Academic Journal
Developing a mix-method protocol to assess green space quality for multiage health-related activities.
| Τίτλος: | Developing a mix-method protocol to assess green space quality for multiage health-related activities. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Chen S; College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China., Wang C; College of Environment + Design, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA., Cheng S; College of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing, China., Yang Z; College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore., Wang Y; College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China. |
| Πηγή: | Applied psychology. Health and well-being [Appl Psychol Health Well Being] 2026 Jun; Vol. 18 (3), pp. e70176. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101502957 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1758-0854 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17580854 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Appl Psychol Health Well Being Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: Oxford : Blackwell |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Environment Design*/standards , Exercise* , Social Interaction*, Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Aged ; Female ; Male |
| Περίληψη: | The development of an urban green space (UGS) quality assessment protocol addressing the health-related activities of older adults and children represents a sustainable approach to promoting health and well-being. Although most protocols have been developed for physical activity, few have considered other categories of health-related activities that encompass multiple age groups. This study develops a mixed-method green space for multiage health-related activities (GMHA) protocol to assess UGS quality for older adults, children, and the general population across different health-related activities, including physical activity and social interaction. Five conventional domains of facility, amenity, aesthetics, maintenance, safety, and incivilities audited by systematic observation are integrated with the geospatial domains of natural environments and spatial configuration, supported by unmanned aerial vehicle and space syntax techniques. Seventy UGS samples were tested for interrater reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients. The relative importance of each UGS domain in the protocol was further examined using a spatial autoregressive (SAR) model. Content validity is substantiated by scholarship. Preliminary tests verified quantitative reliability and concurrent validity. SAR results revealed varying associations between UGS domains and multiage health-related activities, highlighting the significance of the environment-individual-activity interaction. GMHA can facilitate targeting UGS quality enhancement across broader contexts and populations to benefit health and well-being. (© 2026 International Association of Applied Psychology.) |
| References: | Broomhall, M., Giles‐Corti, B., & Lange, A. (2004). Quality of Public Open Space Tool (POST). School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia. Campbell, L. K., Svendsen, E. S., Sonti, N. F., & Johnson, M. L. (2016). A social assessment of urban parkland: Analyzing park use and meaning to inform management and resilience planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.014. Chen, S., Sleipness, O., Christensen, K., Yang, B., Park, K., Knowles, R., Yang, Z., & Wang, H. (2024). Exploring associations between social interaction and urban park attributes: Design guideline for both overall and separate park quality enhancement. Cities, 145, 104714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104714. Chen, S., Sleipness, O., Xu, Y., Park, K., & Christensen, K. (2020). A systematic review of alternative protocols for evaluating non‐spatial dimensions of urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126718. Cheng, S., Zhao, M., Zhang, D., & Chen, S. (2026). Healthy aging planning: A multi‐scale review of urban green space impacts on post‐COVID health behaviors. Cities, 173, 107019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2026.107019. Corley, J., Okely, J. A., Taylor, A. M., Page, D., Welstead, M., Skarabela, B., Redmond, P., Cox, S. R., & Russ, T. C. (2021). Home garden use during COVID‐19: Associations with physical and mental wellbeing in older adults. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101545. Crawford, D., Timperio, A., Giles‐Corti, B., Ball, K., Hume, C., Roberts, R., Andrianopoulos, N., & Salmon, J. (2008). Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio‐economic status? Health & Place, 14(4), 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.11.002. Dadvand, P., Hariri, S., Abbasi, B., Heshmat, R., Qorbani, M., Motlagh, M. E., Basagaña, X., & Kelishadi, R. (2019). Use of green spaces, self‐satisfaction and social contacts in adolescents: A population‐based CASPIAN‐V study. Environmental Research, 168, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.033. Davies, C., & Lafortezza, R. (2017). Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy, 69, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.018. Edwards, N., Hooper, P., Trapp, G. S., Bull, F., Boruff, B., & Giles‐Corti, B. (2013). Development of a public open space desktop auditing tool (POSDAT): A remote sensing approach. Applied Geography, 38, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.010. Ehlis, A. C., Aas, B., Kieckhäfer, C., Schiepek, G., Rosenbaum, D., Theisen, C., Fallgatter, A. J., & Goldbeck, F. (2025). Move, connect and go outside! A randomized controlled trial of two online interventions and analysis of helpful coping strategies in COVID‐19 “homestayers”. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 17(1), e12603. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12603. Eichholtzer, A. C., Driscoll, D. A., Patrick, R., Galletta, L., & Lawson, J. (2024). The co‐benefits of biodiversity citizen science for well‐being and nature relatedness. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 16(2), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12502. Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross‐sectional data to spatial panels. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8. Enssle, F., & Kabisch, N. (2020). Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well‐being of older people—An integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio‐environmental justice. Environmental Science & Policy, 109, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008. Gao, M., & Zhu, X. (2025). Development and testing of the nightscape affect index. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 17(3), e70036. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70036. Gidlow, C., Ellis, N., & Bostock, S. (2012). Development of the neighbourhood green space tool (NGST). Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007. Gidlow, C., van Kempen, E., Smith, G., Triguero‐Mas, M., Kruize, H., Gražulevičienė, R., Ellis, N., Hurst, G., Masterson, D., Cirach, M., van den Berg, M., Smart, W., Dėdelė, A., Maas, J., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2018). Development of the natural environment scoring tool (NEST). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.007. Giles‐Corti, B. (2006). People or places: What should be the target? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9(5), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.021. Han, S., Song, D., Xu, L., Ye, Y., Yan, S., Shi, F., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., & Du, H. (2022). Behaviour in public open spaces: A systematic review of studies with quantitative research methods. Building and Environment, 223, 109444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109444. Harper, S. (2021). The impact of the Covid‐19 pandemic on global population ageing. Journal of Population Ageing, 14(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-021-09330-w. Hazlehurst, M. F., Hajat, A., Tandon, P. S., Szpiro, A. A., Kaufman, J. D., Tylavsky, F. A., Hare, M. E., Sathyanarayana, S., Loftus, C. T., LeWinn, K. Z., Bush, N. R., & Karr, C. J. (2024). Associations of residential green space with internalizing and externalizing behavior in early childhood. Environmental Health, 23(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01051-9. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029. Hoffimann, E., Campelo, D., Hooper, P., Barros, H., & Ribeiro, A. I. (2018). Development of a smartphone app to evaluate the quality of public open space for physical activity. An instrument for health researchers and urban planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.005. Huang, D., Jiang, B., & Yuan, L. (2022). Analyzing the effects of nature exposure on perceived satisfaction with running routes: An activity path‐based measure approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 68, 127480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127480. Joseph, R., & Maddock, J. (2016). Comparative analysis of five observational audit tools to assess the physical environment of parks for physical activity, 2016. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13, E166. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160176. Kaczynski, A. T., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., & Besenyi, G. M. (2012). Development and testing of a community stakeholder park audit tool. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.018. Kleinschroth, F., Savilaakso, S., Kowarik, I., Martinez, P. J., Chang, Y., Jakstis, K., Schneider, J., & Fischer, L. K. (2024). Global disparities in urban green space use during the COVID‐19 pandemic from a systematic review. Nature Cities., 1(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-023-00020-6. Klompmaker, J. O., Hoek, G., Bloemsma, L. D., Gehring, U., Strak, M., Wijga, A. H., van den Brink, C., Brunekreef, B., Lebret, E., & Janssen, N. A. (2018). Green space definition affects associations of green space with overweight and physical activity. Environmental Research, 160, 531–540. Knobel, P., Dadvand, P., Alonso, L., Costa, L., Español, M., & Maneja, R. (2021). Development of the urban green space quality assessment tool (RECITAL). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 57, 126895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126895. Knobel, P., Dadvand, P., & Maneja‐Zaragoza, R. (2019). A systematic review of multi‐domainal quality assessment tools for urban green spaces. Health & Place, 59, 102198. Knöll, M., & Roe, J. J. (2017). Ten questions concerning a new adolescent health urbanism. Building and Environment, 126, 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.006. Koohsari, M. J., Kaczynski, A. T., & Oka, K. (2023). Residential greenspace and health: Quantity or quality? The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(9), e734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00187-0. Labib, S. M., Lindley, S., & Huck, J. J. (2020). Scale effects in remotely sensed greenspace metrics and how to mitigate them for environmental health exposure assessment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 82, 101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101501. Lee, H.