Academic Journal

An exciting Approach to Theoretical Spectroscopy.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: An exciting Approach to Theoretical Spectroscopy.
Συγγραφείς: Raya-Moreno M; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Buccheri A; Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, Germany., Dasch NA; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Farahani N; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Gonzalez Oliva I; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Gulans A; Department of Physics, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia., Hong S; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Hossain M; Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing (PC2), Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany., Kleine H; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Kuban M; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Lubeck S; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Maurer B; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Pavone P; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Peschel F; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Popova-Gorelova D; Institute of Physics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany., Qiao L; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Richter E; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Rigamonti S; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Pela RR; Distributed Algorithms and Supercomputing Department, Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB), Berlin, Germany., Schebek M; Department of Physics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Sinha K; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Speckhard DT; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Stutz J; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Tillack S; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Tumakov D; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Užulis J; Department of Physics, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia., Voiculescu M; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Vona C; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Yang M; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Draxl C; Department of Physics and CSMB, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Πηγή: Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) [Adv Sci (Weinh)] 2026 Jul 06, pp. e76167. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jul 06.
Publication Model: Ahead of Print
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article; Review
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: WILEY-VCH Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 101664569 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2198-3844 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21983844 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Adv Sci (Weinh) Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Weinheim : WILEY-VCH, [2014]-
Περίληψη: Theoretical spectroscopy, and more generally, electronic-structure theory, are powerful concepts for describing the complex many-body interactions in materials. They cover methods from ground-state properties to lattice excitations and light-matter interaction, including time-resolved variants. Among the various electronic-structure codes, exciting is an all-electron full-potential package that has a very rich portfolio, with a particular focus on excitations. It implements the linearized augmented planewave plus local orbital (LAPW+LO) basis, which is known as the gold standard for solving the Kohn-Sham equations of density-functional theory (DFT). exciting also offers benchmark-quality results for a wide range of excited-state methods. In this review, we provide an overview of the most recent features implemented in exciting, accompanied by summaries on the state of the art of the underlying methodologies. They comprise DFT and time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT), density-functional perturbation theory (DFPT) for phonons and electron-phonon coupling, and many-body perturbation theory in terms of the INLINEMATH approach and the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE). Moreover, exciting can handle resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS), pump-probe spectroscopy, as well as exciton-phonon coupling (EXPC). Finally, we cover workflows and a view on data and machine learning (ML). All aspects are demonstrated with examples for scientifically relevant materials.
(© 2026 The Author(s). Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.)
References: P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous Electron Gas,” Physical Review 136, no. 3B (1964): B864, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864.
W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self‐Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects,” Physical Review 140, no. 4A (1965): A1133, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133.
E. Runge and E. K. Gross, “Density‐Functional Theory for Time‐Dependent Systems,” Physical Review Letters 52, no. 12 (1984): 997, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997.
X. Cui, L. Wan, J. Liu, J. Yang, and W. Hu, “Spin‐Dependent Excited‐State Calculations in Plane Wave Linear‐Response Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory: Implementation and Benchmarking,” APL Computational Physics 1, no. 2 (2025): 026109, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0292905.
D. Jacquemin, V. Wathelet, E. A. Perpète, and C. Adamo, “Extensive TD‐DFT Benchmark: Singlet‐Excited States of Organic Molecules,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 5, no. 9 (2009): 2420–2435, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900298e.
C. Adamo and D. Jacquemin, “The Calculations of Excited‐State Properties with Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory,” Chemical Society Reviews 42, no. 3 (2013): 845–856, https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35394f.
M. E. Casida and M. Huix‐Rotllant, “Progress in Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 63, no. 1 (2012): 287–323, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‐physchem‐032511‐143803.
L. Hedin, “New Method for Calculating the One‐Particle Green's Function with Application to the Electron‐Gas Problem,” Physical Review 139 (1965): A796–A823, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796.
E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, “A Relativistic Equation for Bound‐State Problems,” Physical Review 84, no. 6 (1951): 1232.
W. Hanke and L. J. Sham, “Many‐Particle Effects in the Optical Spectrum of a Semiconductor,” Physical Review B 21, no. 10 (1980): 4656–4673, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.21.4656.
M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, “Electron Correlation in Semiconductors and Insulators: Band Gaps and Quasiparticle Energies,” Physical Review B 34, no. 8 (1986): 5390–5413, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390.
G. Strinati, “Application of the Green's Functions Method to the Study of the Optical Properties of Semiconductors,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 11, no. 12 (1988): 1–86.
G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, “Electronic Excitations: Density‐Functional Versus Many‐Body Green's‐Function Approaches,” Review of Modern Physics 74 (2002): 601–659, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.601.
N. Zein, “Density Functional Calculations of Elastic Moduli and Phonon Spectra of Crystals,” Soviet Physics, Solid State (English Translation of Fizika Tverdogo Tela) 26, no. 10 (1984): 1825–1828.
S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, and A. Testa, “Green's‐Function Approach to Linear Response in Solids,” Physical Review Letters 58 (1987): 1861–1864, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1861.
S. Y. Savrasov, D. Y. Savrasov, and O. K. Andersen, “Linear‐Response Calculations of Electron‐Phonon Interactions,” Physical Review Letters 72 (1994): 372–375, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.372.
O. K. Andersen, “Linear Methods in Band Theory,” Physical Review B 12, no. 8 (1975): 3060–3083, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.12.3060.
D. J. Singh and L. Nordström, Planewaves, Pseudopotentials, and the LAPW Method, 2nd ed. (Springer, 2006).
A. Gulans, A. Kozhevnikov, and C. Draxl, “Microhartree Precision in Density Functional Theory Calculations,” Physical Review B 97 (2018): 161105, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.161105.
D. Nabok, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, “Accurate All‐Electron G0W0${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ Quasiparticle Energies Employing the Full‐Potential Augmented Plane‐Wave Method,” Physical Review B 94 (2016): 035118, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.035118.
C. Vorwerk, B. Aurich, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, “Bethe‐Salpeter Equation for Absorption and Scattering Spectroscopy: Implementation in the exciting Code,” Electronic Structure 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ab3123.
S. Tillack, P. Pavone, and C. Draxl, “Density‐Functional Perturbation Theory Within the (L)APW+LO Method,” (2026), (in preparation).
A. Gulans, S. Kontur, C. Meisenbichler, et al., “exciting: A Full‐Potential All‐Electron Package Implementing Density‐Functional Theory and Many‐Body Perturbation Theory,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 26, no. 36 (2014): 363202.
J. C. Slater, “Wave Functions in a Periodic Potential,” Physical Review 51, no. 10 (1937): 846, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.846.
O. Andersen, “Simple Approach to the Band‐Structure Problem,” Solid State Communications 13, no. 2 (1973): 133–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038‐1098(73)90210‐X.
D. J. Singh, “Ground‐State Properties of Lanthanum: Treatment of Extended‐Core States,” Physical Review B 43, no. 8 (1991): 6388–6392, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.6388.
E. Sjöstedt, L. Nordström, and D. J. Singh, “An Alternative Way of Linearizing the Augmented Plane‐Wave Method,” Solid State Communications 114, no. 1 (2000): 15–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038‐1098(99)00577‐3.
F. Peschel, “excitingworkflow,” (2026), https://github.com/exciting/excitingworkflow/.
H. Kleine, S. Lubeck, E. Stephan, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, (2026), (in preparation).
C. Carbogno, K. S. Thygesen, B. Bieniek, et al., “Numerical Quality Control for DFT‐Based Materials Databases,” npj Computational Materials 8, no. 1 (2022): 69, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐022‐00744‐4.
C. Vona, S. Lubeck, H. Kleine, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, “Accurate and Efficient Treatment of Spin‐Orbit Coupling via Second Variation Employing Local Orbitals,” Physical Review B 108 (2023): 235161, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.235161.
S. Lehtola, C. Steigemann, M. J. T. Oliveira, and M. A. L. Marques, “Recent Developments in Libxc ‐ A Comprehensive Library of Functionals for Density Functional Theory,” Software X 7 (2018): 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2017.11.002.
T. Chachiyo and H. Chachiyo, “Understanding Electron Correlation Energy Through Density Functional Theory,” Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 1172 (2020): 112669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2019.112669.
“SIRIUS: Domain Specific Library for Electronic Structure Calculations,” https://github.com/electronic‐structure/SIRIUS, Accessed: 07‐01‐2026.
N. Salas‐Illanes, D. Nabok, and C. Draxl, “Electronic Structure of Representative Band‐Gap Materials by All‐Electron Quasiparticle Self‐Consistent GW$GW$ Calculations,” Physical Review B 106 (2022): 045143, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045143.
R. R. Pela and C. Draxl, “Ehrenfest Dynamics Implemented in the All‐Electron Package exciting,” Electronic Structure 4, no. 3 (2022): 037001, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ac7afc.
B. Maurer and C. Draxl, “Low Scaling BSE Implementation in the exciting Code,” Journal of Open Source Software 11 118 (2026): 8866.
C. Vorwerk, F. Sottile, and C. Draxl, “Excitation Pathways in Resonant Inelastic X‐Ray Scattering of Solids,” Physical Review Research 2, no. 4 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.2.042003.
C. W. Vorwerk, “Theoretical Spectroscopy of Ga2O3,” Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch‐Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (2021).
"Coupled Cluster 4 Solids (cc4s)," accessed: June 19, 2026, https://gitlab.cc4s.org/cc4s/cc4s.
N. H. Protik, C. Li, M. Pruneda, D. Broido, and P. Ordejón, “The Elphbolt Ab Initio Solver for the Coupled Electron‐Phonon Boltzmann Transport Equations,” npj Computational Materials 8, no. 1 (2022): 28, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐022‐00710‐0.
S. Rigamonti, M. Troppenz, M. Kuban, A. Hübner, and C. Draxl, “CELL: A Python Package for Cluster Expansion with a Focus on Complex Alloys,” npj Computational Materials 10, no. 1 (2024): 195, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐024‐01363‐x.
A. Stroth, C. Draxl, and S. Rigamonti, “Cluster Expansion Toward Nonlinear Modeling and Classification,” Physical Review Research 7 (2025): 033091, https://doi.org/10.1103/68lv‐86k6.
“Project Jupyter,” accessed: June 19, 2026 , https://jupyter.org/.
J. P. Perdew and K. Schmidt, “Jacob's Ladder of Density Functional Approximations for the Exchange‐Correlation Energy,” AIP Conference Proceedings 577, no. 1 (2001): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1390175.
J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, “Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional,” Physical Review Letters 115 (2015): 036402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402.
J. P. Perdew, W. Yang, K. Burke, et al., “Understanding Band Gaps of Solids in Generalized Kohn–Sham Theory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 11 (2017): 2801–2806, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621352114.
T. Aschebrock and S. Kümmel, “Ultranonlocality and Accurate Band Gaps from a Meta‐Generalized Gradient Approximation,” Physical Review Research 1 (2019): 033082, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033082.
R. Liu, D. Zheng, X. Liang, X. Ren, M. Chen, and W. Li, “Implementation of the Meta‐GGA Exchange‐Correlation Functional in Numerical Atomic Orbital Basis: With Systematic Testing on SCAN, rSCAN, and r2SCAN Functionals,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 159, no. 7 (2023): 074109, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160726.
A. Görling, “Exact Treatment of Exchange in Kohn‐Sham Band‐Structure Schemes,” Physical Review B 53 (1996): 7024–7029, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.7024.
A. Seidl, A. Görling, P. Vogl, J. A. Majewski, and M. Levy, “Generalized Kohn‐Sham Schemes and the Band‐Gap Problem,” Physical Review B 53 (1996): 3764–3774, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.3764.
J. P. Perdew, M. Ernzerhof, and K. Burke, “Rationale for Mixing Exact Exchange with Density Functional Approximations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 105, no. 22 (1996): 9982–9985, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.472933.
A. D. Becke, “Density–Functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, no. 7 (1993): 5648–5652, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913.
T. M. Maier, A. V. Arbuznikov, and M. Kaupp, “Local Hybrid Functionals: Theory, Implementation, and Performance of an Emerging New Tool in Quantum Chemistry and Beyond,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 9, no. 1 (2019): e1378, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1378.
M. Kaupp, A. Wodyński, A. V. Arbuznikov, S. Fürst, and C. J. Schattenberg, “Toward the Next Generation of Density Functionals: Escaping the Zero‐Sum Game by Using the Exact‐Exchange Energy Density,” Accounts of Chemical Research 57, no. 13 (2024): 1815–1826, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00209.
J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, “Hybrid Functionals Based on a Screened Coulomb Potential,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 118, no. 18 (2003): 8207–8215, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1564060.
J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, “Erratum: “Hybrid Functionals Based on a Screened Coulomb Potential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)],” The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, no. 21 (2006): 219906, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2204597.
Z.‐H. Cui, Y.‐C. Wang, M.‐Y. Zhang, X. Xu, and H. Jiang, “Doubly Screened Hybrid Functional: An Accurate First‐Principles Approach for Both Narrow‐ and Wide‐Gap Semiconductors,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, no. 9 (2018): 2338–2345, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00919.
A. Ghosh, S. Jana, D. Rani, M. Hossain, M. K. Niranjan, and P. Samal, “Accurate and Efficient Prediction of the Band Gaps and Optical Spectra of Chalcopyrite Semiconductors from a Nonempirical Range‐Separated Dielectric‐Dependent Hybrid: Comparison with Many‐Body Perturbation Theory,” Physical Review B 109 (2024): 045133, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.045133.
F. Sagredo, M. Camarasa‐Gómez, F. Ricci, A. Champagne, L. Kronik, and J. B. Neaton, “The Reliability of Hybrid Functionals for Accurate Fundamental and Optical Gap Prediction of Bulk Solids and Surfaces,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 21, no. 10 (2025): 5009–5015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00160.
J. H. Skone, M. Govoni, and G. Galli, “Self‐Consistent Hybrid Functional for Condensed Systems,” Physical Review B 89 (2014): 195112, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.195112.
S. Refaely‐Abramson, M. Jain, S. Sharifzadeh, J. B. Neaton, and L. Kronik, “Solid‐State Optical Absorption From Optimally Tuned Time‐Dependent Range‐Separated Hybrid Density Functional Theory,” Physical Review B 92, no. 8 (2015): 081204, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.92.081204.
D. Wing, G. Ohad, J. B. Haber, et al., “Band Gaps of Crystalline Solids from Wannier‐Localization–Based Optimal Tuning of a Screened Range‐Separated Hybrid Functional,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 34 (2021): e2104556118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104556118.
H. Zheng, M. Govoni, and G. Galli, “Dielectric‐Dependent Hybrid Functionals for Heterogeneous Materials,” Physical Review Materials 3 (2019): 073803, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.073803.
O. Gunnarsson and B. I. Lundqvist, “Exchange and Correlation in Atoms, Molecules, and Solids by the Spin‐Density‐Functional Formalism,” Physical Review B 13 (1976): 4274–4298, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274.
D. Langreth and J. Perdew, “The Exchange‐Correlation Energy of a Metallic Surface,” Solid State Communications 17, no. 11 (1975): 1425–1429, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038‐1098(75)90618‐3.
M. Casadei, X. Ren, P. Rinke, A. Rubio, and M. Scheffler, “Density Functional Theory Study of the α−γ$\alpha \text{$-$}\gamma$ Phase Transition in Cerium: Role of Electron Correlation and f$f$‐Orbital Localization,” Physical Review B 93 (2016): 075153, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075153.
S. Yang and X. Ren, “Phase Stability of the Argon Crystal: First‐Principles Study Based on Random Phase Approximation Plus Renormalized Single Excitation Corrections,” New Journal of Physics 24, no. 3 (2022): 033049, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367‐2630/ac5c19.
Y. Gao, W. Zhu, and X. Ren, “Long‐Range Behavior of a Nonlocal Correlation‐Energy Density Functional Based on the Random‐Phase Approximation,” Physical Review B 101 (2020): 035113, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.035113.
T. Björkman, A. Gulans, A. V. Krasheninnikov, and R. M. Nieminen, “van der Waals Bonding in Layered Compounds from Advanced Density‐Functional First‐Principles Calculations,” Physical Review Letters 108 (2012): 235502, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.235502.
I. Ying Zhang, R. Shi, and X. Ren, “Introduction to the Fifth‐Rung Density Functional Approximations: Concept, Formulation, and Applications,” Electronic Structure 7, no. 4 (2025): 043002, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ae1e49.
S. Grimme, “Density Functional Theory with London Dispersion Corrections,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 1 (2011): 211–228, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.30.
A. Tkatchenko and M. Scheffler, “Accurate Molecular van der Waals Interactions from Ground‐State Electron Density and Free‐Atom Reference Data,” Physical Review Letters 102 (2009): 073005, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073005.
A. Tkatchenko, R. A. DiStasio, R. Car, and M. Scheffler, “Accurate and Efficient Method for Many‐Body van der Waals Interactions,” Physical Review Letters 108 (2012): 236402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.236402.
J. Hermann and A. Tkatchenko, “Density Functional Model for van der Waals Interactions: Unifying Many‐Body Atomic Approaches with Nonlocal Functionals,” Physical Review Letters 124 (2020): 146401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.146401.
M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schröder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, “van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries,” Physical Review Letters 92 (2004): 246401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246401.
F. Tran, L. Kalantari, B. Traoré, X. Rocquefelte, and P. Blaha, “Nonlocal van der Waals Functionals for Solids: Choosing an Appropriate One,” Physical Review Materials 3 (2019): 063602, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.063602.
V. Shukla, Y. Jiao, J.‐H. Lee, E. Schröder, J. B. Neaton, and P. Hyldgaard, “Accurate Nonempirical Range‐Separated Hybrid van der Waals Density Functional for Complex Molecular Problems, Solids, and Surfaces,” Physical Review X 12 (2022): 041003, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.041003.
A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, J. Löfgren, Y. Pouillon, P. Erhart, and P. Hyldgaard, “Libvdwxc: A Library for Exchange–Correlation Functionals in the vdW‐DF Family,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 25, no. 6 (2017): 065004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361‐651X/aa7320.
R. Pederson, B. Kalita, and K. Burke, “Machine Learning and Density Functional Theory,” Nature Reviews Physics 4, no. 6 (2022): 357–358, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254‐022‐00470‐2.
S. Dick and M. Fernandez‐Serra, “Machine Learning Accurate Exchange and Correlation Functionals of the Electronic Density,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 3509, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐020‐17265‐7.
J. Kirkpatrick, B. McMorrow, D. H. P. Turban, et al., “Pushing the Frontiers of Density Functionals by Solving the Fractional Electron Problem,” Science 374, no. 6573 (2021): 1385–1389, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj6511.
K. Lejaeghere, G. Bihlmayer, T. Björkman, et al., “Reproducibility in Density Functional Theory Calculations of Solids,” Science 351, no. 6280 (2016): aad3000, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3000.
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple,” Physical Review Letters 77 (1996): 3865–3868, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865.
J. W. Furness, A. D. Kaplan, J. Ning, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, “Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta‐Generalized Gradient Approximation,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, no. 19 (2020): 8208–8215, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405.
J. Tao, J. P. Perdew, V. N. Staroverov, and G. E. Scuseria, “Climbing the Density Functional Ladder: Nonempirical Meta–Generalized Gradient Approximation Designed for Molecules and Solids,” Physical Review Letter 91 (2003): 146401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.146401.
P. Verma and D. G. Truhlar, “HLE17: An Improved Local Exchange–Correlation Functional for Computing Semiconductor Band Gaps and Molecular Excitation Energies,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, no. 13 (2017): 7144–7154, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01066.
J. Uzulis, A. V. Sorokin, and A. Gulans, “Range‐Separated Hybrid Functionals in Full‐Potential LAPW Using Adaptively Compressed Exchange,” npj Computational Materials 11, no. 1 (2025): 257, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐025‐01733‐z.
J. Doumont, F. Tran, and P. Blaha, “Implementation of Self‐Consistent MGGA Functionals in Augmented Plane‐Wave Based Methods,” Physical Review B 105 (2022): 195138, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.195138.
F. Tran, J. Doumont, P. Blaha, M. A. L. Marques, S. Botti, and A. P. Bartók, “On the Calculation of the Band Gap of Periodic Solids with MGGA Functionals Using the Total Energy,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 151, no. 16 (2019): 161102, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5126393.
L. G. Ferreira, M. Marques, and L. K. Teles, “Approximation to Density Functional Theory for the Calculation of Band Gaps of Semiconductors,” Physical Review B 78, no. 12 (2008): 125116, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.125116.
R. R. Pela, M. Marques, and L. K. Teles, “Comparing LDA‐1/2, HSE03, HSE06 and G 0 W 0 Approaches for Band Gap Calculations of Alloys,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, no. 50 (2015): 505502, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953‐8984/27/50/505502.
R. R. Pelá, C. Caetano, M. Marques, L. G. Ferreira, J. Furthmüller, and L. K. Teles, “Accurate Band Gaps of AlGaN, InGaN, and AlInN Alloys Calculations Based on LDA‐1/2 Approach,” Applied Physics Letters 98, no. 15 (2011): 151907, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3576570.
R. R. Pelá, M. Marques, L. G. Ferreira, J. Furthmüller, and L. K. Teles, “GaMnAs: Position of Mn‐d Levels and Majority Spin Band Gap Predicted from GGA‐1/2 Calculations,” Applied Physics Letters 100, no. 20 (2012): 202408, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4718602.
R. R. Pela, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, “The LDA‐1/2 Method Implemented in the exciting Code,” Computer Physics Communications 220 (2017): 263–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.07.015.
L. G. Ferreira, R. R. Pelá, L. K. Teles, M. Marques, M. R. Jr., and J. Furthmüller, “The LDA‐1/2 Technique: Recent Developments,” AIP Conference Proceedings 1566, no. 1 (2013): 27–28, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4848268.
R. R. Pela, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, “The LDA‐1/2 Method Applied to Atoms and Molecules,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2018), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00518.
R. Rodrigues Pela, U. Werner, D. Nabok, and C. Draxl, “Probing the LDA‐1/2 Method as a Starting Point for G0W0${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ Calculations,” Physical Review B 94 (2016): 235141, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235141.
R. R. Pela, C.‐L. Hsiao, L. Hultman, J. Birch, and G. K. Gueorguiev, “Electronic and Optical Properties of Core–Shell InAlN Nanorods: A Comparative Study via LDA, LDA‐1/2, mBJ, HSE06, G 0 W 0 and BSE Methods,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2024), https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cp05295h.
C. Vona, D. Nabok, and C. Draxl, “Electronic Structure of (Organic‐)Inorganic Metal Halide Perovskites: The Dilemma of Choosing the Right Functional,” Advanced Theory and Simulations 5, no. 1 (2022): 2100496, https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202100496.
D. Zavickis, K. Kacars, J. Cīmurs, and A. Gulans, “Adaptively Compressed Exchange in the Linearized Augmented Plane Wave Formalism,” Physical Review B 106 (2022): 165101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.165101.
