Academic Journal

FICA and HOPE in Clinical Care: A Narrative Review Comparing 2 Spiritual Screening Tools Used by Physicians.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: FICA and HOPE in Clinical Care: A Narrative Review Comparing 2 Spiritual Screening Tools Used by Physicians.
Συγγραφείς: Manjra H; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA., Cho J; College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA., Yeung A; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA., Okamuro L; College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA., Liu C; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Figueroa Gray M; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Seattle, WA, USA., Turner JB; Department of Spiritual Care, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA, USA., Cipta A; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Πηγή: The Permanente journal [Perm J] 2026 Sep 15; Vol. 30 (3), pp. 160-168. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jul 24.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article; Review
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: Permanente Press Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9800474 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1552-5775 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15525767 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Perm J Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: Fall 2010- : Portland, OR : Permanente Press
Original Publication: Portland, Or. : Kaiser Permanente
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Physicians*/psychology , Spirituality* , Hope*, Humans ; Psychometrics
Περίληψη: This review aims to compare the FICA (faith, importance/influence, community, address in care) and HOPE (sources of hope, organized religion, personal spirituality/practices, effects on care) spiritual screening tools across multiple domains, including clinical utility, implementation feasibility, and psychometric properties, in order to synthesize evidence and provide guidance to health care practitioners and educators regarding the relative strengths and limitations of the 2 tools. This review of published literature involved a structured search in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO, from which 2 reviewers independently screened, extracted, and synthesized data using predefined criteria. The studies included in the review assessed the use of the FICA and/or HOPE tools with adult patient populations and health care professionals in multiple countries, primarily within academic and hospital-based settings. FICA was more frequently used in clinical and educational settings and was noted for its structured format and integration into serious illness care. Meanwhile, HOPE was noted for its open-ended format and greater flexibility in exploring personal spirituality, particularly among patients identifying as spiritual but not religious. Although there does not seem to be research validating or using psychometric resources to analyze these tools, qualitative studies indicated their perceived value in enhancing holistic care. Both FICA and HOPE are valuable frameworks for initiating spiritual screenings in clinical practice. FICA may be more suitable in fast-paced environments because of its concise structure, whereas HOPE offers greater depth and personalization. Further research should focus on developing validated outcome measures and examining the impact of spiritual screenings on patient care.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest None declared
References: Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(2):81-90. (PMID: 19142047)
Explore (NY). 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):234-8. (PMID: 21724156)
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11 Suppl 1:51-7. (PMID: 20590350)
Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Sep;22(5):581-591. (PMID: 28736789)
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Sep 15;86(6):546-50. (PMID: 23062046)
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jun;38(5):479-88. (PMID: 12028281)
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr-Jun;6(2):111-121. (PMID: 30931354)
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Aug 9-23;159(15):1803-6. (PMID: 10448785)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 17;11:1334920. (PMID: 38695025)
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Sep;13(9):557-566. (PMID: 28898605)
J Holist Nurs. 2023 Sep;41(3):256-264. (PMID: 35607283)
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Sep;21(9):430-8. (PMID: 26412273)
JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):184-197. (PMID: 35819420)
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):38-43. (PMID: 12534762)
J Palliat Med. 2009 Oct;12(10):885-904. (PMID: 19807235)
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):481-5. (PMID: 16704392)
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Jan-Feb;58(1):25-9. (PMID: 24029615)
Nurse Educ. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):E6-9. (PMID: 27166591)
J Relig Health. 2025 Jun;64(3):1972-2007. (PMID: 40389727)
Virtual Mentor. 2005 May 01;7(5):. (PMID: 23249592)
J Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;24(11):1606-1615. (PMID: 33844951)
J Relig Health. 2018 Feb;57(1):26-32. (PMID: 27342410)
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Oct;62(603):e718-25. (PMID: 23265232)
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 8;17(11):e0276281. (PMID: 36346826)
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Aug;40(2):163-73. (PMID: 20619602)
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Apr 4;132(7):578-83. (PMID: 10744595)
J Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;30(4):823-834. (PMID: 38738922)
J Genet Couns. 2007 Feb;16(1):41-52. (PMID: 17277997)
J Relig Health. 2024 Feb;63(1):159-184. (PMID: 37573533)
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jan 1;63(1):81-9. (PMID: 11195773)
J Fam Pract. 1994 Oct;39(4):349-52. (PMID: 7931113)
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Sep;48(3):400-10. (PMID: 24480531)
J Palliat Med. 2000 Spring;3(1):129-37. (PMID: 15859737)
Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;121(21):3760-8. (PMID: 26258868)
Teach Learn Med. 2004 Winter;16(1):64-8. (PMID: 14987177)
Explore (NY). 2013 May-Jun;9(3):159-70. (PMID: 23643371)
Integr Cancer Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15347354231210841. (PMID: 37961876)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: FICA; HOPE; Screening tools; Spirituality
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260724 Date Completed: 20260915 Latest Revision: 20260917
Update Code: 20260917
PubMed Central ID: PMC13575997
DOI: 10.7812/TPP/26.019
PMID: 42494219
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE