Academic Journal
Moderate gamma irradiation enhances the biostimulant activity of humic acid in tomato: Integrated effects on growth, physiology, yield, and fruit quality.
| Τίτλος: | Moderate gamma irradiation enhances the biostimulant activity of humic acid in tomato: Integrated effects on growth, physiology, yield, and fruit quality. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Nourzadeh Hadad M; Nuclear Agriculture Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Karaj, Iran., Kordrostami M; Nuclear Agriculture Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Karaj, Iran. |
| Πηγή: | PloS one [PLoS One] 2026 Sep 21; Vol. 21 (9), pp. e0357270. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Sep 21 (Print Publication: 2026). |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Solanum lycopersicum*/growth & development , Solanum lycopersicum*/radiation effects , Solanum lycopersicum*/physiology , Solanum lycopersicum*/drug effects , Fruit*/growth & development , Fruit*/radiation effects , Fruit*/drug effects , Humic Substances* , Gamma Rays*, Antioxidants/metabolism ; Carotenoids/metabolism |
| Περίληψη: | Humic acid is widely used as a plant biostimulant, but its effectiveness depends strongly on its physicochemical characteristics and application rate. Gamma irradiation may modify the structure and biological activity of humic substances, although its effects on horticultural crops remain insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the effects of non-irradiated and gamma-irradiated humic acid on the growth, physiological performance, mineral nutrition, antioxidant status, yield, and fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The humic-acid treatments were arranged factorially using three irradiation doses-0, 2, and 5 kGy-and two application rates-2.5 and 5.0 kg ha-1-together with an untreated control. Gamma irradiation dose and humic acid application rate significantly affected most measured traits, whereas their interaction was significant only for total marketable yield. Humic acid irradiated at 2 kGy and applied at 5.0 kg ha-1 produced the greatest plant height, leaf area, root dry weight, chlorophyll index, net photosynthetic rate, leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentrations, antioxidant activity, fruit number, marketable yield, total soluble solids, vitamin C, and lycopene content. Increasing the humic acid rate from 2.5 to 5.0 kg ha-1 significantly increased marketable yield when the humic acid was non-irradiated or irradiated at 2 kGy, but not when irradiated at 5 kGy. Treatment-adjusted correlation analysis linked canopy development and photosynthetic performance with fruit production and marketable yield, while days to first harvest was negatively associated with major growth and productivity traits. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis separated the treatment comprising humic acid irradiated at 2 kGy and applied at 5.0 kg ha-1 from the remaining treatments because of its consistently favorable multivariate profile. An ensemble multi-criteria decision-making framework integrating TOPSIS, VIKOR, WASPAS, and EDAS also ranked this treatment first under alternative criterion-weighting scenarios. These results indicate that moderate gamma irradiation can enhance humic acid biostimulant activity, whereas a higher irradiation dose may reduce the benefits obtained from increasing the application rate. (Copyright: © 2026 Nourzadeh Hadad, Kordrostami. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.) |
| Competing Interests: | The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
| References: | BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):185. (PMID: 38475707) Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 12;15(1):32433. (PMID: 40940388) J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jun 5;411:125071. (PMID: 33454567) Food Res Int. 2022 Jul;157:111218. (PMID: 35761540) J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Apr 22;57(8):3266-72. (PMID: 19281175) Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 15;544:495-8. (PMID: 26673940) Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;13(1):. (PMID: 38202312) Plants (Basel). 2025 Jun 22;14(13):. (PMID: 40647925) Heliyon. 2020 Jun 06;6(6):e04078. (PMID: 32548320) J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Dec;102(15):7098-7106. (PMID: 35778944) Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Apr 13;374(2065):20150202. (PMID: 26953178) Plant Physiol. 2002 Dec;130(4):1951-7. (PMID: 12481077) Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med. 2004 Jul;2(3):245-58. (PMID: 19330147) Plants (Basel). 2024 May 24;13(11):. (PMID: 38891267) Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 Jul 1;12(4):604-14. (PMID: 20636903) Plants (Basel). 2024 Mar 22;13(7):. (PMID: 38611447) Chemosphere. 2020 Oct;256:127021. (PMID: 32438128) J Hazard Mater. 2022 Apr 15;428:128211. (PMID: 35032954) Molecules. 2021 Apr 13;26(8):. (PMID: 33924700) |
| Substance Nomenclature: | 0 (Humic Substances) 0 (Antioxidants) 36-88-4 (Carotenoids) |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260921 Date Completed: 20260921 Latest Revision: 20260923 |
| Update Code: | 20260923 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC13592588 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0357270 |
| PMID: | 42766586 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
καταχωρήστε σχόλιο πρώτοι!