Academic Journal

Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study.
Συγγραφείς: Littman, Ran, Kalanthroff, Eyal
Πηγή: Psychological Research; Sep2021, Vol. 85 Issue 6, p2420-2427, 8p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart
Θεματικοί όροι: Individual differences, Stroop effect, Tasks, Control (Psychology), Regression analysis
Περίληψη: Task conflict is a type of conflict that emerges when a stimulus triggers two or more competing tasks. In the Stroop task, task conflict occurs between the relevant color-naming task and irrelevant word reading task and can be observed mainly on congruent trials, which only involve task conflict and are devoid of additional conflict types. We hypothesized that task conflict also manifests in the affordances task between the relevant task (e.g., classifying manipulatable objects), and the automatic task afforded by the object (e.g., grasping the object), and is mostly evident on congruent trials. Using an individual differences design we assessed the relationship between control mechanisms operating on Stroop congruent and affordances congruent trials under conditions of high and low cognitive control requirements. We hypothesized that task control is employed in both tasks. One-hundred and twenty-three participants performed an affordances task and two blocks of a Stroop task, each requiring a different level of task control (high vs. low). In a hierarchical regression model, we found a significant and specific correlation between affordances congruent and Stroop congruent conditions only in the high-control block, designed to greatly engage participants' task control, thus linking the task control mechanism in both tasks. These results indicate that task control underlies diverse modalities of response (visuomotor and linguistic), independently of other conflict types. We suggest that the affordances task may serve as a supplementary tool for the assessment of task control in the lab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Βάση Δεδομένων: Complementary Index
FullText Links:
  – Type: other
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01411-3
    Name: EDS - Springer Nature Journals (s7799221)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record at Springer
Header DbId: edb
DbLabel: Complementary Index
An: 151861057
RelevancyScore: 900
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 899.901123046875
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Littman%2C+Ran%22">Littman, Ran</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kalanthroff%2C+Eyal%22">Kalanthroff, Eyal</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: Psychological Research; Sep2021, Vol. 85 Issue 6, p2420-2427, 8p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+differences%22">Individual differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stroop+effect%22">Stroop effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tasks%22">Tasks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Control+%28Psychology%29%22">Control (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Task conflict is a type of conflict that emerges when a stimulus triggers two or more competing tasks. In the Stroop task, task conflict occurs between the relevant color-naming task and irrelevant word reading task and can be observed mainly on congruent trials, which only involve task conflict and are devoid of additional conflict types. We hypothesized that task conflict also manifests in the affordances task between the relevant task (e.g., classifying manipulatable objects), and the automatic task afforded by the object (e.g., grasping the object), and is mostly evident on congruent trials. Using an individual differences design we assessed the relationship between control mechanisms operating on Stroop congruent and affordances congruent trials under conditions of high and low cognitive control requirements. We hypothesized that task control is employed in both tasks. One-hundred and twenty-three participants performed an affordances task and two blocks of a Stroop task, each requiring a different level of task control (high vs. low). In a hierarchical regression model, we found a significant and specific correlation between affordances congruent and Stroop congruent conditions only in the high-control block, designed to greatly engage participants' task control, thus linking the task control mechanism in both tasks. These results indicate that task control underlies diverse modalities of response (visuomotor and linguistic), independently of other conflict types. We suggest that the affordances task may serve as a supplementary tool for the assessment of task control in the lab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edb&AN=151861057
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00426-020-01411-3
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 2420
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Individual differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stroop effect
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tasks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Control (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regression analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Littman, Ran
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kalanthroff, Eyal
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03400727
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 85
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1