Decision‐making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of nonparticipants: A qualitative interview study

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Decision‐making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of nonparticipants: A qualitative interview study
Συγγραφείς: Laura A.V. Marlow, Amanda J. Chorley, Lauren Rockliffe, Jo Waller
Πηγή: Psychooncology
Marlow, L, Chorley, A, Rockliffe, L & Waller, J 2018, 'Decision-making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of non-participants: a qualitative interview study', Psycho-oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4857
Στοιχεία εκδότη: Wiley, 2018.
Έτος έκδοσης: 2018
Θεματικοί όροι: PAPM, Adult, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Decision Making, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Early Detection of Cancer/psychology, Patient Compliance/psychology, decision making, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, tailored, 5. Gender equality, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis, Patient Participation/psychology, Vaginal Smears/psychology, Mass Screening/psychology, cancer, Humans, Mass Screening, cervical screening, theory, Early Detection of Cancer, Qualitative Research, Aged, Vaginal Smears, Practice, Health Knowledge, Precaution adoption process model, Middle Aged, 3. Good health, Attitudes, qualitative, oncology, Papers, beliefs, Patient Compliance, Female, Patient Participation, Comprehension
Περιγραφή: ObjectiveAccording to the precaution adoption process model, cervical screening nonparticipants represent a heterogeneous group including those who are unaware of, unengaged with, or undecided about screening, as well as intenders and decliners. We aimed to explore beliefs about cervical screening among these different types of nonparticipant.MethodsSemistructured interviews were carried out with women aged 26 to 65 years living in Britain (n = 29). Women were purposively sampled to represent different nonparticipant types. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed thematically using framework analysis.ResultsThe salience of some barriers to screening varied between different types of nonparticipant. Bad experiences were prominent in the discussions of women who had decided not to attend, while practical barriers were more prominent among intenders. There was also some overlap between nonparticipant types. For example, many of the undecided women described not wanting to go for screening, but with less certainty than decliners. Some intenders (particularly those who had not been screened before) described not really wanting to attend but feeling they ought to. Women's views on the invitation/reminder process also varied; intenders and maintainers appreciated written reminders and general practitioner (GP) prompts but decliners sometimes perceived these as “badgering.” Throughout the interviews, women described changing views on screening in the wider context of ageing and motherhood.ConclusionsThe salience of screening barriers varies by nonparticipant type, offering possibilities for tailored interventions. However, the fluidity of women's stage of screening adoption might have implications for this approach to intervention design.
Τύπος εγγράφου: Article
Other literature type
Γλώσσα: English
ISSN: 1099-1611
1057-9249
DOI: 10.1002/pon.4857
Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/pon.4857
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30095862
https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/908ab0ce-56d1-4cee-9260-550048c905e0
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4857
https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/decisionmaking-about-cervical-screening-in-a-heterogeneous-sample-of-nonparticipants-a-qualitative-interview-study(908ab0ce-56d1-4cee-9260-550048c905e0).html
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pon.4857
http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30095862
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30095862
https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pon.4857
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30095862/
https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10053612/
Rights: CC BY
Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: edsair.doi.dedup.....81ede77ca54a9d6d6d3d82c68316aee5
Βάση Δεδομένων: OpenAIRE
Περιγραφή
ISSN:10991611
10579249
DOI:10.1002/pon.4857