APA (7th ed.) Citation

Delmas, J., Abeida, H., & Guido, R. (2026). The Gaussian Data Assumption Does Not Always Lead to the Largest Cramér–Rao Bound [Lecture Notes]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 43(5), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2026.3683015

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Delmas, J., H. Abeida, and R.C Guido. "The Gaussian Data Assumption Does Not Always Lead to the Largest Cramér–Rao Bound [Lecture Notes]." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 43, no. 5 (2026): 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2026.3683015.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Delmas, J., et al. "The Gaussian Data Assumption Does Not Always Lead to the Largest Cramér–Rao Bound [Lecture Notes]." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 43, no. 5, 2026, pp. 42-46, https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2026.3683015.