| Περίληψη: |
Highlights: What are the main findings? This review systematically analyzes composite-forming technologies for new energy-vehicle battery-pack structures from the perspective of process selection, defect control, and engineering application. • A component-oriented process-selection framework is established, linking service requirements, material systems, forming routes, typical defects, mechanical performance, applicable components, and engineering maturity. • Mainstream forming routes, including SMC, PCM/WCM, RTM/HP-RTM, VARTM, LFT-D/GMT, thermoplastic sheet forming, pultrusion, and multi-material joining, are compared in terms of process capability and battery-pack applicability. • The formation mechanisms, performance effects, and control strategies of typical defects in composite battery-pack components are summarized, including voids, dry spots/insufficient impregnation, resin/filler nonuniformity, delamination/interfacial debonding, warpage and residual stress, and fiber-orientation deviation/waviness/breakage. What are the implications of the main findings? • The proposed framework provides guidance for rational material–process selection in upper covers, lower housings, trays, beams, side frames, protective structures, and joining/sealing regions. • The integration of process simulation, in-line monitoring, non-destructive testing, machine learning, and digital twins supports the transition from post-forming inspection to closed-loop quality control and certifiable manufacturing. Battery packs for new energy vehicles have evolved from simple load-bearing and protective assemblies into multifunctional safety structures integrating structural support, crash protection, thermal-runaway mitigation, flame retardancy, electrical insulation, electromagnetic interference shielding, waterproof sealing, and long-term reliability. Fiber-reinforced polymer composites are promising for upper covers, underbody shields, trays, cross beams, side frames, and local protective structures because of their low density, corrosion resistance, design flexibility, and functional-integration potential. However, composite-part performance is strongly governed by forming. Resin flow, impregnation, curing or cooling shrinkage, fiber orientation, filler dispersion, and interfacial bonding may induce voids, dry spots, resin-rich regions, delamination, warpage, and fiber waviness, thereby affecting load bearing, sealing, thermal protection, and durability. This review focuses on composite-forming technologies for new energy-vehicle battery packs. It summarizes component-level service requirements and material systems and compares representative forming routes, including sheet molding compound (SMC), prepreg compression molding/wet compression molding (PCM/WCM), resin transfer molding/high-pressure resin transfer molding (RTM/HP-RTM), vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM), long-fiber thermoplastic direct processing (LFT-D), glass-mat thermoplastic (GMT), thermoplastic sheet forming, pultrusion, and multi-material joining. These routes are evaluated from six dimensions: material form, forming cycle, typical defects, representative mechanical performance, applicable components, and engineering maturity. The review further discusses defect mechanisms, performance effects, detection and control methods, and the roles of in-line monitoring, non-destructive testing, process simulation, machine learning, and digital twins in closed-loop quality manufacturing. Finally, engineering challenges are examined in multi-material joining, thermal-safety integration, low-carbon recycling, and standard certification. Composite-material battery-pack structures should therefore be developed as coordinated design and closed-loop manufacturing systems linking materials, processes, defects, performance, and validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |