795, p = .004; and significant improvements in healthy lifestyle behaviors, F(2.6, 495) = 3.66, p = .017 over the 6-month study period. Although this study did not include a control group, a control group from another study with a similar population did not experience similar outcomes.People with disabilities experience significantly higher rates of secondary health conditions and lower employment rates than people without disabilities. The combination of these factors signifies the need for health promotion programming outside the work setting.
Document Type: Article
Language: English
ISSN: 1939-1544
0090-5550
DOI: 10.1037/a0036188
Access URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24730575
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24730575
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24730575/
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....2920a273cb981cd0f45b4d617534cd30
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
ISSN:19391544
00905550
DOI:10.1037/a0036188