Academic Journal
Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States
| Τίτλος: | Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Avishai, Aya, Ribisl, Kurt M, Sheeran, Paschal |
| Πηγή: | Social Science & Medicine, 327 |
| Στοιχεία εκδότη: | Elsevier |
| Έτος έκδοσης: | 2023 |
| Συλλογή: | Carolina Digital Repository (UNC - University of North Carolina) |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | never, banning cigarette sales, communication, cigarette, health policy, American, public support, thinking intervention, self-persuasion, avoidable harm, smokers, sale of cigarettes, direction, Study 3, production, group, tobacco endgame, Study 1, mean, smoking, ban, research, cigarette sales, tobacco products, purchase, policy, willingness, never smokers, combustible cigarettes, understanding |
| Περιγραφή: | BACKGROUND: There is little research on public support for banning the sale and purchase of combustible cigarettes even though a ban is an essential step towards achieving the endgame for tobacco products. PURPOSE: We report the first studies designed to (a) examine predictors of support for a ban (Study 1), and (b) test interventions to increase such support (Studies 2-4). METHODS: In Study 1, current, former, and never smokers (N = 479) were randomized to conditions measuring their willingness to ban the sale of cigarettes vs. an unspecified product. Smokers were randomized to a persuasive communication in Study 2 and a paradoxical thinking intervention in Study 3 (Ns = 300 and 302, respectively). In Study 4 (N = 336), we randomized smokers to self-persuasion and issue-framing interventions. RESULTS: Whereas nonsmokers were willing to ban the sale of both cigarettes and equivalent products, current and former smokers exempted cigarettes from a ban. Reactance to prohibition and perceived effectiveness predicted willingness to ban cigarette sales in all three smoking status groups (Study 1). Neither persuasive communication nor paradoxical thinking increased support for banning cigarette sales in Studies 2-3. However, self-persuasion and framing the ban as "protecting Americans from avoidable harm" both led to increased support for banning cigarette sales (Study 4). CONCLUSIONS: Reactance and doubt about the effectiveness of banning the sale of cigarettes are key barriers to supporting a ban. Self-persuasion and issue framing may be effective means of mobilizing policy support among smokers. The present research offers new insights relevant to promoting the "Tobacco Endgame" and helps specify directions for future research on public support for health policies. |
| Τύπος εγγράφου: | article in journal/newspaper |
| Γλώσσα: | unknown |
| Relation: | https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089?file=thumbnail; https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089 |
| DOI: | 10.17615/wj3p-xs83 |
| Διαθεσιμότητα: | https://doi.org/10.17615/wj3p-xs83 https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089?file=thumbnail https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089 |
| Rights: | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
| Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: | edsbas.BCA69FE9 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | BASE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://doi.org/10.17615/wj3p-xs83# Name: EDS - BASE (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: View record from BASE |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edsbas DbLabel: BASE An: edsbas.BCA69FE9 RelevancyScore: 856 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 856.330688476563 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Avishai%2C+Aya%22">Avishai, Aya</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ribisl%2C+Kurt+M%22">Ribisl, Kurt M</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sheeran%2C+Paschal%22">Sheeran, Paschal</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: Social Science & Medicine, 327 – Name: Publisher Label: Publisher Information Group: PubInfo Data: Elsevier – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Year Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: Subset Label: Collection Group: HoldingsInfo Data: Carolina Digital Repository (UNC - University of North Carolina) – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22never%22">never</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22banning+cigarette+sales%22">banning cigarette sales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22communication%22">communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22cigarette%22">cigarette</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22health+policy%22">health policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22American%22">American</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22public+support%22">public support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22thinking+intervention%22">thinking intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22self-persuasion%22">self-persuasion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22avoidable+harm%22">avoidable harm</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22smokers%22">smokers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22sale+of+cigarettes%22">sale of cigarettes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22direction%22">direction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Study+3%22">Study 