Comparison of surface freshwater PFAS sampling methods to evaluate potential for bias due to PFAS enrichment in the surface microlayer.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of surface freshwater PFAS sampling methods to evaluate potential for bias due to PFAS enrichment in the surface microlayer.
Authors: Roark SA; Jacobs, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA., Wilson-Fallon A; Jacobs, Sacramento, California, USA., Struse A; Jacobs, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA., Rectenwald H; Jacobs, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA., Bogdan D; AECOM, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA., Heron C; Jacobs, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.; Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA., Field J; Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Source: Integrated environmental assessment and management [Integr Environ Assess Manag] 2024 Nov; Vol. 20 (6), pp. 2271-2282. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 30.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101234521 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1551-3793 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15513777 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Integr Environ Assess Manag Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: 2025- : [Oxford] : Oxford University Press
Original Publication: Pensacola, FL : Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), c2005-
MeSH Terms: Environmental Monitoring*/methods , Fresh Water*/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical*/analysis , Fluorocarbons*/analysis, Pilot Projects
Abstract: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) accumulate at the air-water interface of the surface microlayer (SML) on marine and freshwater bodies. In order to determine if including the SML when sampling bulk surface water leads to a high bias in measured PFAS concentrations, a pilot study and a full field study were conducted. The pilot study conducted at two sites was aimed at determining the analytical precision and small-scale (~1 m) spatial variability in concentrations of PFAS in bulk water and the SML. The full field study was performed at 11 sites, where three commonly used bulk surface water sampling methods were compared: (1) a peristaltic pump with tubing that excludes the SML, (2) a fully submerged sample bottle that excludes the SML, and (3) a partially submerged sample bottle that allows inclusion of the SML. The SML was sampled using the glass plate method. The samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The pilot study indicated that sampling variation was greater than analytical variation (although Levene's tests indicated that the differences were not statistically significant) and that relatively small differences in the mean concentration among sampling methods could be detected. The full investigation indicated that there was no evidence of high bias of PFAS concentrations in bulk surface water resulting from inclusion of SML using the partially submerged bottle sampling method. Unexpectedly, there was evidence that samples collected using the partially submerged bottle had slightly lower PFAS concentrations, particularly for less hydrophobic PFAS, than bulk water samples that excluded the SML. Additionally, the PFAS enrichment factor in the SML increased with increasing retention time, although the increase was not evident at all sampling sites for all PFAS. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:2271-2282. © 2024 SETAC.
(© 2024 SETAC.)
References: Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Brusseau, M. L. (2018). Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.065.
Casas, G., Martinez‐Varela, A., Roscales, J. L., Vila‐Costa, M., Dachs, J., & Jimenez, B. (2020). Enrichment of perfluoroalkyl substances in the sea‐surface microlayer and sea‐spray aerosols in the Southern Ocean. Environmental Pollution, 267, 115512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115512.
Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., Gasparovic, B., Guitart, C., Murrell, J. C., Salter, M., Stolle, C., Upstill‐Goddard, R., Wurl, O. (2013). Sea surface microlayers: A unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air‐ocean interface. Progress in Oceanography, 109, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.08.004.
Department of Defense (DoD)/Department of Energy (DOE). (2019). Quality Systems Manual (QSM) for Environmental Laboratories, Version 5.3.
Department of Defense (DoD)/Department of Energy (DOE). (2021). Quality Systems Manual (QSM) for Environmental Laboratories, Version 5.4.
Field, J., Schwichtenberg, T., Deeb, R., Hawley, E., Sayler, C., Bogdan, D., Shaefer, C. E., DiGuiseppi, B., & Struse, A. (2021). Assessing the potential for bias in PFAS concentrations during groundwater and surface water sampling. Technical Report SERDP Project ER19‐1205. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1159282.pdf.
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.
Johansson, J. H., Salter, M. E., Navarro, J. C. A., Leck, C., Nilsson, E. D., & Cousins, I. T. (2019). Global transport of perfluoroalkyl acids via sea spray aerosol. Environmental Science‐Processes & Impacts, 21(4), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8em00525g.
Ju, X. D., Jin, Y. H., Sasaki, K., & Saito, N. (2008). Perfluorinated surfactants in surface, subsurface water and microlayer from Dalian Coastal waters in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(10), 3538–3542. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703006d.
Kissa, E. (1994). Fluorinated surfactants: Synthesis, properties, and applications (Vol. 50). Marcel Dekker.
Krafft, M. P., & Riess, J. G. (2015). Selected physicochemical aspects of poly‐ and perfluoroalkylated substances relevant to performance, environment and sustainability—Part one. Chemosphere, 129, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere2014.08.039.
Kassambara, A. (2023). rstatix: Pipe‐friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R package version 0.7.2. https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/rstatix/.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
Schwichtenberg, T., Bogdan, D., Carignan, C. C., Reardon, P., Rewerts, J., Wanzek, T., & Field, J. A. (2020). PFAS and dissolved organic carbon enrichment in surface water foams on a northern US freshwater lake. Environmental Science and Technology, 54(22), 14455–14464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05697.
Schwichtenberg, T., Bogdan, D., Schaefer, C. E., Stults, J., & Field, J. A. (2023). Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances enrichment in the surface microlayer of a freshwater system impacted by aqueous film‐forming foams. ACS Environ Sci Technol Water, 3(4), 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.2c00618.
Sha, B., Johansson, J. H., Tunved, P., Bohlin‐Nizzetto, P., Cousins, I. T., & Salter, M. E. (2022). Sea spray aerosol (SSA) as a source of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) to the atmosphere: Field evidence from long‐term air monitoring. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(1), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04277.
Stults, J. F., Choi, Y. J., Rockwell, C., Schaefer, C. E., Nguyen, D. D., Knappe, D. R. U., Illangasekare, T. H., Higgins, C. P. (2023). Predicting concentration‐and ionic‐strength‐dependent air–water interfacial partitioning parameters of PFASs using quantitative structure–property relationships (QSPRs). Environmental Science & Technology, 57(13), 5203–5215. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07316.
Tokranov, A. K., LeBlanc, D. R., Pickard, H. M., Ruyle, B. J., Barber, L. B., Hull, R. B., Sunderland, E. M., Vecitis, C. D. (2021). Surface‐water/groundwater boundaries affect seasonal PFAS concentrations and PFAA precursor transformations. Environmental Science‐Processes & Impacts, 23(12), 1893–1905. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1em00329a.
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seide, D. P., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686.
Wurl, O., & Obbard, J. P. (2004). A review of pollutants in the sea‐surface microlayer (SML): A unique habitat for marine organisms. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48(11–12), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.03.016.
Grant Information: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Enrichment factor; PFAS; Surface microlayer; Surface water sampling bias
Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Water Pollutants, Chemical)
0 (Fluorocarbons)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240730 Date Completed: 20241017 Latest Revision: 20241017
Update Code: 20260130
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4980
PMID: 39078276
Database: MEDLINE
Description
ISSN:1551-3793
DOI:10.1002/ieam.4980