Academic Journal
Meta-analysis of visual fatigue based on visual display terminals.
| Title: | Meta-analysis of visual fatigue based on visual display terminals. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wang G; Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250011, China. gaofeng5303@126.com., Cui Y; Weifang Eye Hospital, Qingdao District, Qingdao, Shandong, China. |
| Source: | BMC ophthalmology [BMC Ophthalmol] 2024 Nov 07; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 489. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 07. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100967802 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2415 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712415 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Ophthalmol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001- |
| MeSH Terms: | Asthenopia*/physiopathology , Computer Terminals*, Occupational Diseases/physiopathology ; Occupational Diseases/epidemiology ; Vision Disorders/physiopathology ; Vision Disorders/epidemiology ; Humans ; Incidence |
| Abstract: | Background: This study aims to explore the impact of using visual display terminal (VDT) on the visual fatigue of operators through meta-analysis. Methods: The terms "VDT", "visual fatigue", "eyestrain", and "viewing distance" were selected from the Wangfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Web of Science, Springer, and Science Direct online databases. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to the present. All clinical studies related to the analysis of the effects of VDT use on visual fatigue were available. The included studies were screened, and after quality assessment, basic data and outcome index data were extracted. The count data were represented by relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The measurement data were represented by the mean value (MD), standard deviation (SD), and 95% CI. Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan5.3) was employed to analyze the included indicators. Funnel plots were drawn using RevMan5.3 to analyze potential publication bias. The incidence of visual fatigue, lens use time, blink interval, and other indicators were compared between the VDT group and the control (Ctrl) group. Meanwhile, the incidence of eye fatigue and blurred vision in the two groups was counted. Result: The incidence of eye pain, fatigue, blurred vision, teary eyes, and dry eyes in the VDT group significantly exceeded that in the Ctrl group. Meanwhile, the dry eye score, as well as the scores for eye fatigue, discomfort, and blurred vision, were significantly higher in the VDT group compared to the Ctrl group. Conclusions: The results indicate that the use of VDT has a significant impact on visual fatigue. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
| References: | Biomed Rep. 2016 Jul;5(1):7-10. (PMID: 27330747) Ocul Surf. 2019 Oct;17(4):714-721. (PMID: 31352083) Ind Health. 1996;34(2):61-9. (PMID: 8857276) Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;100(7):723-739. (PMID: 35122403) Work. 2019;63(2):299-308. (PMID: 31156211) Cornea. 2017 Aug;36(8):908-914. (PMID: 28542084) J Occup Health. 2016 Sep 30;58(5):444-451. (PMID: 27488039) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 23;16(10):. (PMID: 31126060) Work. 2023;74(2):733-742. (PMID: 36245348) AAOHN J. 2002 Nov;50(11):489-93. (PMID: 12465203) Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):1655-1680. (PMID: 35809192) Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):273-287. (PMID: 30281334) Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Nov 15;26(suppl 3):5215-5222. (PMID: 34787212) Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2003;9(4):453-62. (PMID: 14675518) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):. (PMID: 35409467) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 13;16(14):. (PMID: 31337021) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):. (PMID: 36361134) Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jan;56(1):6-9. (PMID: 10341739) Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;100(4):357-375. (PMID: 34697901) J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2021 Jul;69(1):77-90. (PMID: 34376917) Occup Med (Lond). 2018 Nov 16;68(8):502-511. (PMID: 30445654) J Occup Health. 2019 Mar;61(2):175-181. (PMID: 30866126) Cornea. 2005 Jul;24(5):567-70. (PMID: 15968162) Ocul Surf. 2020 Jan;18(1):56-63. (PMID: 31563549) Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(2):109-13. (PMID: 1889879) Med Sci Monit. 2006 Jul;12(7):CR296-301. (PMID: 16819428) Hum Factors. 2021 Nov;63(7):1182-1195. (PMID: 32374635) Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;100(8):861-877. (PMID: 35441459) J UOEH. 2005 Mar 1;27(1):25-40. (PMID: 15794590) Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020 Dec;9(6):491-497. (PMID: 33181547) J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;140:22-32. (PMID: 34437948) J Postgrad Med. 2022 Oct-Dec;68(4):207-212. (PMID: 35417999) J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12370. (PMID: 36350045) Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 May 3;39(12):858-864. (PMID: 33935199) Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;22(3):. (PMID: 35161662) J Physiol Anthropol. 2007 Mar;26(2):69-73. (PMID: 17435346) J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):e588-e592. (PMID: 35352103) Ophthalmology. 2022 Oct;129(10):1192-1215. (PMID: 35597519) Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;91(8):756-62. (PMID: 23279709) Amino Acids. 2004 Feb;26(1):59-63. (PMID: 14752617) Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1993 Feb;47(6):1032-40. (PMID: 8492480) Nutrients. 2018 Feb 28;10(3):. (PMID: 29495607) Med Lav. 2019 Feb 22;110(1):37-45. (PMID: 30794247) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 03;19(17):. (PMID: 36078749) Ocul Surf. 2017 Jan;15(1):65-76. (PMID: 27725302) PeerJ. 2019 Jun 04;7:e7050. (PMID: 31198647) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Meta-analysis; Prognosis assessment; Visual display terminal; Visual fatigue |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20241107 Date Completed: 20241108 Latest Revision: 20250520 |
| Update Code: | 20260130 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC11542469 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12886-024-03721-1 |
| PMID: | 39511518 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1471-2415 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12886-024-03721-1 |