Academic Journal
Clinical artificial intelligence competence in obstetrics and gynecology: patient safety, physician accountability, and responsible use.
| Τίτλος: | Clinical artificial intelligence competence in obstetrics and gynecology: patient safety, physician accountability, and responsible use. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Grünebaum A; Northwell Health, Division of Ethics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY. Electronic address: agrunebaum@northwell.edu., Dudenhausen J; Northwell Health, Division of Ethics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY., Chervenak FA; Northwell Health, Division of Ethics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY. |
| Πηγή: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2026 Oct; Vol. 235 (4), pp. 817-824. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jun 19. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0370476 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-6868 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00029378 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am J Obstet Gynecol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: <2005->: New York : Elsevier Original Publication: St. Louis. |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Obstetrics*/education , Obstetrics*/standards , Gynecology*/standards , Gynecology*/education , Artificial Intelligence* , Patient Safety* , Clinical Competence* , Social Responsibility*, Humans ; Female ; Generative Artificial Intelligence ; Gynecologists ; Obstetricians ; Pregnancy |
| Περίληψη: | Artificial intelligence, especially generative large language models, has rapidly entered obstetric and gynecologic care through patient use, clinician documentation, counseling support, medical education, and evidence retrieval. This integration has occurred faster than formal training, specialty-specific standards, or governance structures have developed. The relevant clinical question is, therefore, no longer whether obstetricians and gynecologists will encounter artificial intelligence, but whether they can use it competently, verify its outputs, protect patient privacy, and remain accountable for clinical decisions. This Clinical Opinion proposes clinical artificial intelligence competence as an emerging component of safe professional practice in obstetrics and gynecology. We define this competence as the ability to use artificial intelligence tools for appropriate clinical tasks while critically appraising output, recognizing hallucinations and outdated guidance, verifying sources, preserving confidentiality, communicating uncertainty, and maintaining independent clinical judgment. Potential benefits include improved readability of patient materials, more efficient evidence retrieval, documentation support, informed consent assistance, and reduced cognitive burden during complex care. Risks include fabricated citations, incorrect recommendations, algorithmic bias, privacy breaches, deskilling of trainees, and inappropriate delegation of clinical reasoning. Historical experience with ultrasound, electronic fetal monitoring, cell-free DNA screening, and other obstetric technologies suggests that the profession should neither reject new tools reflexively nor adopt them uncritically. Instead, artificial intelligence use should be structured, supervised, version-specific, and proportionate to clinical risk. Clinical artificial intelligence competence should be incorporated gradually into residency, fellowship, continuing medical education, departmental teaching, morbidity and mortality review, and patient safety programs. Outcome-based evaluation remains essential as these tools enter practice. (Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: artificial intelligence; clinical artificial intelligence competence; clinical decision support; clinical governance; clinical judgment; continuing medical education; gynecology; health literacy; implementation science; informed consent; medical professionalism; obstetrics; patient communication; patient counseling; patient safety; physician accountability; physician-patient relationship; quality improvement; residency education |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260619 Date Completed: 20260917 Latest Revision: 20260917 |
| Update Code: | 20260918 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajog.2026.06.011 |
| PMID: | 42320614 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2026.06.011? Name: ScienceDirect (all content) (s7799221) Category: fullText Text: View record from ScienceDirect MouseOverText: View record from ScienceDirect – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:cmedm&genre=article&issn=10976868&ISBN=&volume=235&issue=4&date=20261001&spage=817&pages=817-824&title=American journal of obstetrics and gynecology&atitle=Clinical%20artificial%20intelligence%20competence%20in%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%3A%20patient%20safety%2C%20physician%20accountability%2C%20and%20responsible%20use.&aulast=Gr%C3%BCnebaum%20A&id=DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2026.06.011 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: Full Text Finder MouseOverText: Full Text Finder |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: cmedm DbLabel: MEDLINE An: 42320614 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Clinical artificial intelligence competence in obstetrics and gynecology: patient safety, physician accountability, and responsible use. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Grünebaum+A%22">Grünebaum A</searchLink>; Northwell Health, Division of Ethics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY. Electronic address: agrunebaum@northwell.edu.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Dudenhausen+J%22">Dudenhausen J</searchLink>; Northwell Health, Division of Ethics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Chervenak+FA%22">Chervenak FA</searchLink>; Northwell Health, Division of Ethics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY. – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%220370476%22">American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</searchLink> [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2026 Oct; Vol. 235 (4), pp. 817-824. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2026 Jun 19. – Name: TypePub Label: Publication Type Group: TypPub Data: Journal Article – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: TitleSource Label: Journal Info Group: Src Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22Elsevier%22">Elsevier </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>United States <i>NLM ID: </i>0370476 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1097-6868 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2200029378%22">00029378 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>Am J Obstet Gynecol <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE – Name: PublisherInfo Label: Imprint Name(s) Group: PubInfo Data: <i>Publication</i>: <2005->: New York : Elsevier<br /><i>Original Publication</i>: St. Louis. – Name: SubjectMESH Label: MeSH Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Obstetrics%22">Obstetrics*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Obstetrics+education%22">education</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Obstetrics%22">Obstetrics*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Obstetrics+standards%22">standards</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Gynecology%22">Gynecology*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Gynecology+standards%22">standards</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Gynecology%22">Gynecology*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Gynecology+education%22">education</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence*</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Patient+Safety%22">Patient Safety*</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Clinical+Competence%22">Clinical Competence*</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Social+Responsibility%22">Social Responsibility*</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Female%22">Female</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Generative+Artificial+Intelligence%22">Generative Artificial Intelligence</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Gynecologists%22">Gynecologists</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Obstetricians%22">Obstetricians</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Pregnancy%22">Pregnancy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Artificial intelligence, especially generative large language models, has rapidly entered obstetric and gynecologic care through patient use, clinician documentation, counseling support, medical education, and evidence retrieval. This integration has occurred faster than formal training, specialty-specific standards, or governance structures have developed. The relevant clinical question is, therefore, no longer whether obstetricians and gynecologists will encounter artificial intelligence, but whether they can use it competently, verify its outputs, protect patient privacy, and remain accountable for clinical decisions. This Clinical Opinion proposes clinical artificial intelligence competence as an emerging component of safe professional practice in obstetrics and gynecology. We define this competence as the ability to use artificial intelligence tools for appropriate clinical tasks while critically appraising output, recognizing hallucinations and outdated guidance, verifying sources, preserving confidentiality, communicating uncertainty, and maintaining independent clinical judgment. Potential benefits include improved readability of patient materials, more efficient evidence retrieval, documentation support, informed consent assistance, and reduced cognitive burden during complex care. Risks include fabricated citations, incorrect recommendations, algorithmic bias, privacy breaches, deskilling of trainees, and inappropriate delegation of clinical reasoning. Historical experience with ultrasound, electronic fetal monitoring, cell-free DNA screening, and other obstetric technologies suggests that the profession should neither reject new tools reflexively nor adopt them uncritically. Instead, artificial intelligence use should be structured, supervised, version-specific, and proportionate to clinical risk. Clinical artificial intelligence competence should be incorporated gradually into residency, fellowship, continuing medical education, departmental teaching, morbidity and mortality review, and patient safety programs. Outcome-based evaluation remains essential as these tools enter practice.<br /> (Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) – Name: SubjectMinor Label: Contributed Indexing Group: Data: <i>Keywords: </i>artificial intelligence; clinical artificial intelligence competence; clinical decision support; clinical governance; clinical judgment; continuing medical education; gynecology; health literacy; implementation science; informed consent; medical professionalism; obstetrics; patient communication; patient counseling; patient safety; physician accountability; physician-patient relationship; quality improvement; residency education – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date(s) Group: Date Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20260619 <i>Date Completed: </i>20260917 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20260917 – Name: DateUpdate Label: Update Code Group: Date Data: 20260918 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1016/j.ajog.2026.06.011 – Name: AN Label: PMID Group: ID Data: 42320614 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=42320614 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.ajog.2026.06.011 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: StartPage: 817 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Humans Type: general – SubjectFull: Female Type: general – SubjectFull: Generative Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Gynecologists Type: general – SubjectFull: Obstetricians Type: general – SubjectFull: Pregnancy Type: general – SubjectFull: Obstetrics education Type: general – SubjectFull: Obstetrics standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Gynecology standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Gynecology education Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient Safety Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical Competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Responsibility Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Clinical artificial intelligence competence in obstetrics and gynecology: patient safety, physician accountability, and responsible use. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grünebaum A – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dudenhausen J – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chervenak FA IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: 2026 Oct Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1097-6868 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 235 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |