Academic Journal
Agroecological performance of quinoa-based cropping systems in Saharan drylands: Effects of seed rate, intercropping, and rotation on system productivity and soil fertility.
| Τίτλος: | Agroecological performance of quinoa-based cropping systems in Saharan drylands: Effects of seed rate, intercropping, and rotation on system productivity and soil fertility. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Jouira HB; Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia., Goussi R; Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia., Youssef RB; Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia., Zidane OD; Saharan Bio-Resources Laboratory, Safeguarding and Valorization, Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University, Ouargla, Algeria., Khaled H; Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of El Oued, El Oued, Algeria., Manaa A; Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia. |
| Πηγή: | Journal of the science of food and agriculture [J Sci Food Agric] 2026 Aug 15; Vol. 106 (10), pp. 6126-6143. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Apr 21. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article; Evaluation Study |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0376334 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-0010 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00225142 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Sci Food Agric Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: <2005-> : Chichester, West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons Original Publication: London, Society of Chemical Industry. |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Chenopodium quinoa*/growth & development , Chenopodium quinoa*/genetics , Chenopodium quinoa*/chemistry , Chenopodium quinoa*/metabolism , Seeds*/growth & development , Seeds*/chemistry , Seeds*/metabolism , Seeds*/genetics , Soil*/chemistry , Crop Production*/methods, Avena/growth & development ; Avena/metabolism ; Triticum/growth & development ; Triticum/metabolism ; Tunisia ; Agroecology ; Desert Climate |
| Περίληψη: | Background: Saharan dryland systems in southern Tunisia are characterized by severe environmental constraints, including saline and waterlogged soils due to poor drainage and compacted textures. Agroecological practices such as intercropping and crop rotation offer sustainable alternatives to intensive monoculture for improving soil health and productivity. This study, conducted in southern Tunisia, evaluated the agroecological performance of different quinoa genotypes under varying planting densities, comparing monocropping, intercropping with oat, and rotation with traditional cereals such as wheat and oat. Seed rate (sowing density) significantly influenced growth, yield, and seed quality. Results: A 6 kg ha-1 seed rate produced the highest stem diameter, plant height, and biomass. A 12 kg ha-1 seed rate reduced growth and yield, with harvest index (HI) and seed yield declining by up to 76%, depending on genotype. Saponin content increased by up to 25% with a high seed rate, whereas protein content decreased. Quinoa-oat intercropping enhanced plant height, stem diameter, and dry weight, but reduced quinoa HI by up to 53%. In contrast, oat HI, seed yield, and thousand-kernel weight (TKW) increased under the intercropping system. Land equivalent ratio values ranged from 1.5 to 2.14, indicating improved system productivity, whereas competitive ratio (CRq) values confirmed that quinoa was less competitive than oat. Rotation with quinoa increased oat harvest index by 95% but reduced wheat harvest index by 22%. Both intercropping and rotation improved soil organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus availability while reducing salinity, enhancing soil fertility. Conclusion: These results highlight the potential of quinoa-based cropping systems for sustainable production and soil management in arid and saline environments. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry. (© 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.) |
