Academic Journal

Making meaning, making a living: historical transformations of handicraft labor and cultural identity in China.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Making meaning, making a living: historical transformations of handicraft labor and cultural identity in China.
Authors: Lin, Feiyang1,2 (AUTHOR), Ma, Zhiyao1,2,3 (AUTHOR) Mazhiyao1971@163.com, Shen, Yao1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Labor History. Sep2025, p1-22. 22p. 1 Illustration.
Subject Terms: *LABOR economics, *ECONOMIC competition, HANDICRAFT, CULTURAL identity, ASIANS, SYMBOLISM, ORAL history, CULTURAL property
Geographic Terms: CHINA
Abstract: This study examines the historical transformation of labor patterns, identity construction, and value practices among Chinese handicraft workers under the influence of national ICH policies and the market economy. Based on oral history interviews with ICH representative inheritors and participatory observation, the research reveals the following findings. First, handicraft workers have undergone identity transitions over a long historical process, from artisans to workers and then to representative inheritors, with their livelihood negotiations continually adjusting in response to institutional changes. Second, within a framework shaped by both incentives and discipline under the ICH system, handicraft workers negotiate their official identity and societal expectations through strategic cultural practices, gradually establishing their own cultural subjectivity. Third, through innovative transformation of traditional techniques, narrative construction, and performative labor, they endow handicrafts with new symbolic value and thereby realize contemporary expressions of tradition. This study reveals the interwoven relationship among livelihood, identity, and meaning-making, arguing that meaning-making has become an indispensable component of handicraft labor, through which workers’ agency and historical positioning are manifested at the intersection of cultural politics and economic practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Labor History is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
ISSN:0023656X
DOI:10.1080/0023656x.2025.2551523