M. Betzinger, C. Friedrich, and S. Blügel, “Hybrid Functionals Within the All‐Electron FLAPW Method: Implementation and Applications of PBE0,” Physical Review B 81 (2010): 195117, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.195117.
L. Lin, “Adaptively Compressed Exchange Operator,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12, no. 5 (2016): 2242–2249, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00092.
F. Tran and P. Blaha, “Implementation of Screened Hybrid Functionals Based on the Yukawa Potential Within the LAPW Basis Set,” Physical Review B 83, no. 23 (2011): 235118, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.83.235118.
J. Uzulis and A. Gulans, “Radial Kohn–Sham Problem via Integral‐Equation Approach,” Journal of Physics Communications 6, no. 8 (2022): 085002, https://doi.org/10.1088/2399‐6528/ac82a5.
J. Uzulis and A. Gulans, “Hartree‐Fock Limit for Energies in Solids,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.20116 (2026).
M. Weinert, “Solution of Poisson's Equation: Beyond Ewald–Type Methods,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 22, no. 11 (1981): 2433–2439, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.524800.
D. D. Koelling and B. N. Harmon, “A Technique for Relativistic Spin‐Polarized Calculations,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 10, no. 16 (1977): 3107–3114, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022‐3719/10/16/019.
J. Kuneš, P. Novák, R. Schmid, P. Blaha, and K. Schwarz, “Electronic Structure of fcc Th: Spin‐Orbit Calculation with 6p1/2${\rm p}_{1/2}$ Local Orbital Extension,” Physical Review B 64 (2001): 153102, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.153102.
J. Gavnholt, T. Olsen, M. Engelund, and J. Schiøtz, “Δ$\Delta$ Self‐Consistent Field Method to Obtain Potential Energy Surfaces of Excited Molecules on Surfaces,” Physical Review B 78, no. 7 (2008): 075441, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.78.075441.
G. M. J. Barca, A. T. B. Gilbert, and P. M. W. Gill, “Simple Models for Difficult Electronic Excitations,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14, no. 3 (2018): 1501–1509, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00994.
K. Carter‐Fenk and J. M. Herbert, “State‐Targeted Energy Projection: A Simple and Robust Approach to Orbital Relaxation of Non‐Aufbau Self‐Consistent Field Solutions,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16, no. 8 (2020): 5067–5082, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00502.
T. Kowalczyk, S. R. Yost, and T. V. Voorhis, “Assessment of the ΔSCF$\Delta{\rm SCF}$ Density Functional Theory Approach for Electronic Excitations in Organic Dyes,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, no. 5 (2011): 054128, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3530801.
A. T. B. Gilbert, N. A. Besley, and P. M. W. Gill, “Self‐Consistent Field Calculations of Excited States Using the Maximum Overlap Method (MOM) –,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 112, no. 50 (2008): 13164–13171, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp801738f.
J. Luo, X. Wang, S. Li, et al., “Efficient and Stable Emission of Warm‐White Light from Lead‐Free Halide Double Perovskites,” Nature 563, no. 7732 (2018): 541–545, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586‐018‐0691‐0.
T. C. Rossi, L. Qiao, C. P. Dykstra, et al., “Dynamic Control of X‐Ray Core‐Exciton Resonances by Coulomb Screening in Photoexcited Semiconductors,” Communications Materials 6 (2025): 191.
L. Qiao, R. Rodrigues Pela, and C. Draxl, “First‐Principles Approach to Ultrafast Pump‐Probe Spectroscopy in Solids,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07612 (2025).
N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, “Maximally Localized Generalized Wannier Functions for Composite Energy Bands,” Physical Review B 56, no. 20 (1997): 12847–12865, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.12847.
I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, “Maximally Localized Wannier Functions for Entangled Energy Bands,” Physical Review B 65, no. 3 (2001): 035109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109.
A. Damle, A. Levitt, and L. Lin, “Variational Formulation for Wannier Functions with Entangled Band Structure,” Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 17, no. 1 (2019): 167–191, https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1167164.
S. Tillack, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, “Maximally Localized Wannier Functions Within the (L)APW+LO Method,” Physical Review B 101, no. 23 (2020): 235102, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.235102.
S. Tillack and C. Draxl, “Automatic Generation of Maximally Localized Wannier Functions via Optimized Projection Functions and Self‐Projections,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03213 (2025).
P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen, and L. D. Marks, “WIEN2k: An APW+lo Program for Calculating the Properties of Solids,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, no. 7 (2020): 074101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143061.
M. Zacharias, G. Volonakis, F. Giustino, and J. Even, “Anharmonic Lattice Dynamics via the Special Displacement Method,” Physical Review B 108, no. 3 (2023): 035155, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.035155.
S. Poncé and X. Gonze, “In Search of the Electron‐Phonon Contribution to Total Energy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04897 (2025).
M. J. Verstraete, J. Abreu, G. E. Allemand, et al., “Abinit 2025: New Capabilities for the Predictive Modeling of Solids and Nanomaterials,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 163, no. 16 (2025): 164126, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0288278.
P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, et al., “QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A Modular and Open‐Source Software Project for Quantum Simulations of Materials,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, no. 39 (2009): 395502.
J. Noffsinger, F. Giustino, B. D. Malone, C.‐H. Park, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, “EPW: A Program for Calculating the Electron–Phonon Coupling Using Maximally Localized Wannier Functions,” Computer Physics Communications 181, no. 12 (2010): 2140–2148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.08.027.
S. Poncé, J.‐M. Lihm, and C.‐H. Park, “Verification and Validation of Zero‐Point Electron‐Phonon Renormalization of the Bandgap, Mass Enhancement, and Spectral Functions,” npj Computational Materials 11, no. 1 (2025): 117, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐025‐01587‐5.
J.‐M. Lihm and S. Poncé, “Beyond‐Quasiparticle Transport with Vertex Correction: Self‐Consistent Ladder Formalism for Electron‐Phonon Interactions,” Physical Review X 16 (2026): 011008, https://doi.org/10.1103/mtjf‐ylf7 .
Y. Luo, J. Park, and M. Bernardi, “First‐Principles Diagrammatic Monte Carlo for Electron–Phonon Interactions and Polaron,” Nature Physics 21, no. 8 (2025): 1275–1282, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567‐025‐02954‐1.
J. Lafuente‐Bartolome, C. Lian, W. H. Sio, I. G. Gurtubay, A. Eiguren, and F. Giustino, “Ab Initio Self‐Consistent Many‐Body Theory of Polarons at All Couplings,” Physical Review B 106, no. 7 (2022): 075119, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.075119.
J. Lafuente‐Bartolome, C. Lian, W. H. Sio, I. G. Gurtubay, A. Eiguren, and F. Giustino, “Unified Approach to Polarons and Phonon‐Induced Band Structure Renormalization,” Physical Review Letters 129, no. 7 (2022): 076402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.076402.
V. Vasilchenko, M. Giantomassi, S. Poncé, and X. Gonze, “Variational First‐Principles Approach to Self‐Trapped Polarons,” Physical Review B 112, no. 1 (2025): 014314, https://doi.org/10.1103/12b6‐yj6n.
C. Ambrosch‐Draxl, H. Auer, R. Kouba, E. Y. Sherman, P. Knoll, and M. Mayer, “Raman Scattering in YBa∗2Cu∗3O7:${\mathrm{YBa}}*{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}*{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}:$ A Comprehensive Theoretical Study in Comparison with Experiments,” Physical Review B 65 (2002): 064501, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.064501.
S. Ponc'e, E. Margine, C. Verdi, and F. Giustino, “EPW: Electron–Phonon Coupling, Transport and Superconducting Properties Using Maximally Localized Wannier Functions,” Computer Physics Communications 209 (2016): 116–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.07.028.
J.‐J. Zhou, J. Park, I.‐T. Lu, I. Maliyov, X. Tong, and M. Bernardi, “Perturbo: A Software Package for Ab Initio Electron–Phonon Interactions, Charge Transport and Ultrafast Dynamics,” Computer Physics Communications 264 (2021): 107970, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107970.
Y. Luo, D. Desai, B. K. Chang, J. Park, and M. Bernardi, “Data‐Driven Compression of Electron‐Phonon Interactions,” Physical Review X 14, no. 2 (2024): 021023, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021023.
Y. Luo, D. Mangtani, S. Peng, J. Yao, S. Kliavinek, and M. Bernardi, “Tensor Learning and Compression of N‐Phonon Interactions,” Physical Review Letters 135, no. 12 (2025): 126101, https://doi.org/10.1103/nmgj‐yq1g.
R. D. King‐Smith and D. Vanderbilt, “Theory of Polarization of Crystalline Solids,” Physical Review B 47, no. 3 (1993): 1651–1654, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1651.
R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, “Theory of Polarization: A Modern Approach,” in Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective Vol. 105 (Springer, 2007) 31–68.
F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, “Electron‐Phonon Interaction Using Wannier Functions,” Physical Review B 76, no. 16 (2007): 165108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165108.
C. Verdi and F. Giustino, “Fröhlich Electron‐Phonon Vertex from First Principles,” Physical Review Letters 115, no. 17 (2015): 176401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.176401.
H. J. Choi, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, “Anisotropic Eliashberg Theory of MgB2:${\rm MgB}_2:$ Tc$T_c$, Isotope Effects, Superconducting Energy Gaps, Quasiparticles, and Specific Heat,” Physica C: Superconductivity 385, no. 1 (2003): 66–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921‐4534(02)02345‐6.
M. Lüders, A. Ernst, W. M. Temmerman, Z. Szotek, and P. J. Durham, “Ab Initio Angle‐Resolved Photoemission in Multiple‐Scattering FormuLation,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, no. 38 (2001): 8587, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953‐8984/13/38/305.
P. Mori‐Sánchez, A. J. Cohen, and W. Yang, “Localization and Delocalization Errors in Density Functional Theory and Implications for Band‐Gap Prediction,” Physical Review Letter 100 (2008): 146401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.146401.
L. Reining, “The GW Approximation: Content, Successes and Limitations,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 8, no. 3 (2018): e1344, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1344.
M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, “Implementation and Performance of the Frequency‐Dependent GW$GW$ Method Within the PAW Framework,” Physical Review B 74 (2006): 035101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035101.
F. Hüser, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, “Quasiparticle GW Calculations for Solids, Molecules, and Two‐Dimensional Materials,” Physical Review B 87 (2013): 235132, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235132.
A. Kutepov, S. Y. Savrasov, and G. Kotliar, “Ground‐State Properties of Simple Elements from GW Calculations,” Physical Review B 80 (2009): 041103, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.041103.
D. Sangalli, A. Ferretti, H. Miranda, et al., “Many‐Body Perturbation Theory Calculations Using the yambo Code,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, no. 32 (2019): 325902, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361‐648X/ab15d0.
J. Deslippe, G. Samsonidze, D. A. Strubbe, M. Jain, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, “BerkeleyGW: A Massively Parallel Computer Package for the Calculation of the Quasiparticle and Optical Properties of Materials and Nanostructures,” Computer Physics Communications 183, no. 6 (2012): 1269–1289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.006.
M. Graml, K. Zollner, D. Hernangómez‐Pérez, P. E. Faria Junior, and J. Wilhelm, “Low‐Scaling GW Algorithm Applied to Twisted Transition‐Metal Dichalcogenide Heterobilayers,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 20, no. 5 (2024): 2202–2208, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01230.
V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, et al., “Ab Initio Molecular Simulations with Numeric Atom‐Centered Orbitals,” Computer Physics Communications 180, no. 11 (2009): 2175–2196, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022.
M. Azizi, F. A. Delesma, M. Giantomassi, et al., “Precision Benchmarks for Solids: G0W0 Calculations with Different Basis Sets,” Computational Materials Science 250 (2025): 113655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113655.
F. Bruneval, F. Sottile, V. Olevano, R. Del Sole, and L. Reining, “Many‐Body Perturbation Theory Using the Density‐Functional Concept: Beyond the GW$GW$ Approximation,” Physical Review Letter 94 (2005): 186402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.186402.
M. Gatti, F. Bruneval, V. Olevano, and L. Reining, “Understanding Correlations in Vanadium Dioxide from First Principles,” Physical Review Letter 99 (2007): 266402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.266402.
J. Vidal, F. Trani, F. Bruneval, M. A. L. Marques, and S. Botti, “Effects of Electronic and Lattice Polarization on the Band Structure of Delafossite Transparent Conductive Oxides,” Physical Review Letter 104 (2010): 136401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136401.
M. J. van Setten, F. Caruso, S. Sharifzadeh, et al., “GW100: Benchmarking G0W0 for Molecular Systems,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11, no. 12 (2015): 5665–5687, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00453.
R. Rodrigues Pela, C. Vona, S. Lubeck, B. Alex, I. Gonzalez Oliva, and C. Draxl, “Critical Assessment of G0W0$G_0W_0$ Calculations for 2D Materials: the Example of Monolayer MoS2${\rm MoS}_2$,” npj Computational Materials 10, no. 1 (2024): 77, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐024‐01253‐2.
A. Tal, T. Bischoff, and A. Pasquarello, “Absolute Energy Levels of Liquid Water from Many‐Body Perturbation Theory with Effective Vertex Corrections,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, no. 10 (2024): e2311472121, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2311472121.
M. Wen, V. Abraham, G. Harsha, A. Shee, K. B. Whaley, and D. Zgid, “Comparing Self‐Consistent GW and Vertex‐Corrected G0W0 (G0W0Γ$\Gamma$) Accuracy for Molecular Ionization Potentials,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 20, no. 8 (2024): 3109–3120, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01279.
S. Jana, A. Ghosh, A. Bhattacharjee, D. Rani, M. Hossain, and P. Samal, “Nonempirical Dielectric‐Dependent Hybrid as an Accurate Starting Point for the Single‐Shot G0W0 Calculation of Chalcopyrite Semiconductors,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 162, no. 6 (2025): 064104, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0240012.
F. Bruneval, N. Vast, and L. Reining, “Effect of Self‐Consistency on Quasiparticles in Solids,” Physical Review B 74 (2006): 045102, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.045102.
M. van Schilfgaarde, T. Kotani, and S. Faleev, “Quasiparticle Self‐Consistent GW$GW$ Theory,” Physical Review Letter 96 (2006): 226402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.226402.
T. Kotani, M. van Schilfgaarde, and S. V. Faleev, “Quasiparticle Self‐Consistent GW$GW$ Method: A Basis for the Independent‐Particle Approximation,” Physical Review B 76 (2007): 165106, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165106.
A. Kutepov, K. Haule, S. Y. Savrasov, and G. Kotliar, “Electronic Structure of Pu and Am Metals by Self‐Consistent Relativistic GW$GW$ Method,” Physical Review B 85 (2012): 155129, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155129.
M. Grumet, P. Liu, M. Kaltak, J. C. V. Klimeš, and G. Kresse, “Beyond the Quasiparticle Approximation: Fully Self‐Consistent GW$GW$ Calculations,” Physical Review B 98 (2018): 155143, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.155143.
K. Haule and S. Mandal, “All‐Electron GW With Linearized Augmented Plane Waves for Metals and Semiconductors,” Computer Physics Communications 295 (2024): 108986, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108986.
J. Lischner, D. Vigil‐Fowler, and S. G. Louie, “Physical Origin of Satellites in Photoemission of Doped Graphene: An Ab Initio GW$GW$ Plus Cumulant Study,” Physical Review Letter 110 (2013): 146801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.146801.
F. Caruso, H. Lambert, and F. Giustino, “Band Structures of Plasmonic Polarons,” Physical Review Letter 114 (2015): 146404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.146404.
B. Gumhalter, V. Kovač, F. Caruso, H. Lambert, and F. Giustino, “On the Combined Use of GW Approximation and Cumulant Expansion in the Calculations of Quasiparticle Spectra: The Paradigm of Si Valence Bands,” Physical Review B 94 (2016): 035103, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.035103.
P.‐F. Loos, A. Marie, and A. Ammar, “Cumulant Green's Function Methods for Molecules,” Faraday Discussions 254 (2024): 240–260, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4FD00037D.
C. Mejuto‐Zaera, G. Weng, M. Romanova, et al., “Are Multi‐Quasiparticle Interactions Important in Molecular Ionization?,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 154, no. 12 (2021): 121101, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0044060.
A. L. Kutepov, “Electronic Structure of Na, K, Si, and LiF from Self‐Consistent Solution of Hedin's Equations Including Vertex Corrections,” Physical Review B 94 (2016): 155101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155101.
A. L. Kutepov, “Full Versus Quasiparticle Self‐Consistency in Vertex‐Corrected GW Approaches,” Physical Review B 105 (2022): 045124, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.045124.
P. S. Schmidt, C. E. Patrick, and K. S. Thygesen, “Simple Vertex Correction Improves GW Band Energies of Bulk and Two‐Dimensional Crystals,” Physical Review B 96 (2017): 205206, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205206.
T. Olsen, C. E. Patrick, J. E. Bates, A. Ruzsinszky, and K. S. Thygesen, “Beyond the RPA and GW Methods with Adiabatic xc‐Kernels for Accurate Ground‐State and Quasiparticle Energies,” npj Computational Materials 5, no. 1 (2019): 106, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐019‐0242‐8.
Y.‐H. Kim and A. Görling, “Excitonic Optical Spectrum of Semiconductors Obtained by Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory with the Exact‐Exchange Kernel,” Physical Review Letter 89 (2002): 096402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.096402.
M. Shishkin, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, “Accurate Quasiparticle Spectra from Self‐Consistent GW Calculations with Vertex Corrections,” Physical Review Letter 99 (2007): 246403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246403.
W. Chen and A. Pasquarello, “Accurate Band Gaps of Extended Systems via Efficient Vertex Corrections in GW$GW$,” Physical Review B 92 (2015): 041115, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.041115.
J. A. Berger, “Fully Parameter‐Free Calculation of Optical Spectra for Insulators, Semiconductors, and Metals from a Simple Polarization Functional,” Physical Review Letter 115 (2015): 137402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.137402.
S. Rigamonti, S. Botti, V. Veniard, C. Draxl, L. Reining, and F. Sottile, “Estimating Excitonic Effects in the Absorption Spectra of Solids: Problems and Insight from a Guided Iteration Scheme,” Physical Review Letters 114, no. 14 (2015): 146402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.146402.
A. Tal, W. Chen, and A. Pasquarello, “Vertex Function Compliant with the Ward Identity for Quasiparticle Self‐Consistent Calculations Beyond GW$GW$,” Physical Review B 103 (2021): L161104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L161104.
A. Grüneis, G. Kresse, Y. Hinuma, and F. Oba, “Ionization Potentials of Solids: The Importance of Vertex Corrections,” Physical Review Letter 112 (2014): 096401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.096401.
P. B. Allen and M. Cardona, “Theory of the Temperature Dependence of the Direct Gap of Germanium,” Physical Review B 23 (1981): 1495–1505, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.23.1495.
F. Giustino, “Electron‐Phonon Interactions from First Principles,” Reviews of Modern Physics 89 (2017): 015003, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015003.
F. Bechstedt, K. Seino, P. H. Hahn, and W. G. Schmidt, “Quasiparticle Bands and Optical Spectra of Highly Ionic Crystals: AlN and NaCl,” Physical Review B 72 (2005): 245114, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.245114.
S. Botti and M. A. L. Marques, “Strong Renormalization of the Electronic Band Gap Due to Lattice Polarization in the GW$GW$ Formalism,” Physical Review Letter 110 (2013): 226404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.226404.
C. Friedrich, M. C. Müller, and S. Blügel, “Band Convergence and Linearization Error Correction of All‐Electron GW$\mathit {GW}$ Calculations: The Extreme Case of Zinc Oxide,” Physical Review B 83 (2011): 081101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.081101.
M. Betzinger, C. Friedrich, A. Görling, and S. Blügel, “Precise All‐Electron Dynamical Response Functions: Application to COHSEX and the RPA Correlation Energy,” Physical Review B 92 (2015): 245101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.245101.
C. Freysoldt, P. Eggert, P. Rinke, A. Schindlmayr, R. Godby, and M. Scheffler, “Dielectric Anisotropy in the GW Space–Time Method,” Computer Physics Communications 176, no. 1 (2007): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.018.
F. A. Rasmussen, P. S. Schmidt, K. T. Winther, and K. S. Thygesen, “Efficient Many‐Body Calculations for Two‐Dimensional Materials Using Exact Limits for the Screened Potential: Band Gaps of MoS2${\mathbf {MoS}}_{2}$, h$h$‐BN, and Phosphorene,” Physical Review B 94 (2016): 155406, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155406.
“GreenX Library,” accessed: December 17, 2025, https://github.com/nomad‐coe/greenX.
“IDieL: Inverse Dielectric Library,” accessed: December 17, 2025, https://github.com/mrm24/inverse_dielectric.
H. N. Rojas, R. W. Godby, and R. J. Needs, “Space‐Time Method for Ab Initio Calculations of Self‐Energies and Dielectric Response Functions of Solids,” Physical Review Letters 74 (1995): 1827–1830, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1827.
P. Liu, M. Kaltak, J. C. V. Klimeš, and G. Kresse, “Cubic Scaling GW: Towards Fast Quasiparticle Calculations,” Physical Review B 94 (2016): 165109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165109.
A. Kutepov, V. Oudovenko, and G. Kotliar, “Linearized Self‐Consistent Quasiparticle GW Method: Application to Semiconductors and Simple Metals,” Computer Physics Communications 219 (2017): 407–414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.06.012.
M. Azizi, J. Wilhelm, D. Golze, et al., “Validation of the GreenX Library Time‐Frequency Component for Efficient GW and RPA Calculations,” Physical Review B 109 (2024): 245101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.245101.
D. Neuhauser, Y. Gao, C. Arntsen, C. Karshenas, E. Rabani, and R. Baer, “Breaking the Theoretical Scaling Limit for Predicting Quasiparticle Energies: The Stochastic GW Approach,” Physical Review Letters 113 (2014): 076402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.076402.
V. C. V. Vlček, W. Li, R. Baer, E. Rabani, and D. Neuhauser, “Swift GW$GW$ Beyond 10,000 Electrons using Sparse Stochastic Compression,” Physical Review B 98 (2018): 075107, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075107.
F. Xuan, Y. Chen, and S. Y. Quek, “Quasiparticle Levels at Large Interface Systems from Many‐Body Perturbation Theory: The XAF‐GW Method,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, no. 6 (2019): 3824–3835, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00229.
Z.‐F. Liu, F. H. da Jornada, S. G. Louie, and J. B. Neaton, “Accelerating GW‐Based Energy Level Alignment Calculations for Molecule–Metal Interfaces Using a Substrate Screening Approach,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, no. 7 (2019): 4218–4227, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00326.
M. Schebek, I. Gonzalez Oliva, and C. Draxl, “Efficient G0W0 and Bethe‐Salpeter Equation Calculations of Heterostructures within an All‐Electron Framework,” Physical Review B 112, no. 16 (2025): 165130, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.112.165130.
F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, “The GW Method,” Reports on Progress in Physics 61, no. 3 (1998): 237, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034‐4885/61/3/002.
