Academic Journal
Constitutional challenges: Constituent power and plebiscitary claims at odds
| Τίτλος: | Constitutional challenges: Constituent power and plebiscitary claims at odds |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Botello Moncada, Luis |
| Πηγή: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 2346-2051, Nº. 63, 2025 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Septiembre-Diciembre), pags. 9-32 |
| Έτος έκδοσης: | 2025 |
| Συλλογή: | Dialnet - Portada de revistas (Universidad de La Rioja) |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | Diseño constitucional, presidencias plebiscitarias, poder constituyente, poder constituido, restricciones ascendentes y descendentes, momentos constitu-cionales, Constitution-making, constitutional design, plebiscitary presidencies, constituent power, upstream and downstream constraints, constitutional moments |
| Περιγραφή: | This paper elaborates on the scope of plebiscitary presidencies as disruptive forces between democracy and constitutionalism, emphasizing the procedures for convening the constituent power. Through a comparison of Venezuela (1999) and Chile (2019-2023), this paper deepens how plebiscitary outbreaks become linkages capable of dragging down constitutional fundamentals. A substantial aspect focuses on establishing why the request and effectiveness of procedures may vary under the notion of foundational power in constitutional analysis, as is the case with the right of resistance. The paper concludes that the distinction between the concepts of constituent power lies not in the force it deploys, but in the cirmcunstances preceding its convocation. Thus, the theory of constitutional moments plays a significant role in this study. In this sense, the paper emphasizes how plebiscitary tendencies pose a threat to constitutional designs. Rather than taking advantage of procedural channels to establisha new order, these tendencies tend to debase constitutional forms in favor of marked ideological interests. ; El presente trabajo explora el alcance de las presidencias plebiscitarias como fuerzas disruptivas entre la democracia y el constitucionalismo, priorizando los procedimientos de convocatoria del poder constituyente. Al contrastar los casos de Venezuela (1999) y Chile (2019-2023), el trabajo profundiza en cómo los estallidos plebiscitarios se convierten en encadenamientos capaces de arrastrar fundamentos constitucionales. Un aspecto sustancial se centra en establecer por qué la solicitud y efectividad de los procedimientos pueden variar bajo la noción de poder fundacional en el análisis constitucional, como es el caso respecto del derecho de resistencia. El trabajo determina que la diferencia entre las nociones de poder constituyente debe rastrearse no en la fuerza que despliega, sino en los escenarios que anteceden a su convocatoria, desplegando así por qué la teoría de los momentos constitucionales adquiere un ... |
| Τύπος εγγράφου: | article in journal/newspaper |
| Περιγραφή αρχείου: | application/pdf |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Relation: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10437325 |
| Διαθεσιμότητα: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10437325 |
| Rights: | LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI |
| Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: | edsbas.A2CF4FB8 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | BASE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10437325# Name: EDS - BASE (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: View record from BASE |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edsbas DbLabel: BASE An: edsbas.A2CF4FB8 RelevancyScore: 908 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 907.8095703125 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Constitutional challenges: Constituent power and plebiscitary claims at odds – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Botello+Moncada%2C+Luis%22">Botello Moncada, Luis</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 2346-2051, Nº. 63, 2025 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Septiembre-Diciembre), pags. 9-32 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Year Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: Subset Label: Collection Group: HoldingsInfo Data: Dialnet - Portada de revistas (Universidad de La Rioja) – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diseño+constitucional%22">Diseño constitucional</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22presidencias+plebiscitarias%22">presidencias plebiscitarias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22poder+constituyente%22">poder constituyente</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22poder+constituido%22">poder constituido</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22restricciones+ascendentes+y+descendentes%22">restricciones ascendentes y descendentes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22momentos+constitu-cionales%22">momentos constitu-cionales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Constitution-making%22">Constitution-making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22constitutional+design%22">constitutional design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22plebiscitary+presidencies%22">plebiscitary presidencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22constituent+power%22">constituent power</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22upstream+and+downstream+constraints%22">upstream and downstream constraints</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22constitutional+moments%22">constitutional moments</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: This paper elaborates on the scope of plebiscitary presidencies as disruptive forces between democracy and constitutionalism, emphasizing the procedures for convening the constituent power. Through a comparison of Venezuela (1999) and Chile (2019-2023), this paper deepens how plebiscitary outbreaks become linkages capable of dragging down constitutional fundamentals. A substantial aspect focuses on establishing why the request and effectiveness of procedures may vary under the notion of foundational power in constitu­tional analysis, as is the case with the right of resistance. The paper concludes that the distinction between the concepts of constituent power lies not in the force it deploys, but in the cirmcunstances preceding its convocation. Thus, the theory of constitutional moments plays a significant role in this study. In this sense, the paper emphasizes how plebiscitary tendencies pose a threat to constitutional designs. Rather than taking advantage of procedural channels to establisha new order, these tendencies tend to debase constitutional forms in favor of marked ideological interests. ; El presente trabajo explora el alcance de las presidencias plebiscitarias como fuerzas disruptivas entre la democracia y el constitucionalismo, priorizando los procedimientos de convocatoria del poder constituyente. Al contrastar los casos de Venezuela (1999) y Chile (2019-2023), el trabajo profundiza en cómo los estallidos plebiscitarios se convierten en encadenamientos capaces de arrastrar fundamentos constitucionales. Un aspecto sustancial se centra en establecer por qué la solicitud y efectividad de los procedimientos pueden variar bajo la noción de poder fundacional en el análisis constitucional, como es el caso respecto del derecho de resistencia. El trabajo determina que la diferencia entre las nociones de poder constituyente debe rastrearse no en la fuerza que despliega, sino en los escenarios que anteceden a su convoca­toria, desplegando así por qué la teoría de los momentos constitucionales adquiere un ... – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: article in journal/newspaper – Name: Format Label: File Description Group: SrcInfo Data: application/pdf – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: NoteTitleSource Label: Relation Group: SrcInfo Data: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10437325 – Name: URL Label: Availability Group: URL Data: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=10437325 – Name: Copyright Label: Rights Group: Cpyrght Data: LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: edsbas.A2CF4FB8 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.A2CF4FB8 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English Subjects: – SubjectFull: Diseño constitucional Type: general – SubjectFull: presidencias plebiscitarias Type: general – SubjectFull: poder constituyente Type: general – SubjectFull: poder constituido Type: general – SubjectFull: restricciones ascendentes y descendentes Type: general – SubjectFull: momentos constitu-cionales Type: general – SubjectFull: Constitution-making Type: general – SubjectFull: constitutional design Type: general – SubjectFull: plebiscitary presidencies Type: general – SubjectFull: constituent power Type: general – SubjectFull: upstream and downstream constraints Type: general – SubjectFull: constitutional moments Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Constitutional challenges: Constituent power and plebiscitary claims at odds Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Botello Moncada, Luis IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-locals Value: edsbas Titles: – TitleFull: Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 2346-2051, Nº. 63, 2025 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Septiembre-Diciembre), pags. 9-32 Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |