Academic Journal
РОЛЬ ИНТЕРПРЕТИРУЮЩЕГО ДИСКУРСА В ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ КОММУНИКАТИВНОГО СООБЩЕСТВА: THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATIVE DISCOURSE IN THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATION COMMUNITY
| Τίτλος: | РОЛЬ ИНТЕРПРЕТИРУЮЩЕГО ДИСКУРСА В ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ КОММУНИКАТИВНОГО СООБЩЕСТВА: THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATIVE DISCOURSE IN THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATION COMMUNITY |
|---|---|
| Πηγή: | Русистика и компаративистика. :304-316 |
| Στοιχεία εκδότη: | Moscow City Pedagogical University, 2019. |
| Έτος έκδοσης: | 2019 |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | interpretative discourse, интерпретирующий дискурс, создание знаний, 9. Industry and infrastructure, трансфер знаний, collective cognition, когнитивное сообщество, knowledge creation, communication community, cognitive community, knowledge transfer, коммуникативное сообщество, communicative personality, коллективная когниция, коммуникативная личность |
| Περιγραφή: | В статье дается обоснование сущности коммуникативного сообщества как когнитивного сообщества, или сообщества знания. Знание рассматривается как продукт коммуникативного сообщества и причина его формирования. Результаты исследования показывают, что в коммуникативном сообществе осуществляются и взаимодействуют две основные когнитивные операции трансфер и создание знаний. Вводится понятие интерпретирующего дискурса и выделяются два его основных типа: объясняющий и аргументирующий дискурс. Разграничивается объективное и субъективное знание в качестве субъективного рассматривается ложное, фейковое и деструктивное знание. Это разграничение служит основой классификации коммуникативных сообществ. В статье также отмечается роль в формировании коммуникативного сообщества коллективной когниции и коллективной интерпретирующей деятельности. The aim of this paper is to propose a cognitive model of communication community. The starting point is the philosophical theory by K.O. Apel in which communication community, in contrast to social and territorial communities, is conceived as unlimited being based on coordinated, or mutual, understanding. This de nition is not su ciently explanatory and so far no research has been done to make it applicable to linguistics. The theoretical claim proved in this paper is that communication community should be understood, rst, as a structural and, second, as a cognitive, or knowledge, community. The structural approach to communication community reveals the main characteristic of discourse produced in it, namely its relevance as a condition for maintaining coordinated communicative behavior. The inclusion of a person in the communication community depends on his / her ability to produce such discourses which will be in demand by other participants and thus retain his / her copresence with them. The acceptability of discourse means that the speaker has been accepted as a communicative personality. In this interpretation communicative personality is understood from the standpoint of the model of communicative act as addresser or addressee. The exchange of messages between them presupposes their copresence in the same communication community. The cognitive approach to communication community implies that knowledge is viewed as a product of communication community, as well as the cause for its formation. The investigation has established that two cognitive operations knowledge transfer and knowledge creation are carried out and interact in the process of communication community formation. Knowledge transfer is de ned as transfer of data of any kind from individual to individual and knowledge creation as new information obtained by an individual or a group and considered by the communication community as new knowledge. The notion of interpretative discourse through which knowledge transfer and knowledge creation are realized verbally is introduced and two types of it, namely explanatory and argumentative discourse, are singled out. The distinction between objective and subjective knowledge, the latter including false, fake and destructive knowledge, is drawn and then applied to the di erentiation of types of communication communities. The paper also explores the ways in which communication community correlates with, and is shaped by, collective cognition and collective interpretative activity. |
| Τύπος εγγράφου: | Article |
| Γλώσσα: | Russian |
| ISSN: | 2619-0656 |
| DOI: | 10.25688/2619-0656.2019.13.20 |
| Αριθμός Καταχώρησης: | edsair.doi...........e396df81f097a6b196fa43c1f4cc47a1 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | OpenAIRE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edsair DbLabel: OpenAIRE An: edsair.doi...........e396df81f097a6b196fa43c1f4cc47a1 RelevancyScore: 872 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 872.317565917969 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: РОЛЬ ИНТЕРПРЕТИРУЮЩЕГО ДИСКУРСА В ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ КОММУНИКАТИВНОГО СООБЩЕСТВА: THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATIVE DISCOURSE IN THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATION COMMUNITY – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <i>Русистика и компаративистика</i>. :304-316 – Name: Publisher Label: Publisher Information Group: PubInfo Data: Moscow City Pedagogical University, 2019. – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Year Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22interpretative+discourse%22">interpretative discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22интерпретирующий+дискурс%22">интерпретирующий дискурс</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22создание+знаний%22">создание знаний</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%229%2E+Industry+and+infrastructure%22">9. Industry and infrastructure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22трансфер+знаний%22">трансфер знаний</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22collective+cognition%22">collective cognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22когнитивное+сообщество%22">когнитивное