J. C. Inkson, Many‐Body Theory of Solids: An Introduction (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley, Interacting Electrons (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
H. Jiang, R. I. Gómez‐Abal, X.‐Z. Li, C. Meisenbichler, C. Ambrosch‐Draxl, and M. Scheffler, “FHI‐gap: A GW Code Based on the All‐Electron Augmented Plane Wave Method,” Computer Physics Communications 184, no. 2 (2013): 348–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.018.
M. Raya‐Moreno, H. Kleine, S. Lubeck, et al., “HPC‐Optimized, Fully Modular GW Implementation in the All‐Electron Full‐Potential Code exciting,” (2026), (in preparation).
F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, “Product‐Basis Method for Calculating Dielectric Matrices,” Physical Review B 49 (1994): 16214–16222, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.16214.
P. Carrier, S. Rohra, and A. Görling, “General Treatment of the Singularities in Hartree‐Fock and Exact‐Exchange Kohn‐Sham Methods for Solids,” Physical Review B 75 (2007): 205126, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.205126.
A. Marini, C. Hogan, M. Grüning, and D. Varsano, “Yambo: An Ab Initio Tool for Excited‐State Calculations,” Computer Physics Communications 180, no. 8 (2009): 1392–1403.
F. H. da Jornada, D. Y. Qiu, and S. G. Louie, “Nonuniform Sampling Schemes of the Brillouin Zone for Many‐Electron Perturbation‐Theory Calculations in Reduced Dimensionality,” Physical Review B 95 (2017): 035109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035109.
X. Ren, F. Merz, H. Jiang, et al., “All‐Electron Periodic G0W0${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ Implementation with Numerical Atomic Orbital Basis Functions: Algorithm and Benchmarks,” Physical Review Materials 5 (2021): 013807, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.013807.
J. Spencer and A. Alavi, “Efficient Calculation of the Exact Exchange Energy in Periodic Systems Using a Truncated Coulomb Potential,” Physical Review B 77 (2008): 193110, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.193110.
S. Baroni and R. Resta, “Ab Initio Calculation of the Macroscopic Dielectric Constant in Silicon,” Physical Review B 33 (1986): 7017–7021, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.7017.
C. Ambrosch‐Draxl and J. O. Sofo, “Linear Optical Properties of Solids within the Full‐Potential Linearized Augmented Planewave Method,” Computer Physics Communications 175, no. 1 (2006): 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2006.03.005.
B. Alex, “Efficient Screening in Many‐Body Calculations for Low‐Dimensional Materials,” Master's thesis, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin (2023).
R. Gómez‐Abal, X. Li, M. Scheffler, and C. Ambrosch‐Draxl, “Influence of the Core‐Valence Interaction and of the Pseudopotential Approximation on the Electron Self‐Energy in Semiconductors,” Physical Review Letter 101 (2008): 106404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.106404.
X.‐Z. Li, R. Gómez‐Abal, H. Jiang, C. Ambrosch‐Draxl, and M. Scheffler, “Impact of Widely used Approximations to the G0W0 Method: an All‐Electron Perspective,” New Journal of Physics 14, no. 2 (2012): 023006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367‐2630/14/2/023006.
I. Gonzalez Oliva, F. Caruso, P. Pavone, and C. Draxl, “Hybrid Excitations at the Interface between a MoS2${\rm MoS}_2$ Monolayer and Organic Molecules: A First‐Principles Study,” Physical Review Materials 6, no. 5 (2022): 054004, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.054004.
I. Gonzalez Oliva, B. Maurer, B. Alex, S. Tillack, M. Schebek, and C. Draxl, “Hybrid Materials: Still Challenging for Ab Initio Theory?,” Physica Status Solidi (a) 221 (2024): 2300170, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.202300170.
W. Bennecke, I. Gonzalez Oliva, J. P. Bange, et al., “Hybrid Frenkel–Wannier Excitons Facilitate Ultrafast Energy Transfer at a 2D–Organic Interface,” Nature Physics 21, no. 12 (2025): 1973–1980, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567‐025‐03075‐5.
F. Henneke, L. Lin, C. Vorwerk, C. Draxl, R. Klein, and C. Yang, “Fast Optical Absorption Spectra Calculations for Periodic Solid State Systems,” Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science 15, no. 1 (2020): 89–113, https://doi.org/10.2140/camcos.2020.15.89.
S. Albrecht, L. Reining, R. Del Sole, and G. Onida, “Ab Initio Calculation of Excitonic Effects in the Optical Spectra of Semiconductors,” Physical Review Letter 80 (1998): 4510–4513, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4510.
M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, “Electron‐Hole Excitations and Optical Spectra from First Principles,” Physical Review B 62, no. 8 (2000): 4927–4944, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927.
A. M. Alvertis, A. Champagne, M. Del Ben, et al., “Importance of Nonuniform Brillouin‐Zone Sampling for Ab Initio Bethe‐Salpeter Equation Calculations of Exciton Binding Energies in Crystalline Solids,” Physical Review B 108 (2023): 235117, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.235117.
M. Shao, F. H. da Jornada, L. Lin, C. Yang, J. Deslippe, and S. G. Louie, “A Structure‐Preserving Lanczos Algorithm for Computing the Optical Absorption Spectrum,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 39, no. 2 (2018): 683–711, https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1102641.
W. Hu, M. Shao, A. Cepellotti, et al., “Accelerating Optical Absorption Spectra and Exciton Energy Computation via Interpolative Separable Density Fitting,” in Computational Science – ICCS 2018, eds. Y. Shi, H. Fu, Y. Tian, V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, M. H. Lees, J. Dongarra, and P. M. A. Sloot (Springer International Publishing, 2018), 604–617.
P.‐F. Loos and X. Blase, “Dynamical Correction to the Bethe–Salpeter Equation beyond the Plasmon‐Pole Approximation,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, no. 11 (2020): 114120, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023168.
X. Zhang, J. A. Leveillee, and A. Schleife, “Effect of Dynamical Screening in the Bethe‐Salpeter Framework: Excitons in Crystalline Naphthalene,” Physical Review B 107, no. 23 (2023): 235205, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235205.
T. Olsen, “Unified Treatment of Magnons and Excitons in Monolayer ${\mathrm{CrI}}_{3}$ from Many‐Body Perturbation Theory,” Physical Review Letters 127, no. 16 (2021): 166402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.166402.
E. Perfetto, D. Sangalli, A. Marini, and G. Stefanucci, “Nonequilibrium Bethe‐Salpeter Equation for Transient Photoabsorption Spectroscopy,” Physical Review B 92, no. 20 (2015): 205304, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.205304.
D. Sangalli, S. Dal Conte, C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, and A. Marini, “Nonequilibrium Optical Properties in Semiconductors from First Principles: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study of Bulk Silicon,” Physical Review B 93, no. 19 (2016): 195205, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195205.
N. Farahani and D. Popova‐Gorelova, “Revealing Fingerprints of Valence Excitons in X‐Ray Absorption Spectra With the Bethe‐Salpeter Equation,” Physical Review B 110 (2024): 235126, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.235126.
J. Vinson, T. Jach, M. Müller, R. Unterumsberger, and B. Beckhoff, “Resonant X‐Ray Emission of Hexagonal Boron Nitride,” Physical Review B 96 (2017): 205116, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205116.
C. Vorwerk, F. Sottile, and C. Draxl, “All‐Electron Many‐Body Approach to Resonant Inelastic X‐Ray Scattering,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 24, no. 29 (2022): 17439–17448, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cp00994c.
A. Marini, “Ab Initio Finite‐Temperature Excitons,” Physical Review Letters 101, no. 10 (2008): 106405, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.106405.
M. R. Filip, J. B. Haber, and J. B. Neaton, “Phonon Screening of Excitons in Semiconductors: Halide Perovskites and Beyond,” Physical Review Letter 127 (2021): 067401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.067401.
Y.‐H. Chan, J. B. Haber, M. H. Naik, et al., “Exciton Lifetime and Optical Line Width Profile via Exciton–Phonon Interactions: Theory and First‐Principles Calculations for Monolayer MoS2,” Nano Letters 23, no. 9 (2023): 3971–3977, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00732.
A. M. Alvertis, J. B. Haber, Z. Li, et al., “Phonon Screening and Dissociation of Excitons at Finite Temperatures from First Principles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, no. 30 (2024): e2403434121, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2403434121.
M. Schebek, P. Pavone, C. Draxl, and F. Caruso, “Phonon‐Mediated Renormalization of Exciton Energies and Absorption Spectra in Polar Semiconductors,” Journal of Physics: Materials 8, no. 2 (2025): 025006, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515‐7639/adab24.
M. Yang and C. Draxl, “Novel Approach to Structural Relaxation of Materials in Optically Excited States,” (2022), arXiv:2212.13645 [physics.comp‐ph].
Y. Bai, Y. Wang, and S. Meng, “Ab Initio Self‐Trapped Excitons,” Physical Review Letters 133 (2024): 046903, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.046903.
Z. Dai, C. Lian, J. Lafuente‐Bartolome, and F. Giustino, “Excitonic Polarons and Self‐Trapped Excitons from First‐Principles Exciton‐Phonon Couplings,” Physical Review Letters 132 (2024): 036902, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.036902.
Z. Dai, C. Lian, J. Lafuente‐Bartolome, and F. Giustino, “Theory of Excitonic Polarons: From Models to First‐Principles Calculations,” Physical Review B 109 (2024): 045202, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.045202.
H. Ehrenreich and M. H. Cohen, “Self‐Consistent Field Approach to the Many‐Electron Problem,” Physical Review 115, no. 4 (1959): 786–790, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.115.786.
K. Dong, W. Hu, and L. Lin, “Interpolative Separable Density Fitting through Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation with Applications to Hybrid Functional Electronic Structure Calculations,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14, no. 3 (2018): 1311–1320, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01113.
E. Richter, B. Maurer, and C. Draxl, “First‐principles description of pumped inelastic X‐ray scattering: example of K‐edge RIXS in graphite,” (2026), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.09440.
C. Vorwerk, “BRIXS,” (2021), accessed: June 19, 2026, https://github.com/exciting/BRIXS/.
C. Vorwerk, “pyBRIXS,” (2021), accessed: June 19, 2026, https://github.com/exciting/pyBRIXS/.
P. Giannozzi, S. de Gironcoli, P. Pavone, and S. Baroni, “Ab Initio Calculation of Phonon Dispersions in Semiconductors,” Physical Review B 43 (1991): 7231–7242, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.7231.
F. Bechstedt and J. Furthmüller, “Influence of Screening Dynamics on Excitons in Ga2O3 Polymorphs,” Applied Physics Letters 114, no. 12 (2019): 122101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5084324.
A. Schleife, M. D. Neumann, N. Esser, et al., “Optical Properties of In2O3 from Experiment and First‐Principles Theory: Influence of Lattice Screening,” New Journal of Physics 20, no. 5 (2018): 053016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367‐2630/aabeb0.
P. Umari, E. Mosconi, and F. De Angelis, “Infrared Dielectric Screening Determines the Low Exciton Binding Energy of Metal‐Halide Perovskites,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, no. 3 (2018): 620–627, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03286.
F. Fuchs, C. Rödl, A. Schleife, and F. Bechstedt, “Efficient O(N2)$\mathcal {O}({N}^{2})$ Approach to Solve the Bethe‐Salpeter Equation for Excitonic Bound States,” Physical Review B 78 (2008): 085103, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.085103.
L. Adamska and P. Umari, “Bethe‐Salpeter Equation Approach with Electron‐Phonon Coupling for Exciton Binding Energies,” Physical Review B 103 (2021): 075201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.075201.
