Academic Journal

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Software Engineering Tertiary Studies: A Systematic Mapping and Emerging Framework

Bibliographic Details
Title: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Software Engineering Tertiary Studies: A Systematic Mapping and Emerging Framework
Authors: Costal Costa, Dolors, Farré Tost, Carles, Franch Gutiérrez, Javier, Quer, Carme
Source: UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Publication Status: Preprint
Publisher Information: ACM, 2021.
Publication Year: 2021
Subject Terms: Software Engineering (cs.SE), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Software Engineering, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Enginyeria del software, Software engineering, Exclusion criteria, Informàtica::Enginyeria del software [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology, Enginyeria de programari, Inclusión criteria, Tertiary studies
Description: Context: Tertiary studies in software engineering (TS@SE) are widely used to synthesise evidence on a research topic systematically. As part of their protocol, TS@SE define inclusion and exclusion criteria (IC/EC) aimed at selecting those secondary studies (SS) to be included in the analysis. Aims: To provide a state of the art on the definition and application of IC/EC in TS@SE, and from the results of this analysis, we outline an emerging framework, TSICEC, to be used by SE researchers. Method: To provide the state of the art, we conducted a systematic mapping (SM) combining automatic search and snowballing over the body of SE scientific literature, which led to 50 papers after application of our own IC/EC. The extracted data was synthesised using content analysis. The results were used to define a first version of TSICEC. Results: The SM resulted in a coding schema, and a thorough analysis of the selected papers on the basis of this coding. Our TSICEC framework includes guidelines for the definition of IC/EC in TS@SE. Conclusion: This paper is a step forward establishing a foundation for researchers in two ways. As authors, understanding the different possibilities to define IC/EC and apply them to select SS. As readers, having an instrument to understand the methodological rigor upon which TS@SE may claim their findings.
Document Type: Article
Conference object
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
DOI: 10.1145/3475716.3484190
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.08226
DOI: 10.13039/501100011033
Access URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.08226
http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08226
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08226
http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210908226C/abstract
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.08226.pdf
http://export.arxiv.org/abs/2109.08226
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08226
http://arxiv-export-lb.library.cornell.edu/abs/2109.08226
https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/355581/1/Costal%20et%20al.pdf
https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr2109.html#abs-2109-08226
https://doi.org/10.1145/3475716.3484190
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3475716.3484190
https://hdl.handle.net/2117/355581
https://doi.org/10.1145/3475716.3484190
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08226
Rights: arXiv Non-Exclusive Distribution
URL: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....13c0d67a57d3053b7f721eee1de9de67
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
DOI:10.1145/3475716.3484190