сообщество</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22knowledge+creation%22">knowledge creation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22communication+community%22">communication community</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22cognitive+community%22">cognitive community</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22knowledge+transfer%22">knowledge transfer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22коммуникативное+сообщество%22">коммуникативное сообщество</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22communicative+personality%22">communicative personality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22коллективная+когниция%22">коллективная когниция</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22коммуникативная+личность%22">коммуникативная личность</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: В статье дается обоснование сущности коммуникативного сообщества как когнитивного сообщества, или сообщества знания. Знание рассматривается как продукт коммуникативного сообщества и причина его формирования. Результаты исследования показывают, что в коммуникативном сообществе осуществляются и взаимодействуют две основные когнитивные операции трансфер и создание знаний. Вводится понятие интерпретирующего дискурса и выделяются два его основных типа: объясняющий и аргументирующий дискурс. Разграничивается объективное и субъективное знание в качестве субъективного рассматривается ложное, фейковое и деструктивное знание. Это разграничение служит основой классификации коммуникативных сообществ. В статье также отмечается роль в формировании коммуникативного сообщества коллективной когниции и коллективной интерпретирующей деятельности. The aim of this paper is to propose a cognitive model of communication community. The starting point is the philosophical theory by K.O. Apel in which communication community, in contrast to social and territorial communities, is conceived as unlimited being based on coordinated, or mutual, understanding. This de nition is not su ciently explanatory and so far no research has been done to make it applicable to linguistics. The theoretical claim proved in this paper is that communication community should be understood, rst, as a structural and, second, as a cognitive, or knowledge, community. The structural approach to communication community reveals the main characteristic of discourse produced in it, namely its relevance as a condition for maintaining coordinated communicative behavior. The inclusion of a person in the communication community depends on his / her ability to produce such discourses which will be in demand by other participants and thus retain his / her copresence with them. The acceptability of discourse means that the speaker has been accepted as a communicative personality. In this interpretation communicative personality is understood from the standpoint of the model of communicative act as addresser or addressee. The exchange of messages between them presupposes their copresence in the same communication community. The cognitive approach to communication community implies that knowledge is viewed as a product of communication community, as well as the cause for its formation. The investigation has established that two cognitive operations knowledge transfer and knowledge creation are carried out and interact in the process of communication community formation. Knowledge transfer is de ned as transfer of data of any kind from individual to individual and knowledge creation as new information obtained by an individual or a group and considered by the communication community as new knowledge. The notion of interpretative discourse through which knowledge transfer and knowledge creation are realized verbally is introduced and two types of it, namely explanatory and argumentative discourse, are singled out. The distinction between objective and subjective knowledge, the latter including false, fake and destructive knowledge, is drawn and then applied to the di erentiation of types of communication communities. The paper also explores the ways in which communication community correlates with, and is shaped by, collective cognition and collective interpretative activity. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Article – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: Russian – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2619-0656 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.25688/2619-0656.2019.13.20 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: edsair.doi...........e396df81f097a6b196fa43c1f4cc47a1 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi...........e396df81f097a6b196fa43c1f4cc47a1 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.25688/2619-0656.2019.13.20 Languages: – Text: Russian PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 304 Subjects: – SubjectFull: interpretative discourse Type: general – SubjectFull: интерпретирующий дискурс Type: general – SubjectFull: создание знаний Type: general – SubjectFull: 9. Industry and infrastructure Type: general – SubjectFull: трансфер знаний Type: general – SubjectFull: collective cognition Type: general – SubjectFull: когнитивное сообщество Type: general – SubjectFull: knowledge creation Type: general – SubjectFull: communication community Type: general – SubjectFull: cognitive community Type: general – SubjectFull: knowledge transfer Type: general – SubjectFull: коммуникативное сообщество Type: general – SubjectFull: communicative personality Type: general – SubjectFull: коллективная когниция Type: general – SubjectFull: коммуникативная личность Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: РОЛЬ ИНТЕРПРЕТИРУЮЩЕГО ДИСКУРСА В ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ КОММУНИКАТИВНОГО СООБЩЕСТВА: THE ROLE OF INTERPRETATIVE DISCOURSE IN THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATION COMMUNITY Type: main BibRelationships: IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 24 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 26190656 – Type: issn-locals Value: edsair Titles: – TitleFull: Русистика и компаративистика Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |