Dissertation/ Thesis

The material and immaterial connectivity underpinning Iran–Central Eurasia relations: elite discourse in Baku and Tashkent

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: The material and immaterial connectivity underpinning Iran–Central Eurasia relations: elite discourse in Baku and Tashkent
Συγγραφείς: Tomek, J
Συνεισφορές: Herzig, E, Allison, R
Έτος έκδοσης: 2024
Συλλογή: Oxford University Research Archive (ORA)
Θεματικοί όροι: Former Soviet republics, Islam and politics, International economic relations, Group identity, Historiography, Geopolitics--Middle East, Diplomacy, Investments, Foreign, Infrastructure (Economics)--Developing countries, International relations and culture, Regionalism, Politics and government, International relations, Trade routes, Geopolitics--Asia, Central, Nationalism and historiography, Former communist countries, Geopolitics
Περιγραφή: The collapse of the Soviet Union and the independence of the republics of the South Caucasus and Central Asia opened a window of geopolitical opportunity to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Like Turkey, Iran could henceforth start leveraging millennia-worth of ‘immaterial connectivity’: religious, linguistic, cultural and historical commonalities, hitherto impeded and obscured by decades of Soviet hegemony. Compared to Turkey, however, Iran has a clear advantage in terms of ‘material connectivity’, by virtue of directly bordering both sub-regions, as well as the Caspian Sea waterway. It has thus been able to court the bulk of its landlocked interlocutors with the promise of enabling access to international shipping routes via the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, as well as overland transport along east–west and north–south Eurasia-spanning axes respectively. With interlocutors such as Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan, the latter has been done without much compounding complexity, largely in pursuit of pragmatic interests, especially once it became clear that Iran’s northern policy vector is an overwhelmingly-de-ideologized pragmatic one. By contrast, the two most complex constituent dyads of the Iran–Central Eurasia regional nexus—namely the Tehran–Baku and the Tehran–Tashkent relationship, which are both explored here and compared in an in-depth manner—have been experiencing particular volatility over the course of the past three decades. Applying the theoretical framework of constructivism and relying on the methodological tool of analysing all hegemonic national discourse where Iran is the common denominator—discourse relayed over the course of elite interviews in Baku and Tashkent in the 2021–2022 period—one can discern some overarching trends. Firstly, in addition to Tehran systematically deferring to Moscow on Eurasian matters, the two aforementioned relationships have operated as a function of the broader Tehran–Baku–Yerevan and Tehran–Tashkent–Dushanbe ‘relationship triangles’ respectively. Assumptions of the ...
Τύπος εγγράφου: thesis
Γλώσσα: English
DOI: 10.5287/ora-aov2ewpzy
Διαθεσιμότητα: https://doi.org/10.5287/ora-aov2ewpzy
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:de33e9a1-850e-486f-b28e-ce7822fbd679
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: edsbas.43ED00E3
Βάση Δεδομένων: BASE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://doi.org/10.5287/ora-aov2ewpzy#
    Name: EDS - BASE (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record from BASE
Header DbId: edsbas
DbLabel: BASE
An: edsbas.43ED00E3
RelevancyScore: 867
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Dissertation/ Thesis
PubTypeId: dissertation
PreciseRelevancyScore: 866.983581542969
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The material and immaterial connectivity underpinning Iran–Central Eurasia relations: elite discourse in Baku and Tashkent
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tomek%2C+J%22">Tomek, J</searchLink>
– Name: Author
  Label: Contributors
  Group: Au
  Data: Herzig, E<br />Allison, R
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Year
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: Subset
  Label: Collection
  Group: HoldingsInfo
  Data: Oxford University Research Archive (ORA)
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Former+Soviet+republics%22">Former Soviet republics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Islam+and+politics%22">Islam and politics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+economic+relations%22">International economic relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+identity%22">Group identity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Historiography%22">Historiography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geopolitics--Middle+East%22">Geopolitics--Middle East</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diplomacy%22">Diplomacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Investments%22">Investments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign%22">Foreign</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Infrastructure+%28Economics%29--Developing+countries%22">Infrastructure (Economics)--Developing countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+relations+and+culture%22">International relations and culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regionalism%22">Regionalism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Politics+and+government%22">Politics and government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+relations%22">International relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trade+routes%22">Trade routes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geopolitics--Asia%22">Geopolitics--Asia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Central%22">Central</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nationalism+and+historiography%22">Nationalism and historiography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Former+communist+countries%22">Former communist countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geopolitics%22">Geopolitics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: The collapse of the Soviet Union and the independence of the republics of the South Caucasus and Central Asia opened a window of geopolitical opportunity to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Like Turkey, Iran could henceforth start leveraging millennia-worth of ‘immaterial connectivity’: religious, linguistic, cultural and historical commonalities, hitherto impeded and obscured by decades of Soviet hegemony. Compared to Turkey, however, Iran has a clear advantage in terms of ‘material connectivity’, by virtue of directly bordering both sub-regions, as well as the Caspian Sea waterway. It has thus been able to court the bulk of its landlocked interlocutors with the promise of enabling access to international shipping routes via the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, as well as overland transport along east–west and north–south Eurasia-spanning axes respectively. With interlocutors such as Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan, the latter has been done without much compounding complexity, largely in pursuit of pragmatic interests, especially once it became clear that Iran’s northern policy vector is an overwhelmingly-de-ideologized pragmatic one. By contrast, the two most complex constituent dyads of the Iran–Central Eurasia regional nexus—namely the Tehran–Baku and the Tehran–Tashkent relationship, which are both explored here and compared in an in-depth manner—have been experiencing particular volatility over the course of the past three decades. Applying the theoretical framework of constructivism and relying on the methodological tool of analysing all hegemonic national discourse where Iran is the common denominator—discourse relayed over the course of elite interviews in Baku and Tashkent in the 2021–2022 period—one can discern some overarching trends. Firstly, in addition to Tehran systematically deferring to Moscow on Eurasian matters, the two aforementioned relationships have operated as a function of the broader Tehran–Baku–Yerevan and Tehran–Tashkent–Dushanbe ‘relationship triangles’ respectively. Assumptions of the ...
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: thesis
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.5287/ora-aov2ewpzy
– Name: URL
  Label: Availability
  Group: URL
  Data: https://doi.org/10.5287/ora-aov2ewpzy<br />https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:de33e9a1-850e-486f-b28e-ce7822fbd679
– Name: Copyright
  Label: Rights
  Group: Cpyrght
  Data: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: edsbas.43ED00E3
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.43ED00E3
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.5287/ora-aov2ewpzy
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Former Soviet republics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Islam and politics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: International economic relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Group identity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Historiography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Geopolitics--Middle East
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diplomacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Investments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Infrastructure (Economics)--Developing countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: International relations and culture
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regionalism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Politics and government
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: International relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trade routes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Geopolitics--Asia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Central
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nationalism and historiography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Former communist countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Geopolitics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The material and immaterial connectivity underpinning Iran–Central Eurasia relations: elite discourse in Baku and Tashkent
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tomek, J
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Herzig, E
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Allison, R
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: edsbas
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: edsbas.oa
ResultId 1