Academic Journal
Προβολή σε EDS

Consistency of Judicial Practice as an Element of Legal Certainty: Approach of the ECtHR

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Consistency of Judicial Practice as an Element of Legal Certainty: Approach of the ECtHR
Πηγή: Проблемы законности; № 146 (2019); 63-74
Problems of Legality; № 146 (2019); 63-74
Проблеми законності; № 146 (2019); 63-74
Στοιχεία εκδότη: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2019.
Έτος έκδοσης: 2019
Θεματικοί όροι: правова визначеність, право на справедливий судовий розгляд у цивільних справах, єдність судової практики, верховенство права, правовая определенность, право на справедливое судебное разбирательство по гражданским делам, единство судебной практики, 16. Peace & justice, legal certainty, right to a fair trial in civil cases, consistency of judicial practice, rule of law, 347.9
Περιγραφή: The article is devoted to the analysis of the consistency of judicial practice as an essential element of the legal certainty principle in terms of the evaluative interpretation of par. 1 art. 6 ECHR devoted to the right to a fair trial in civil procedure. The author describes an algorithm which is used by the ECtHR in order to confirm the violation of the right to a fair trial because of the lack of the consistency of judicial practice at national level. In order to identify whether conflicting decisions in similar cases violate the principle of legal certainty in terms of the par. 1 art. 6 ECHR, ECtHR has to find out: a) whether “profound and long-standing divergences” in the case-law exist; b) whether domestic law provides for a mechanism capable of removing the judicial inconsistency; and c) whether this mechanism was applied and, if so, what its effects were. Different types of the inconsistency of judicial practice can be distinguished, for example, inconsistency in practice of lower courts, inconsistency in case-law of the highest court, inconsistency in case-law of different highest courts which are not subordinated to each other. Different standards should be applied for such kinds of divergence: the ECtHR doesn’t analyze the divergence of case-law in the level of lower court, because it’s the higher court which should fix this inconsistency, the main attention should be paid to the divergence of the highest courts. There are two main types of such divergence: a) inconsistency of the case-law of the one and only highest court; b) inconsistency in case-law of several courts which are not subordinated one to another. In first situation the ECtHR applies stricter standards according to which the highest court at the national level should guarantee the consistent interpretation of the law avoiding divergence of interpretation. Nevertheless, in the second situation the ECtHR follows less strict approach according to which inconsistency of case-law of several independent can be tolerated.
Статья посвящена исследованию базовых подходов, разработанных в практике Европейского суда по правам человека, касательно интерпретации такого требования принципа правовой определенности, как единство судебной практики, в контексте толкования п. 1 ст. 6 Конвенции о защите прав человека и основных свобод, который закрепляет право каждого на справедливое судебное разбирательство по гражданским делам.
Статтю присвячено вивченню базових підходів, вироблених у практиці Європейського суду з прав людини, до інтерпретації такої вимоги принципу правової визначеності, як єдність судової практики, у контексті тлумачення п. 1 ст. 6 Конвенції про захист прав людини та основоположних свобод, що закріплює право кожного на справедливий судовий розгляд у цивільних справах.
Τύπος εγγράφου: Article
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Γλώσσα: Ukrainian
ISSN: 2224-9281
2414-990X
Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/175598
Rights: CC BY
Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: edsair.scientific.p..9c0cc3f9a71a6adb0f41f858e5a28aa3
Βάση Δεδομένων: OpenAIRE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=scientific_p%3A%3A9c0cc3f9a71a6adb0f41f858e5a28aa3
    Name: EDS - OpenAIRE (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record at OpenAIRE
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:edsair&genre=article&issn=22249281&ISBN=&volume=&issue=&date=20190924&spage=&pages=&title=Проблемы законности&atitle=Consistency%20of%20Judicial%20Practice%20as%20an%20Element%20of%20Legal%20Certainty%3A%20Approach%20of%20the%20ECtHR&aulast=&id=DOI:
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
Header DbId: edsair
DbLabel: OpenAIRE
An: edsair.scientific.p..9c0cc3f9a71a6adb0f41f858e5a28aa3
RelevancyScore: 822
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 822.350830078125
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Consistency of Judicial Practice as an Element of Legal Certainty: Approach of the ECtHR
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: Проблемы законности; № 146 (2019); 63-74<br />Problems of Legality; № 146 (2019); 63-74<br />Проблеми законності; № 146 (2019); 63-74
– Name: Publisher
  Label: Publisher Information
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2019.
