Academic Journal
View in EDS

High school biology teachers' integration of computational thinking into data practices to support student investigations.

Bibliographic Details
Title: High school biology teachers' integration of computational thinking into data practices to support student investigations.
Authors: Peters‐Burton, Erin, Rich, Peter Jacob, Kitsantas, Anastasia, Stehle, Stephanie M., Laclede, Laura
Source: Journal of Research in Science Teaching; Aug2023, Vol. 60 Issue 6, p1353-1384, 32p
Subject Terms: High school teachers, Career development, Teacher development, Pattern recognition systems, Teacher researchers
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: In the United States, the Next Generation Science Standards advocate for the integration of computational thinking (CT) as a science and engineering practice. Additionally, there is agreement among some educational researchers that increasing opportunities for engaging in computational thinking can lend authenticity to classroom activities. This can be done through introducing CT principles, such as algorithms, abstractions, and automations, or through examining the tools used to conduct modern science, emphasizing CT in problem solving. This cross‐case analysis of nine high school biology teachers in the mid‐Atlantic region of the United States documents how they integrated CT into their curricula following a year‐long professional development (PD). The focus of the PD emphasized data practices in the science teachers' lessons, using Weintrop et al.'s definition of data practices. These are: (a) creation (generating data), (b) collection (gathering data), (c) manipulation (cleaning and organizing data), (d) visualization (graphically representing data), and (e) analysis (interpreting data). Additionally, within each data practice, teachers were asked to integrate at least one of five CT practices: (a) decomposition (breaking a complex problem into smaller parts), (b) pattern‐recognition (identifying recurring similarities in data practices), (c) algorithms (the creation and use of formulas to predict an output given a specific input), (d) abstraction (eliminating detail in order to generalize or see the "big picture"), and (e) automation (using computational tools to carry out specific procedures). Although the biology teachers integrated all CT practices across their lessons, they found it easier to integrate decomposition and pattern recognition while finding it more difficult to integrate abstraction, algorithmic thinking, and automation. Implications for designing professional development experiences are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Research in Science Teaching is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
FullText Links:
  – Type: other
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: edb
DbLabel: Complementary Index
An: 165047216
RelevancyScore: 938
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 937.869384765625
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: High school biology teachers' integration of computational thinking into data practices to support student investigations.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peters‐Burton%2C+Erin%22">Peters‐Burton, Erin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rich%2C+Peter+Jacob%22">Rich, Peter Jacob</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kitsantas%2C+Anastasia%22">Kitsantas, Anastasia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stehle%2C+Stephanie+M%2E%22">Stehle, Stephanie M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laclede%2C+Laura%22">Laclede, Laura</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: Journal of Research in Science Teaching; Aug2023, Vol. 60 Issue 6, p1353-1384, 32p
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+school+teachers%22">High school teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Career+development%22">Career development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+development%22">Teacher development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pattern+recognition+systems%22">Pattern recognition systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+researchers%22">Teacher researchers</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In the United States, the Next Generation Science Standards advocate for the integration of computational thinking (CT) as a science and engineering practice. Additionally, there is agreement among some educational researchers that increasing opportunities for engaging in computational thinking can lend authenticity to classroom activities. This can be done through introducing CT principles, such as algorithms, abstractions, and automations, or through examining the tools used to conduct modern science, emphasizing CT in problem solving. This cross‐case analysis of nine high school biology teachers in the mid‐Atlantic region of the United States documents how they integrated CT into their curricula following a year‐long professional development (PD). The focus of the PD emphasized data practices in the science teachers' lessons, using Weintrop et al.'s definition of data practices. These are: (a) creation (generating data), (b) collection (gathering data), (c) manipulation (cleaning and organizing data), (d) visualization (graphically representing data), and (e) analysis (interpreting data). Additionally, within each data practice, teachers were asked to integrate at least one of five CT practices: (a) decomposition (breaking a complex problem into smaller parts), (b) pattern‐recognition (identifying recurring similarities in data practices), (c) algorithms (the creation and use of formulas to predict an output given a specific input), (d) abstraction (eliminating detail in order to generalize or see the "big picture"), and (e) automation (using computational tools to carry out specific procedures). Although the biology teachers integrated all CT practices across their lessons, they found it easier to integrate decomposition and pattern recognition while finding it more difficult to integrate abstraction, algorithmic thinking, and automation. Implications for designing professional development experiences are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Research in Science Teaching is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=165047216
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/tea.21834
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 32
        StartPage: 1353
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High school teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Career development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pattern recognition systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher researchers
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: High school biology teachers' integration of computational thinking into data practices to support student investigations.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peters‐Burton, Erin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rich, Peter Jacob
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kitsantas, Anastasia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stehle, Stephanie M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Laclede, Laura
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00224308
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 60
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Research in Science Teaching
              Type: main
ResultId 1