Academic Journal
Message madness: Characterization of electronic secure messages in the hospital.
| Title: | Message madness: Characterization of electronic secure messages in the hospital. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Clawson J; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA., Grobbel E; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA., Keniston A; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA., McBeth L; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA., Knees M; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA., Burden M; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. |
| Source: | Journal of hospital medicine [J Hosp Med] 2026 Mar; Vol. 21 (3), pp. 253-260. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Aug 07. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101271025 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1553-5606 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15535592 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Hosp Med Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 2022- : Hoboken, NJ : Wiley Original Publication: Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, 2006- |
| MeSH Terms: | Hospitalists* , Electronic Mail* , Communication* , Hospital Communication Systems*, Humans ; Qualitative Research |
| Abstract: | Background: Hospital communication is increasingly reliant on asynchronous electronic secure messaging (SM) systems, with the unintended consequence of increased task switching and a greater overall burden of communications. We sought to analyze secure messages sent and received by hospitalists to understand content, urgency, and actionability, which may guide future efforts on best practices around SM. Methods: A qualitative content analysis was performed on a subset of messages sent and received by hospitalists from 1 weekday and 1 weekend day in 2023, coding them by urgency (i.e., emergent, urgent, nonurgent), context (i.e., clinical, administrative), actionable/non-actionable, content (i.e., social, gratitude, acknowledgment, apology, completion notification), sentiment (i.e., positive, negative, neutral), and other key features (i.e., communication mode change, near miss/miss, presence of emoticon). Thematic analysis was then conducted on conversations that were length outliers, messages with emotion, messages indicating a change in communication mode, and messages with a near miss/miss. Results: A total of 2706 messages (365 conversations) were coded. These messages were sent and received by physicians (38%), advanced practice providers (22%), nurses (33%), and other team members (8%). The majority of these messages were "nonurgent" (99%), "clinical" (64%), and/or "non-actionable" (66%). Among these messages, nearly one-third were classified as acknowledgment (13%), gratitude (8%), acknowledgment and gratitude (8%), apology (2%), and social interactions (0.6%). Conclusions: A majority of secure messages were nonurgent and non-actionable, with many containing lower acuity elements (e.g., acknowledgment, gratitude). Hospitals can explore minimizing this type of communication to help decrease task switching and cognitive burden. (© 2025 Society of Hospital Medicine.) |
| References: | O'Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Baker DW. How hospitalists spend their time: insights on efficiency and safety. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(2):88‐93. doi:10.1002/jhm.88. Tipping MD, Forth VE, O'Leary KJ, et al. Where did the day go?—A time‐motion study of hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(6):323‐328. doi:10.1002/jhm.790. O'Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Wu RC, et al. Hospital‐based clinicians’ use of technology for patient care‐related communication: a national survey. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(7):530‐535. doi:10.12788/jhm.2767. Knees M, Keniston A, Yu A, et al. Academic hospitalist perspectives on the benefits and challenges of secure messaging: a mixed methods analysis. J Hosp Med. 2024;20:248‐257. doi:10.1002/jhm.13522. Lou SS, Lew D, Xia L, Baratta L, Eiden E, Kannampallil T. Secure messaging use and wrong‐patient ordering errors among inpatient clinicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(12):e2447797. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47797. Quan SD, Wu RC, Rossos PG, et al. It's not about pager replacement: an in‐depth look at the interprofessional nature of communication in healthcare. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(3):137‐143. doi:10.1002/jhm.2008. Wong HJ, Bierbrier R, Ma P, Quan S, Lai S, Wu RC. An analysis of messages sent between nurses and physicians in deteriorating internal medicine patients to help identify issues in failures to rescue. Int J Med Inform. 2017;100:9‐15. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.008. Brickson C, Keniston A, Knees M, Burden M. Characterizing electronic messaging use among hospitalists and its association with patient volumes. J Hosp Med. 2024;19(12):1131‐1137. doi:10.1002/jhm.13462. Donnelly CE, Flores PL, Weiner M, Kara AY, Lee JL. Texting is caring: a content analysis of clinical text messages by hospitalists. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(3):e002385. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002385. Small W, Iturrate E, Austrian J, Genes N. Electronic health record messaging patterns of health care professionals in inpatient medicine. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2349136. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49136. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277‐1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687. Erlingsson C, Brysiewicz P. A hands‐on guide to doing content analysis. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017;7(3):93‐99. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107‐115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. Halverson CME, Donnelly CE, Weiner M, Lee JL. Content analysis of emoji and emoticon use in clinical texting systems. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2318140. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18140. Sun AJ, Wang L, Go M, et al. Night‐time communication at Stanford university hospital: perceptions, reality and solutions. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(2):156‐162. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006727. Wu R, Lo V, Morra D, et al. A smartphone‐enabled communication system to improve hospital communication: usage and perceptions of medical trainees and nurses on general internal medicine wards. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(2):83‐89. doi:10.1002/jhm.2278. Chen Y, Adler‐Milstein J, Sinsky CA. Measuring and maximizing undivided attention in the context of electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform. 2022;13(4):774‐777. doi:10.1055/a-1892-1437. Weigl M, Müller A, Vincent C, Angerer P, Sevdalis N. The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors’ workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(5):399‐407. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000188. Kissler MJ, Porter S, Knees M, Kissler K, Keniston A, Burden M. Attention among health care professionals: a scoping review. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177(7):941‐952. doi:10.7326/m23-3229. Hagedorn PA, Singh A, Luo B, Bonafide CP, Simmons JM. Secure text messaging in healthcare: latent threats and opportunities to improve patient safety. J Hosp Med. 2020;15(6):378‐380. doi:10.12788/jhm.3305. Will J, Small W, Iturrate E, Testa P, Feldman J. Enhancing secure messaging in electronic health records: evaluating the impact of emoji chat reactions on the volume of interruptive notifications. ACI Open. 2024;08:e62‐e68. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1788621. Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med. 2004;79(2):186‐194. doi:10.1097/00001888-200402000-00019. Alvarez G, Coiera E. Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):236‐242; discussion 242. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.02.004. |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20250807 Date Completed: 20260306 Latest Revision: 20260306 |
| Update Code: | 20260307 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jhm.70144 |
| PMID: | 40771116 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1553-5606 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/jhm.70144 |