3</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22production%22">production</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22group%22">group</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22tobacco+endgame%22">tobacco endgame</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Study+1%22">Study 1</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22mean%22">mean</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22smoking%22">smoking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ban%22">ban</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22research%22">research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22cigarette+sales%22">cigarette sales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22tobacco+products%22">tobacco products</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22purchase%22">purchase</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22policy%22">policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22willingness%22">willingness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22never+smokers%22">never smokers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22combustible+cigarettes%22">combustible cigarettes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22understanding%22">understanding</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: BACKGROUND: There is little research on public support for banning the sale and purchase of combustible cigarettes even though a ban is an essential step towards achieving the endgame for tobacco products. PURPOSE: We report the first studies designed to (a) examine predictors of support for a ban (Study 1), and (b) test interventions to increase such support (Studies 2-4). METHODS: In Study 1, current, former, and never smokers (N = 479) were randomized to conditions measuring their willingness to ban the sale of cigarettes vs. an unspecified product. Smokers were randomized to a persuasive communication in Study 2 and a paradoxical thinking intervention in Study 3 (Ns = 300 and 302, respectively). In Study 4 (N = 336), we randomized smokers to self-persuasion and issue-framing interventions. RESULTS: Whereas nonsmokers were willing to ban the sale of both cigarettes and equivalent products, current and former smokers exempted cigarettes from a ban. Reactance to prohibition and perceived effectiveness predicted willingness to ban cigarette sales in all three smoking status groups (Study 1). Neither persuasive communication nor paradoxical thinking increased support for banning cigarette sales in Studies 2-3. However, self-persuasion and framing the ban as "protecting Americans from avoidable harm" both led to increased support for banning cigarette sales (Study 4). CONCLUSIONS: Reactance and doubt about the effectiveness of banning the sale of cigarettes are key barriers to supporting a ban. Self-persuasion and issue framing may be effective means of mobilizing policy support among smokers. The present research offers new insights relevant to promoting the "Tobacco Endgame" and helps specify directions for future research on public support for health policies. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: article in journal/newspaper – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: unknown – Name: NoteTitleSource Label: Relation Group: SrcInfo Data: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089?file=thumbnail; https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.17615/wj3p-xs83 – Name: URL Label: Availability Group: URL Data: https://doi.org/10.17615/wj3p-xs83<br />https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089?file=thumbnail<br />https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/8p58pw089 – Name: Copyright Label: Rights Group: Cpyrght Data: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: edsbas.BCA69FE9 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.BCA69FE9 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.17615/wj3p-xs83 Languages: – Text: unknown Subjects: – SubjectFull: never Type: general – SubjectFull: banning cigarette sales Type: general – SubjectFull: communication Type: general – SubjectFull: cigarette Type: general – SubjectFull: health policy Type: general – SubjectFull: American Type: general – SubjectFull: public support Type: general – SubjectFull: thinking intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: self-persuasion Type: general – SubjectFull: avoidable harm Type: general – SubjectFull: smokers Type: general – SubjectFull: sale of cigarettes Type: general – SubjectFull: direction Type: general – SubjectFull: Study 3 Type: general – SubjectFull: production Type: general – SubjectFull: group Type: general – SubjectFull: tobacco endgame Type: general – SubjectFull: Study 1 Type: general – SubjectFull: mean Type: general – SubjectFull: smoking Type: general – SubjectFull: ban Type: general – SubjectFull: research Type: general – SubjectFull: cigarette sales Type: general – SubjectFull: tobacco products Type: general – SubjectFull: purchase Type: general – SubjectFull: policy Type: general – SubjectFull: willingness Type: general – SubjectFull: never smokers Type: general – SubjectFull: combustible cigarettes Type: general – SubjectFull: understanding Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Avishai, Aya – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ribisl, Kurt M – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sheeran, Paschal IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-locals Value: edsbas Titles: – TitleFull: Social Science & Medicine, 327 Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |