Academic Journal

Facilitators of and barriers to high-quality care at end-of-life: experiences of terminally ill patients and their relatives.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Facilitators of and barriers to high-quality care at end-of-life: experiences of terminally ill patients and their relatives.
Συγγραφείς: Jensen HI; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, DK-7100, Denmark. hanne.irene.jensen@rsyd.dk.; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sygehusvej 24, Kolding, DK-6000, Denmark. hanne.irene.jensen@rsyd.dk.; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, DK-5230, Denmark. hanne.irene.jensen@rsyd.dk., Jørgensen L; Specialised Palliative Care Team, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark., Bertelsen L; Specialised Palliative Care Team, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark., Bruun H; Department of Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Πηγή: BMC palliative care [BMC Palliat Care] 2026 May 21; Vol. 25 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 May 21.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088685 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-684X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1472684X NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Palliat Care Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2002-
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Terminal Care*/standards , Terminal Care*/psychology , Terminal Care*/methods , Terminally Ill*/psychology , Family*/psychology , Quality of Health Care*/standards, Interviews as Topic/methods ; Humans ; Female ; Male ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Qualitative Research ; Aged, 80 and over ; Adult
Περίληψη: Background: To ensure coherence and continuity of care for individual patients, it is necessary to improve collaboration between healthcare systems as well as between healthcare systems and patients. The objective of the study was to gain knowledge about the experiences of terminally ill patients and their relatives with the healthcare system to identify facilitators of and barriers to high-quality care in the last stage of patients' lives.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with terminally ill patients and their relatives. The data were analysed using content analysis.
Results: Six patients and four relatives participated in the study. The analysis identified five themes: (1) continuity, coherence and timing: significance and challenges; (2) conversations about end-of-life: the need for an individual approach; (3) being seen and trusted; (4) "small" things may have a great significance; and (5) relatives have their own needs. Among patients and relatives who felt that the healthcare system had the overall overview and was present with the necessary help at the right time, the healthcare system provided a secure frame within which they could devote their energy to dealing with the impending farewell and trying to foster a high quality of life every day. However, in cases in which the healthcare system was not perceived to have the overall overview, patients and relatives became insecure and had to exert energy and effort to navigate the healthcare system themselves. One of the most important things for patients and relatives was that there was clear agreement regarding who was responsible for what and where they could call for help.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of continuity of care, an individual approach and the need to trust the patients. Adherence to these findings can help healthcare professionals and institutions improve end-of-life care.
(© 2026. The Author(s).)
Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Southern Denmark (22-77189) and was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (22-55484). The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References: Bernard M, Braunschweig G, Fegg MJ, Borasio GD. Meaning in life and perceived quality of life in Switzerland: results of a representative survey in the German, French and Italian regions. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:160. (PMID: 10.1186/s12955-015-0353-y264162344587717)
Suhonen R, Valimaki M, Leino-Kilpi H. Individualized care, quality of life and satisfaction with nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(3):283–92. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03391.x15811107)
WHO. Palliative care for older people; Better practices. 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289002240 (accessed 14 November 2025).
Calvache JA, Moreno S, Prue G, Reid J, Ahmedzai SH, Arango-Gutierrez A, et al. Knowledge of end-of-life wishes by physicians and family caregivers in cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):140. (PMID: 10.1186/s12904-021-00823-1345075678434705)
Tuesen LD, Agard AS, Bulow HH, Fromme EK, Jensen HI. Decision-making conversations for life-sustaining treatment with seriously ill patients using a Danish version of the US POLST: a qualitative study of patient and physician experiences. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022:40(1):57–66.
Tuesen LD, Bülow HH, Ågård AS, Strøm SM, Fromme E, Jensen HI. Patient–physician conversations about lifesustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments. Palliat Supportive Care. 2023;21(1):20–6.
Houben CHM, Spruit MA, Groenen MTJ, Wouters EFM, Janssen DJA. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(7):477–89. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.00824598477)
Neergaard MA, Skorstengaard MH, Brogaard T, Bendstrup E, Lokke A, Aagaard S, et al. Advance care planning and longer survival in the terminally ill: a randomised controlled trial unexpected finding. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020;10(2):221–2. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-00190631822479)
van Melle MA, Erkelens DC, van Stel HF, de Wit NJ, Zwart DL. Pilot study on identification of incidents in healthcare transitions and concordance between medical records and patient interview data. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011368. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011368275435885013350)
Karam M, Brault I, Van Durme T, Macq J. Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:70–83. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.00229202313)
De Regge M, De Pourcq K, Meijboom B, Trybou J, Mortier E, Eeckloo K. The role of hospitals in bridging the care continuum: a systematic review of coordination of care and follow-up for adults with chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):550. (PMID: 10.1186/s12913-017-2500-0287938935551032)
Davis KM, Eckert MC, Hutchinson A, Harmon J, Sharplin G, Shakib S, et al. Effectiveness of nurse-led services for people with chronic disease in achieving an outcome of continuity of care at the primary-secondary healthcare interface: A quantitative systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;121:103986. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.10398634242979)
Tuly SR, Ranjbari S, Murat EA, Arslanturk S. From Silos to Synthesis: A comprehensive review of domain adaptation strategies for multi-source data integration in healthcare. Comput Biol Med. 2025;191:110108. (PMID: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.11010840209575)
Bull C, Byrnes J, Mulhern B. We Respect Their Autonomy and Dignity, But How Do We Value Patient-Reported Experiences? MDM Policy Pract. 2018;3(2):2381468318807458. (PMID: 10.1177/2381468318807458304504116236495)
Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e001570.