M. Bokdam, T. Sander, A. Stroppa, et al., “Role of Polar Phonons in the Photo‐Excited State of Metal Halide Perovskites,” Scientific Reports 6, no. 1 (2016): 28618, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28618.
H. Fröhlich, “Electrons in Lattice Fields,” Advances in Physics 3, no. 11 (1954): 325–361, https://doi.org/10.1080/00018735400101213.
H.‐Y. Chen, D. Sangalli, and M. Bernardi, “Exciton‐Phonon Interaction and Relaxation Times from First Principles,” Physical Review Letters 125 (2020): 107401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.107401.
N. Ferré, M. Filatov, and M. Huix‐Rotllant (Eds.), Density‐Functional Methods for Excited States (Springer, 2015).
C. A. Ullrich, “A Snapshot of Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory,” APL Computational Physics 1, no. 2 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0297117.
R. R. Pela and C. Draxl, “All‐Electron Full‐Potential Implementation of Real‐Time TDDFT in Exciting,” Electronic Structure 3, no. 3 (2021): 037001, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ac0c26.
C. Pemmaraju, “Simulation of Attosecond Transient Soft X‐Ray Absorption in Solids Using Generalized Kohn–Sham Real‐Time Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory,” New Journal of Physics 22, no. 8 (2020): 083063, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367‐2630/aba76c.
N. T. Maitra, “Perspective: Fundamental Aspects of Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 144, no. 22 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4953039.
C. A. Ullrich and Z.‐H. Yang, “A Brief Compendium of Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory,” Brazilian Journal of Physics 44, no. 1 (2014): 154–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538‐013‐0141‐2.
Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Schwalbe, T. Gawne, T. R. Preston, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, “Applying the Liouville–Lanczos Method of Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory to Warm Dense Matter,” Matter and Radiation at Extremes 10, no. 4 (2025): 047601, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0263947.
T. Skovhus, T. Olsen, and H. M. Rønnow, “Influence of Static Correlation on the Magnon Dynamics of an Itinerant Ferromagnet with Competing Exchange Interactions: First‐Principles Study of MnBi,” Physical Review Materials 6, no. 5 (2022): 054402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.054402.
X. Xu and R. Long, “Polarity and Site Symmetry Synergize to Drive Ultrafast Self‐Trapped Exciton Formation in Sb‐Doped 0D Perovskites,” ACS Nano (2025), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c13647.
J. T. Taylor, D. J. Tozer, and B. F. E. Curchod, “On the Topological Phase around Conical Intersections with Tamm–Dancoff Linear‐Response Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 128, no. 27 (2024): 5314–5320, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02503.
S. Tussupbayev, N. Govind, K. Lopata, and C. J. Cramer, “Comparison of Real‐Time and Linear‐Response Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theories for Molecular Chromophores Ranging from Sparse to High Densities of States,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11, no. 3 (2015): 1102–1109, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500763y.
H. Zhao and L. He, “Hybrid Gauge Approach for Accurate Real‐Time TDDFT Simulations with Numerical Atomic Orbitals,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 21, no. 7 (2025): 3335–3341, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00111.
S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, U. D. Giovannini, and A. Rubio, “Technical Review: Time‐dependent Density Functional Theory for Attosecond Physics Ranging from Gas‐Phase to Solids,” npj Computational Materials 11, no. 1 (2025): 233, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐025‐01715‐1.
J. I. Fuks, K. Luo, E. D. Sandoval, and N. T. Maitra, “Time‐Resolved Spectroscopy in Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory: An Exact Condition,” Physical Review Letters 114, no. 18 (2015): 183002, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.183002.
B. Buades, A. Picón, E. Berger, et al., “Attosecond State‐Resolved Carrier Motion in Quantum Materials Probed by Soft X‐Ray XANES,” Applied Physics Reviews 8, no. 1 (2021): 011408, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0020649.
J. Simoni, X. Andrade, W. Fang, et al., “Spin Non‐Collinear Real‐Time Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory and Implementation in the Modern GPU‐Accelerated INQ Code,” APL Computational Physics 1, no. 2 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0290737.
F. Caruso, M. A. Sentef, C. Attaccalite, et al., “The 2025 Roadmap to Ultrafast Dynamics: Frontiers of Theoretical and Computational Modeling,” Journal of Physics: Materials 9, no. 1 (2026): 012501, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515‐7639/ae1165.
C. Shepard, R. Zhou, D. C. Yost, Y. Yao, and Y. Kanai, “Simulating Electronic Excitation and Dynamics with Real‐Time Propagation Approach to TDDFT Within Plane‐Wave Pseudopotential Formulation,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 155, no. 10 (2021): 100901, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0057587.
Y. Shinohara, S. Sato, K. Yabana, J.‐I. Iwata, T. Otobe, and G. Bertsch, “Nonadiabatic Generation of Coherent Phonons,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, no. 22 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4739844.
C. Andrea Rozzi, S. Maria Falke, N. Spallanzani, et al., “Quantum Coherence Controls the Charge Separation in a Prototypical Artificial Light‐Harvesting System,” Nature Communications 4, no. 1 (2013): 1602, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2603.
A. V. Krasheninnikov, Y. Miyamoto, and D. Tománek, “Role of Electronic Excitations in Ion Collisions with Carbon Nanostructures,” Physical Review Letters 99, no. 1 (2007): 016104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.016104.
S. Andermatt, J. Cha, F. Schiffmann, and J. VandeVondele, “Combining Linear‐Scaling DFT with Subsystem DFT in Born–Oppenheimer and Ehrenfest Molecular Dynamics Simulations: From Molecules to a Virus in Solution,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12, no. 7 (2016): 3214–3227, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00398.
R. Long and O. V. Prezhdo, “Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics of the Ultrafast Electron Injection from a PbSe Quantum Dot into the TiO2${\rm TiO}_2$ Surface,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, no. 47 (2011): 19240–19249, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2085806.
V. Blum, R. Asahi, J. Autschbach, et al., “Roadmap on Methods and Software for Electronic Structure‐Based Simulations in Chemistry and Materials,” Electronic Structure 6, no. 4 (2024): 042501, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ad48ec.
J. Lloyd‐Hughes, P. M. Oppeneer, T. P. D. Santos, et al., “The 2021 Ultrafast Spectroscopic Probes of Condensed Matter Roadmap,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, no. 35 (2021): 353001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361‐648x/abfe21.
S. Kümmel, “Charge–Transfer Excitations: A Challenge for Time–Dependent Density Functional Theory That Has Been Met,” Advanced Energy Materials 7, no. 16 (2017): 1700440, https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700440.
J. Authier and P.‐F. Loos, “Dynamical Kernels for Optical Excitations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, no. 18 (2020): 184105, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0028040.
N. T. Maitra, “Charge Transfer in Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, no. 42 (2017): 423001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361‐648x/aa836e.
A. K. Manna, S. Refaely‐Abramson, A. M. Reilly, A. Tkatchenko, J. B. Neaton, and L. Kronik, “Quantitative Prediction of Optical Absorption in Molecular Solids from an Optimally Tuned Screened Range‐Separated Hybrid Functional,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14, no. 6 (2018): 2919–2929, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01058.
A. Mahler, J. Williams, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, “Localized Orbital Scaling Correction for Periodic Systems,” Physical Review B 106, no. 3 (2022): 035147, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.035147.
C. Pemmaraju, “Valence and Core Excitons in Solids from Velocity‐Gauge Real‐Time TDDFT with Range‐Separated Hybrid Functionals: An LCAO Approach,” Computational Condensed Matter 18, no. Physical Review Letter 52 no.12 (2019): e00348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocom.2018.e00348.
Y.‐M. Byun, J. Sun, and C. A. Ullrich, “Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory for Periodic Solids: Assessment of Excitonic Exchange–Correlation Kernels,” Electronic Structure 2, no. 2 (2020): 023002, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ab7b12.
A. Gomez Pueyo, M. A. Marques, A. Rubio, and A. Castro, “Propagators for the Time‐Dependent Kohn–Sham Equations: Multistep, Runge–Kutta, Exponential Runge–Kutta, and Commutator‐Free Magnus Methods,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14, no. 6 (2018): 3040–3052, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00197.
L. Reining, V. Olevano, A. Rubio, and G. Onida, “Excitonic Effects in Solids Described by Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory,” Physical Review Letters 88, no. 6 (2002): 066404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.066404.
S. Botti, A. Fourreau, F. Nguyen, Y.‐O. Renault, F. Sottile, and L. Reining, “Energy Dependence of the Exchange‐Correlation Kernel of Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory: A Simple Model for Solids,” Physical Review B–Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 72, no. 12 (2005): 125203, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125203.
S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, A. Sanna, and E. K. U. Gross, “Bootstrap Approximation for the Exchange‐Correlation Kernel of Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory,” Physical Review Letter 107 (2011): 186401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.186401.
A. Marini, R. Del Sole, and A. Rubio, “Bound Excitons in Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Theory: Optical and Energy‐Loss Spectra,” Physical Review Letters 91, no. 25 (2003): 256402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.256402.
F.‐R. Fan, H. Wu, D. Nabok, et al., “Electric‐Magneto‐Optical Kerr Effect in a Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskite,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, no. 37 (2017): 12883–12886, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b04911.
S. Sagmeister, “Excitonic Effects in Solids: Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory versus the Bethe‐Salpeter Equation,” Ph.D. thesis (2009).
S. Sagmeister and C. Ambrosch‐Draxl, “Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory Versus Bethe–Salpeter Equation: An All‐Electron Study,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 11, no. 22 (2009): 4451–4457, https://doi.org/10.1039/B903676H.
R. R. Pela and C. Draxl, “Speeding Up All‐Electron Real‐Time TDDFT Demonstrated by the exciting Package,” Computer Physics Communications 304 (2024): 109292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109292.
A. Scherrer, F. Agostini, D. Sebastiani, E. Gross, and R. Vuilleumier, “On the Mass of Atoms in Molecules: Beyond the Born‐Oppenheimer Approximation,” Physical Review X 7, no. 3 (2017): 031035, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031035.
B. F. E. Curchod, U. Rothlisberger, and I. Tavernelli, “Trajectory–Based Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Time–Dependent Density Functional Theory,” ChemPhysChem 14, no. 7 (2013): 1314–1340, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201200941.
R. Crespo‐Otero and M. Barbatti, “Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics,” Chemical Reviews 118, no. 15 (2018): 7026–7068, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577.
P. You, D. Chen, C. Lian, C. Zhang, and S. Meng, “First–Principles Dynamics of Photoexcited Molecules and Materials Towards a Quantum Description,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 11, no. 2 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1492.
T. R. Nelson, A. J. White, J. A. Bjorgaard, et al., “Non‐Adiabatic Excited‐State Molecular Dynamics: Theory and Applications for Modeling Photophysics in Extended Molecular Materials,” Chemical Reviews 120, no. 4 (2020): 2215–2287, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00447.
J. C. Tully, “Molecular Dynamics with Electronic Transitions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 93, no. 2 (1990): 1061–1071, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.459170.
A. Ojanperä, V. Havu, L. Lehtovaara, and M. Puska, “Nonadiabatic Ehrenfest Molecular Dynamics within the Projector Augmented‐Wave Method,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 136, no. 14 (2012): 144103, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3700800.
F. Wang, C. Y. Yam, L. Hu, and G. Chen, “Time‐Dependent Density Functional Theory Based Ehrenfest Dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 135, no. 4 (2011): 044126, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3615958.
C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, “Nonlinear Optical Susceptibilities of Semiconductors: Results with a Length‐Gauge Analysis,” Physical Review B 52 (1995): 14636–14645, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.14636.
