Academic Journal
Προβολή σε EDS

Distinguishing between ontology and ‘decolonisation as praxis’

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Distinguishing between ontology and ‘decolonisation as praxis’
Συγγραφείς: Kumalo, S.H.
Στοιχεία εκδότη: Tydskrif vir Letterkunde Assosiasie
Tydskrif vir Letterkunde Association, Department of Afrikaans, University of Pretoria
Tydskrif vir Letterkunde Association
Έτος έκδοσης: 2021
Θεματικοί όροι: Indigenous languages, Decolonisation, Literature, Philosophy, Ontological recognition, phil, litt
Περιγραφή: In this review article I closely read the recently published book African Philosophical and Literary Possibilities: Re-reading the Canon (2020), edited by Aretha Phiri. I suggest two ways of reading the text. The first levels a critique at some of the conflations we find in the text and the second showcases the useful takeaways that the reader gleans from the book. These takeaways are not—themselves—without criticisms, however. Such criticism is generative in that it shores up the work that still remains to be addressed by those working in the decolonial tradition, both here at home (i.e., in the South Africa academe) and further afield. In sum, I demonstrate that the objectives of decolonisation are clearly discernible when we apply ourselves to scholarship developed in the Indigenous languages of South Africa. ; http://www.letterkunde.up.ac.za ; pm2022 ; Political Sciences
Τύπος εγγράφου: article in journal/newspaper
Γλώσσα: English
Relation: 10670/1.7jq7ft; https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85073
Διαθεσιμότητα: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85073
Rights: undefined
Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: edsbas.F72C80F0
Βάση Δεδομένων: BASE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85073#
    Name: EDS - BASE (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record from BASE
Header DbId: edsbas
DbLabel: BASE
An: edsbas.F72C80F0
RelevancyScore: 836
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 836.347900390625
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Distinguishing between ontology and ‘decolonisation as praxis’
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kumalo%2C+S%2EH%2E%22">Kumalo, S.H.</searchLink>
– Name: Publisher
  Label: Publisher Information
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: Tydskrif vir Letterkunde Assosiasie<br />Tydskrif vir Letterkunde Association, Department of Afrikaans, University of Pretoria<br />Tydskrif vir Letterkunde Association
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Year
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indigenous+languages%22">Indigenous languages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decolonisation%22">Decolonisation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature%22">Literature</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy%22">Philosophy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ontological+recognition%22">Ontological recognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22phil%22">phil</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22litt%22">litt</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: In this review article I closely read the recently published book African Philosophical and Literary Possibilities: Re-reading the Canon (2020), edited by Aretha Phiri. I suggest two ways of reading the text. The first levels a critique at some of the conflations we find in the text and the second showcases the useful takeaways that the reader gleans from the book. These takeaways are not—themselves—without criticisms, however. Such criticism is generative in that it shores up the work that still remains to be addressed by those working in the decolonial tradition, both here at home (i.e., in the South Africa academe) and further afield. In sum, I demonstrate that the objectives of decolonisation are clearly discernible when we apply ourselves to scholarship developed in the Indigenous languages of South Africa. ; http://www.letterkunde.up.ac.za ; pm2022 ; Political Sciences
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: article in journal/newspaper
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: NoteTitleSource
  Label: Relation
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: 10670/1.7jq7ft; https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85073
– Name: URL
  Label: Availability
  Group: URL
  Data: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85073
– Name: Copyright
  Label: Rights
  Group: Cpyrght
  Data: undefined
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: edsbas.F72C80F0
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.F72C80F0
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Indigenous languages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decolonisation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Literature
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ontological recognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: phil
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: litt
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Distinguishing between ontology and ‘decolonisation as praxis’
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kumalo, S.H.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: edsbas
ResultId 1