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Year
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22правова+визначеність%22">правова визначеність</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22право+на+справедливий+судовий+розгляд+у+цивільних+справах%22">право на справедливий судовий розгляд у цивільних справах</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22єдність+судової+практики%22">єдність судової практики</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22верховенство+права%22">верховенство права</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22правовая+определенность%22">правовая определенность</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22право+на+справедливое+судебное+разбирательство+по+гражданским+делам%22">право на справедливое судебное разбирательство по гражданским делам</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22единство+судебной+практики%22">единство судебной практики</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%2216%2E+Peace+%26+justice%22">16. Peace & justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22legal+certainty%22">legal certainty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22right+to+a+fair+trial+in+civil+cases%22">right to a fair trial in civil cases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22consistency+of+judicial+practice%22">consistency of judicial practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22rule+of+law%22">rule of law</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22347%2E9%22">347.9</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article is devoted to the analysis of the consistency of judicial practice as an essential element of the legal certainty principle in terms of the evaluative interpretation of par. 1 art. 6 ECHR devoted to the right to a fair trial in civil procedure. The author describes an algorithm which is used by the ECtHR in order to confirm the violation of the right to a fair trial because of the lack of the consistency of judicial practice at national level. In order to identify whether conflicting decisions in similar cases violate the principle of legal certainty in terms of the par. 1 art. 6 ECHR, ECtHR has to find out: a) whether “profound and long-standing divergences” in the case-law exist; b) whether domestic law provides for a mechanism capable of removing the judicial inconsistency; and c) whether this mechanism was applied and, if so, what its effects were. Different types of the inconsistency of judicial practice can be distinguished, for example, inconsistency in practice of lower courts, inconsistency in case-law of the highest court, inconsistency in case-law of different highest courts which are not subordinated to each other. Different standards should be applied for such kinds of divergence: the ECtHR doesn’t analyze the divergence of case-law in the level of lower court, because it’s the higher court which should fix this inconsistency, the main attention should be paid to the divergence of the highest courts. There are two main types of such divergence: a) inconsistency of the case-law of the one and only highest court; b) inconsistency in case-law of several courts which are not subordinated one to another. In first situation the ECtHR applies stricter standards according to which the highest court at the national level should guarantee the consistent interpretation of the law avoiding divergence of interpretation. Nevertheless, in the second situation the ECtHR follows less strict approach according to which inconsistency of case-law of several independent can be tolerated.<br />Статья посвящена исследованию базовых подходов, разработанных в практике Европейского суда по правам человека, касательно интерпретации такого требования принципа правовой определенности, как единство судебной практики, в контексте толкования п. 1 ст. 6 Конвенции о защите прав человека и основных свобод, который закрепляет право каждого на справедливое судебное разбирательство по гражданским делам.<br />Статтю присвячено вивченню базових підходів, вироблених у практиці Європейського суду з прав людини, до інтерпретації такої вимоги принципу правової визначеності, як єдність судової практики, у контексті тлумачення п. 1 ст. 6 Конвенції про захист прав людини та основоположних свобод, що закріплює право кожного на справедливий судовий розгляд у цивільних справах.
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Article
– Name: Format
  Label: File Description
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: application/pdf
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: Ukrainian
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2224-9281<br />2414-990X
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/175598" linkWindow="_blank">http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/175598</link>
– Name: Copyright
  Label: Rights
  Group: Cpyrght
  Data: CC BY
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: edsair.scientific.p..9c0cc3f9a71a6adb0f41f858e5a28aa3
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsair&AN=edsair.scientific.p..9c0cc3f9a71a6adb0f41f858e5a28aa3
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: Ukrainian
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: правова визначеність
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: право на справедливий судовий розгляд у цивільних справах
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: єдність судової практики
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: верховенство права
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: правовая определенность
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: право на справедливое судебное разбирательство по гражданским делам
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: единство судебной практики
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: 16. Peace & justice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: legal certainty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: right to a fair trial in civil cases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: consistency of judicial practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: rule of law
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: 347.9
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Consistency of Judicial Practice as an Element of Legal Certainty: Approach of the ECtHR
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 24
              M: 09
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 22249281
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2414990X
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: edsair
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: edsairFT
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Проблемы законности
              Type: main
ResultId 1