K. S. Virk and J. E. Sipe, “Semiconductor Optics in Length Gauge: A General Numerical Approach,” Physical Review B 76 (2007): 035213, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.035213.
G. F. Bertsch, J.‐I. Iwata, A. Rubio, and K. Yabana, “Real‐Space, Real‐Time Method for the Dielectric Function,” Physical Review B 62 (2000): 7998–8002, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.7998.
C. D. Pemmaraju, F. D. Vila, J. J. Kas, et al., “Velocity‐Gauge Real‐Time TDDFT Within a Numerical Atomic Orbital Basis Set,” Computer Physics Communications 226 (2018): 30–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.013.
R. Del Sole and R. Girlanda, “Optical Properties of Semiconductors Within the Independent‐Quasiparticle Approximation,” Physical Review B 48 (1993): 11789–11795, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.11789.
D. Sangalli, J. A. Berger, C. Attaccalite, M. Grüning, and P. Romaniello, “Optical Properties of Periodic Systems Within the Current‐Current Response Framework: Pitfalls and Remedies,” Physical Review B 95 (2017): 155203, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155203.
I. Souza, J. Íniguez, and D. Vanderbilt, “Dynamics of Berry‐Phase Polarization in Time‐Dependent Electric Fields,” Physical Review B 69, no. 8 (2004): 085106, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.085106.
C. Attaccalite and M. Grüning, “Nonlinear Optics from an Ab Initio Approach by Means of the Dynamical Berry Phase: Application to Second‐ and Third‐Harmonic Generation in Semiconductors,” Physical Review B 88, no. 23 (2013): 235113, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.235113.
G. A. Baraff and M. Schlüter, “Migration of Interstitials in Silicon,” Physical Review B 30 (1984): 3460–3469, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.30.3460.
D. Tumakov and D. Popova‐Gorelova, “Real‐Time Exciton Dynamics in Two‐Dimensional Materials Under Ultrashort Laser Pulses,” (2026), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.06446.
R. King‐Smith and D. Vanderbilt, “Theory of Polarization of Crystalline Solids,” Physical Review B 47, no. 3 (1993): 1651, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1651.
R. Resta, “Macroscopic Polarization in Crystalline Dielectrics: The Geometric Phase Approach,” Reviews of Modern Physics 66, no. 3 (1994): 899, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.899.
F. Paleari, T. Galvani, H. Amara, F. Ducastelle, A. Molina‐Sánchez, and L. Wirtz, “Excitons in Few‐Layer Hexagonal Boron Nitride: Davydov Splitting and Surface Localization,” 2D Materials 5, no. 4 (2018): 045017, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053‐1583/aad586.
A. Ashoka, R. R. Tamming, A. V. Girija, et al., “Extracting Quantitative Dielectric Properties from Pump‐Probe Spectroscopy,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 1437, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐022‐29112‐y.
A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, M. Colja, et al., “Visible Pump–Mid Infrared Pump–Broadband Probe: Development and Characterization of a Three‐Pulse Setup for Single‐Shot Ultrafast Spectroscopy at 50 kHz,” Review of Scientific Instruments 91 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0016362.
M. Rebholz, T. Ding, V. Despré, et al., “All‐XUV Pump‐Probe Transient Absorption Spectroscopy of the Structural Molecular Dynamics of Di‐Iodomethane,” Physical Review X 11 (2021): 031001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031001.
R. Geneaux, H. J. Marroux, A. Guggenmos, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, “Transient Absorption Spectroscopy Using High Harmonic Generation: A Review of Ultrafast X‐Ray Dynamics in Molecules and Solids,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 377 (2019): 20170463, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0463.
D. Garratt, L. Misiekis, D. Wood, et al., “Ultrafast Exciton Dynamics in Poly(3‐Hexylthiophene) Probed with Time‐Resolved X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy at the Carbon K‐Edge,” 2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro‐Optics Europe and European Quantum Electronics Conference (2021): jsiii_2_4.
D. Garratt, L. Misiekis, D. Wood, et al., “Direct Observation of Ultrafast Exciton Localization in an Organic Semiconductor with Soft X‐Ray Transient Absorption Spectroscopy,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 3414.
P. Hillyard, S. Kuchibhatla, T. Glover, et al., “Atomic Resolution Mapping of the Excited‐State Electronic Structure of Cu2O with Time‐Resolved X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy,” Physical Review B 80, no. 12 (2009): 125210.
T. Palmieri, E. Baldini, A. Steinhoff, et al., “Mahan Excitons in Room‐Temperature Methylammonium Lead Bromide Perovskites,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 850, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐020‐14683‐5.
M. Zürch, H.‐T. Chang, L. J. Borja, et al., “Direct and Simultaneous Observation of Ultrafast Electron and Hole Dynamics in Germanium,” Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 15734, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15734.
D. Garratt, M. Matthews, and J. Marangos, “Toward Ultrafast Soft X‐Ray Spectroscopy of Organic Photovoltaic Devices,” Structural Dynamics 11, no. 1 (2024): 010901, https://doi.org/10.1063/4.0000214.
A. Picón, L. Plaja, and J. Biegert, “Attosecond X‐Ray Transient Absorption in Condensed Matter: A Core‐State‐Resolved Bloch Model,” New Journal of Physics 21, no. 4 (2019): 043029.
G. Cistaro, M. Malakhov, J. J. Esteve‐Paredes, et al., “Theoretical Approach for Electron Dynamics and Ultrafast Spectroscopy (EDUS),” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, no. 1 (2023): 333–348, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00674.
M. Malakhov, G. Cistaro, F. Martín, and A. Picón, “Exciton Migration in Two‐Dimensional Materials,” Communications Physics 7, no. 1 (2024): 196.
T. Hansen, T. Bezriadina, and D. Popova‐Gorelova, “Theoretical Description of Attosecond X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy of Frenkel Exciton Dynamics,” Molecules 28, no. 11 (2023): 4502.
S. Pabst, A. Sytcheva, A. Moulet, A. Wirth, E. Goulielmakis, and R. Santra, “Theory of Attosecond Transient‐Absorption Spectroscopy of Krypton for Overlapping Pump and Probe Pulses,” Physical Review A 86 (2012): 063411, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.063411.
A. S. Skeidsvoll, A. Balbi, and H. Koch, “Time‐Dependent Coupled‐Cluster Theory for Ultrafast Transient‐Absorption Spectroscopy,” Physical Review A 102 (2020): 023115, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023115.
D. Sangalli, M. D'Alessandro, and C. Attaccalite, “Exciton‐Exciton Transitions Involving Strongly Bound Excitons: An Ab Initio Approach,” Physical Review B 107, no. 20 (2023): 205203.
J. Vinson, “Advances in the OCEAN‐3 Spectroscopy Package,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 24, no. 21 (2022): 12787–12803.
I. M. Klein, A. Krotz, W. Lee, J. M. Michelsen, and S. K. Cushing, “Ab Initio Calculations of XUV Ground and Excited States for First‐Row Transition Metal Oxides,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06548.
I. M. Klein, H. Liu, D. Nimlos, A. Krotz, and S. K. Cushing, “Ab Initio Prediction of Excited‐State and Polaron Effects in Transient XUV Measurements of α$\alpha$‐Fe2O3,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 28 (2022): 12834–12841, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c03994.
N. Farahani, “PreXAS‐Exciton,” (2024), https://github.com/nasrinfarahan/PreXAS‐Exciton.
M. Poul, L. Huber, and J. Neugebauer, “Automated Generation of Structure Datasets for Machine Learning Potentials and Alloys,” npj Computational Materials 11 (2025): 174, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐025‐01669‐4.
M. Bonacci, J. Qiao, N. Spallanzani, et al., “Towards High‐Throughput Many‐Body Perturbation Theory: Efficient Algorithms and Automated Workflows,” npj Computational Materials 9 (2023): 74, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐023‐01027‐2.
D. T. Speckhard, M. Kuban, C. T. Koch, J. F. Rudzinski, and C. Draxl, “Workflows in Materials Science,” in Workflow Systems for Large‐Scale Scientific Data Analysis, eds. U. Leser, M. Hilbrich, S. R. Wilkinson, and R. Ferreira da Silva, (Technische Universität Berlin, 2026), Chap. 15, 373–406.
A. Buccheri, F. Peschel, B. Maurer, et al., “excitingtools: An Exciting Workflow Tool,” Journal of Open Source Software 8, no. 85 (2023): 5148, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05148.
A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, et al., “The Atomic Simulation Environment–A Python Library for Working with Atoms,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, no. 27 (2017): 273002.
P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, et al., “Advanced Capabilities for Materials Modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, no. 46 (2017): 465901, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361‐648X/aa8f79.
J. Enkovaara, C. Rostgaard, J. J. Mortensen, et al., “Electronic Structure Calculations with GPAW: A Real‐Space Implementation of the Projector Augmented‐Wave Method,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22, no. 25 (2010): 253202, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953‐8984/22/25/253202.
S. Steensen, T. Thakur, M. Dillenz, et al., “The Interoperability Challenge in DFT Workflows Across Implementations,” (2025), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.11524.
M. Gjerding, T. Skovhus, A. Rasmussen, et al., “Atomic Simulation Recipes: A Python Framework and Library for Automated Workflows,” Computational Materials Science 199 (2021): 110731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110731.
J. J. Mortensen, M. Gjerding, and K. S. Thygesen, “MyQueue: Task and Workflow Scheduling System,” Journal of Open Source Software 5, no. 45 (2020): 1844, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01844.
A. H. Larsen, M. J. Kuisma, T. M. Boland, F. A. Nilsson, and K. S. Thygesen, “Taskblaster: A Generic Framework for Automated Computational Workflows,” Digital Discovery 4 (2025): 2512–2520, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00097A.
A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, et al., “Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation,” APL Materials 1, no. 1 (2013): 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323.
S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, et al., “Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A Robust, Open‐Source Python Library for Materials Analysis,” Computational Materials Science 68 (2013): 314–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028.
A. S. Rosen, M. Gallant, J. George, et al., “Jobflow: Computational Workflows Made Simple,” Journal of Open Source Software 9, no. 93 (2024): 5995, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05995.
A. M. Ganose, H. Sahasrabuddhe, M. Asta, et al., “Atomate2: Modular Workflows for Materials Science,” Digital Discovery 4 (2025): 1944–1973, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00019J.
S. P. Huber, S. Zoupanos, M. Uhrin, et al., “AiiDA 1.0, a Scalable Computational Infrastructure for Automated Reproducible Workflows and Data Provenance,” Scientific Data 7, no. 1 (2020): 300, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐020‐00638‐4.
“Excitingtools PyPI,” https://pypi.org/project/excitingtools/.
R. Golesorkhtabar, P. Pavone, J. Spitaler, P. Puschnig, and C. Draxl, “ElaStic: A Tool for Calculating Second‐Order Elastic Constants from First Principles,” Computer Physics Communications 184, no. 8 (2013): 1861–1873, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.010.
K. Lion, P. Pavone, and C. Draxl, “Elastic Stability of Ga 2 O 3: Addressing the β$\beta$ to α$\alpha$ Phase Transition from First Principles,” Physical Review Materials 6, no. 1 (2022): 013601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.013601.
D. F. Urban, O. Ambacher, and C. Elsässer, “First‐Principles Calculation of Electroacoustic Properties of Wurtzite (Al,Sc)N,” Physical Review B 103 (2021): 115204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.115204.
C.‐J. Yu, I.‐C. Ri, H.‐M. Ri, J.‐H. Jang, Y.‐S. Kim, and U.‐G. Jong, “First‐Principles Study on Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties of Halide Double Perovskite Cs2AgBX6 (B = In, Sb; X = F, Cl, Br, I),” RSC Advances 13 (2023): 16012–16022, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02566G.
