Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
A Mixed‐Methods Needs Assessment of Frontline Communities: Insights for Engagement and Partnerships Between Communities and Intermediary Organizations. |
| Authors: |
Marston, Rachel, Lutz, Nina, Mangabat, Danielle, Sánchez Ainsa, Gabriel, Stober, Javier, Brown, Margot, Turner, Katlyn M. |
| Source: |
Community Science; Sep2025, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p1-19, 19p |
| Subject Terms: |
Climate change, Capacity building, Resource allocation, Partnering between organizations, Participation, Political opposition, Community organization |
| Abstract: |
This research aims to understand how frontline communities and community‐based organizations (CBOs) that serve them conceptualize themselves, their communities, success, and their needs. Frontline communities experience the "first and worst" impacts of climate change due to industrialization, pollution, changing ecosystems, and other societal issues. CBOs serving frontline communities often face difficulties building organizational capacity and fostering growth in their communities. These challenges emerge from combined factors, including resistance from business and government stakeholders. Funders and scientists alike have shown interest in supporting frontline communities; however, top‐down conceptualizations of success drive existing norms for intermediaries and are often inconsistent with how CBOs define success. To understand how frontline communities conceptualize themselves, success, and their needs, we conducted a mixed‐methods study of CBOs within the network of an emerging intermediary organization supporting frontline communities. Using natural language processing, a survey, and semi‐structured interviews, we identified themes pertaining to how frontline communities conceptualize themselves, capacity building, and success. We find that frontline communities seek four things when engaging with intermediaries: understanding of being frontline as a state of active resistance, unrestricted and destigmatized funding, technical assistance, and reciprocal relationships with resource providers. Our results suggest that self‐definition of being "frontline" as active resistance impacts how frontline communities define success and therefore affects best practices for engagement. Based on this definition, we emphasize the importance of equitable relationship building and hierarchy deconstruction in the philanthropic and scientific sectors. Plain Language Summary: Frontline communities experience the "first and worst" impacts of climate change and face difficulties obtaining resources to support the wellbeing of their communities. Funders and scientists have shown interest in supporting frontline communities; however, these relationships can be fraught with power dynamics. To understand how frontline communities define themselves and how they prioritize their needs, we conducted interviews and surveys with representatives of community‐based organizations. We also conducted natural language processing analysis to identify themes arising from the network's grant applications. We find that frontline communities define themselves not only as passively experiencing environmental harm but actively resisting against the systems that cause those harms. Frontline communities also seek three things when engaging with resource providers: unrestricted funding, technical assistance, and reciprocal relationships. We emphasize the importance of relationship building and power sharing for anyone who seeks to support frontline communities–particularly scientists and funders. Key Points: Frontline communities view organizational capacity as a state of physical and psychological flexibility, stability, bandwidth, and spaceFrontline identity is defined by active resistance against the oppressive systems that cause environmental harmCommunity‐based organizations' resource priorities include unrestricted funding, technical assistance, and reciprocal relationships [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Community Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |