Academic Journal
Evaluation of LLMs for Automated Dental-to-Medical Consult Letter Generation: Comparative Study.
| Τίτλος: | Evaluation of LLMs for Automated Dental-to-Medical Consult Letter Generation: Comparative Study. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Eom D; Interdisciplinary Program of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea., Koh K; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea., Chung H; Department of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea., Kim K; Department of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Center for Data Science, Healthcare AI Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea., Lee SH; Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Dentistry, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: justina@catholic.ac.kr. |
| Πηγή: | International dental journal [Int Dent J] 2026 Oct; Vol. 76 (5), pp. 111088. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Sep 03. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article; Comparative Study; Evaluation Study |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0374714 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1875-595X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00206539 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int Dent J Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 2021- : London : Elsevier Original Publication: London : FDI World Dental |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Large Language Models* , Referral and Consultation* , Correspondence as Topic*, Humans ; Feasibility Studies |
| Περίληψη: | Introduction and Aims: For dental patients with systemic diseases, multidisciplinary care via referral letters is essential for clinical safety. This study evaluated the clinical feasibility and quality of dental-to-medical referral letters generated by Large Language Models (LLMs). Methods: Using 153 paired datasets, three LLMs - Gemini-2.5-Pro, GPT-5 and MedGemma - generated referral letters via a standardised prompting framework. Two dental clinicians performed a blinded assessment across nine sub-criteria covering content, style and correctness. GPT-5 also performed an automated evaluation. Statistical significance was analysed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. Results: In the human clinical evaluation, Gemini-2.5-Pro achieved the highest overall performance (TOTAL mean SCORE: 2.9487 with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval [CI] of 2.9345-2.9606), significantly outperforming GPT-5 (2.8818 with 95% CI of 2.8613-2.9008) and MedGemma (2.8613 with 95% CI of 2.8338-2.8865) (P < .05). While GPT-5 showed high clarity in systemic problem descriptions, MedGemma excelled in structural adherence. The overall performance difference between GPT-5 and MedGemma was not statistically significant (P = .3519). Inter-rater reliability was strong in the prompt search dataset (QWK: 0.7175) but lower in the independent test dataset (QWK: 0.1505), reflecting the subjective nature of clinical document assessment; therefore, final human scores were reported as average ratings from two blinded clinicians with bootstrap confidence intervals. Notably, GPT-5's self-evaluation results deviated from human judgment, exhibiting potential model-based bias. Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests the potential of Gemini-2.5-Pro for automated consult letter generation, though the low test-set inter-rater reliability (QWK: 0.1505) highlights the subjective complexity of clinical text. To integrate these assistive prototypes into routine clinical application, more systematic studies are required. Clinical Relevance: Integrating LLMs offers a promising approach to assisting with dental-to-medical referrals, presenting a potential future benefit of reducing administrative workloads and enabling healthcare providers to focus on safe, empathetic patient care. (Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Competing Interests: | Declaration of competing interest None disclosed. |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Dental records; Large language models; Referral and consultation |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260903 Date Completed: 20260916 Latest Revision: 20260916 |
| Update Code: | 20260916 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC13571579 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.identj.2026.111088 |
| PMID: | 42691762 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.111088? Name: ScienceDirect (all content) (s7799221) Category: fullText Text: View record from ScienceDirect MouseOverText: View record from ScienceDirect – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:cmedm&genre=article&issn=1875595X&ISBN=&volume=76&issue=5&date=20261001&spage=111088&pages=111088&title=International dental journal&atitle=Evaluation%20of%20LLMs%20for%20Automated%20Dental-to-Medical%20Consult%20Letter%20Generation%3A%20Comparative%20Study.&aulast=Eom%20D&id=DOI:10.1016/j.identj.2026.111088 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: Full Text Finder MouseOverText: Full Text Finder |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: cmedm DbLabel: MEDLINE An: 42691762 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluation of LLMs for Automated Dental-to-Medical Consult Letter Generation: Comparative Study. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Eom+D%22">Eom D</searchLink>; Interdisciplinary Program of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Koh+K%22">Koh K</searchLink>; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Chung+H%22">Chung H</searchLink>; Department of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Kim+K%22">Kim K</searchLink>; Department of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Center for Data Science, Healthcare AI Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Lee+SH%22">Lee SH</searchLink>; Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Dentistry, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: justina@catholic.ac.kr. – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%220374714%22">International dental journal</searchLink> [Int Dent J] 2026 Oct; Vol. 76 (5), pp. 111088. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2026 Sep 03. – Name: TypePub Label: Publication Type Group: TypPub Data: Journal Article; Comparative Study; Evaluation Study – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: TitleSource Label: Journal Info Group: Src Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22Elsevier%22">Elsevier </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>England <i>NLM ID: </i>0374714 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1875-595X (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2200206539%22">00206539 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>Int Dent J <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE – Name: PublisherInfo Label: Imprint Name(s) Group: PubInfo Data: <i>Publication</i>: 2021- : London : Elsevier<br /><i>Original Publication</i>: London : FDI World Dental – Name: SubjectMESH Label: MeSH Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Large+Language+Models%22">Large Language Models*</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Referral+and+Consultation%22">Referral and Consultation*</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Correspondence+as+Topic%22">Correspondence as Topic*</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Feasibility+Studies%22">Feasibility Studies</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Introduction and Aims: For dental patients with systemic diseases, multidisciplinary care via referral letters is essential for clinical safety. This study evaluated the clinical feasibility and quality of dental-to-medical referral letters generated by Large Language Models (LLMs).<br />Methods: Using 153 paired datasets, three LLMs - Gemini-2.5-Pro, GPT-5 and MedGemma - generated referral letters via a standardised prompting framework. Two dental clinicians performed a blinded assessment across nine sub-criteria covering content, style and correctness. GPT-5 also performed an automated evaluation. Statistical significance was analysed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction.<br />Results: In the human clinical evaluation, Gemini-2.5-Pro achieved the highest overall performance (TOTAL mean SCORE: 2.9487 with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval [CI] of 2.9345-2.9606), significantly outperforming GPT-5 (2.8818 with 95% CI of 2.8613-2.9008) and MedGemma (2.8613 with 95% CI of 2.8338-2.8865) (P &lt; .05). While GPT-5 showed high clarity in systemic problem descriptions, MedGemma excelled in structural adherence. The overall performance difference between GPT-5 and MedGemma was not statistically significant (P = .3519). Inter-rater reliability was strong in the prompt search dataset (QWK: 0.7175) but lower in the independent test dataset (QWK: 0.1505), reflecting the subjective nature of clinical document assessment; therefore, final human scores were reported as average ratings from two blinded clinicians with bootstrap confidence intervals. Notably, GPT-5's self-evaluation results deviated from human judgment, exhibiting potential model-based bias.<br />Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests the potential of Gemini-2.5-Pro for automated consult letter generation, though the low test-set inter-rater reliability (QWK: 0.1505) highlights the subjective complexity of clinical text. To integrate these assistive prototypes into routine clinical application, more systematic studies are required.<br />Clinical Relevance: Integrating LLMs offers a promising approach to assisting with dental-to-medical referrals, presenting a potential future benefit of reducing administrative workloads and enabling healthcare providers to focus on safe, empathetic patient care.<br /> (Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) – Name: Abstract Label: Competing Interests Group: Ab Data: Declaration of competing interest None disclosed. – Name: SubjectMinor Label: Contributed Indexing Group: Data: <i>Keywords: </i>Artificial intelligence; Dental records; Large language models; Referral and consultation – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date(s) Group: Date Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20260903 <i>Date Completed: </i>20260916 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20260916 – Name: DateUpdate Label: Update Code Group: Date Data: 20260916 – Name: PubmedCentralID Label: PubMed Central ID Group: ID Data: PMC13571579 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1016/j.identj.2026.111088 – Name: AN Label: PMID Group: ID Data: 42691762 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=42691762 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.identj.2026.111088 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: StartPage: 111088 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Humans Type: general – SubjectFull: Feasibility Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Large Language Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Referral and Consultation Type: general – SubjectFull: Correspondence as Topic Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluation of LLMs for Automated Dental-to-Medical Consult Letter Generation: Comparative Study. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Eom D – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Koh K – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chung H – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kim K – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lee SH IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: 2026 Oct Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1875-595X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 76 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: International dental journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |