Defining quality of healthcare in Dutch police custody: the development of a conceptual framework for monitoring care quality through a scoping review and expert consultations.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος:	Defining quality of healthcare in Dutch police custody: the development of a conceptual framework for monitoring care quality through a scoping review and expert consultations.
Συγγραφείς:	Zinger ND; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.zinger@nivel.nl., Slev VVN; Department of Forensic Medicine, Public Health Service, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Verheij RA; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tranzo, Tilburg, The Netherlands.; Health Care Institute Netherlands, Diemen, Netherlands., Ramerman L; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Bos I; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Kringos DS; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Global Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Πηγή:	BMC public health [BMC Public Health] 2026 Jul 02; Vol. 26 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jul 02.
Τύπος έκδοσης:	Journal Article; Scoping Review
Γλώσσα:	English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού:	Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):	Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH):	Quality of Health Care/standards , Police, Humans ; Netherlands ; Health Services for Prisoners
Περίληψη:	Background: Individuals in police custody may require medical attention, yet little is known about the quality of care in police custody. Research is lacking on appropriate standards and indicators for measuring care quality. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework to identify key aspects for measuring the quality of care in police custody in the Netherlands. Methods: A scoping review supplemented by expert consultations was conducted to gather information on health needs and quality of care in short-term police custody settings. Searches were performed across seven electronic databases (Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Criminal Justice Abstracts, PiCarta, and Cochrane) for articles published in English or Dutch between 2008 and February 2023, and were supplemented with Dutch documents of medical guidelines, protocols, work instructions, and additional grey literature. An initial conceptual framework was developed from the literature review and author expertise, which was subsequently discussed and validated by field experts through two expert consultation group meetings. Results: This study included 69 scientific articles, 17 medical guidelines, protocols and work instructions, and 12 reports, alongside consultation with 27 experts. The resulting conceptual framework applies a structure-process-outcome model to evaluate the care quality in police custody, organized into 14 domains. At the structure level, it includes the scope and nature of care demand, (healthcare) staff, the legal framework, quality assurance, infrastructure and (medical) resources, and funding. The process level covers triage and access to healthcare, detection of care needs, continuity of healthcare information, coordination of care, general healthcare provision, and healthcare provision for common needs. The outcome level addresses effectiveness and health outcomes, and satisfaction. These domains are further classified into 48 subdomains. There were no existing indicators identified in the literature to populate the framework. Conclusions: The conceptual framework outlines key domains for measuring quality of care in Dutch police custody. Future research will be necessary to populate the framework with indicators to monitor quality of care and support improvement efforts tailored to the needs of specific stakeholders. The operationalization and implementation of the framework will be vital for improving the care provided within police custody. (© 2026. The Author(s).)
Competing Interests:	Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved as exempt from the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Amsterdam University Medical Centers (reference number W22_437 #22.515). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References:	Abbing HR. Prisoners right to healthcare, a European perspective. Eur J Health Law. 2013;20(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341251 . (PMID: 10.1163/15718093-1234125123544314) Gatherer A, Enggist S, Møller L. The essentials about prisons and health. In: Enggist S, Møller L, Galea G, Udesen C, eds. Prisons and Health. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe [online]; 2014. pp. 1-5. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/128603 . Accessed 13 Mar 2023. UN General Assembly, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules): resolution / adopted by the General Assembly, 8 January 2016, A/RES/70/175 [online]. https://www.refworld.org/docid/5698a3a44.html . Accessed 30 Mar 2023. Coyle A. Standards in prison health: the prisoner as a patient. In: Enggist S, Møller L, Galea G, Udesen C, eds. Prisons and Health. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe [online]; 2014. pp. 6-10. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/128603 . Accessed 13 Mar 2023. Hanssens LGM, Vyncke V, Steenberghs E, Willems SJT. The role of socioeconomic status in the relationship between detention and self-rated health among prison detainees in Belgium. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(4):547–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12552 . (PMID: 10.1111/hsc.1255229488259) Kinner SA, Young JT. Understanding and improving the health of people who experience incarceration: an overview and synthesis. Epidemiol Rev. 2018;40(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxx018 . (PMID: 10.1093/epirev/mxx018298603425982728) Chariot P, Heide S. Custody medicine. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;57:55–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.021 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.02129801953) Jacobs P, Lindeman J. Analysis of national law: national norms as regard to access of detained persons to the law and to court: Report on the Netherlands for the EUPRETRIALRIGHTS research project [online]. 2018. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/381846 . Accessed 26 July 2024. de Rechtspraak. If you are suspected of a criminal offence [online]. 2008. https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/If-you-are-suspected-of-a-criminal-offence.pdf . Accessed 26 July 2024. De Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van Der Voort P, Westert G. Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(2):119–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn059 . (PMID: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn05919155288) World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Busse R, Klazinga N, Panteli D et al., eds. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe [online]. 2019. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/327356 . Accessed 30 Mar 2023. Bellass S, Canvin K, McLintock K, Wright N, Farragher T, Foy R, et al. Quality indicators and performance measures for prison healthcare: a scoping review. Health Justice. 2022;10(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-022-00175-9 . (PMID: 10.1186/s40352-022-00175-9352572548902782) The WHO Prison Health Framework: a framework for assessment of prison health system performance. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO [online]. 2021. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289055482 . Accessed 11 Sept 2023. Damberg CL, Shaw R, Teleki SS, Hiatt L, Asch SM. A review of quality measures used by state and federal prisons. J Correct Health Care. 2011;17(2):122–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078345810397605 . (PMID: 10.1177/107834581039760521525116) Thoonen E. Death in State Custody: Obligations to prevent premature death of detainees and to investigate deaths of detainees pursuant to the European Convention on Human Rights: Maklu [online] 2017. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/178407/178596.pdf . Accessed 27 Sept 2023. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 . (PMID: 10.1080/1364557032000119616) Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 . (PMID: 10.7326/M18-085030178033) Dudley L, Mamdoo P, Naidoo S, Muzigaba M. Towards a harmonised framework for developing quality of care indicators for global health: a scoping review of existing conceptual and methodological practices. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022;29(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100469 . Wardrop R, Ranse J, Chaboyer W, Crilly J. Structures, processes and outcomes of health care for people detained in short-term police custody settings: a scoping review. J Forensic Leg Med. 2021;81:102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102198 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2021.10219834147830) Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166–206. (PMID: 10.2307/3348969) Buster M, Dorn T, Ceelen M, Das K. Detainees in Amsterdam, a target population of the Public Mental Health System? J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;25:55–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.015 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.01524931863) Ceelen M, Dorn T, Buster M, Stirbu I, Donker G, Das K. Health-care issues and health-care use among detainees in police custody. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012;19(6):324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.02.012 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.02.01222847049) Coudert C, Vidal C, Lefèvre T, Chariot P. Adolescent arrestees detained in police cells: an observational study in the Paris, France, area. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(4):1251–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1942-1 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00414-018-1942-130324326) Beaufrère A, Belmenouar O, Chariot P. Elderly arrestees in police custody cells: implementation of detention and medical decision on fitness to be detained. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;241:15–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.031 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.03124835030) Beaufrère A, Chariot P. The health of older arrestees in police cells. Age Ageing. 2015;44(4):662–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afv022 . (PMID: 10.1093/ageing/afv02225762802) Chariot P, Lepresle A, Lefèvre T, Boraud C, Barthès A, Tedlaouti M. Alcohol and substance screening and brief intervention for detainees kept in police custody. A feasibility study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;134:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.006 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.00624210771) Chariot P, Beaufrère A, Denis C, Dang C, Vincent R, Boraud C. Detainees in police custody in the Paris, France area: medical data and high-risk situations (a prospective study over 1 year). Int J Legal Med. 2014;128(5):853–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-0990-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00414-014-0990-424671410) Sondhi A, Williams E. Health needs and co-morbidity among detainees in contact with healthcare professionals within police custody across the London Metropolitan Police Service area. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;57:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.012 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.01229801961) Vidal C, Lepresle A, Chariot P. Self-reported mental health issues among arrestees in the Paris, France area. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62(4):947–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13362 . (PMID: 10.1111/1556-4029.1336228568767) van den Hondel KE, Saaltink AL, Bender PPM. Eight years of psychiatric examination of detainees by forensic physicians in the Netherlands. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;44:116–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.10.001 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.10.00127755988) Sirdifield C, Brooker C. Detainees in police custody: results of a health needs assessment in Northumbria, England. Int J Prison Health. 2012;8(2):60–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/17449201211277183 . (PMID: 10.1108/1744920121127718325758017) Fablet D, Chariot P. Children detained in French police cells. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(7):788–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13852 . (PMID: 10.1111/jpc.1385229442389) Vincent R, Beaufrère A, Chariot P. Detainees arrested for the first time in French police stations. J Forensic Leg Med. 2015;31:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.12.017 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.12.01725735776) Payne-James JJ, Green PG, Green N, McLachlan GM, Munro MH, Moore TC. Healthcare issues of detainees in police custody in London, UK. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17(1):11–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2007.10.011 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.10.01120083045) Ogloff J, Warren L, Tye C, Blaher F, Thomas S. Psychiatric symptoms and histories among people detained in police cells. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011;46(9):871–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0256-5 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00127-010-0256-520571755) Dorn T, Janssen A, de Keijzer JC, van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Reijnders UJL, Luitse JSK, et al. Hospital referral of detainees during police custody in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;57:82–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.025 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.02529801958) Sturgiss EA, Parekh V. The work of forensic physicians with police detainees in the Canberra City Watchhouse. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(2):57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.11.014 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.11.01421315298) Gandon V, Outh-Gauer S, Chariot P. The health of female arrestees in police cells: a descriptive study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;57:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.026 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.02629801959) Verdier E, Denis C, Bourokba N, Chauvin P, Chariot P. Social vulnerabilities and health conditions of arrestees in the Greater Paris area, France, in 2013: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(3):897–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1727-y . (PMID: 10.1007/s00414-017-1727-y29090334) McKinnon I, Grubin D. Health screening in police custody. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17(4):209–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks027 . (PMID: 10.1093/eurpub/cks027203823577618458) Gérardin M, Guigand G, Wainstein L, Jolliet P, Victorri-Vigneau C, Clément R. Evaluation of problematic psychoactive substances use in people placed in police custody. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;49:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.05.002 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.05.00228494249) Gahide S, Lepresle A, Boraud C, Mahindhoratep TS, Chariot P. Reported assaults and observed injuries in detainees held in police custody. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;223(1–3):184–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.031 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.03122980144) Dorn T, Ceelen M, Buster M, Stirbu I, Donker G, Das K. Mental health and health-care use of detainees in police custody. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;26:24–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.06.005 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.06.00525066169) McKinnon I, Hayes A, Grubin D. Health characteristics of older police custody detainees in London, UK. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2017;28(3):331–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1280071 . (PMID: 10.1080/14789949.2017.1280071) Carter J, Mayhew J. Audit of hospital transfers January to March 2006 from Sussex police custody. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17(1):38–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2009.07.014 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2009.07.01420083049) Samele C, McKinnon I, Brown P, Srivastava S, Arnold A, Hallett N, et al. The prevalence of mental illness and unmet needs of police custody detainees. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2021;31(2):80–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2193 . (PMID: 10.1002/cbm.219333818834) McKinnon IG, Grubin D. Health screening of people in police custody--evaluation of current police screening procedures in London, UK. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks027 . (PMID: 10.1093/eurpub/cks02722539630) Baksheev GN, Thomas SDM, Ogloff JRP. Psychopathology in police custody: the role of importation, deprivation and interaction models. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2012;11(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.667512 . (PMID: 10.1080/14999013.2012.667512) Magee LA, Fortenberry JD, Rosenman M, Aalsma MC, Gharbi S, Wiehe SE. Two-year prevalence rates of mental health and substance use disorder diagnoses among repeat arrestees. Health Justice. 2021;9(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-020-00126-2 . (PMID: 10.1186/s40352-020-00126-2334110677789256) Morgan VA, Morgan F, Valuri G, Ferrante A, Castle D, Jablensky A. A whole-of-population study of the prevalence and patterns of criminal offending in people with schizophrenia and other mental illness. Psychol Med. 2013;43(9):1869–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002887 . (PMID: 10.1017/S003329171200288723234722) Brooker C, Tocque K, Mitchell D, Pearce M. Police custody in the north of England: Findings from a health needs assessment in Durham and Darlington. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;57:91–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.013 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.01329801960) Bennett T, Holloway K. Identifying and preventing health problems among young drug‐misusing offenders. Health Educ. 2008;108(3):247–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/09654280810867114 . (PMID: 10.1108/09654280810867114) Nwafor CC, Nwafor NN, Eziagu UB, Owobu CI. Retrospective post mortem study of custodial deaths in Uyo, South-South, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2021;38(7):689–94. (PMID: 34331527) Mahamad Arif ANF, Syed Alwee Al’aidrus SS, Shafee MS, Mohd Nor F. A 15-year study of death in custody in Tuanku Ja’afar Hospital Seremban. Malays J Pathol. 2021;43(2):303–10. (PMID: 34448794) Vohra VK, Singh D, Malik S. custodial death: a two years prospective study. Medico-Legal update. 2016;16(1). https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-1283.2016.00013.X . Kuchewar SV, Bhosle SH, Shrigiriwar MB, Padole TO. Custody-related deaths in Maharashtra state of India - analysis of autopsies performed at a medical teaching institute during the period 2000-2018. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020;70:101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101915 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.10191532090970) Heide S, Kleiber M, Hanke S, Stiller D. Deaths in German police custody. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(6):597–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp084 . (PMID: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp08419556385) Thoonen E, Kubat B, Duijst W. Deaths under the responsibility of the Dutch police: Lessons to be learned. Police J. 2015;88(2):123–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X15585248 . (PMID: 10.1177/0032258X15585248) Cummins I. A place of safety? Self-harming behaviour in police custody. J Adult Prot. 2008;10(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/14668203200800006 . (PMID: 10.1108/14668203200800006) Leese M, Russell S. Mental health, vulnerability and risk in police custody. J Adult Prot. 2017;19(5):274–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-03-2017-0006 . (PMID: 10.1108/JAP-03-2017-0006) Chariot P, Martel P, Penneau M, Debout M. Guidelines for doctors attending detainees in police custody: A consensus conference in France. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122(1):73–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0157-7 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00414-007-0157-717285321) Heide S, Stiller D, Lessig R, Lautenschläger C, Birkholz M, Früchtnicht W. Medical examination of fitness for police custody in two large German towns. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0557-6 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00414-011-0557-621384151) Walker S, Higgs P, Stoové M, Wilson M. “They just don’t care about us!”: police custody experiences for young men with histories of injecting drug use. Aust N Z J Criminol. 2019;53(1):102–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865819868004 . (PMID: 10.1177/0004865819868004) Struijk S. De Commissie van Toezicht Politiecellen: een onmisbare luis in de pels van de arrestantenzorg. Sancties Tijdschrift over Straffen en Maatregelen. 2012;2012(4):187–96. Wright R, Barclay J, Frier B, Plastow B. Management of diabetes in police custody: a liaison initiative between a diabetes specialist service and the police force. Pract Diabetes Int. 2008;25(2):72–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.1209 . (PMID: 10.1002/pdi.1209) Arends MT, De Haan HA, Van ’t Hoff GI. First Dutch national guidelines--pharmacological care for detained opioid addicts. Int J Prison Health. 2009;5(4):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449200903343167 . (PMID: 10.1080/1744920090334316725757520) Webb V, Stark M, Cutts A, Tait S, Randle J, Green G. One model of healthcare provision lessons learnt through clinical governance. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17(7):368–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.05.011 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.05.01120851355) Rekrut-Lapa T, Lapa A. Health needs of detainees in police custody in England and Wales. Literature review. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;27:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.08.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.08.00425287804) McKenna D, Murphy H, Rosenbrier C, Soulsby A, Lyall A, Keown P, et al. Referrals to a mental health criminal justice Liaison and diversion team in the North East of England. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2019;30(2):301–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2018.1544266 . (PMID: 10.1080/14789949.2018.1544266) Visscher AJ, van de Kraats GB, van der Goot B, Braam AW. Bad or mad? Thinking in terms of “bad or mad” and the (possible) prosecution of offenses committed by the mentally ill. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2015;57(7):480–8. (PMID: 26189416) Senior J, Noga H, Shaw J. When two worlds collide: a twenty-first century approach to mental health and policing. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014;24(2):81–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1897 . (PMID: 10.1002/cbm.189724719337) Ma Y, Du C, Cai T, Han Q, Yuan H, Luo T, et al. Barriers to community-based drug dependence treatment: implications for police roles, collaborations and performance indicators. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(4 Suppl 3):20879. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.4.20879 . (PMID: 10.7448/IAS.19.4.20879274357144951535) Dembo R, Faber J, Cristiano J, DiClemente RJ, Krupa JM, Terminello A, et al. Health risk behavior among justice involved male and female youth: exploratory, multi-group latent class analysis. Subst Use Misuse. 2017;52(13):1751–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1310246 . (PMID: 10.1080/10826084.2017.131024628742418) Bendelow G, Warrington CA, Jones AM, Markham S. Police detentions of 'mentally disordered persons': a multi-method investigation of section 136 use in Sussex. Med Sci Law. 2019;59(2):95-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419830882 . Thomas A, Forrester-Jones R. Understanding the Changing Patterns of Behaviour Leading to Increased Detentions by the Police under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983. Policing: a journal of policy and practice. 2019;13(2):134-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay011 . Hopkin G, Chaplin L, Slade K, Craster L, Valmaggia L, Samele C, et al. Differences between homeless and non-homeless people in a matched sample referred for mental health reasons in police custody. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(6):576–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020920904 . (PMID: 10.1177/002076402092090432438844) Chariot P, Briffa H, Lepresle A, Lefèvre T, Boraud C. Fitness for detention in police custody: a practical proposal for improving the format of medical opinion. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(8):980–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.07.006 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.07.00624237804) Bisseling E, Braam A. Tijdslimieten in de samenwerking tussen politie en crisisdienst: een praktijkevaluatie in Utrecht. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;2009/9:687–92. Mahindhoratep TS, Lepresle A, Chiadmi F, Schlatter J, Boraud C, Chariot P. Police custody following driving under the influence of cannabis: a prospective study. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231(1–3):92–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.030 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.03023890621) Rees G. Getting the sergeants on your side: the importance of interpersonal relationships and cultural interoperability for generating interagency collaboration between nurses and the police in custody suites. Sociol Health Illn. 2020;42(1):111–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12989 . (PMID: 10.1111/1467-9566.1298931515831) Wainwright A, Mojtahedi D. An examination of stigmatising attributions about mental illness amongst police custody staff. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020;68:101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101522 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.10152232033693) Williams E, Norman J, Sondhi A. Understanding risks: practitioner’s perceptions of the lottery of mental healthcare available for detainees in custody. Policing. 2019;13(4):441–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax067 . (PMID: 10.1093/police/pax067) Heide S, Chariot P, Green P, Fabian J, Payne-James J. Healthcare and forensic medical aspects of police detainees, suspects and complainants in Europe. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;57:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.022 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.02229801954) Scott D, McGilloway S, Donnelly M. The mental health needs of women detained in police custody. J Ment Health. 