Global methane action pays for itself at least six times over.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος:	Global methane action pays for itself at least six times over.
Συγγραφείς:	Stoerk, Thomas, Rising, James, Shindell, Drew, Dietz, Simon
Πηγή:	Science; 10/30/2025, Vol. 390 Issue 6772, p1-10, 10p
Θεματικοί όροι:	Methane, Abatement (Atmospheric chemistry), Air quality, Break-even analysis, Environmental economics, Low-income countries, Greenhouse gas mitigation, Profitability
Περίληψη:	We provide a comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits and costs of global methane emissions abatement, anchored on the Global Methane Pledge. We use an integrated assessment model to estimate avoided climate damages at the global and country levels, including quantification of tipping points and risk. We further estimate air-quality cobenefits and methane abatement costs. We find that global methane action would be highly beneficial, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of at least six. It would provide larger benefits in lower-income countries, and it would reduce tipping point intensity and risk. We provide estimates of the social cost of methane to compare with previous literature and show that these estimates imply that key economies, such as the United States, European Union, and China, should be self-interested to abate methane emissions substantially. Editor's summary: Methane is a key greenhouse gas, and its emissions create large economic costs because of their effects on climate. Stoerk et al. calculated the economic value of methane emission abatement efforts, finding that reasonable actions could reduce climate-related damages in 2050 by more than a trillion dollars a year while costing only one sixth of the damages they would avoid. Concerted methane abatement action also would reduce the risks associated with climate-tipping behaviors and extreme climate damage scenarios. —Jesse Smith INTRODUCTION: Methane is a powerful but short-lived greenhouse gas, responsible for about one-third of the warming caused by well-mixed greenhouse gases since the 19th century. Its concentration in the atmosphere is once again rising rapidly owing to emissions from fossil fuels, agriculture, and waste, as well as anthropogenic and natural emissions from wetlands. Because of these two factors, reducing methane emissions has been identified as one of the most effective ways to curb near-term global warming. In response, the Global Methane Pledge, launched at COP26 in 2021, set an international target to reduce anthropogenic methane emissions by at least 30% from 2020 levels by 2030. Understanding the economic case for such action is crucial, especially given concerns about costs and the distribution of climate impacts across countries. RATIONALE: We provide a comprehensive economic assessment of global methane abatement, quantifying both benefits and costs. Our study improves on prior work by incorporating recent climate modeling, country-level damage estimates, and the effects of climate tipping points. We anchor our analysis on methane scenarios consistent with the Global Methane Pledge, using an integrated assessment model (IAM) to capture the impact of methane abatement on global temperatures, economic damages, and key tipping elements such as ice sheets and ocean currents. In addition to modeling climate-related benefits, we include improved air quality from reduced methane-driven ozone, and we evaluate abatement costs using detailed sectoral estimates from the Global Methane Assessment. RESULTS: Our findings show that global methane abatement yields large net economic benefits. Achieving the Global Methane Pledge results in more than $1 trillion in annual avoided market damages by 2050. Benefits are greater in lower-income countries because of their higher vulnerability to climate change. Methane action also reduces climate risk, including the likelihood and severity of extreme damage outcomes (climate tail risk). It lowers the intensity of several key tipping points: For example, by 2050, the likelihood of Amazon rainforest dieback drops by 8% and Indian monsoon disruption by 13%. Even using conservative assumptions about costs, the benefit-cost ratio of methane action is at least three—rising to more than six when health cobenefits are included. Some cost estimates suggest that methane mitigation could even be profitable owing to energy recovery and other gains. Finally, we provide estimates of the "social cost of methane" [the monetary value of future damages from 1 metric ton of methane emissions (tCH4)], finding a global average of $7381/tCH4, with higher domestic values for economies such as the US, EU, China, and India—implying strong economic self-interest in methane reductions. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that global methane mitigation is not only feasible but also economically compelling. The benefits—spanning avoided climate damages and improved air quality—consistently outweigh the costs under a wide range of scenarios. The gains are especially pronounced for low- and middle-income countries, underscoring the policy's equity-enhancing potential. Given that major economies also stand to gain considerably on their own, global cooperation is not strictly necessary for substantial methane action to be in their national interest. Net economic benefit of global methane action from 2020 to 2050.: Net present value of climate benefits (market and nonmarket), air-quality cobenefits, and abatement costs under five methane abatement cost scenarios. Horizontal black lines show net benefits. The dashed line indicates the switching value threshold and available cost headroom before net present value is reduced to zero. The discount rate is 2.5%. IIASA, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; EPA, US Environmental Protection Agency; Harmsen et al., M. Harmsen et al., Environ. Sci. Policy99, 136–149 (2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Βάση Δεδομένων:	Complementary Index

FullText	Text: Availability: 0
Header	DbId: edb DbLabel: Complementary Index An: 189012971 RelevancyScore: 1087 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 1087.34326171875
IllustrationInfo
