Academic Journal

Why statistical learning researchers should study nonhuman animals.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Why statistical learning researchers should study nonhuman animals.
Authors: Tosatto L; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia; Normandie University, UNICAEN, CNRS, EthoS, UMR 6552, 14000 Caen, France., Avarguès-Weber A; CNRS, University of Toulouse, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA-CBI), Toulouse, France. Electronic address: aurore.avargues-weber@utoulouse.fr.
Source: Current opinion in neurobiology [Curr Opin Neurobiol] 2026 Oct; Vol. 100, pp. 103261. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Aug 19.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Current Biology Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9111376 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-6882 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09594388 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Curr Opin Neurobiol Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: London, UK : Current Biology, c1991-
MeSH Terms: Learning*/physiology , Brain*/physiology , Cognition*/physiology , Probability Learning*, Animals ; Humans ; Biological Evolution
Abstract: Statistical learning (SL) - the ability to detect patterns in sensory input without explicit instruction - is crucial for building internal models of the environment. In humans, it notably supports language acquisition, including word segmentation and grammar learning. Evidence across primates, songbirds, rodents, and insects indicate that SL is a widely shared evolutionarily conserved ability. The computational complexity of the mechanisms involved; however, varies between species, likely reflecting specific cognitive limitations. Alternatively, specific competences may have evolved to support the emergence of demanding, ecologically relevant, functions such as complex communication systems. These findings challenge the idea of a human-specific SL module while raising key questions about its evolutionary drivers and underlying mechanisms. Addressing these questions requires the expansion of cross-species, cross-modal studies with ecologically valid, unsupervised paradigms. Comparative approaches are indeed essential to uncover shared properties and species-specific SL adaptations. Framing SL as a foundational component of cognition, informed by animal research, offers new insights into brain function, and implicit learning in light of the evolution of sophisticated, emergent cognitive abilities such as complex communication systems.
(Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260819 Date Completed: 20260904 Latest Revision: 20260904
Update Code: 20260905
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2026.103261
PMID: 42617431
Database: MEDLINE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2026.103261?
    Name: ScienceDirect (all content) (s7799221)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record from ScienceDirect
    MouseOverText: View record from ScienceDirect
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:cmedm&genre=article&issn=18736882&ISBN=&volume=100&issue=&date=20261001&spage=103261&pages=103261&title=Current opinion in neurobiology&atitle=Why%20statistical%20learning%20researchers%20should%20study%20nonhuman%20animals.&aulast=Tosatto%20L&id=DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2026.103261
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
Header DbId: cmedm
DbLabel: MEDLINE
An: 42617431
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Why statistical learning researchers should study nonhuman animals.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Tosatto+L%22">Tosatto L</searchLink>; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia; Normandie University, UNICAEN, CNRS, EthoS, UMR 6552, 14000 Caen, France.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Avarguès-Weber+A%22">Avarguès-Weber A</searchLink>; CNRS, University of Toulouse, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA-CBI), Toulouse, France. Electronic address: aurore.avargues-weber@utoulouse.fr.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%229111376%22">Current opinion in neurobiology</searchLink> [Curr Opin Neurobiol] 2026 Oct; Vol. 100, pp. 103261. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2026 Aug 19.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Journal Article; Review
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22Current+Biology%22">Current Biology </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>England <i>NLM ID: </i>9111376 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1873-6882 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2209594388%22">09594388 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>Curr Opin Neurobiol <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE
– Name: PublisherInfo
  Label: Imprint Name(s)
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: <i>Original Publication</i>: London, UK : Current Biology, c1991-
– Name: SubjectMESH
  Label: MeSH Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Learning%22">Learning*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Learning+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Brain%22">Brain*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Brain+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Cognition+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Probability+Learning%22">Probability Learning*</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Animals%22">Animals</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Biological+Evolution%22">Biological Evolution</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Statistical learning (SL) - the ability to detect patterns in sensory input without explicit instruction - is crucial for building internal models of the environment. In humans, it notably supports language acquisition, including word segmentation and grammar learning. Evidence across primates, songbirds, rodents, and insects indicate that SL is a widely shared evolutionarily conserved ability. The computational complexity of the mechanisms involved; however, varies between species, likely reflecting specific cognitive limitations. Alternatively, specific competences may have evolved to support the emergence of demanding, ecologically relevant, functions such as complex communication systems. These findings challenge the idea of a human-specific SL module while raising key questions about its evolutionary drivers and underlying mechanisms. Addressing these questions requires the expansion of cross-species, cross-modal studies with ecologically valid, unsupervised paradigms. Comparative approaches are indeed essential to uncover shared properties and species-specific SL adaptations. Framing SL as a foundational component of cognition, informed by animal research, offers new insights into brain function, and implicit learning in light of the evolution of sophisticated, emergent cognitive abilities such as complex communication systems.<br /> (Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Competing Interests
  Group: Ab
  Data: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date(s)
  Group: Date
  Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20260819 <i>Date Completed: </i>20260904 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20260904
– Name: DateUpdate
  Label: Update Code
  Group: Date
  Data: 20260905
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1016/j.conb.2026.103261
– Name: AN
  Label: PMID
  Group: ID
  Data: 42617431
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=42617431
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.conb.2026.103261
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: 103261
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Animals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Humans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biological Evolution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Brain physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognition physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probability Learning
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Why statistical learning researchers should study nonhuman animals.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tosatto L
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Avarguès-Weber A
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: 2026 Oct
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1873-6882
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 100
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Current opinion in neurobiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1