‐S. (2022). Developing and testing the senior park environment assessment in Korea (SPEAK) audit tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 227, 104545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104545. Lee, R. E., Booth, K. M., Reese‐Smith, J. Y., Regan, G., & Howard, H. H. (2005). The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-2-13. Li, F., Lynam, A., Huang, H., & Wei, J. (2024). Institutional co‐production at neighbourhood scale: Cases of urban renewal for Shanghai's ageing population. Habitat International, 144, 103000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.103000. Lis, A., Zalewska, K., & Grabowski, M. (2024). The ability to choose how to interact with other people in the park space and its role in terms of perceived safety and preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 99, 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102429. Lu, Y., & Giuliano, G. (2023). Where do people meet? Time‐series clustering for social interaction levels in daily‐life spaces during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Cities, 137, 104298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104298. Luo, Y., Kaczynski, A. T., Li, J., Motomura, M., Zhao, J., Hanibuchi, T., Oka, K., & Koohsari, M. J. (2025). Redesigning urban parks for active living in dense urban areas: A remote audit approach. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 35(10), 3031–3041. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2024.2343944. MacKenzie, A., Pearson, L. J., & Pearson, C. J. (2019). A framework for governance of public green spaces in cities. Landscape Research., 44(4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1444153. Massaro, E., Schifanella, R., Piccardo, M., Caporaso, L., Taubenböck, H., Cescatti, A., & Duveiller, G. (2023). Spatially‐optimized urban greening for reduction of population exposure to land surface temperature extremes. Nature Communications, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38596-1. McKenzie, T. L., Cohen, D. A., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., & Golinelli, D. (2006). System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and feasibility measures. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S208–S222. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208. Millo, G., & Piras, G. (2012). splm: Spatial panel data models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 47(1). Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & Prisma‐P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analysis protocols (PRISMA‐P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1–9. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Khreis, H., Triguero‐Mas, M., Gascon, M., & Dadvand, P. (2017). Fifty shades of green: Pathway to healthy urban living. Epidemiology, 28(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000549. Oliveira, M. R., Sudati, I. P., Konzen, V. M., de Campos, A. C., Wibelinger, L. M., Correa, C., Miguel, F. M., Silva, R. N., & Borghi‐Silva, A. (2022). Covid‐19 and the impact on the physical activity level of elderly people: A systematic review. Experimental Gerontology, 159, 111675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111675. Olszewska‐Guizzo, A., Sia, A., Fogel, A., & Ho, R. (2022). Features of urban green spaces associated with positive emotions, mindfulness and relaxation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20695. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24637-0. Omer, I., & Kaplan, N. (2017). Using space syntax and agent‐based approaches for modeling pedestrian volume at the urban scale. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.007. Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006. Park, H., Brown, C. D., & Pearson, A. L. (2024). A systematic review of audit tools for evaluating the quality of green spaces in mental health research. Health & Place, 86, 103185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103185. Park, K., Christensen, K., & Lee, D. (2020). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in behavior mapping: A case study of neighborhood parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 52, 126693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126693. Poppe, L., Van Dyck, D., De Keyser, E., Van Puyvelde, A., Veitch, J., & Deforche, B. (2023). The impact of renewal of an urban park in Belgium on park use, UGS‐based physical activity, and social interaction: A natural experiment. Cities, 140, 104428. Putra, I. G. N. E., Astell‐Burt, T., Cliff, D. P., Vella, S. A., & Feng, X. (2021). Do physical activity, social interaction, and mental health mediate the association between green space quality and child prosocial behaviour? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127264. Raymore, L. A. (2002). Facilitators to leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949959. Reece, R., Elliott, L., Bray, I., & Bornioli, A. (2024). How properties of urban green spaces shape well‐being across age groups: A qualitative study. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 7, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2024.100206. Rigolon, A., & Nemeth, J. (2018). A QUality INdex of Parks for Youth (QUINPY): Evaluating urban parks through geographic information systems. Environment and Planning B‐Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516672212. Rivera, E., Timperio, A., Loh, V. H., Deforche, B., & Veitch, J. (2021). Important park features for encouraging park visitation, physical activity and social interaction among adolescents: A conjoint analysis. Health & Place, 70, 102617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102617. Roy, S., Majumder, S., Bose, A., & Chowdhury, I. R. (2024). Spatial heterogeneity in the urban household living conditions: A‐GIS‐based spatial analysis. Annals of GIS, 30(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2024.2304194. Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Auffrey, C., Whitaker, R. C., Burdette, H. L., & Colabianchi, N. (2006). Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter‐rater reliability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S190–S207. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s190. Sallis, J. F., Cervero, R. B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K. A., Kraft, M. K., & Kerr, J. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100. Sánchez, I. A. V., & Labib, S. M. (2024). Accessing eye‐level greenness visibility from open‐source street view images: A methodological development and implementation in multi‐city and multi‐country contexts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 103, 105262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105262. Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Randrup, T. B., & Troelsen, J. (2010). Influences on the use of urban green space—A case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002. Sepúlveda‐Loyola, W., Rodríguez‐Sánchez, I., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Ganz, F., Torralba, R., Oliveira, D. V., & Rodríguez‐Mañas, L. (2020). Impact of social isolation due to COVID‐19 on health in older people: Mental and physical effects and recommendations. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 24(9), 938–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1500-7. Sezavar, N., Pazhouhanfar, M., Van Dongen, R. P., & Grahn, P. (2023). The importance of designing the spatial distribution and density of vegetation in urban parks for increased experience of safety. Journal of Cleaner Production, 403, 136768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136768. Sheng, Q., Wan, D., & Yu, B. (2021). Effect of space configurational attributes on social interactions in urban parks. Sustainability, 13(14), 7805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147805. Stessens, P., Canters, F., Huysmans, M., & Khan, A. Z. (2020). Urban green space qualities: An integrated approach towards GIS‐based assessment reflecting user perception. Land Use Policy, 91, 104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104319. Stewart, O. T., Moudon, A. V., Littman, A., Seto, E., & Saelens, B. E. (2018). The association between park facilities and the occurrence of physical activity during park visits. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(3–5), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2018.1534073. Tabrizian, P., Baran, P. K., Smith, W. R., & Meentemeyer, R. K. (2018). Exploring perceived restoration potential of urban green enclosure through immersive virtual environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.001. Taylor, B., Taylor, B. T., Fernando, P., Bauman, A. E., Williamson, A., Craig, J. C., & Redman, S. (2011). Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.024. Teeuwen, R., Milias, V., Bozzon, A., & Psyllidis, A. (2024). How well do NDVI and OpenStreetMap data capture people's visual perceptions of urban greenspace? Landscape and Urban Planning, 245, 105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105009. Tucker, C. J., Holben, B. N., Elgin, J. H., & Mcmurtrey, J. E. (1980). Relationship of spectral data to grain yield variation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46. Turner, A. (2001). International symposium on space syntax. Georgia Institute of Technology. 7–11 May 2001. Van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to space syntax in urban studies. Springer International Publishing. Veitch, J., Ball, K., Rivera, E., Loh, V., Deforche, B., Best, K., & Timperio, A. (2022). What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104254. Wang, C., Chen, S., Chen, Y., & Shen, Z. (2025). Greenery effects: Comparing the associations between multi‐dimensional measurements of urban green space greenery and engagement in health‐related activities across age groups. Land, 14(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061128. Wang, T., Chandra, A., Jung, J., & Chang, A. (2022). UAV remote sensing based estimation of green cover during turfgrass establishment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 194, 106721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106721. Wavrek, M. T., Carr, E., Jean‐Philippe, S., & McKinney, M. L. (2023). Drone remote sensing in urban forest management: A case study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 86, 127978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127978. Wen, C., Albert, C., & Von Haaren, C. (2018). The elderly in green spaces: Exploring requirements and preferences concerning nature‐based recreation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.023. Yang, L., Ao, Y., Ke, J., Lu, Y., & Liang, Y. (2021). To walk or not to walk? Examining non‐linear effects of streetscape greenery on walking propensity of older adults. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103099. Yin, Z., Wang, L., & Xu, Z. (2025). Retrofit‐oriented large parks’ walking‐shed evaluation—A case study of Rizhao, China. Land, 14(3), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030498. Yuan, F., & Chen, M. (2025). A systematic review of measurement tools and senior engagement in urban nature: Health benefits and behavioral patterns analysis. Health & Place, 91, 103410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103410. Zhai, Y., & Baran, P. K. (2016). Do configurational attributes matter in context of urban parks? Park pathway configurational attributes and senior walking. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.010. Zhang, S., Song, H., Li, X., & Luo, S. (2024). Urban parks quality assessment using multi‐domain indicators in Chengdu, China. Land, 13(1), 86. Zhang, Y., Koene, M., Chen, C., Wagenaar, C., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2024). Associations between the built environment and physical activity in children, adults and older people: A narrative review of reviews. Preventive Medicine, 180, 107856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107856. |
| Grant Information: | 52308066 National Natural Science Foundation of China; BK20230401 Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; 2023M741720 China Postdoctoral Science Foundation |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: children; elder; geospatial; health and well‐beings; physical activity; social interaction; urban green space |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260623 Date Completed: 20260623 Latest Revision: 20260623 |
| Update Code: | 20260624 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/aphw.70176 |
| PMID: | 42333937 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
καταχωρήστε σχόλιο πρώτοι!