| References: | Negacz K , Malek Ž , de Vos A and Vellinga P , Saline soils worldwide: identifying the most promising areas for saline agriculture. J Arid Environ 203:104775 (2022). United Nations, World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100. UN DESA United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 21 June 2017 (2017). Kebede F , Status, drivers, and suggested management scenarios of salt‐affected soils in Africa, in Biosaline Agriculture as a Climate Change Adaptation for Food Security, ed. by Choukr‐Allah R and Ragab R . Springer, Cham, pp. 259–284 (2023). Bouksila F , Persson M , Bahri A and Berndtsson R , Electromagnetic induction prediction of soil salinity and groundwater properties in a Tunisian Saharan oasis. Hydrol Sci J 57:1473–1486 (2012). Duarte B and Caçador I , Iberian halophytes as agroecological solutions for degraded lands and biosaline agriculture. Sustainability 13:1005 (2021). Rahman MM , Mostofa MG , Keya SS , Siddiqui MN , Ansary MMU , Das AK et al., adaptive mechanisms of halophytes and their potential in improving salinity tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci 22:10733 (2021). Hussain S , Khalid MF , Sohail M , Anjum MA , Ejaz S , Nafees M et al., Role of transporters in accumulating salt ions by halophytes, in Approaches to the Remediation of Inorganic Pollutants, ed. by Hasanuzzaman M . Springer Nature, Singapore, pp. 11–40 (2021). Palacios MB , Rizzo AJ , Heredia TB , Roqueiro G , Maldonado S , Murgida DH et al., Structure, ultrastructure and cation accumulation in quinoa epidermal bladder cell complex under high saline stress. Protoplasma 261:655–669 (2024). Gupta V , Metabolomic studies of halophytes under salinity stress, in Physiology of Halophytes, ed. by Gupta V . Apple Academic Press, Florida, pp. 1–37 (2025). Kumari N and Rani B , Antioxidative response mechanisms in halophytes: their role in stress defence, in Halophytes vis à vis Saline Agriculture, ed. by Hirich A and Choukr‐Allah R . Springer Nature, Singapore, pp. 329–346 (2024). Centofanti T and Bañuelos G , Practical uses of halophytic plants as sources of food and fodder, in Halophytes and Climate Change: Adaptive mechanisms and potential uses, ed. by Fujita E et al. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 324–342 (2019). Shahid SA and Alkandari AJ , Halophytic crops as a solution for food security, land rehabilitation, and mitigating future water crises by utilizing marginal quality waters, in Halophytes vis‐à‐vis saline agriculture, ed. by Dagar JC , Gupta SR and Kumar A . Springer, Singapore (2024). Geissler N , Lieth H and Koyro HW , Cash crop halophytes: the ecologically and economically sustainable use of naturally salt‐resistant plants in the context of global changes, in physiological mechanisms and adaptation strategies in Plants Under Changing Environment, ed. by Wani MR and Shah TA . Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 145–162 (2013). Bouras H , Choukr‐Allah R , Amouaouch Y , Bouaziz A , Devkota KP , El Mouttaqi A et al., How does quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) respond to phosphorus fertilization and irrigation water salinity? Plants 11:216 (2022). Sun X , Deng C , Gao J , Lu J , Zheng Y , Guo Z et al., Fertilizer types and nitrogen rates integrated strategy for achieving sustainable quinoa yield and dynamic soil nutrient water distribution at high altitude. Sci Rep 15:5599 (2025). González JA , Mercado MI , Martínez Calsina LE , Erazzú SE , Buedo SE , González DA et al., Plant density effects on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) yield, leaf anatomy, ultrastructure and gas exchange. J Agric Sci 160:349–359 (2022). Sogoni A , Jimoh MO , Ngxabi S , Keyster M , Kambizi L and Laubscher CP , Intercropping the halophyte Tetragonia decumbens mill. With salt‐sensitive Spinacia oleracea L. mitigated salinity stress by enhancing the physiological, biochemical, and nutritional quality of the salt‐sensitive species under saline cultivation. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 24:2 (2025). Albaho MS and Green J , Suaeda salsa, a desalinating companion plant for greenhouse tomato. HortScience 35:620–623 (2000). Santin M , Parichanon P , Sciampagna MC , Ranieri A and Castagna A , Enhancing tomato productivity and quality in moderately saline soils through Salicornia assisted cultivation methods: a comparative study. Horticulturae 10:655 (2024). Bazile D , Jacobsen SE and Verniau A , The global expansion of quinoa: trends and limits. Front Plant Sci 7:622 (2016). Martínez EA , History of quinoa: its origin, domestication, diversification, and cultivation with particular reference to the Chilean context, in Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production, ed. by Murphy K and Matanguihan J . Wiley, Hoboken, pp. 19–24 (2015). Repo‐Carrasco‐Valencia R , Espinoza C and Jacobsen SE , Nutritional value and use of the Andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Rev Int 19:179–189 (2003). Vega‐Gálvez A , Miranda M , Vergara J , Uribe E , Puente L and Martínez EA , Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J Sci Food Agric 90:2541–2547 (2010). Ruiz KB , Biondi S , Oses R , Acuña‐Rodríguez IS , Antognoni F , Martinez‐Mosqueira EA et al., Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:349–359 (2013). Ruiz KB , Aloisi I , Del Duca S , Canelo V , Torrigiani P , Silva H et al., Salares versus coastal ecotypes of quinoa: salinity responses in Chilean landraces from contrasting habitats. Plant Physiol Biochem 101:1–13 (2016). Derbali W , Goussi R and Koyro HW , Physiological and biochemical markers for screening salt‐tolerant quinoa genotypes at early seedling stage. J Plant Interact 15:27–38 (2020). Manaa A , Goussi R , Derbali W , Cantamessa S , Abdelly C and Barbato R , Salinity tolerance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as assessed by chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic performance. Environ Exp Bot 162:103–114 (2019). Manaa A , Goussi R , Derbali W , Cantamessa S , Essemine J and Barbato R , Photosynthetic performance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) after exposure to a gradual drought stress followed by a recovery period. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1862:148383 (2021). Jacobsen SE , Monteros C , Corcuera LJ , Bravo LA , Christiansen JL and Mujica A , Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): short communication. Eur J Agron 26:471–475 (2007). Zurita Silva A , Jacobsen S‐E , Razzaghi F , Álvarez Flores R , Ruiz KB , Morales A et al., in Quinoa drought responses and adaptation. In state‐of‐the‐art report on quinoa around the world, Vol. 2024, ed. by Bazile D and Bertero D . FAO and CIRAD Rome, Santiago, Chile, pp. 157–171 (2015). Abidi I , Daoui K , Abouabdillah A , Bazile D , Hassane Sidikou AA , Belqadi L et al., Pomegranate–quinoa‐based agroforestry system: an innovative strategy to alleviate salinity effects and enhance land use efficiency in salt‐affected semiarid regions. Plants 13:2543 (2024). Goussi R , Ben Jouira H , Zidane OD , Essemine J , Khaled H , Nait Mohamed S et al., Exploring the correlation between salt tolerance and seed nutritional value of different quinoa genotypes grown under Saharan climatic conditions. Plants 13:3180 (2024). Blake GR and Hartge KH , Bulk density, in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1 – Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agron Monogr 9, ASA SSSA, 2nd edn, ed. by Klute A . American Society of Agronomy, Inc. (ASA), Madison, WI, USA, pp. 363–375 (1986). Sosa Zuniga V , Brito V , Fuentes FF and Steinfort UC , Phenological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) based on the BBCH scale. Ann Appl Biol 171:156–168 (2017). Ayers RS and Westcot DW , Water Quality for Agriculture, Vol. 29. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome (1985). Mead R and Willey RW , The concept of a ‘land equivalent ratio’ and advantages in yields from intercropping. Exp Agric 16:217–228 (1980). Koziol MJ , Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Food Compos Anal 5:35–68 (1992). Mora Ocación MS et al., Extraction and quantification of saponins in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes from Colombia. Int J Food Sci 202:7287487 (2022). Bradford MM , A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254 (1976). Jacobsen SE and Christiansen JL , Some agronomic strategies for organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Agron Crop Sci 202:454–463 (2016). Jacobsen SE , Mujica A and Jensen CR , The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Rev Int 19:99–109 (2003). Bhargava A , Shukla S and Ohri D , Genetic variability and interrelationship among various morphological and quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crop Res 101:104–116 (2007). Heitholt J and Sassenrath Cole G , Inter‐plant competition: growth responses to plant density and row spacing, in Physiology of Cotton, ed. by Stewart JM , Oosterhuis DM , Heitholt JJ and Mauney JR . Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 179–186 (2010). Gomez‐Pando LR , Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) breeding, in Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Cereals, Vol. 5, ed. by Vandenberg B et al. Springer, Cham, pp. 259–316 (2019). Medina Meza IG , Aluwi NA , Saunders SR et al., GC–MS profiling of triterpenoid saponins from 28 quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties grown in Washington state. J Agric Food Chem 64:8583–8594 (2016). Karyotis T , Iliadis C , Noulas C and Mitsibonas T , Preliminary research on seed production and nutrient content for certain quinoa varieties in a saline‐sodic soil. J Agron Crop Sci 189:402–408 (2003). Vikas and Ranjan R , Agroecological approaches to sustainable development. Front Sustain Food Syst 8:1405409 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1405409. Maitra S , Hossain A , Brestic M , Skalicky M , Ondrisik P , Gitari H et al., Intercropping – a low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security. Agronomy 11:343 (2021). Abidi I , Daoui K , Abouabdillah A , Belqadi L , Mahyou H , Bazile D et al., Quinoa–Olive Agroforestry System Assessment in Semi‐Arid Environments: Performance of an Innovative System. Agronomy 14:495 (2024). Zuccarini P , Ion uptake by halophytic plants to mitigate saline stress in solanum lycopersicon L., and different effect of soil and water salinity. Soil Water Res 3:62–73 (2008). Gong XW , Liu CJ , Li J , Luo Y , Yang QH , Zhang WL et al., Responses of rhizosphere soil properties, enzyme activities and microbial diversity to intercropping patterns on the loess plateau of China. Soil Tillage Res 195:104355 (2019). Li C , Hoffland E , Kuyper TW , Yu Y , Zhang C , Li H et al., Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nat Plants 6:653–660 (2020). Sher J , Khan N and Tomlinson KW , Plant growth of Chenopodium quinoa (Willd) is better when growing with kin than with non‐kin regardless of soil nutrient conditions. Plant Ecol 225:153–161 (2024). Bybee Finley KA , Menalled UD , Pelzer CJ , Ryan MR , Darby H , Ruhl L et al., Quantifying the roles of intraspecific and interspecific diversification strategies in forage cropping systems. Field Crop Res 302:109036 (2023). Vahidi H , Mahmoodi S , Parsa S and Fallahi HR , Evaluation of the yield and intercropping indices of Panicum miliaceum L. and Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Under effect of plant density and cultivation ratios in Birjand region. J Agroecol 13:471–488 (2021). Xue N , Liu J and Anwar S , Enhancing soil physicochemical properties, quinoa yield, and nutrients through intercropping of quinoa with legumes. Pol J Environ Stud 34:5935–5949 (2025). Araghian S , Sadrabadi H , Ghasemi M and Souhani Darban A , The effects of intercropping and plant density on the growth and yield characteristics of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and guar Environ Dev Sustain 28:1901–1919 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04999-3. Hirich A , Choukr‐Allah R and Jacobsen SE , Quinoa in Morocco – effect of sowing dates on development and yield. J Agron Crop Sci 200:371–377 (2014). Shah KK , Modi B , Pandey HP , Subedi A , Aryal G , Pandey M et al., Diversified crop rotation: an approach for sustainable agriculture production. Adv Agric 2021:8924087 (2021). Barcia Piedras JM , Pérez Romero JA , Mateos Naranjo E , Tavares RM , Ortiz A , Fernández Catón L et al., Effect of prior salt experience on desalination capacity of the halophyte Arthrocnemum macrostachyum . Desalination 463:50–54 (2019). Chen N , Li X , Šimůnek J , Zhang Y , Shi H and Hu Q , Evaluation of soil salt dynamics in a tomato–corn intercropping system with various spatial arrangements: experiment and modeling. Soil Tillage Res 247:106377 (2024). Razzaghi F , Ahmadi SH , Jacobsen SE , Jensen CR and Andersen MN , Effects of salinity and soil drying on radiation use efficiency, water productivity and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Agron Crop Sci 198:173–184 (2012). Hasanuzzaman M , Nahar K , Alam MM , Bhowmik PC , Hossain MA , Rahman MM et al., Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils. Biomed Res Int 2014:589341 (2014). Li G , Ren A , Anwar S , Shi L , Bai W , Zhang Y et al., Optimizing soil health and sorghum productivity through crop rotation with quinoa. Life 14:745 (2024). |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: arid regions; crop rotation; intercropping; quinoa; seed rate; soil fertility |
| Substance Nomenclature: | 0 (Soil) |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260422 Date Completed: 20260614 Latest Revision: 20260625 |
| Update Code: | 20260625 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jsfa.70671 |
| PMID: | 42015331 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1097-0010 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/jsfa.70671 |