Academic Journal
STR1DE: A Near-Peer Approach to FY1 Teaching.
| Τίτλος: | STR1DE: A Near-Peer Approach to FY1 Teaching. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Gleeson-Buddhdev J; The Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK., Boal H; The Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK., Wragg A; The Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK., Johnson C; The Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK. |
| Πηγή: | The clinical teacher [Clin Teach] 2026 Aug; Vol. 23 (4), pp. e70454. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: Blackwell Pub Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101227511 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1743-498X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17434971 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Teach Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Pub., c2004- |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Teaching*/organization & administration , Problem-Based Learning*/organization & administration , Peer Group* , Faculty, Medical*, Humans ; Curriculum ; United Kingdom |
| Περίληψη: | Background: UK Foundation Year 1 doctors (FY1s) undergo 30 h of core teaching annually to supplement clinical experiential learning. Previous weekly hour-long teaching at our institution was unpopular due to curriculum issues, difficulty in attending and focusing on teaching, and an overuse of lectures. This prompted the development of STR1DE-Simulation, Teaching and Reflection for FY1 Development and Education-which aimed to improve FY1s' satisfaction with a new teaching programme. Approach: STR1DE comprises six full-day sessions per year, each repeated six times (~12 participants per day). Competitively appointed and specifically trained near-peer teaching fellows design and deliver content. The curriculum is adapted in response to FY1s' feedback. Interactive educational techniques, including simulation, are used. Clinically relevant topics are prioritised while integrating core requirements from the Foundation Programme Curriculum. Evaluation: STR1DE was attended by 168 FY1s over 3 years. Anonymised feedback forms were completed after each session. Quantitative data consistently showed high satisfaction (mean rating > 4.8/5 per session). The full-day format was preferred by 99.3% (N = 149). Qualitative feedback was collected via open-ended questions on the days' strengths and weaknesses. Thematic analysis showed that (1) the full-day approach, (2) the near-peer faculty and (3) the relevant and co-designed curriculum were key drivers of the positive quantitative feedback. Implications: STR1DE demonstrates that a full-day teaching programme, designed and delivered by near-peer teaching fellows, can be highly valued. Stakeholder engagement, learner involvement in curriculum development and creating a positive, collaborative learning culture are vital. (© 2026 Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| References: | UK Foundation Programme Curriculum 2021. (UK Foundation Programme Office, 2021). O. Ten Cate and S. Durning, “Dimensions and Psychology of Peer Teaching in Medical Education,” Medical Teacher 29, no. 6 (2007): 546–552. T. M. Lockspeiser, P. O’Sullivan, A. Teherani, and J. Muller, “Understanding the Experience of Being Taught by Peers: The Value of Social and Cognitive Congruence,” Advances in Health Sciences Education 13, no. 3 (2006): 361–372. S. de Menezes and D. Premnath, “Near‐Peer Education: A Novel Teaching Program,” International Journal of Medical Education 7 (2016): 160–167. C. Bulte, A. Betts, K. Garner, and S. Durning, “Student Teaching: Views of Student Near‐Peer Teachers and Learners,” Medical Teacher 29, no. 6 (2007): 583–590. H. Zhang, A. W. X. Liao, S. H. Goh, X. V. Wu, and S. Q. Yoong, “Effectiveness of Peer Teaching in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Nurse Education Today 118, no. 118 (2022): 105499. J. J. Gleeson, H. Boal, T. Sharp, et al., “Teaching Ultrasound‐Guided Venous Cannulation to Newly Qualified Doctors,” Cureus. 16, no. 4 (2024): e58295. A. Wragg, J. Gleeson‐Buddhdev, T. Sharp, and R. Khodabocus, “Teaching Foundation Doctors How to Manage Tracheostomy Emergencies,” Cureus. 17 (2025): e94846. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101. M. S. Choe, L. C. Huffman, H. M. Feldman, and L. M. Hubner, “Academic Half‐Day Education Experience in Post‐Graduate Medical Training: A Scoping Review of Characteristics and Learner Outcomes,” Frontiers in Medicine 9 (2022): 835045. J. Lou and F. Guo, “Comparing the Seminar‐Case Learning and Lecture‐Based Learning Models in Medical Education: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” BMC Medical Education 25, no. 1 (2025): 470. H. Y. So, P. P. Chen, G. K. C. Wong, and T. T. N. Chan, “Simulation in Medical Education,” Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 49, no. 1 (2019): 52–57. H. Levinsson, A. Nilsson, K. Mårtensson, and S. D. Persson, “Course Design as a Stronger Predictor of Student Evaluation of Quality and Student Engagement Than Teacher Ratings,” Higher Education 88 (2024): 1997–2013. É. Ambrosetti, C. Gaudin, S. Flandin, and G. Poizat, “Students as Co‐Designers in Health Professional Education: A Scoping Review,” BMC Medical Education 3 (2025): 645. A. Smidt, S. Balandin, J. Sigafoos, and V. A. Reed, “The Kirkpatrick Model: A Useful Tool for Evaluating Training Outcomes,” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 34, no. 3 (2009): 266–274. |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: curriculum design; foundation doctors; near‐peer; reflection; simulation; teaching organisation; transition |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260609 Date Completed: 20260612 Latest Revision: 20260726 |
| Update Code: | 20260726 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC13349550 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/tct.70454 |
| PMID: | 42264540 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
καταχωρήστε σχόλιο πρώτοι!