E. Jin, I. S. Lee, D. C. Yang, et al., “Origamic Metal‐Organic Framework toward Mechanical Metamaterial,” Nature Communications 14 (2021): 7938, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐023‐43647‐8.
D. T. Speckhard, P. Pavone, S. Bächli, and C. Draxl, “ElaStic2: Automating the Calculation of Second‐ and Third‐Order Elastic Coefficients from First Principles,” (2026), (in preparation).
A. Togo, K. Shinohara, and I. Tanaka, “Spglib: A Software Library for Crystal Symmetry Search,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods 4, no. 1 (2024): 2384822, https://doi.org/10.1080/27660400.2024.2384822.
C. Møller and M. S. Plesset, “Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many‐Electron Systems,” Physical Review 46 (1934): 618–622, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.46.618.
R. J. Bartlett and M. Musiał, “Coupled‐Cluster Theory in Quantum Chemistry,” Reviews of Modern Physics 79 (2007): 291–352, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.291.
F. Furche, “Developing the Random Phase Approximation into a Practical Post‐Kohn–Sham Correlation Model,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 129, no. 11 (2008): 114105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2977789.
T. Gruber, K. Liao, T. Tsatsoulis, F. Hummel, and A. Grüneis, “Applying the Coupled‐Cluster Ansatz to Solids and Surfaces in the Thermodynamic Limit,” Physical Review X 8 (2018): 021043, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021043.
A. Grüneis, K. Kacars, A. Gulans, et al., “CC4S Interfaces,” (2026), (in preparation).
F. Caruso, M. Troppenz, S. Rigamonti, and C. Draxl, “Thermally Enhanced Fröhlich Coupling in SnSe,” Physical Review B 99 (2019): 081104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.081104.
T. J. Scheidemantel, C. Ambrosch‐Draxl, T. Thonhauser, J. V. Badding, and J. O. Sofo, “Transport Coefficients from First‐Principles Calculations,” Physical Review B 68 (2003): 125210, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.125210.
H. J. Kulik, T. Hammerschmidt, J. Schmidt, et al., “Roadmap on Machine Learning in Electronic Structure,” Electronic Structure 4, no. 2 (2022): 023004, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516‐1075/ac572f.
D. Speckhard, T. Bechtel, L. M. Ghiringhelli, M. Kuban, S. Rigamonti, and C. Draxl, “How Big Is Big Data?,” Faraday Discussions 256 (2025): 483–502, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4FD00102H.
S. Curtarolo, W. Setyawan, S. Wang, et al., “AFLOWLIB.ORG: A Distributed Materials Properties Repository from High‐Throughput Ab Initio Calculations,” Computational Materials Science 58 (2012): 227–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.002.
S. Kirklin, J. E. Saal, B. Meredig, et al., “The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): Assessing the Accuracy of DFT Formation Energies,” npj Computational Materials 1, no. 1 (2015): 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10.
J. Schmidt, T. F. Cerqueira, A. H. Romero, et al., “Improving Machine‐Learning Models in Materials Science Through Large Datasets,” Materials Today Physics 48 (2024): 101560, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101560.
C. Draxl and M. Scheffler, “NOMAD: The FAIR Concept for Big Data‐Driven Materials Science,” MRS Bulletin 43, no. 9 (2018): 676–682, https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2018.208.
M. Scheidgen, L. Himanen, A. N. Ladines, et al., “NOMAD: A Distributed Web‐Based Platform for Managing Materials Science Research Data,” Journal of Open Source Software 8, no. 90 (2023): 5388, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05388.
F. Meng, B. Maurer, F. Peschel, et al., “Multicode Benchmark on Simulated Ti K‐Edge X‐Ray Absorption Spectra of Ti‐O Compounds,” Physical Review Materials 8 (2024): 013801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.013801.
L. M. Antunes, K. T. Butler, and R. Grau‐Crespo, “Crystal Structure Generation with Autoregressive Large Language Modeling,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 10570, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐024‐54639‐7.
J. Riebesell, R. E. A. Goodall, P. Benner, et al., “A Framework to Evaluate Machine Learning Crystal Stability Predictions,” Nature Machine Intelligence 7, no. 6 (2025): 836–847, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256‐025‐01055‐1.
T. Xie and J. C. Grossman, “Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for an Accurate and Interpretable Prediction of Material Properties,” Physical Review Letters 120, no. 14 (2018): 145301, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301.
T. Bechtel, D. T. Speckhard, J. Godwin, and C. Draxl, “Band‐Gap Regression with Architecture‐Optimized Message‐Passing Neural Networks,” Chemistry of Materials 37, no. 4 (2025): 1358–1369, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01988.
L. M. Ghiringhelli, J. Vybiral, S. V. Levchenko, C. Draxl, and M. Scheffler, “Big Data of Materials Science: Critical Role of the Descriptor,” Physical Review Letters 114, no. 10 (2015): 105503, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503.
V. Stanev, C. Oses, A. G. Kusne, et al., “Machine Learning Modeling of Superconducting Critical Temperature,” npj Computational Materials 4, no. 1 (2018): 29, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐018‐0085‐8.
H. Hayashi, A. Seko, and I. Tanaka, “Recommender System for Discovery of Inorganic Compounds,” npj Computational Materials 8, no. 1 (2022): 217, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐022‐00899‐0.
S. D. Griesemer, B. Baldassarri, R. Zhu, et al., “Wide‐Ranging Predictions of New Stable Compounds Powered by Recommendation Engines,” Science Advances 11, no. 1 (2025): eadq1431, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq1431.
P.‐P. De Breuck, H.‐C. Wang, G.‐M. Rignanese, S. Botti, and M. A. L. Marques, “Generative AI for Crystal Structures: A Review,” npj Computational Materials 11, no. 1 (2025): 370, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐025‐01881‐2.
J. Schmidt, M. R. G. Marques, S. Botti, and M. A. L. Marques, “Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Solid‐State Materials Science,” npj Computational Materials 5, no. 1 (2019): 83, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐019‐0221‐0.
K. Choudhary, B. DeCost, C. Chen, et al., “Recent Advances and Applications of Deep Learning Methods in Materials Science,” npj Computational Materials 8, no. 1 (2022): 59, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐022‐00734‐6.
M. Cheng, C.‐L. Fu, R. Okabe, et al., “Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Approaches for Materials Design and Discovery,” Nature Materials 25 (2026): 174–190, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563‐025‐02403‐7.
N. R. Knøsgaard and K. S. Thygesen, “Representing Individual Electronic States for Machine Learning GW Band Structures of 2D Materials,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 468, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐022‐28122‐0.
M. Kuban, S. Rigamonti, M. Scheidgen, and C. Draxl, “Density‐of‐States Similarity Descriptor for Unsupervised Learning from Materials Data,” Scientific Data 9, no. 1 (2022): 646, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐022‐01754‐z.
M. Kuban, Š. Gabaj, W. Aggoune, C. Vona, S. Rigamonti, and C. Draxl, “Similarity of Materials and Data‐Quality Assessment by Fingerprinting,” MRS Bulletin 47, no. 10 (2022): 991–999, https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577‐022‐00339‐w.
D. T. Speckhard, C. Carbogno, L. M. Ghiringhelli, S. Lubeck, M. Scheffler, and C. Draxl, “Extrapolation to the Complete Basis‐Set Limit in Density‐Functional Theory Using Statistical Learning,” Physical Review Materials 9, no. 1 (2025): 013801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.013801.
L. M. Ghiringhelli, C. Carbogno, S. Levchenko, et al., “Towards Efficient Data Exchange and Sharing for Big‐Data Driven Materials Science: Metadata and Data Formats,” npj Computational Materials 3, no. 1 (2017): 46, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524‐017‐0048‐5.
P. Kraus, “Extrapolating DFT Toward the Complete Basis Set Limit: Lessons from the PBE Family of Functionals,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 17, no. 9 (2021): 5651–5660.
R. Ouyang, S. Curtarolo, E. Ahmetcik, M. Scheffler, and L. M. Ghiringhelli, “SISSO: A Compressed‐Sensing Method for Identifying the Best Low‐Dimensional Descriptor in an Immensity of Offered Candidates,” Physical Review Materials 2, no. 8 (2018): 083802, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.083802.
T. A. Purcell, M. Scheffler, and L. M. Ghiringhelli, “Recent Advances in the SISSO Method and Their Implementation in the SISSO++ Code,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 159, no. 11 (2023): 114110, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156620.
D. Speckhard, “Uncertainty Quantification and Δ$\Delta$‐Learning via Statistical and Geometric Learning With Density Functional Theory Data,” Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin (2026), (in preparation).
L. Pardini, (2018), Dataset, https://doi.org/10.17172/NOMAD/2018.08.22‐4.
O. Isayev, D. Fourches, E. N. Muratov, et al., “Materials Cartography: Representing and Mining Materials Space Using Structural and Electronic Fingerprints,” Chemistry of Materials 27, no. 3 (2015): 735–743, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm503507h.
M. Kuban, S. Rigamonti, and C. Draxl, “MADAS: a Python Framework for Assessing Similarity in Materials‐Science Data,” Digital Discovery 3, no. 12 (2024): 2448–2457, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dd00258j.
P. Willett, J. M. Barnard, and G. M. Downs, “Chemical Similarity Searching,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 38, no. 6 (1998): 983–996, https://doi.org/10.1021/ci9800211.
J. Sanchez, F. Ducastelle, and D. Gratias, “Generalized Cluster Description of Multicomponent Systems,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 128, no. 1 (1984): 334–350, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378‐4371(84)90096‐7.
J. W. D. Connolly and A. R. Williams, “Density‐Functional Theory Applied to Phase Transformations in Transition‐Metal Alloys,” Physical Review B 27 (1983): 5169–5172, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.27.5169.
M. Troppenz, S. Rigamonti, J. O. Sofo, and C. Draxl, “Partial Order‐Disorder Transition Driving Closure of Band Gap: Example of Thermoelectric Clathrates,” Physical Review Letters 130 (2023): 166402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.166402.
A. Kokalj, “XCrySDen–A New Program for Displaying Crystalline Structures and Electron Densities,” Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 17, no. 3–4 (1999): 176–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1093‐3263(99)00028‐5.
M. Kawamura, “FermiSurfer: Fermi‐Surface Viewer Providing Multiple Representation Schemes,” Computer Physics Communications 239 (2019): 197–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.017.
P. T. Inc., (2015), Collaborative Data Science.
J. Stutz, M. Kuban, P. Pavone, and C. Draxl, (2026), (In Preparation).
J. Kim, A. Gulans, and C. Draxl, “Work‐Function Modification of PEG(Thiol) Adsorbed on the Au(111) Surface: A First‐Principles Study,” Physical Review Materials 4 (2020): 116001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.116001.
Grant Information: 951786 European Commission; 182087777 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; 414984028 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; 424709454 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; 460197019 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; 96237 Volkswagen Foundation; 1.1.1.8/1/24/I/003 Latvijas Universitate; lzp-2024/1-0202 Latvijas Zinātnes Padome; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Bethe‐Salpeter equation; GW approximation; density‐functional perturbation theory; density‐functional theory; excited states; exciting code; many‐body perturbation theory; theoretical spectroscopy; time‐dependent density‐functional theory
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260706 Latest Revision: 20260726
Update Code: 20260726
PubMed Central ID: PMC13335714
DOI: 10.1002/advs.76167
PMID: 42405891
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
Περιγραφή
ISSN:2198-3844
DOI:10.1002/advs.76167