Editorial & Opinion

Delphi-based consensus studies: persistent challenges of bias.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Delphi-based consensus studies: persistent challenges of bias.
Συγγραφείς: Nasa P; Department of Critical Care Medicine and Anaesthesia, New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton, NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: dr.prashantnasa@hotmail.com., Schultz MJ; Department of Anaesthesiology, Rescue and Pain Medicine Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Juneja D; Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital Saket, New Delhi, India.
Πηγή: British journal of anaesthesia [Br J Anaesth] 2026 Oct; Vol. 137 (4), pp. 941-946. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Aug 27.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Editorial
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0372541 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-6771 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00070912 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Br J Anaesth Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: 2018- : [London] : Elsevier
Original Publication: London, Eng. [etc.]
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Consensus* , Delphi Technique*, Humans ; Bias ; Research Design
Περίληψη: Delphi methodology plays an important role in consensus development in areas where evidence is limited, ambiguous, or heterogeneous. However, the process remains inherently vulnerable to cognitive and methodological biases involving principal investigators, expert panellists, and other stakeholders. Recognising and proactively addressing these biases is essential to improve the rigour, transparency, and credibility of Delphi-based consensus research. Future efforts should focus on developing structured frameworks for transparent reporting and systematic implementation of bias mitigation strategies throughout the Delphi process.
(Copyright © 2026 British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.)
Competing Interests: Declaration of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Delphi methodology; bias; cognitive bias; consensus development; methodological bias; qualitative research
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260915 Date Completed: 20260915 Latest Revision: 20260922
Update Code: 20260923
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.015
PMID: 42744459
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.015?
    Name: ScienceDirect (all content) (s7799221)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record from ScienceDirect
    MouseOverText: View record from ScienceDirect
Header DbId: cmedm
DbLabel: MEDLINE
An: 42744459
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Editorial & Opinion
PubTypeId: editorialOpinion
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Delphi-based consensus studies: persistent challenges of bias.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Nasa+P%22">Nasa P</searchLink>; Department of Critical Care Medicine and Anaesthesia, New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton, NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: dr.prashantnasa@hotmail.com.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Schultz+MJ%22">Schultz MJ</searchLink>; Department of Anaesthesiology, Rescue and Pain Medicine Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Juneja+D%22">Juneja D</searchLink>; Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital Saket, New Delhi, India.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%220372541%22">British journal of anaesthesia</searchLink> [Br J Anaesth] 2026 Oct; Vol. 137 (4), pp. 941-946. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2026 Aug 27.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Editorial
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22Elsevier%22">Elsevier </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>England <i>NLM ID: </i>0372541 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1471-6771 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2200070912%22">00070912 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>Br J Anaesth <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE
– Name: PublisherInfo
  Label: Imprint Name(s)
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: <i>Publication</i>: 2018- : [London] : Elsevier<br /><i>Original Publication</i>: London, Eng. [etc.]
– Name: SubjectMESH
  Label: MeSH Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Consensus%22">Consensus*</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Delphi+Technique%22">Delphi Technique*</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Bias%22">Bias</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Research+Design%22">Research Design</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Delphi methodology plays an important role in consensus development in areas where evidence is limited, ambiguous, or heterogeneous. However, the process remains inherently vulnerable to cognitive and methodological biases involving principal investigators, expert panellists, and other stakeholders. Recognising and proactively addressing these biases is essential to improve the rigour, transparency, and credibility of Delphi-based consensus research. Future efforts should focus on developing structured frameworks for transparent reporting and systematic implementation of bias mitigation strategies throughout the Delphi process.<br /> (Copyright © 2026 British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.)
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Competing Interests
  Group: Ab
  Data: Declaration of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
– Name: SubjectMinor
  Label: Contributed Indexing
  Group:
  Data: <i>Keywords: </i>Delphi methodology; bias; cognitive bias; consensus development; methodological bias; qualitative research
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date(s)
  Group: Date
  Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20260915 <i>Date Completed: </i>20260915 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20260922
– Name: DateUpdate
  Label: Update Code
  Group: Date
  Data: 20260923
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.015
– Name: AN
  Label: PMID
  Group: ID
  Data: 42744459
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=42744459
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.015
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: 941
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Humans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consensus
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Delphi Technique
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Delphi-based consensus studies: persistent challenges of bias.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nasa P
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schultz MJ
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Juneja D
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: 2026 Oct
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1471-6771
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 137
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British journal of anaesthesia
              Type: main
ResultId 1