Academic Journal
Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training.
| Τίτλος: | Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Boissin, Esther, Caparos, Serge, De Neys, Wim |
| Πηγή: | Thinking & Reasoning; May2024, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p327-355, 29p |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | Dual-task paradigm, Deliberation, Cognitive load |
| Περίληψη: | Does avoiding biased responding to reasoning problems and grasping the -correct solution require engaging in effortful deliberation or can such solution insight be acquired more intuitively? In this study we set out to test the impact of deliberation on the efficiency of a de-bias training in which the problem logic was explained to participants. We focused on the infamous bat-and-ball problem and varied the degree of possible deliberation during the training session by manipulating time constraints and cognitive load. The results show that the less constrained the deliberation, the more participants improve. However, even under extremely stringent conditions (high time-pressure and dual task load), participants still show a significant improvement. Critically, this "intuitive" insight effect persists over two months. This suggests that deliberation helps reasoners benefit from the training, but it is not indispensable. We discuss critical applied and theoretical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Thinking & Reasoning is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | Biomedical Index |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:edm&genre=article&issn=13546783&ISBN=&volume=30&issue=2&date=20240501&spage=327&pages=327-355&title=Thinking & Reasoning&atitle=Examining%20the%20role%20of%20deliberation%20in%20de-bias%20training.&aulast=Boissin%2C%20Esther&id=DOI:10.1080/13546783.2023.2259542 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: Full Text Finder MouseOverText: Full Text Finder |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edm DbLabel: Biomedical Index An: 176763647 RelevancyScore: 958 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 957.830749511719 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boissin%2C+Esther%22">Boissin, Esther</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Caparos%2C+Serge%22">Caparos, Serge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22De+Neys%2C+Wim%22">De Neys, Wim</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: Thinking & Reasoning; May2024, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p327-355, 29p – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dual-task+paradigm%22">Dual-task paradigm</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deliberation%22">Deliberation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+load%22">Cognitive load</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Does avoiding biased responding to reasoning problems and grasping the -correct solution require engaging in effortful deliberation or can such solution insight be acquired more intuitively? In this study we set out to test the impact of deliberation on the efficiency of a de-bias training in which the problem logic was explained to participants. We focused on the infamous bat-and-ball problem and varied the degree of possible deliberation during the training session by manipulating time constraints and cognitive load. The results show that the less constrained the deliberation, the more participants improve. However, even under extremely stringent conditions (high time-pressure and dual task load), participants still show a significant improvement. Critically, this "intuitive" insight effect persists over two months. This suggests that deliberation helps reasoners benefit from the training, but it is not indispensable. We discuss critical applied and theoretical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Thinking & Reasoning is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edm&AN=176763647 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/13546783.2023.2259542 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 29 StartPage: 327 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Dual-task paradigm Type: general – SubjectFull: Deliberation Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive load Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Boissin, Esther – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Caparos, Serge – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: De Neys, Wim IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13546783 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Thinking & Reasoning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |