Academic Journal

Safety Evaluation of 4 Red Light Therapy Devices for Myopia.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Safety Evaluation of 4 Red Light Therapy Devices for Myopia.
Authors: Ostrin LA; University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas., Schill AW; University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas.
Source: JAMA ophthalmology [JAMA Ophthalmol] 2026 Mar 01; Vol. 144 (3), pp. 255-258.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: American Medical Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101589539 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2168-6173 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21686165 NLM ISO Abbreviation: JAMA Ophthalmol Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Chicago, IL : American Medical Association, [2013]-
MeSH Terms: Myopia*/radiotherapy , Myopia*/therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy*/instrumentation , Red Light*, Humans ; Equipment Safety ; Equipment Design ; Quality Improvement
Abstract: Importance: Red laser therapy (ie, repeated low-level red light) has emerged as an intervention for myopia, with widespread clinical use in Asia and increasing international consideration. However, the ocular safety of commercially available devices has not been rigorously evaluated.
Objective: To assess the optical output and safety classification of 4 commercially available red light therapy devices for myopia management using American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidelines.
Design and Setting: This quality improvement study consisted of a laboratory-based evaluation of the Sky-n1201, Future Vision, EyeRising, and AirDoc instruments and was performed from November 25, 2023, to April 30, 2024. Radiometric power was measured with an integrating sphere radiometer at 1- and 10-cm distances through a 7-mm aperture and retinal irradiance calculated for 2- to 7-mm pupil diameters. Safety classification was investigated according to ANSI Z80.36-2021 and ANSI Z136.1-2022 standards. Data were analyzed from November 25, 2023, to September 10, 2024.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was assessing the time to the group 1 safety limit and the ANSI device classification. This was measured by laboratory-based evaluation of 4 instruments and measuring radiometric power at various pupil diameters.
Results: The Sky-n1201 and EyeRising devices reached ANSI group 1 limits within exposure times of 2.8 and 1.4 seconds, respectively, for a 7-mm pupil and are classified as Class 1 and 2M laser devices, respectively. The Future Vision device reached group 1 limits under extended exposure times of 253 seconds or longer but remained within limits for Class 1 laser classification. The light-emitting diode-based AirDoc produced diffuse illumination with a time to group 1 limit of 22 761 seconds, classifying it as group 1.
Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that laser-based red light therapy instruments deliver irradiance levels that reach ANSI safety limits within exposure times below the recommended 180-second treatment time. These findings, combined with emerging clinical reports of retinal damage and recent regulatory reclassification of red laser devices as Class III in China, highlight the need for rigorous, independent safety validation before widespread pediatric use.
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260205 Date Completed: 20260706 Latest Revision: 20260910
Update Code: 20260910
PubMed Central ID: PMC12878638
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.5660
PMID: 41642586
Database: MEDLINE
Description
ISSN:2168-6173
DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.5660