Effect of propolis added to single-bottle adhesives on water permeation through the hybrid layer.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Effect of propolis added to single-bottle adhesives on water permeation through the hybrid layer.
Συγγραφείς: da Rocha LS; Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil., de Oliveira DF; Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil., de Lima CLV; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil., do Nascimento TG; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil., de Freitas JD; Department of Chemistry, Federal Institute of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil., de Freitas JMD; Department of Chemistry, Federal Institute of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil., Porto ICCM; Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.
Πηγή: European journal of oral sciences [Eur J Oral Sci] 2024 Dec; Vol. 132 (6), pp. e13023. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 10.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9504563 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1600-0722 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09098836 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Oral Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Copenhagen : Munksgaard, c1995-
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Propolis*/chemistry , Water*/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents*/chemistry , Dentin Permeability*/drug effects , Dentin*/drug effects , Materials Testing*, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry ; Dental Bonding/methods ; Resin Cements/chemistry ; Humans ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Acid Etching, Dental ; Surface Properties
Περίληψη: Water treeing and water droplets are observed within adhesive layers and on the hybridized surface after bonding sound dentin using single-bottle etch-and-rinse adhesives, indicating permeability of the hybrid layer to water. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of dentin sealing by adhesives containing propolis by quantifying the area of water transudation from dentinal tubules after dentin hybridization. Brazilian red propolis was added to experimental adhesive and Single Bond (3M/ESPE) adhesive; experimental adhesive and Single Bond without propolis were used as controls. Under simulated pulp pressure, two layers of adhesive were applied to etched human dentin discs. Three minutes after light-curing, the hybridized dentin surface was replicated, and epoxy resin replicas were created to obtain scanning electron microscope images. Data were evaluated using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Single Bond containing propolis significantly decreased water permeation through the hybrid layer compared with the control group. Three minutes after polymerization, the experimental adhesive without propolis had formed a permeable hybrid layer. The addition of Brazilian red propolis significantly reduced surface water on hybridized dentin in a concentration-dependent manner. Two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives containing propolis were effective in reducing water permeation through the hybridized dentin surface.
(© 2024 Scandinavian Division of the International Association for Dental Research. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
References: Yoshida Y, Inoue S. Chemical analyses in dental adhesive technology. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2012;48:141–52.
Singh S. Microleakage studies—a viewpoint. J Conserv Dent. 2023;26:1–2.
Porto ICCM, Almeida DCC, Costa GVCO, Donato TSS, Nunes LM, Nascimento TG, et al. Mechanical and aesthetics compatibility of Brazilian red propolis micellar nanocomposite as a cavity cleaning agent. BMC Compl Altern Med. 2018;18:219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906‐018‐2281‐y.
ElMansy MM, Tadros SST, Saleh RS, Abdelmonem R, El Menoufy H, Shawky N. Comparative evaluation on the effect of different cavity disinfectant nano gels; chlorohexidine, propolis, liquorice versus diode laser in terms of composite microleakage (comparative in vitro study). BDJ Open. 2023;9:49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405‐023‐00176‐2.
Porto ICCM, Rocha ABB, Ferreira IIS, de Barros BM, Ávila EC, da Silva MC, et al. Polyphenols and Brazilian red propolis incorporated into a total‐etching adhesive system help in maintaining bonding durability. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06237.
Mohan PV, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Rao RC. In vivo comparison of cavity disinfection efficacy with APF gel, propolis, diode laser, and 2% chlorhexidine in primary teeth. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7:45–50.
Arslan S, Yazici AR, Görücü J, Pala K, Antonson DE, Antonson SA, et al. Comparison of the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents on microleakage of current adhesives. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:805–11.
Abbasi AJ, Mohammadi F, Bayat M, Gema SM, Ghadirian H, Seifi H, et al. Applications of propolis in dentistry: a review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018;28:505–12.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self‐etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27:17–28.
Arandi NZ. The classification and selection of adhesive agents; an overview for the general dentist. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2023;15:165–80.
Tran XV, Tran KQ. Microleakage and characteristics of resin‐tooth tissues interface of a self‐etch and an etch‐and‐rinse adhesive systems. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46:e30. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e30.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:726–31.
Perdigão J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion—not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56:190–207.
Nascimento TG, Arruda RES, Almeida ETC, Oliveira JMS, Basílio‐Júnior ID, Porto ICCM, et al. Comprehensive multivariate correlations between climatic effect, metabolite‐profile, antioxidant capacity and antibacterial activity of Brazilian red propolis metabolites during seasonal study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐019‐54591‐3.
Alamoudi NM, Baik AM, El‐Housseiny AA, Abu Haimed TS, Bakry AS. Influence of povidone‐iodine on micro‐tensile bonding strength to dentin under simulated pulpal pressure. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903‐018‐0645‐9.
Oliveira JMDS, Cavalcanti TFS, Leite IF, Dos Santos DMRC, Porto ICCM, de Aquino FLT, et al. Propolis in oral healthcare: antibacterial activity of a composite resin enriched with Brazilian red propolis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:787633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.787633.
Esteves SRMS, Barcellos DC, da Silva TM, Silva MR, Campos TMB, Rosetti EP, et al. How water content can influence the chemomechanical properties and physical degradation under aging of experimental adhesives. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:5771341. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5771341.
Mulla SA, Kondkari SA, Patil A, Jain A, Mali S, Jaiswal HC, et al. Look into the cytotoxicity of composite fillings: friend or foe? Cureus. 2023;15:e46327. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46327.
Durner J, Wellner P, Hickel R, Reichl FX. Synergistic interaction caused to human gingival fibroblasts from dental monomers. Dent Mater. 2012;28:818–23.
Sauro S, Pasley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self‐etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2007;23:705–13.
Rizk SK. Principles of adhesion to tooth structure. Biomater J. 2023;2:10–30.
Cadenaro M, Maravic T, Comba A, Mazzoni A, Fanfoni L, Hilton T, et al. The role of polymerization in adhesive dentistry. Dent Mater. 2019;35:e1–22.
Perdigão J. Dentin bonding‐variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e24–37.
Porto ICCM, Andrade AKM, Alves LC, Braz R. Effect of dentin pretreatment with potassium oxalate: analysis of microtensile bond strengths and morphologic aspects. Microsc Res Tech. 2012;75:239–44.
Porto ICCM, Costa JLSG, Lopes MRNS, Freitas JD, Oliveira ILM, Monteiro GQM, et al. Effect of dentin pretreatment with potassium oxalate: a 6‐year follow‐up. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80:870–7.
Mancuso E, Durso D, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, Josic U, D'Alessandro C, et al. Glutaraldehyde‐based desensitizers' influence on bonding performances and dentin enzymatic activity of universal adhesives. J Dent. 2023;136:104643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104643.
Yang H, Pei D, Liu S, Wang Y, Zhou L, Deng D, et al. Effect of a functional desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the microtensile bond strength of etch‐and‐rinse adhesives to human dentin. Am J Dent. 2013;26:137–42.
Anithakumari R, Sureshbabu NM. The effect of desensitizing agents on the bond strength of dentin bonding agents: a systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25:580–7.
Tilburt CJ, Kaptchuk TJ. Herbal medicine research and global health: an ethical analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:594–9.
Daugsch A, Fort P, Park YK. Brazilian red propolis—chemical composition and botanical origin. Evid Based Compl Alternat Med. 2008;5:435–41.
Franchin M, Saliba ASMC, Sartori AGO, Pereira Neto SO, Benso B, Ikegaki M, et al. Food‐grade delivery systems of Brazilian propolis from Apis mellifera: from chemical composition to bioactivities in vivo. Food Chem. 2024;432:137175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137175.
Aldana‐Mejía JA, Ccana‐Ccapatinta GV, Squarisi IS, Nascimento S, Tanimoto MH, Ribeiro VP, et al. Nonclinical toxicological studies of Brazilian red propolis and its primary botanical source Dalbergia ecastaphyllum. Chem Res Toxicol. 2021;34:1024–33.
Trusheva B, Popova M, Bankova V, Simova S, Marcucci MC, Miorin PL, et al. Bioactive constituents of Brazilian red propolis. Evid Based Compl Alternat Med. 2006;3:249–54.
Bueno‐Silva B, Koo H, Falsetta ML, SM A, Ikegaki M, Rosalen PL. Effect of neovestitol‐vestitol containing Brazilian red propolis on accumulation of biofilm in vitro and development of dental caries in vivo. Biofouling. 2013;29:1233–42.
Silva VC, Silva AMGS, Basílio JAD, Xavier JA, do Nascimento TG, Naal RMZG, et al. New insights for red propolis of Alagoas: chemical constituents, topical membrane formulations and their physicochemical and biological properties. Molecules. 2020;25:5811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245811.
Chen CL, Parolia A, Pau A, Porto ICCM. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of desensitizing agents in dentine tubule occlusion using scanning electron microscopy. Aust Dent J. 2015; 60:65–72.
Zulhendri F, Felitti R, Fearnley J, Ravalia M. The use of propolis in dentistry, oral health, and medicine: a review. J Oral Biosci. 2021;63:23–34.
Kim JH, Kim SY, Woo SM, Jeong HN, Jung JY, Kim SM, et al. Combination of mineral trioxide aggregate and propolis promotes odontoblastic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells through ERK signaling pathway. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019;28:1801e9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068‐019‐00609‐5.
Mendonça ICG, Medeiros MLBB, Penteado, RAPM, Parolia A, Porto ICCM. An overview of the toxic effects and allergic reactions caused by propolis. Pharmacol Online Arch. 2013;2:96–105.
Yuan J, Yuan W, Guo Y, Wu Q, Wang F, Xuan H. Anti‐biofilm activities of Chinese poplar propolis essential oil against Streptococcus mutans. Nutrients. 2022;14:3290. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14163290.
Ali S, Farooq I, Bugshan A, Siddiqui IA, Al‐Khalifa KS, Al‐Hariri M. Efficacy of propolis in remineralising artificially induced demineralisation of human enamel: an in‐vitro study. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020;16:283–87.
Tavares JAO, da Silva FA, Santos TML, Caneppele TMF, Augusto MG. The effectiveness of propolis extract in reducing dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;131:105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105248.
Bankova V, de Castro SL, Marcucci MC. Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie. 2000;31:3–15.
Mjör IA. Dentin permeability: the basis for understanding pulp reactions and adhesive technology. Braz Dent J. 2009;20:3–16.
Marshall Jr GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent. 1997;25:441–5.
Grant Information: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; Foundation for Research Support of the State Alagoas
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: dental materials; dentin bonding agents; dentin permeability; dentinal fluid
Substance Nomenclature: 9009-62-5 (Propolis)
059QF0KO0R (Water)
0 (Dentin-Bonding Agents)
0 (single bond)
454I75YXY0 (Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate)
0 (Resin Cements)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20241011 Date Completed: 20241127 Latest Revision: 20260717
Update Code: 20260718
DOI: 10.1111/eos.13023
PMID: 39390713
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
Περιγραφή
ISSN:1600-0722
DOI:10.1111/eos.13023