2009;18(2):144–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230701879193 . (PMID: 10.1080/09638230701879193) GGD Amsterdam, Politie Amsterdam-Amelstelland, Ambulance Amsterdam, Spoedeisende Psychiatrie Amsterdam, Event Medical Services (EMS), Dorn T, eds. Richtlijn Excited Delirium Syndroom. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: GGD Amsterdam [online] 2013. https://www.ggd.amsterdam.nl/forensische-geneeskunde/richtlijn-excited-delirium-syndroom/ . Accessed 25 July 2024. Inspectie Justitie en Veiligheid, Inspectie Gezondheidszorg. Toetsingskaders IVenJ en IGZ – Onderzoek Arrestantenzorg [online]. 2014. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/toetsingskaders/2014/06/20/toetsingskader-arrestantenzorg-juni-2014 . Accessed 25 Apr 2024. Forensisch Medisch Genootschap. Richtlijn Forensische Geneeskunde Beoordeling intoxicaties bij ingesloten personen [online]. 2019. https://www.forgen.nl/file/8010d40f9aaf09873d9aaacb0cf6a00a . Politie, Wierda H, eds. Landelijk Reglement Arrestantenzorg Politie; voor politiecellen en ophoudkamers [online]. 2019. https://www.toezichtarrestantenzorg.nl/regelgeving/ . Accessed 3 Jan 2024. GGD Amsterdam, Politie Amsterdam-Amstelland, Ambulance Amsterdam, Spoedeisende Psychiatrie Amsterdam, Event Medical Service, Dorn T, eds. Richtlijn verwarde personen - Inclusief GHB-onthoudingsdelier en Excited Delirium Syndroom (EDS) [online]. 2016. https://www.ggd.amsterdam.nl/forensische-geneeskunde/richtlijn-excited-delirium-syndroom/ . Accessed 25 July 2024. Forensisch Medisch Genootschap. Richtlijn Forensische Geneeskunde - Behandeling drugsgebruik in de politiecel m.u.v. opiaten en alcohol [online]. 2011. https://www.forgen.nl/file/9cfd0bca0a798ba5e04c6b75ae0057e7 . Accessed 25 July 2024. Forensisch Medisch Genootschap. Richtlijn Forensische Geneeskunde - Behandeling opiaatverslaafden in politiecellen [online]. 2016. https://www.forgen.nl/file/f89c8d969bf4c7a00533aaf50d427c32 . Accessed 25 July 2024. medTzorg, Peeters T, eds. Richtlijn Verslaving [online]. 2021. https://medtzorg.nl/richtlijnen/ . Accessed 25 July 2024. Nederlands Instituut voor Forensische Psychiatrie en Psychologie, van Bergen AG, Westra M, eds. Handreiking het bepalen van GHB-afhankelijkheid bij justitiabelen en de samenwerking rondom plaatsing in een penitentiaire inrichting [online]. 2022. https://www.nifp.nl/documenten/publicaties/2022/07/28/het-bepalen-van-ghb-afhankelijkheid-bij-justitiabelen . medTzorg, Peeters T, eds. Richtlijn Minderjarigen in gesloten setting [online]. 2020. https://medtzorg.nl/richtlijnen/ . Accessed 25 July 2024. Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Noord-Nederland [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-noord-nederland . Accessed 30 July 2024. Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Limburg [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-limburg . Accessed 30 July 2024. Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Arrestantenzorg Nederland - Landelijke rapportage [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/arrestantenzorg-nederland---landelijke-rapportage . Accessed 30 July 2024. Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Den Haag [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-den-haag . Accessed 30 July 2024. de Nederlandse ggz. Aangepast convenant samenwerking politie en ggz (2012): Samenvatting van aangepaste afspraken over samenwerking politie en ggz bij personen met onbegrepen gedrag [online]. 2023. https://cms.denederlandseggz.nl/assets/common/Factsheet-samenwerking-politie-en-ggz-update-n%C3%A1-convenant-2012-DEF.pdf . Accessed 30 July 2024. Miles T, Webb V, Kevern P, Shibchurn R, Bird T, Finch G. Custody early warning scores; do they predict patient deterioration in police custody? J Forensic Leg Med. 2020;76:102069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102069 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.10206933099124) Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Rotterdam [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-rotterdam . Accessed 30 July 2024. Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Zeeland-West-Brabant [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-zeeland-west-brabant . Accessed 30 July 2024. McKinnon IG, Thomas SD, Noga HL, Senior J. Police custody health care: a review of health morbidity, models of care and innovations within police custody in the UK, with international comparisons. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2016;9:213–26. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S61536 . (PMID: 10.2147/RMHP.S61536276953735028165) Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Amsterdam [online]. 2015. Accessed 30 July 2024. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-amsterdam . Lepresle A, Mahindhoratep TS, Chiadmi F, Schlatter J, Boraud C, Chariot P. Police custody following drink-driving: a prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;126(1–2):51–4. (PMID: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.04.01322592140) Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Midden-Nederland [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-midden-nederland . Accessed 30 July 2024. Sufrin CB, Tulsky JP, Goldenson J, Winter KS, Cohan DL. Emergency contraception for newly arrested women: evidence for an unrecognized public health opportunity. J Urban Health. 2010;87(2):244–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9418-8 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11524-009-9418-820012702) Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Noord-Holland [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-noord-holland . Accessed 30 July 2024. Inspectie Veiligheid en Justitie, Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Inspectie Jeugdzorg. Deelverslag Arrestantenzorg - Eenheid Oost-Brabant [online]. 2015. https://www.inspectie-jenv.nl/Publicaties/rapporten/2016/01/26/deelverslag-arrestantenzorg---eenheid-oost-brabant . Accessed 30 July 2024. Kennedy KM, Payne-James GJ, Payne-James JJ, Green PG. Complaints against health care professionals providing police custodial and forensic medical/health care services in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - what do we know? Med Sci Law. 2022;62(3):168–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024211053977 . (PMID: 10.1177/0025802421105397734796760) Batenburg R, Hansen J. Inventarisatie forensisch medisch onderzoek en medische arrestantenzorg in Nederland: rapport I voor de Commissie Hoes. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nivel [online] 2017. https://www.nivel.nl/nl/publicatie/inventarisatie-forensisch-medisch-onderzoek-en-medische-arrestantenzorg-nederland . Accessed 30 July 2024. Carroll M, Sutherland G, Kemp-Casey A, Kinner SA. Agreement between self-reported healthcare service use and administrative records in a longitudinal study of adults recently released from prison. Health Justice. 2016;4(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-016-0042-x . (PMID: 10.1186/s40352-016-0042-x27942429) Kroneman M, Verheij R, Tacken M, van der Zee J. Urban–rural health differences: primary care data and self reported data render different results. Health Place. 2010;16(5):893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.015 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.01520493756) Del Boca FK, Noll JA. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction. 2000;95(Suppl3):S347–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652140020004278 . (PMID: 10.1080/0965214002000427811132362) Baker M, Stabile M, Deri C. What do self-reported, objective, measures of health measure? J Hum Resour. 2004;39(4):1067–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3559039 . (PMID: 10.2307/3559039) Verheij RA, Curcin V, Delaney BC, McGilchrist MM. Possible sources of bias in primary care electronic health record data use and reuse. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e185. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9134 . (PMID: 10.2196/jmir.9134298440105997930) Butler B. Health information exchange between jails and their communities: a bridge that is needed under healthcare reform. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014;11(Winter):1b. (PMID: 248088093995481) Glowalla G, Subbian V. Data sharing between jail and community health systems: missing links and lessons for re-entry success. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022;290:47–51. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220029 . (PMID: 10.3233/SHTI22002935672968) Eden KB, Totten AM, Kassakian SZ, Gorman PN, McDonagh MS, Devine B, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;88:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004268787614778080) Dirkzwager AJE, Verheij R, Nieuwbeerta P, Groenewegen P. Mental and physical health problems before and after detention: A matched cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Europe. 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100154 . Adwoa P, Arabella S, Alison B, Jillian Catherine M, William JS, Kath W, et al. Interagency collaboration models for people with mental ill health in contact with the police: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e019312. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 . (PMID: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312295883235875664) Noga HL, Walsh ECL, Shaw JJ, Senior J. The development of a mental health screening tool and referral pathway for police custody. Eur J Public Health. 2014;25(2):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku160 . (PMID: 10.1093/eurpub/cku16025223434) Blackaby J, Byrne J, Bellass S, Canvin K, Foy R. Interventions to improve the implementation of evidence-based healthcare in prisons: a scoping review. Health Justice. 2023;11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-022-00200-x . (PMID: 10.1186/s40352-022-00200-x365951419809036) Barbazza E, Klazinga NS, Kringos DS. Exploring the actionability of healthcare performance indicators for quality of care: a qualitative analysis of the literature, expert opinion and user experience. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(12):1010–20. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011247339630728606459) Mintzberg H. Managing the myths of health care. World Hosp Health Serv. 2012;48(3):4–7. (PMID: 23342753) Foley TJ, Vale L. What role for learning health systems in quality improvement within healthcare providers? Learn Health Syst. 2017;1(4):e10025. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10025 . (PMID: 10.1002/lrh2.10025312455676508561)
Grant Information:	10480012140003 Netherlands ZONMW_ ZonMw
Contributed Indexing:	Keywords: Incarceration; Police custody; Quality of care
Entry Date(s):	Date Created: 20260703 Date Completed: 20260714 Latest Revision: 20260726
Update Code:	20260726
PubMed Central ID:	PMC13359842
DOI:	10.1186/s12889-026-27949-2
PMID:	42393609
Βάση Δεδομένων:	MEDLINE

Full Text Finder

Περιγραφή
ISSN:	1471-2458
DOI:	10.1186/s12889-026-27949-2