Academic Journal
Non-governmental organisations and the regulation of harmful commodity industries: navigating global governance to change corporate practices.
| Τίτλος: | Non-governmental organisations and the regulation of harmful commodity industries: navigating global governance to change corporate practices. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Lauber K; School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK., Townsend B; School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia., Arnanz L; NCD Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland., Baum F; University of Adelaide, Stretton Institute, Adelaide, Australia., Cullerton K; School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia., Friel S; School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia., Holmes R; Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education (FARE), Canberra, Australia., Martin J; Food for Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia., Ralston R; School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK., Collin J; School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. jeff.collin@ed.ac.uk. |
| Πηγή: | Globalization and health [Global Health] 2026 Mar 13; Vol. 22 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Mar 13. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101245734 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1744-8603 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17448603 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Global Health Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2005- |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Food Industry*/legislation & jurisprudence , Organizations* , Global Health* , Government Regulation*, Humans ; Food, Processed ; Qualitative Research ; Commerce ; Interviews as Topic |
| Περίληψη: | BACKGROUND: The crucial role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in advancing effective regulation of health-harming corporate practices is widely accepted, yet how precisely they shape global health governance is not well-understood. While a vast literature has grappled with corporate power and its political, market, and technological dimensions, less attention has been paid to strategic efforts to counter the influence of corporate actors. Drawing on international relations and political economy scholarship, we seek to understand NGO strategies aimed at achieving greater regulation of the ultra-processed food (UPF) and alcohol industries in global fora, and examine the considerations and constraints which inform NGO strategy choice. METHODS: We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with professional advocates active in global debates on UPF and/or alcohol governance, complemented by six interviews with officials from international organisations (IOs). Coding combined inductive and deductive approaches, with the latter informed by existing models of advocacy strategy. RESULTS: Participants described ‘inside’ strategies targeting IOs and member states as the primary focus of their organisations’ global advocacy, underpinned by a sense that such approaches are more effective. More confrontational, outside approaches were seen as inappropriate particularly for targeting the World Health Organisation as a key forum. Core advocacy activities thus include participation in consultations and meetings hosted by IOs, although advocates did highlight less radical forms of ‘outside’ strategies, rooted in information provision rather than protest. The direct targeting of corporations was relatively uncommon, with monitoring and exposing of corporate practices primarily aimed at building momentum for governmental regulation. Advocates highlighted the importance of engagement beyond health governance, noting, however, that resource challenges preclude effective entry into new fora for many NGOs. DISCUSSION: The challenge of attaining and maintaining insider status in relevant fora introduces constraints which may explain the reliance on quieter, less confrontational strategies. We reflect critically on the potential value of a noisier approach to addressing health-harming corporate practices, and challenge the notion that a primary function of NGOs can and should be to act as a ‘watchdog’ of corporate practices, instead advancing a wider perspective on corporate accountability. |
| Competing Interests: | Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval was obtained from the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. |
| References: | Gilmore AB, Fabbri A, Baum F, Bertscher A, Bondy K, Chang HJ, et al. Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health. Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1194–213. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00013-236966782) Maani N, Petticrew M, Galea S, editors. The Commercial Determinants of Health. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2023. Rinaldi C, Van Schalkwyk MC, Egan M, Petticrew M. A Framing Analysis of Consultation Submissions on the WHO global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol: values and interests. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;1. Lauber K, Rutter H, Gilmore AB. Big food and the World Health Organization: a qualitative study of industry attempts to influence global-level non-communicable disease policy. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005216. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005216341170118202098) Weishaar H, Collin J, Smith K, Grüning T, Mandal S, Gilmore A. Global health governance and the commercial sector: a documentary analysis of tobacco company strategies to influence the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Novotny TE, ed. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001249. Friel S, Collin J, Daube M, Depoux A, Freudenberg N, Gilmore AB, et al. Commercial determinants of health: future directions. Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1229–40. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00011-936966784) Dellmuth LM, Tallberg J. Advocacy Strategies in Global Governance: Inside versus Outside Lobbying. Polit Stud. 2017;65(3):705–23. (PMID: 10.1177/0032321716684356) Baumgartner FR, Leech BL. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1998. (PMID: 10.1515/9781400822485) Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1965. (PMID: 10.4159/9780674041660) Maloney WA, Jordan G, McLaughlin AM. Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited. J Pub Pol. 1994;14(1):17–38. (PMID: 10.1017/S0143814X00001239) Binderkrantz A. Interest Group Strategies: Navigating between Privileged Access and Strategies of Pressure. Polit Stud. 2005;53(4):694–715. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00552.x) Colli F, Adriaensen J. Lobbying the state or the market? A framework to study civil society organizations’ strategic behavior. Regul Gov. 2020;14(3):501–13. (PMID: 10.1111/rego.12227) Townsend B, Johnson TD, Ralston R, Cullerton K, Martin J, Collin J, et al. A framework of NGO inside and outside strategies in the commercial determinants of health: findings from a narrative review. Globalization Health. 2023;19(1):74. (PMID: 10.1186/s12992-023-00978-x3781719610565967) Mamudu HM, Glantz SA. Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Glob Public Health. 2009;4(2):150–68. (PMID: 10.1080/17441690802095355193338062664518) Newell P. Climate for Change? Civil Society and the Politics of Global Warming. Global Civil Society 2005/6. London: SAGE; 2006. pp. 90–119. (PMID: 10.4135/9781446212714.n4) Baker P, Machado P, Santos T, Sievert K, Backholer K, Hadjikakou M, et al. Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: Global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev. 2020;21(12):e13126. (PMID: 10.1111/obr.1312632761763) Casswell S. Current developments in the Global Governance arena: where is alcohol headed? J Global Health. 2019;9(2):020305. (PMID: 10.7189/jogh.09.020305) Margulis ME. Shadow negotiators: How UN organizations shape the rules of world trade for food security. Stanford University Press. 2023. Raustiala K, Victor DG. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. Int Org. 2004;58(2). Banatvala N, Bovet P, editors. Noncommunicable Diseases: A Compendium. Milton: Taylor & Francis; 2023. Marten R, Amul GGH, Casswell S. Alcohol: global health’s blind spot. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(3):e329–30. (PMID: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30008-532087164) Thow AM, Jones A, Schneider CH, Labonté R. Global Governance of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling: A Qualitative Analysis. Nutrients. 2019;11(2):268. (PMID: 10.3390/nu11020268306910246412334) Widerberg O, Fast C, Rosas MK, Pattberg P. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for the SDGs: is the next generation fit for purpose? Int Environ Agreements. 2023;23(2):165–71. (PMID: 10.1007/s10784-023-09606-w) Uribe J. Governing on par with states: Private power and practices of political normalisation. Rev Int Stud. 2024;1–20. Sethi SP, Schepers DH. United Nations Global Compact: The Promise–Performance Gap. J Bus Ethics. 2014;122(2):193–208. (PMID: 10.1007/s10551-013-1629-y) Ralston R, Godziewski C, Brooks E. Reconceptualising the commercial determinants of health: bringing institutions in. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8:e013698. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-0136983801670910685945) Doh J. International non-governmental organizations. In: Asmussen CG, Hashai N, Minbaeva D, editors. Encyclopedia of International Strategic Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2024. pp. 232–4. (PMID: 10.4337/9781800884045.ch59) Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. In: Schwartz-Shea P, editor. Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive Turn. 2nd ed. Yanow D. 2015. Anderl F, Hißen M. How trust is lost: the Food Systems Summit 2021 and the delegitimation of UN food governance. Eur J Int Relat. 2024;30(1):151–75. (PMID: 10.1177/13540661231173553) Canfield MC, Duncan J, Claeys P. Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy. Development. 2021;64(3–4):181–91. (PMID: 10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1346586078513380) WHO. Framework of engagement with non-state actors. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/wha69/a69_r10-en.pdf. Levy DL, Szejnwald Brown H, de Jong M. The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance: The Case of the Global Reporting Initiative. Bus Soc. 2010;49(1):88–115. (PMID: 10.1177/0007650309345420) Ponte S. Roundtabling’ sustainability: Lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum. 2014;54:261–71. (PMID: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.008) Stone D. Making global policy. Cambridge University Press. 2019. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Alimentarius Commission procedural manual – Twenty-ninth edition. Rome: FAO. 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2280en. Hanrieder T. WHO orchestrates? Coping with competitors in global health. In: Abbott KW, Genschel P, Snidal D, Zangl B, ed. International organizations as orchestrators. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. 2015;191–213. Friel S. Redressing the Corporate Cultivation of Consumption: Releasing the Weapons of the Structurally Weak. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10:784–92. (PMID: 331312259309974) Newell P, Civil, Society. Corporate Accountability and the Politics of Climate Change. Glob Environ Politics. 2008;8(3):122–53. (PMID: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.122) Ralston R, Townsend B, Arnanz L, Baum F, Cullerton K, Holmes R, et al. NGOs and Global Business Regulation of Transnational Alcohol and Ultra-Processed Food Industries. Policy Soc. 2024;43(1):54–69. (PMID: 10.1093/polsoc/puae002) Johnson DA, Duckett LJ. Advocacy, Strategy and Tactics Used to Confront Corporate Power: The Nestlé Boycott and International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. J Hum Lact. 2020;36(4):568–78. (PMID: 10.1177/089033442095515833035127) Allan JI. The new climate activism NGO authority and participation in climate change governance. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2020. (PMID: 10.3138/9781487538125) Stroup SS, Wong WH. The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2018. (PMID: 10.7591/9781501709777) Dauvergne P, Clapp J. Surging Biojustice Environmentalism from Below: Hope for Ending the Earth System Emergency? Glob Environ Politics. 2023;23(4):3–16. (PMID: 10.1162/glep_a_00712) Corporate Accountability. Corporate Accountability. 2025 [cited 11 Mar 2025]. What we do. Available from: https://corporateaccountability.org/what-we-do/. |
| Grant Information: | LP200100100 Australian Research Council; MR/S037519/1 UK Prevention Research Partnership |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Advocacy; Alcohol; Commercial determinants of health; Global health governance; Non-governmental organizations; Ultra-processed food |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260314 Date Completed: 20260627 Latest Revision: 20260703 |
| Update Code: | 20260703 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC13097841 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12992-026-01200-4 |
| PMID: | 41826938 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1744-8603 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12992-026-01200-4 |