Academic Journal
Προβολή σε EDS

Social-Emotional Ability and Relationship Satisfaction in Marriage: The Roles of Partner Consensus and Commitment.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Social-Emotional Ability and Relationship Satisfaction in Marriage: The Roles of Partner Consensus and Commitment.
Συγγραφείς: Park C; Department of Counselor Education and School Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA., Park G; Department of Educational Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA., Harris VW; Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Πηγή: Journal of marital and family therapy [J Marital Fam Ther] 2026 Oct; Vol. 52 (4), pp. e70175.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7904614 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1752-0606 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0194472X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Marital Fam Ther Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: <2007->: Malden, Mass. : Blackwell
Original Publication: Washington, D.C., American Assn. for Marriage and Family Therapy
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Marriage*/psychology , Spouses*/psychology , Personal Satisfaction* , Interpersonal Relations* , Consensus*, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Middle Aged ; United States
Περίληψη: Although social-emotional abilities may support couple functioning, less is known about how they covary with relational appraisals relevant to couple therapy. Using cross-sectional self-report data from 2139 married adults in the United States, this study estimated a structural equation model linking social-emotional ability, perceived partner consensus, dedication commitment, and relationship satisfaction. The gender-adjusted model included 2137 participants. Social-emotional ability was positively associated with perceived consensus. Consensus was positively associated with commitment and satisfaction, and commitment was positively associated with satisfaction. The direct association between social-emotional ability and satisfaction was not significant after accounting for consensus and commitment. Specific indirect associations through consensus alone and sequentially through consensus and commitment were statistically significant. Because all constructs were assessed concurrently by one spouse, the findings do not establish temporal mediation or couple-level processes. The results identify perceived consensus and commitment as potentially relevant domains for assessment and future longitudinal, dyadic research.
(© 2026 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.)
References: Adams, J. M., and W. H. Jones. 1997. “The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, no. 5: 1177–1196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177.
Be, D., M. A. Whisman, and L. A. Uebelacker. 2013. “Prospective Associations Between Marital Adjustment and Life Satisfaction.” Personal Relationships 20, no. 4: 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12011.
Bentler, P. M. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107, no. 2: 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
Boden, M. T., and R. J. Thompson. 2017. “Meta‐Analysis of the Association Between Emotional Clarity and Attention to Emotions.” Emotion Review 9, no. 1: 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915610640.
Brackett, M. A., R. M. Warner, and J. S. Bosco. 2005. “Emotional Intelligence and Relationship Quality Among Couples.” Personal Relationships 12, no. 2: 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00111.x.
Doane, M. J. 2016. “Cohesion, Marital.” In Encyclopedia of Family Studies. Edited by C. Shehan, Vol. 1, 1–3. Wiley Blackwell.
Doohan, E.‐A. M., S. Carrère, C. Siler, and C. Beardslee. 2009. “The Link Between the Marital Bond and Future Triadic Family Interactions.” Journal of Marriage and Family 71, no. 4: 892–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00642.x.
Flynn, M., and K. D. Rudolph. 2010. “The Contribution of Deficits in Emotional Clarity to Stress Responses and Depression.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31, no. 4: 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.04.004.
Givertz, M., C. Segrin, and A. Hanzal. 2009. “The Association Between Satisfaction and Commitment Differs Across Marital Couple Types.” Communication Research 36, no. 4: 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333035.
Greenstein, T. N. 1996. “Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality.” Social Forces 74, no. 3: 1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.1029.
Greenstein, T. N. 2009. “National Context, Family Satisfaction, and Fairness in the Division of Household Labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family 71, no. 4: 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00651.x.
Harris, V. W., J. Anderson, and B. Visconti. 2022. “Social Emotional Ability Development (SEAD): An Integrated Model of Practical Emotion‐Based Competencies.” Motivation and Emotion 46, no. 2: 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09922-1.
Harris, V. W., B. Visconti, C. B. Sewell, R. Cantrell, J. Anderson, and E. M. Davison. 2020. “Southern Romance: Relationship Quality, Consensus, and Context Among Cohabiting Couples in the Gulf States.” Marriage & Family Review 56, no. 2: 109–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2019.1655518.
Harris, V. W., X. Zhang, J. Anderson, B. Visconti, and C. Park. 2026. “Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Multi‐Dimensional Social Emotional Ability Inventory (SEAI).” Unpublished manuscript.
Ho, M. Y., S. X. Chen, M. H. Bond, C. M. Hui, C. Chan, and M. Friedman. 2012. “Linking Adult Attachment Styles to Relationship Satisfaction in Hong Kong and the United States: The Mediating Role of Personal and Structural Commitment.” Journal of Happiness Studies 13, no. 3: 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9279-1.
Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, no. 1: 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Johnson, C. A., S. M. Stanley, N. D. Glenn, et al. 2002. Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 Baseline Statewide Survey on Marriage and Divorce (S02096OKDHS). Department of Human Services.
Kalsoom, S., and A. Kamal. 2018. “Emotional Intelligence and Multitasking Ability Predictors of Marital Adjustment of Working Married Individuals.” FWU Journal of Social Sciences 12, no. 2: 60.
Kinkead, A., C. Salas, and C. P. Ewert. 2022. “Couples’ Extrinsic Emotion Regulation and Dyadic Adjustment: An Actor‐Partner Interdependence Model Analysis.” Current Psychology 42, no. 35: 31619–31633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04188-3.
Malouff, J. M., N. S. Schutte, and E. B. Thorsteinsson. 2014. “Trait Emotional Intelligence and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: A Meta‐Analysis.” American Journal of Family Therapy 42, no. 1: 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2012.748549.
Markman, H. J., S. M. Stanley, and S. L. Blumberg. 2001. Fighting for Your Marriage. Jossey‐Bass.
Park, C., and V. W. Harris. 2025. “Consensus, Need Fulfillment, Commitment, and Satisfaction in Couple Relationships: Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 51, no. 1: e70001. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70001.
Park, C., and V. W. Harris. 2026. “Mindfulness, Social–Emotional Integration, Consensus, and Couple Quality in Married Relationships.” Unpublished manuscript.
Proulx, C. M., H. M. Helms, and C. Buehler. 2007. “Marital Quality and Personal Well‐Being: A Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Marriage and Family 69, no. 3: 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x.
Rhoades, G. K., S. M. Stanley, and H. J. Markman. 2010. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Predicting Dating Relationship Stability From Four Aspects of Commitment.” Journal of Family Psychology 24, no. 5: 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021008.
Robles, T. F., R. B. Slatcher, J. M. Trombello, and M. M. McGinn. 2014. “Marital Quality and Health: A Meta‐Analytic Review.” Psychological Bulletin 140, no. 1: 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859.
Rusbult, C. E. 1980. “Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the Investment Model.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16, no. 2: 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4.
Spanier, G. B. 1976. “Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 38, no. 1: 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547.
Stanley, S. M., and H. J. Markman. 1992. “Assessing Commitment in Personal Relationships.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54, no. 3: 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245.
Stanley, S. M., G. K. Rhoades, and S. W. Whitton. 2010. “Commitment: Functions, Formation, and the Securing of Romantic Attachment.” Journal of Family Theory & Review 2, no. 4: 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x.
Taniguchi, H., and G. Kaufman. 2022. “Sharing the Load: Housework, Joint Decision‐Making, and Marital Quality in Japan.” Journal of Family Studies 28, no. 3: 914–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1769707.
Ursu, A., and M. N. Turliuc. 2020. “Do Emotion Recognition and Emotion Regulation Predict Dyadic Adjustment? The Moderating Role of Relationship Length.” Journal of Psychological & Educational Research 28, no. 1: 45–63.
Whisman, M. A., A. L. Gilmour, and J. M. Salinger. 2018. “Marital Satisfaction and Mortality in the United States Adult Population.” Health Psychology 37, no. 11: 1041–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000677.
Yi, C.‐C., W.‐H. Lin, and J. Kuo‐Hsun ma. 2019. “Marital Satisfaction Among Taiwanese Young Married Couples: The Effects of Resources and Traditional Norms.” Journal of Family Issues 40, no. 14: 2015–2043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19863212.
Zainah, A. Z., R. Nasir, R. S. Hashim, and N. M. Yusof. 2012. “Effects of Demographic Variables on Marital Satisfaction.” Asian Social Science 8, no. 9: 46–49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n9p46.
Zeidner, M., and I. Kloda. 2013. “Emotional Intelligence (EI), Conflict Resolution Patterns, and Relationship Satisfaction: Actor and Partner Effects Revisited.” Personality and Individual Differences 54, no. 2: 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.013.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: commitment; perceived partner consensus; relationship satisfaction; social–emotional ability
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260928 Date Completed: 20260928 Latest Revision: 20260928
Update Code: 20260928
DOI: 10.1111/jmft.70175
PMID: 42803716
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:cmedm&genre=article&issn=17520606&ISBN=&volume=52&issue=4&date=20261001&spage=e70175&pages=e70175&title=Journal of marital and family therapy&atitle=Social-Emotional%20Ability%20and%20Relationship%20Satisfaction%20in%20Marriage%3A%20The%20Roles%20of%20Partner%20Consensus%20and%20Commitment.&aulast=Park%20C&id=DOI:10.1111/jmft.70175
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
Header DbId: cmedm
DbLabel: MEDLINE
An: 42803716
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Social-Emotional Ability and Relationship Satisfaction in Marriage: The Roles of Partner Consensus and Commitment.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Park+C%22&quot;&gt;Park C&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Counselor Education and School Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Park+G%22&quot;&gt;Park G&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Educational Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Harris+VW%22&quot;&gt;Harris VW&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%227904614%22&quot;&gt;Journal of marital and family therapy&lt;/searchLink&gt; [J Marital Fam Ther] 2026 Oct; Vol. 52 (4), pp. e70175.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Journal Article
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Publisher: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;PB&quot; term=&quot;%22Blackwell%22&quot;&gt;Blackwell &lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;i&gt;Country of Publication: &lt;/i&gt;United States &lt;i&gt;NLM ID: &lt;/i&gt;7904614 &lt;i&gt;Publication Model: &lt;/i&gt;Print &lt;i&gt;Cited Medium: &lt;/i&gt;Internet &lt;i&gt;ISSN: &lt;/i&gt;1752-0606 (Electronic) &lt;i&gt;Linking ISSN: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;IS&quot; term=&quot;%220194472X%22&quot;&gt;0194472X &lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;i&gt;NLM ISO Abbreviation: &lt;/i&gt;J Marital Fam Ther &lt;i&gt;Subsets: &lt;/i&gt;MEDLINE
– Name: PublisherInfo
  Label: Imprint Name(s)
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Publication&lt;/i&gt;: &lt;2007-&gt;: Malden, Mass. : Blackwell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Original Publication&lt;/i&gt;: Washington, D.C., American Assn. for Marriage and Family Therapy
– Name: SubjectMESH
  Label: MeSH Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Marriage%22&quot;&gt;Marriage*&lt;/searchLink&gt;/&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Marriage+psychology%22&quot;&gt;psychology&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Spouses%22&quot;&gt;Spouses*&lt;/searchLink&gt;/&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Spouses+psychology%22&quot;&gt;psychology&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Personal+Satisfaction%22&quot;&gt;Personal Satisfaction*&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Interpersonal+Relations%22&quot;&gt;Interpersonal Relations*&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Consensus%22&quot;&gt;Consensus*&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Humans%22&quot;&gt;Humans&lt;/searchLink&gt; ; &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Female%22&quot;&gt;Female&lt;/searchLink&gt; ; &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Male%22&quot;&gt;Male&lt;/searchLink&gt; ; &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Adult%22&quot;&gt;Adult&lt;/searchLink&gt; ; &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Cross-Sectional+Studies%22&quot;&gt;Cross-Sectional Studies&lt;/searchLink&gt; ; &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Middle+Aged%22&quot;&gt;Middle Aged&lt;/searchLink&gt; ; &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22United+States%22&quot;&gt;United States&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Although social-emotional abilities may support couple functioning, less is known about how they covary with relational appraisals relevant to couple therapy. Using cross-sectional self-report data from 2139 married adults in the United States, this study estimated a structural equation model linking social-emotional ability, perceived partner consensus, dedication commitment, and relationship satisfaction. The gender-adjusted model included 2137 participants. Social-emotional ability was positively associated with perceived consensus. Consensus was positively associated with commitment and satisfaction, and commitment was positively associated with satisfaction. The direct association between social-emotional ability and satisfaction was not significant after accounting for consensus and commitment. Specific indirect associations through consensus alone and sequentially through consensus and commitment were statistically significant. Because all constructs were assessed concurrently by one spouse, the findings do not establish temporal mediation or couple-level processes. The results identify perceived consensus and commitment as potentially relevant domains for assessment and future longitudinal, dyadic research.&lt;br /&gt; (&#169; 2026 American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.)