Bjork E, Thompson W, Ryg J, Gaardboe O, Jorgensen TL, Lundby C. Patient Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3136–47. (PMID: 10.1007/s11606-021-06973-5343389788481511)
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.00114769454)
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. (PMID: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm04217872937)
Klarare A, Rasmussen BH, Fossum B, Furst CJ, Hansson J, Hagelin CL. Experiences of security and continuity of care: Patients’ and families’ narratives about the work of specialized palliative home care teams. Palliat Support Care. 2017;15(2):181–9. (PMID: 10.1017/S147895151600054727443410)
Chen AY, Chen B, Kuo CC. Better continuity of care improves the quality of end-of-life care among elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19716. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-020-76707-w331843747661719)
Khatri R, Endalamaw A, Erku D, Wolka E, Nigatu F, Zewdie A, et al. Continuity and care coordination of primary health care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):750. (PMID: 10.1186/s12913-023-09718-83744300610339603)
Reeves E, Liebig B, Schweighoffer R. Care Coordination in Palliative Home Care: Who Plays the Key Role? Int J Integr Care. 2020;20(3):15. (PMID: 10.5334/ijic.5466330417327528663)
Reeves E, Schweighoffer R, Liebig B. An investigation of the challenges to coordination at the interface of primary and specialized palliative care services in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(1):21–7. (PMID: 10.1080/13561820.2020.172408532101081)
Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327(7425):1219–21. (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.121914630762274066)
Ohinata H, Aoyama M, Miyashita M. Complexity in the context of palliative care: a systematic review. Ann Palliat Med. 2022;11(10):3231–46. (PMID: 10.21037/apm-22-62336226646)
Motamedi M, Brandenburg C, Bakhit M, Michaleff ZA, Albarqouni L, Clark J, et al. Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):729. (PMID: 10.1186/s12877-021-02680-2349301778690959)
Krikorian A, Maldonado C, Pastrana T. Patient’s Perspectives on the Notion of a Good Death: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;59(1):152–64. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.03331404643)
Smith MA, Brøchner AC, Nedergaard HK, Jensen HI. "Gives peace of mind " - Relatives’ perspectives of end-of-life conversations. Palliat Support Care. 2024;22(5):1209–16.
Starr LT, Ulrich CM, Corey KL, Meghani SH. Associations Among End-of-Life Discussions, Health-Care Utilization, and Costs in Persons With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019;36(10):913–26. (PMID: 10.1177/1049909119848148310721096711813)
Brennan N, Barnes R, Calnan M, Corrigan O, Dieppe P, Entwistle V. Trust in the health-care provider-patient relationship: a systematic mapping review of the evidence base. Int J Qual Health Care. 2013;25(6):682–8. (PMID: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt06324068242)
Rajcan L, Lockhart JS, Goodfellow LM. Generating Oncology Patient Trust in the Nurse: An Integrative Review. West J Nurs Res. 2020;43(1):85–98. (PMID: 10.1177/019394592093033732493142)
Weber LR. Measuring trust in one’s physician: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(5):e0303840. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.03038403875882911101118)
Lau C, Meaney C, Morgan M, Cook R, Zimmermann C, Wentlandt K. Disparities in access to palliative care facilities for patients with and without cancer: A retrospective review. Palliat Med. 2021;35(6):1191–201. (PMID: 10.1177/02692163211007387338558868189004)
Chen ML. Inequity of Palliative Care for Non-Cancer Patients. J Nurs Res. 2019;27(2):1–2. (PMID: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000324308890976369878)
Tobin J, Rogers A, Winterburn I, Tullie S, Kalyanasundaram A, Kuhn I, et al. Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022;12(2):142–51. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-00271933608254)
Benzein E, Olin C, Persson C. You put it all together’ - families’ evaluation of participating in Family Health Conversations. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29(1):136–44. (PMID: 10.1111/scs.1214124720612)
Gambhir HS, Goodrick S, Dhamoon A, Kaul V. Impact of Structured and Scheduled Family Meetings on Satisfaction in Patients Admitted to Hospitalist Service. J Patient Exp. 2021;8:23743735211002748. (PMID: 10.1177/23743735211002748341794128205387)
Gervais C, Verdon C, deMontigny F, Leblanc L, Lalande D. Creating a space to talk about one’s experience of suffering: families’ experience of a family nursing intervention. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(2):446–55. (PMID: 10.1111/scs.1274831487072)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: End-of-life, palliative care, quality of life, relatives, semistructured interviews, terminally ill patients
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260522 Date Completed: 20260715 Latest Revision: 20260726
Update Code: 20260726
PubMed Central ID: PMC13371511
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-026-02155-4
PMID: 42169096
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
Περιγραφή
ISSN:1472-684X
DOI:10.1186/s12904-026-02155-4