Academic Journal
The Evolution of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Applications and Clinical Implications.
| Title: | The Evolution of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Applications and Clinical Implications. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Foula MS; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. msfoula@iau.edu.sa., Bamalan OA; General Surgery Department, Security Forces Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Foula A; Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital - Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Eldamati AM; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt., Alratrout HA; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., AlQatari AA; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Alsaleem HA; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Aldabaeab AE; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Foula H; Department of Nephrology, Alqabbary Specialist Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt., Zakaria HM; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Alarfaj MA; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Sharroufna MJ; Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia., Nwesar FA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mouwasat Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. |
| Source: | Obesity surgery [Obes Surg] 2026 Oct; Vol. 36 (10), pp. 5478-5497. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Aug 20. |
| Publication Type: | Systematic Review; Journal Article; Review |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Springer Science + Business Media Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9106714 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1708-0428 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09608923 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Obes Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 2006- : New York : Springer Science + Business Media Original Publication: Oxford, OX, UK : Rapid Communications of Oxford, [1991- |
| MeSH Terms: | Bariatric Surgery*/methods , Bariatric Surgery*/trends , Artificial Intelligence*, Humans ; Generative Artificial Intelligence |
| Abstract: | Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) uses in the field of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) have evolved over the past few years. However, published evidence remains limited. AI generally refers to computer systems capable of performing tasks that require human intelligence and cognitive functions. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the utility of AI tools in BMS and summarize current applications to establish a common language for bariatric surgeons. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines. Studies indexed in PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were identified using appropriate keywords related to obesity, bariatric procedures, and AI tools from inception until October 2025. Relevant studies' reference lists were also screened. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Results: The literature search identified 840 studies, with an additional 25 studies identified through citation screening. After removing duplicates and screening, 88 studies were included, categorized into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative AI uses as well as large language models uses. Quality assessment showed overall moderate to high quality. Conclusion: AI uses in BMS remains a supportive rather than a decisive tool. When applied appropriately, AI can assist surgeons and patients. LLMs should be used cautiously for preliminary health education. Societal initiatives should direct future efforts to address research gaps. Improving surgeon AI literacy, collaboration with AI specialists, and establishing national registries will maximize AI's potential. (© 2026. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
| Competing Interests: | Declarations. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. |
| References: | Schwartz WB. Medicine and the computer. The promise and problems of change. N Engl J Med. 1970;283(23):1257–64. (PMID: 4920342) Lin Z, Feng W, Liu Y, et al. Machine learning to identify metabolic subtypes of obesity: a multi-center study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:713592. (PMID: 343354798317220) Narath SH, Mautner SI, Svehlikova E, et al. An untargeted metabolomics approach to characterize short-term and long-term metabolic changes after bariatric surgery. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0161425. (PMID: 275840175008721) Khokhar S, Holden J, Toomer C, Del Parigi A. Weight loss with an ai-powered digital platform for lifestyle intervention. Obes Surg. 2024;34(5):1810–8. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07209-138573389) Chew HSJ, Chew NW, Loong SSE, et al. Effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-assisted app for improving eating behaviors: mixed methods evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e46036. (PMID: 3871390911109864) Chew HSJ, Achananuparp P, Dalakoti M, et al. Public acceptance of using artificial intelligence-assisted weight management apps in high-income southeast Asian adults with overweight and obesity: a cross-sectional study. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1287156. (PMID: 3838501110879329) Marchitelli S, Mazza C, Ricci E, et al. Identification of psychological treatment dropout predictors using machine learning models on italian patients living with overweight and obesity ineligible for bariatric surgery. Nutrients. 2024;16(16):2605. (PMID: 3920374211357013) Sizemore JA, Magudia K, He H, et al. Associations of computerized tomography-based body composition and food insecurity in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2025;35(9):3636–44. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-025-08045-740658358) Chiong R, Fan Z, Hu Z, Chiong F. Using an improved relative error support vector machine for body fat prediction. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;198:105749. (PMID: 33080491) Assaf D, Rayman S, Segev L, et al. Improving pre-bariatric surgery diagnosis of hiatal hernia using machine learning models. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):760–7. (PMID: 33779469) Trebolle J, Murillo J, Cobo J, et al. Development and validation of a predictive algorithm for the total length of the small intestine using artificial intelligence techniques for application in bariatric surgery. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2025;103(7):800124. Sheidaei A, Setaredan SA, Soleimany F, et al. A machine learning approach to predict types of bariatric surgery using the patients first physical exam information. Annals Bariatr Surg. 2019;8(2):9–13. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER, et al. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270(3):414–21. (PMID: 312746527216040) Fer D, Zhang B, Abukhalil R, et al. An artificial intelligence model that automatically labels Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, a comparison to trained surgeon annotators. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(7):5665–72. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-023-09870-636658282) Dayan D. Implementation of artificial intelligence–based computer vision model for sleeve gastrectomy: experience in one tertiary center. Obes Surg. 2024;34(2):330–6. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-023-07043-x38180619) Dayan D, Nizri E, Keidar A. Using artificial intelligence to evaluate adherence to best practices in one anastomosis gastric bypass: first steps in a real-world setting. Surg Endosc. 2025;39(3):1945–51. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-025-11556-03987083011870938) Dials J, Demirel D, Sanchez-Arias R, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: stomach location and task classification for evaluation using artificial intelligence. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024;19(4):635–44. (PMID: 3821247010978260) Lee YC, Lee WJ, Lee TS, et al. Prediction of successful weight reduction after bariatric surgery by data mining technologies. Obes Surg. 2007;17(9):1235–41. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-007-9322-918074500) Piaggi P, Lippi C, Fierabracci P, et al. Artificial neural networks in the outcome prediction of adjustable gastric banding in obese women. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):e13624. (PMID: 210489602965091) Wise ES, Hocking KM, Kavic SM. Prediction of excess weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: data from an artificial neural network. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):480–8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-015-4225-726017908) Nadal E, Benito E, Ródenas-Navarro AM, et al. Machine learning model in obesity to predict weight loss one year after bariatric surgery: a pilot study. Biomedicines. 2024;12(6):1175. (PMID: 3892738211200726) Domínguez M, Montano I, López Gómez JJ, et al. Predicting weight loss success after gastric sleeve surgery: a machine learning-based approach. Nutrients. 2025;17(8):1391. Benítez-Andrades JA, Prada-García C, García-Fernández R, et al. Application of machine learning algorithms in classifying postoperative success in metabolic bariatric surgery: A comprehensive study. Digit Health. 2024;10:20552076241239274. (PMID: 3855958310981264) Weerakoon W, Pemarathne W. Machine learning based weight prediction system for bariatric patients. In: 2021 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS). IEEE; 2021. pp. 203–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIS53135.2021.9660730. Vannucci M, Niyishaka P, Collins T, et al. Machine learning models to predict success of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using total and excess weight loss percent achievement: a multicentre study. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(1):229–39. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-023-10520-037973639) Zhang W, Ji G, Manza P, et al. Connectome-based prediction of optimal weight loss six months after bariatric surgery. Cereb Cortex. 2021;31(5):2561–73. (PMID: 333504418248852) Dimeglio C, Becouarn G, Topart P, et al. Weight loss trajectories after bariatric surgery for obesity: mathematical model and proof-of-concept study. JMIR Med Inf. 2020;8(3):e13672. Vieira NB, Bandeira PFR, de Sousa DF, et al. Statistical and machine learning modeling of psychological, sociodemographic, and physical activity factors associated with weight regain after bariatric surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025;22(6):904. (PMID: 4056633012193194) ZareMehrjardi F, Reid RER, Andersen RE, Hughes JA. Assessment of the relationship between physical behaviours, psychological factors, medication use, body composition and weight regain following bariatric surgery. In: 2022 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB). IEEE; 2022. pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIBCB55180.2022.9863038. Pedersen HK, Gudmundsdottir V, Pedersen MK, et al. Ranking factors involved in diabetes remission after bariatric surgery using machine-learning integrating clinical and genomic biomarkers. NPJ Genom Med. 2016;1(1):16035. (PMID: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.35292638205685313) Cao Y, Näslund I, Näslund E, et al. Using a convolutional neural network to predict remission of diabetes after gastric bypass surgery: machine learning study from the scandinavian obesity surgery register. JMIR Med Inf. 2021;9(8):e25612. Johnston SS, Morton JM, Kalsekar I, et al. Using machine learning applied to real-world healthcare data for predictive analytics: an applied example in bariatric surgery. Value Health. 2019;22(5):580–6. (PMID: 31104738) Aminian A, Zajichek A, Arterburn DE, et al. Predicting 10-year risk of end-organ complications of type 2 diabetes with and without metabolic surgery: a machine learning approach. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(4):852–9. (PMID: 320296387646205) Chen J, Zhang B, Cheng Y, et al. Machine learning-based non-invasive prediction of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis in obese patients: a retrospective study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(9):1096. (PMID: 4036191512072127) Jamialahmadi T, Looha MA, Jangjoo S, et al. Predictive performance of noninvasive factors for liver fibrosis in severe obesity: a screening based on machine learning models. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025;24(1):54. (PMID: 10.1007/s40200-025-01564-13983435011741961) Li Z, Wang L, Tian C, et al. Identification of hub biomarkers in liver post-metabolic and bariatric surgery using comprehensive machine learning (experimental studies). Int J Surg. 2025;111(2):1814–24. (PMID: 39728595) Cao Y, Raoof M, Montgomery S, et al. Predicting long-term health-related quality of life after bariatric surgery using a conventional neural network: a study based on the scandinavian obesity surgery registry. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2149. (PMID: 318173856947423) Cao Y, Raoof M, Szabo E, et al. Using Bayesian networks to predict long-term health-related quality of life and comorbidity after bariatric surgery: a study based on the scandinavian obesity surgery registry. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1895. (PMID: 325604247356516) Stenberg E, Cao Y, Szabo E, et al. Risk prediction model for severe postoperative complication in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):1869–75. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-017-3099-2293306546018582) Cao Y, Fang X, Ottosson J, et al. A comparative study of machine learning algorithms in predicting severe complications after bariatric surgery. J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):668. (PMID: 310836436571760) Kang DW, Zhou S, Torres R, et al. Predicting serious postoperative complications and evaluating racial fairness in machine learning algorithms for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024;20(11):1056–64. (PMID: 39232870) Zucchini N, Capozzella E, Giuffrè M, et al. Advanced non-linear modeling and explainable artificial intelligence techniques for predicting 30-day complications in bariatric surgery: a single-center study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(10):3627–38. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07501-039271585) Zhang M, Chen R, Yang Y, et al. Machine learning analysis of lab tests to predict bariatric readmissions. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16845. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-024-67710-63903913011263698) Farinella E, Papakonstantinou D, Koliakos N, et al. Integrating machine learning and dynamic digital follow-up for enhanced prediction of postoperative complications in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2025;35(6):2202–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-025-07894-640314925) Razzaghi T, Safro I, Ewing J, et al. Predictive models for bariatric surgery risks with imbalanced medical datasets. Ann Oper Res. 2019;280(1):1–18. (PMID: 10.1007/s10479-019-03156-8) Sheikhtaheri A, Orooji A, Pazouki A, Beitollahi M. A clinical decision support system for predicting the early complications of one-anastomosis gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2019;29(7):2276–86. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-019-03849-w31028626) Wise ES, Amateau SK, Ikramuddin S, Leslie DB. Prediction of thirty-day morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: data from an artificial neural network. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(8):3590–6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-019-07130-031571034) Wise ES, Leslie D, Amateau S, et al. Prediction of thirty-day morbidity and mortality after duodenal switch using an artificial neural network. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(2):1440–8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-022-09378-535764835) Torquati M, Mendis M, Xu H, et al. Using the super learner algorithm to predict risk of 30-day readmission after bariatric surgery in the united states. Surgery. 2022;171(3):621–7. (PMID: 34340821) Ali H, Patel P, Malik TF, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty reintervention score using supervised machine learning. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;98(5):747–e7545. (PMID: 37263362) Scott AW, Amateau SK, Leslie DB, et al. Prediction of 30-day morbidity and mortality after conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: use of an artificial neural network. Am Surg. 2024;90(6):1202–10. (PMID: 38197867) Nudel J, Bishara AM, de Geus SWL, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict gastrointestinal leak and venous thromboembolism after weight loss surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(1):182–91. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-020-07378-x31953733) Hsu JL, Chen KA, Butler LR, et al. Application of machine learning to predict postoperative gastrointestinal bleed in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(9):7121–7. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-023-10156-03731189312046526) Ali H, Inayat F, Moond V, et al. Predicting short-term thromboembolic risk following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using supervised machine learning. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;16(4):1097–108. (PMID: 3869004311056662) Romero-Velez G, Dang J, Barajas-Gamboa JS, et al. Machine learning prediction of major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(1):319–26. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-023-10429-837749205) Emile SH, Ghareeb W, Elfeki H, et al. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model to predict gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2022;32(8):2537–47. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-022-06112-x355969159273557) Prendin F, Streicher O, Cappon G, et al. Towards a decision support system for post bariatric hypoglycaemia: development of forecasting algorithms in unrestricted daily-life conditions. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):33. Shan X, Zhang M, Liang Y, et al. Application of machine learning to predict postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2025;35(7):2663–72. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-025-07951-040461710) Mousavi M, Tabesh MR, Moghadami SM, et al. Determining the importance of lifestyle risk factors in predicting binge eating disorder after bariatric surgery using machine learning models and lifestyle scores. Obes Surg. 2025;35(4):1396–406. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-025-07765-040045153) Cruz MR, Martins C, Dias J, Pinto JS. A validation of an intelligent decision-making support system for the nutrition diagnosis of bariatric surgery patients. JMIR Med Inf. 2014;2(2):e8. Pan Y, Du R, Han X, et al. Machine learning prediction of iron deficiency anemia in chinese premenopausal women 12 months after sleeve gastrectomy. Nutrients. 2023;15(15):3385. (PMID: 3757132210421369) Parrott JM, Parrott AJ, Rouhi AD, et al. What we are missing: using machine learning models to predict vitamin c deficiency in patients with metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1710–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-023-06571-w37060491) Nudel J, Kenzik KM, Rajendran I, et al. A machine learning framework for optimizing obesity care by simulating clinical trajectories and targeted interventions. Obesity. 2023;31(11):2665–75. (PMID: 37840392) Modaresnezhad M, Vahdati A, Nemati H, et al. A rule-based semantic approach for data integration, standardization and dimensionality reduction utilizing the UMLS: Application to predicting bariatric surgery outcomes. Comput Biol Med. 2019;106:84–90. (PMID: 30708220) Kang DW, Zhou S, Niranjan S, et al. Predicting operative time for metabolic and bariatric surgery using machine learning models: a retrospective observational study. Int J Surg. 2024;110(4):1968–74. (PMID: 3827063511019972) Guo C, Cai Q, Liu K. Optimizing surgical efficiency: a critical appraisal of machine learning in forecasting operative duration for metabolic and bariatric procedures. Int J Surg. 2024;110(6):4004–5. (PMID: 3844552511175809) Ochs V, Tobler A, Enodien B, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model of the hospital cost associated with bariatric surgery. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2023;17(6):529–35. (PMID: 37903676) Samaan JS, Yeo YH, Rajeev N, et al. Assessing the accuracy of responses by the language model ChatGPT to questions regarding bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1790–6. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-023-06603-53710626910234918) Moazzam Z, Lima HA, Endo Y, et al. A paradigm shift: online artificial intelligence platforms as an informational resource in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(8):2611–4. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-023-06675-337322244) Lee Y, Shin T, Tessier L, et al. Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024;20(7):603–8. (PMID: 38644078) Aburumman R, Al Annan K, Mrad R, et al. Assessing ChatGPT vs. standard medical resources for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty education: a medical professional evaluation study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(7):2718–24. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07283-538758515) Jazi AHD, Mahjoubi M, Shahabi S, et al. Bariatric evaluation through ai: a survey of expert opinions versus ChatGPT-4 (BETA-SEOV). Obes Surg. 2023;33(12):3971–80. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-023-06903-w37889368) Lopez-Gonzalez R, Sanchez-Cordero S, Pujol-Gebellí J, Castellvi J. Evaluation of the impact of ChatGPT on the selection of surgical technique in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2025;35(1):19–24. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07279-138760650) Lopez-Gonzalez R, Sanchez-Cordero S. Comments on: evaluation of the impact of chatgpt on the selection of surgical technique in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2024;34(7):2703–2703. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07351-w38850436) Sanchez-Cordero S, Lopez-Gonzalez R, Fernandez H, Pujol-Gebellí J. Training chatgpt for surgical decisions: bariatric surgery analysis using algorithms and evidence. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2025;19(4):352–5. (PMID: 40817014) Leng Y, Yang Y, Liu J, et al. Evaluating the feasibility of chatgpt-4 as a knowledge resource in bariatric surgery: a preliminary assessment. Obes Surg. 2025;35(2):645–50. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07666-839821906) Aksoy E. The performance of artificial intelligence in one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery: comparative efficacy of ChatGPT-4.0, ChatGPT-Omni, and Gemini AI. Obes Surg. 2025;35(4):1469–75. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-025-07794-940100615) Kahlon S, Sleet M, Sujka J, et al. Evaluating the concordance of ChatGPT and physician recommendations for bariatric surgery. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2025;103(2):70–4. (PMID: 39561352) Sanders A, Lim R, Jones D, Vosburg RW. Artificial intelligence large language model scores highly on focused practice designation in metabolic and bariatric surgery board practice questions. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(11):6678–81. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-024-11267-y39317906) Mahjoubi M, Shahabi S, Sheikhbahaei S, Jazi AHD. Evaluating AI capabilities in bariatric surgery: a study on ChatGPT-4 and DALLE 3’s recognition and illustration accuracy. Obes Surg. 2025;35(2):638–41. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07653-z39733375) Bellini V, Valente M, Turetti M, et al. Current applications of artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2022;32(8):2717–33. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-022-06100-1356167689273529) Bektaş M, Reiber BMM, Pereira JC, et al. Artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: current status and future perspectives. Obes Surg. 2022;32(8):2772–83. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-022-06146-1357138559273535) Enodien B, Taha-Mehlitz S, Saad B, et al. The development of machine learning in bariatric surgery. Front Surg. 2023;10:1102711. (PMID: 369115999998495) Nopour R. Comparison of machine learning models to predict complications of bariatric surgery: A systematic review. Health Inf J. 2024;30(3):14604582241285794. Mukhtar MAH, Ahmed AUB, Mohammed MAS, et al. The role of artificial intelligence in the prediction of bariatric surgery complications: a systematic review. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82461. Elzayyat M, Kermansaravi M, Fakhro J, Kassir R. Artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: optimizing personalized decision-making, predictive monitoring, and postoperative outcomes. Obes Surg. 2025;35(10):4531–3. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-025-08097-94093127512540497) Law S, Oldfield B, Yang W. ChatGPT/GPT-4 (large language models): Opportunities and challenges of perspective in bariatric healthcare professionals. Obes Rev. 2024;25(7):e13746. (PMID: 38613164) Şişik A, Dalkılıç MS, Gençtürk M, et al. Individualized bariatric surgery utilizing artificial intelligence: a call to colleagues and new year’s aspiration. Obes Surg. 2024;34(4):1380–1. (PMID: 10.1007/s11695-024-07060-438206563) Song Y, Ni Z, Li Y, et al. Exploring the landscape, hot topics, and trends of bariatric metabolic surgery with machine learning and bibliometric analysis. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;15:26317745221111944. (PMID: 359232149340401) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Bariatric surgery; Deep learning; Gastric bypass; Generative AI; Machine learning; Obesity |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260820 Date Completed: 20261007 Latest Revision: 20261008 |
| Update Code: | 20261008 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-026-08908-7 |
| PMID: | 42622983 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1708-0428 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-026-08908-7 |