– Name: Ref
  Label: References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: Adams, J. M., and W. H. Jones. 1997. “The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, no. 5: 1177–1196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177.&lt;br /&gt;Be, D., M. A. Whisman, and L. A. Uebelacker. 2013. “Prospective Associations Between Marital Adjustment and Life Satisfaction.” Personal Relationships 20, no. 4: 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12011.&lt;br /&gt;Bentler, P. M. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107, no. 2: 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.&lt;br /&gt;Boden, M. T., and R. J. Thompson. 2017. “Meta‐Analysis of the Association Between Emotional Clarity and Attention to Emotions.” Emotion Review 9, no. 1: 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915610640.&lt;br /&gt;Brackett, M. A., R. M. Warner, and J. S. Bosco. 2005. “Emotional Intelligence and Relationship Quality Among Couples.” Personal Relationships 12, no. 2: 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00111.x.&lt;br /&gt;Doane, M. J. 2016. “Cohesion, Marital.” In Encyclopedia of Family Studies. Edited by C. Shehan, Vol. 1, 1–3. Wiley Blackwell.&lt;br /&gt;Doohan, E.‐A. M., S. Carr&#232;re, C. Siler, and C. Beardslee. 2009. “The Link Between the Marital Bond and Future Triadic Family Interactions.” Journal of Marriage and Family 71, no. 4: 892–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00642.x.&lt;br /&gt;Flynn, M., and K. D. Rudolph. 2010. “The Contribution of Deficits in Emotional Clarity to Stress Responses and Depression.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31, no. 4: 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.04.004.&lt;br /&gt;Givertz, M., C. Segrin, and A. Hanzal. 2009. “The Association Between Satisfaction and Commitment Differs Across Marital Couple Types.” Communication Research 36, no. 4: 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333035.&lt;br /&gt;Greenstein, T. N. 1996. “Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality.” Social Forces 74, no. 3: 1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.1029.&lt;br /&gt;Greenstein, T. N. 2009. “National Context, Family Satisfaction, and Fairness in the Division of Household Labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family 71, no. 4: 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00651.x.&lt;br /&gt;Harris, V. W., J. Anderson, and B. Visconti. 2022. “Social Emotional Ability Development (SEAD): An Integrated Model of Practical Emotion‐Based Competencies.” Motivation and Emotion 46, no. 2: 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09922-1.&lt;br /&gt;Harris, V. W., B. Visconti, C. B. Sewell, R. Cantrell, J. Anderson, and E. M. Davison. 2020. “Southern Romance: Relationship Quality, Consensus, and Context Among Cohabiting Couples in the Gulf States.” Marriage &amp; Family Review 56, no. 2: 109–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2019.1655518.&lt;br /&gt;Harris, V. W., X. Zhang, J. Anderson, B. Visconti, and C. Park. 2026. “Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Multi‐Dimensional Social Emotional Ability Inventory (SEAI).” Unpublished manuscript.&lt;br /&gt;Ho, M. Y., S. X. Chen, M. H. Bond, C. M. Hui, C. Chan, and M. Friedman. 2012. “Linking Adult Attachment Styles to Relationship Satisfaction in Hong Kong and the United States: The Mediating Role of Personal and Structural Commitment.” Journal of Happiness Studies 13, no. 3: 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9279-1.&lt;br /&gt;Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, no. 1: 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.&lt;br /&gt;Johnson, C. A., S. M. Stanley, N. D. Glenn, et al. 2002. Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 Baseline Statewide Survey on Marriage and Divorce (S02096OKDHS). Department of Human Services.&lt;br /&gt;Kalsoom, S., and A. Kamal. 2018. “Emotional Intelligence and Multitasking Ability Predictors of Marital Adjustment of Working Married Individuals.” FWU Journal of Social Sciences 12, no. 2: 60.&lt;br /&gt;Kinkead, A., C. Salas, and C. P. Ewert. 2022. “Couples’ Extrinsic Emotion Regulation and Dyadic Adjustment: An Actor‐Partner Interdependence Model Analysis.” Current Psychology 42, no. 35: 31619–31633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04188-3.&lt;br /&gt;Malouff, J. M., N. S. Schutte, and E. B. Thorsteinsson. 2014. “Trait Emotional Intelligence and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: A Meta‐Analysis.” American Journal of Family Therapy 42, no. 1: 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2012.748549.&lt;br /&gt;Markman, H. J., S. M. Stanley, and S. L. Blumberg. 2001. Fighting for Your Marriage. Jossey‐Bass.&lt;br /&gt;Park, C., and V. W. Harris. 2025. “Consensus, Need Fulfillment, Commitment, and Satisfaction in Couple Relationships: Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 51, no. 1: e70001. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70001.&lt;br /&gt;Park, C., and V. W. Harris. 2026. “Mindfulness, Social–Emotional Integration, Consensus, and Couple Quality in Married Relationships.” Unpublished manuscript.&lt;br /&gt;Proulx, C. M., H. M. Helms, and C. Buehler. 2007. “Marital Quality and Personal Well‐Being: A Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Marriage and Family 69, no. 3: 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x.&lt;br /&gt;Rhoades, G. K., S. M. Stanley, and H. J. Markman. 2010. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Predicting Dating Relationship Stability From Four Aspects of Commitment.” Journal of Family Psychology 24, no. 5: 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021008.&lt;br /&gt;Robles, T. F., R. B. Slatcher, J. M. Trombello, and M. M. McGinn. 2014. “Marital Quality and Health: A Meta‐Analytic Review.” Psychological Bulletin 140, no. 1: 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859.&lt;br /&gt;Rusbult, C. E. 1980. “Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the Investment Model.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16, no. 2: 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4.&lt;br /&gt;Spanier, G. B. 1976. “Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 38, no. 1: 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547.&lt;br /&gt;Stanley, S. M., and H. J. Markman. 1992. “Assessing Commitment in Personal Relationships.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54, no. 3: 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245.&lt;br /&gt;Stanley, S. M., G. K. Rhoades, and S. W. Whitton. 2010. “Commitment: Functions, Formation, and the Securing of Romantic Attachment.” Journal of Family Theory &amp; Review 2, no. 4: 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x.&lt;br /&gt;Taniguchi, H., and G. Kaufman. 2022. “Sharing the Load: Housework, Joint Decision‐Making, and Marital Quality in Japan.” Journal of Family Studies 28, no. 3: 914–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1769707.&lt;br /&gt;Ursu, A., and M. N. Turliuc. 2020. “Do Emotion Recognition and Emotion Regulation Predict Dyadic Adjustment? The Moderating Role of Relationship Length.” Journal of Psychological &amp; Educational Research 28, no. 1: 45–63.&lt;br /&gt;Whisman, M. A., A. L. Gilmour, and J. M. Salinger. 2018. “Marital Satisfaction and Mortality in the United States Adult Population.” Health Psychology 37, no. 11: 1041–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000677.&lt;br /&gt;Yi, C.‐C., W.‐H. Lin, and J. Kuo‐Hsun ma. 2019. “Marital Satisfaction Among Taiwanese Young Married Couples: The Effects of Resources and Traditional Norms.” Journal of Family Issues 40, no. 14: 2015–2043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19863212.&lt;br /&gt;Zainah, A. Z., R. Nasir, R. S. Hashim, and N. M. Yusof. 2012. “Effects of Demographic Variables on Marital Satisfaction.” Asian Social Science 8, no. 9: 46–49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n9p46.&lt;br /&gt;Zeidner, M., and I. Kloda. 2013. “Emotional Intelligence (EI), Conflict Resolution Patterns, and Relationship Satisfaction: Actor and Partner Effects Revisited.” Personality and Individual Differences 54, no. 2: 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.013.
– Name: SubjectMinor
  Label: Contributed Indexing
  Group:
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Keywords: &lt;/i&gt;commitment; perceived partner consensus; relationship satisfaction; social–emotional ability
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date(s)
  Group: Date
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Date Created: &lt;/i&gt;20260928 &lt;i&gt;Date Completed: &lt;/i&gt;20260928 &lt;i&gt;Latest Revision: &lt;/i&gt;20260928
– Name: DateUpdate
  Label: Update Code
  Group: Date
  Data: 20260928
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1111/jmft.70175
– Name: AN
  Label: PMID
  Group: ID
  Data: 42803716
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=42803716
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/jmft.70175
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: e70175
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Humans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Female
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Male
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adult
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-Sectional Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Middle Aged
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Marriage psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spouses psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Personal Satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interpersonal Relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consensus
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Social-Emotional Ability and Relationship Satisfaction in Marriage: The Roles of Partner Consensus and Commitment.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Park C
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Park G
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Harris VW
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: 2026 Oct
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1752-0606
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 52
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of marital and family therapy
              Type: main
ResultId 1