Items	– Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Global methane action pays for itself at least six times over. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stoerk%2C+Thomas%22">Stoerk, Thomas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rising%2C+James%22">Rising, James</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shindell%2C+Drew%22">Shindell, Drew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dietz%2C+Simon%22">Dietz, Simon</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: Science; 10/30/2025, Vol. 390 Issue 6772, p1-10, 10p – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methane%22">Methane</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Abatement+%28Atmospheric+chemistry%29%22">Abatement (Atmospheric chemistry)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Air+quality%22">Air quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Break-even+analysis%22">Break-even analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Environmental+economics%22">Environmental economics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Low-income+countries%22">Low-income countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Greenhouse+gas+mitigation%22">Greenhouse gas mitigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Profitability%22">Profitability</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We provide a comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits and costs of global methane emissions abatement, anchored on the Global Methane Pledge. We use an integrated assessment model to estimate avoided climate damages at the global and country levels, including quantification of tipping points and risk. We further estimate air-quality cobenefits and methane abatement costs. We find that global methane action would be highly beneficial, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of at least six. It would provide larger benefits in lower-income countries, and it would reduce tipping point intensity and risk. We provide estimates of the social cost of methane to compare with previous literature and show that these estimates imply that key economies, such as the United States, European Union, and China, should be self-interested to abate methane emissions substantially. Editor's summary: Methane is a key greenhouse gas, and its emissions create large economic costs because of their effects on climate. Stoerk et al. calculated the economic value of methane emission abatement efforts, finding that reasonable actions could reduce climate-related damages in 2050 by more than a trillion dollars a year while costing only one sixth of the damages they would avoid. Concerted methane abatement action also would reduce the risks associated with climate-tipping behaviors and extreme climate damage scenarios. —Jesse Smith INTRODUCTION: Methane is a powerful but short-lived greenhouse gas, responsible for about one-third of the warming caused by well-mixed greenhouse gases since the 19th century. Its concentration in the atmosphere is once again rising rapidly owing to emissions from fossil fuels, agriculture, and waste, as well as anthropogenic and natural emissions from wetlands. Because of these two factors, reducing methane emissions has been identified as one of the most effective ways to curb near-term global warming. In response, the Global Methane Pledge, launched at COP26 in 2021, set an international target to reduce anthropogenic methane emissions by at least 30% from 2020 levels by 2030. Understanding the economic case for such action is crucial, especially given concerns about costs and the distribution of climate impacts across countries. RATIONALE: We provide a comprehensive economic assessment of global methane abatement, quantifying both benefits and costs. Our study improves on prior work by incorporating recent climate modeling, country-level damage estimates, and the effects of climate tipping points. We anchor our analysis on methane scenarios consistent with the Global Methane Pledge, using an integrated assessment model (IAM) to capture the impact of methane abatement on global temperatures, economic damages, and key tipping elements such as ice sheets and ocean currents. In addition to modeling climate-related benefits, we include improved air quality from reduced methane-driven ozone, and we evaluate abatement costs using detailed sectoral estimates from the Global Methane Assessment. RESULTS: Our findings show that global methane abatement yields large net economic benefits. Achieving the Global Methane Pledge results in more than $1 trillion in annual avoided market damages by 2050. Benefits are greater in lower-income countries because of their higher vulnerability to climate change. Methane action also reduces climate risk, including the likelihood and severity of extreme damage outcomes (climate tail risk). It lowers the intensity of several key tipping points: For example, by 2050, the likelihood of Amazon rainforest dieback drops by 8% and Indian monsoon disruption by 13%. Even using conservative assumptions about costs, the benefit-cost ratio of methane action is at least three—rising to more than six when health cobenefits are included. Some cost estimates suggest that methane mitigation could even be profitable owing to energy recovery and other gains. Finally, we provide estimates of the "social cost of methane" [the monetary value of future damages from 1 metric ton of methane emissions (tCH<subscript>4</subscript>)], finding a global average of $7381/tCH<subscript>4</subscript>, with higher domestic values for economies such as the US, EU, China, and India—implying strong economic self-interest in methane reductions. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that global methane mitigation is not only feasible but also economically compelling. The benefits—spanning avoided climate damages and improved air quality—consistently outweigh the costs under a wide range of scenarios. The gains are especially pronounced for low- and middle-income countries, underscoring the policy's equity-enhancing potential. Given that major economies also stand to gain considerably on their own, global cooperation is not strictly necessary for substantial methane action to be in their national interest. Net economic benefit of global methane action from 2020 to 2050.: Net present value of climate benefits (market and nonmarket), air-quality cobenefits, and abatement costs under five methane abatement cost scenarios. Horizontal black lines show net benefits. The dashed line indicates the switching value threshold and available cost headroom before net present value is reduced to zero. The discount rate is 2.5%. IIASA, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; EPA, US Environmental Protection Agency; Harmsen et al., M. Harmsen et al., Environ. Sci. Policy99, 136–149 (2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink	https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=189012971
RecordInfo	BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1126/science.adu7392 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Methane Type: general – SubjectFull: Abatement (Atmospheric chemistry) Type: general – SubjectFull: Air quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Break-even analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Environmental economics Type: general – SubjectFull: Low-income countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Greenhouse gas mitigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Profitability Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Global methane action pays for itself at least six times over. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stoerk, Thomas – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rising, James – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shindell, Drew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dietz, Simon IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 30 M: 10 Text: 10/30/2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00368075 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 390 – Type: issue Value: 6772 Titles: – TitleFull: Science Type: main
ResultId	1