Academic Journal

Replicability of Functional Brain Networks: A Study Through the Lens of Seven Resting-State Networks.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Replicability of Functional Brain Networks: A Study Through the Lens of Seven Resting-State Networks.
Authors: Fales KR; Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA., Zhi X; Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA., Song H; Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA., Lazar NA; Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.; Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Source: Human brain mapping [Hum Brain Mapp] 2026 Jun 01; Vol. 47 (8), pp. e70559.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9419065 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-0193 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10659471 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Hum Brain Mapp Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: New York : Wiley
Original Publication: New York : Wiley-Liss, c1993-
MeSH Terms: Magnetic Resonance Imaging*/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging*/standards , Nerve Net*/physiology , Nerve Net*/diagnostic imaging , Connectome*/standards , Connectome*/methods , Brain*/physiology , Brain*/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*/standards , Default Mode Network*/diagnostic imaging , Default Mode Network*/physiology, Humans ; Rest
Abstract: The study of brain networks is essential for improving our understanding of how the human brain functions. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis is a widely used approach for studying co-activating patterns among brain regions by estimating their temporal dependencies and constructing an undirected network. Data processing is critical before estimating a subject's functional network, but the absence of a standardized procedure serves as a source of heterogeneity in results, especially in multi-site studies. Commonly studied functional networks include the default mode, sensorimotor, visual, salience, dorsal attention, frontoparietal, and language networks. These networks are stable and still exhibit intrinsic activation when an individual is at rest, making them ideal networks to focus on for studying how processing choices affect the replicability of functional connectivity networks. We use the aforementioned seven networks to assess the impact of various processing choices, including preprocessing pipeline, band-pass filtering, and brain parcellation, on the replicability of functional connectivity estimates for multi-site resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE). Finally, we provide some practical recommendations for how researchers should proceed with processing choices in the face of these effects.
(© 2026 The Author(s). Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: ABIDE. 2013. ABIDE Preprocessed. http://preprocessed‐connectomes‐project.org/abide/index.html.
Abraham, A., M. Milham, A. Di Martino, et al. 2017. “Deriving Reproducible Biomarkers From Multi‐Site Resting‐State Data: An Autism‐Based Example.” NeuroImage 147: 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.045.
Arslan, S., S. Ktena, A. Makropoulos, E. Robinson, D. Rueckert, and S. Parisot. 2018. “Human Brain Mapping: A Systematic Comparison of Parcellation Methods for the Human Cerebral Cortex.” NeuroImage 170: 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.014.
Ashburner, J. 2007. “A Fast Diffeomorphic Image Registration Algorithm.” NeuroImage 38, no. 1: 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007.
Ashby, F. 2015. “An Introduction to fMRI.” In An Introduction to Model‐Based Cognitive Neuroscience, 91–112. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4939‐2236‐9_5.
Bagrow, J. P., and E. M. Bollt. 2019. “An Information‐Theoretic, All‐Scales Approach to Comparing Networks.” Applied Network Science 4, no. 1: 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109‐019‐0156‐x.
Bari, S., E. Amico, N. Vike, T. Talavage, and J. Goñi. 2019. “Uncovering Multi‐Site Identifiability Based on Resting‐State Functional Connectomes.” NeuroImage 202: 115967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.045.
Bijsterbosch, J., S. Harrison, S. Jbabdi, et al. 2020. “Challenges and Future Directions for Representations of Functional Brain Organization.” Nature Neuroscience 23: 1484–1495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593‐020‐00726‐z.
Birn, R. 2023. “Quality Control Procedures and Metrics for Resting‐State Functional MRI.” Frontiers in Neuroimaging 2: 1072927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1072927.
Botvinik‐Nezer, R., F. Holzmeister, C. Camerer, et al. 2020. “Variability in the Analysis of a Single Neuroimaging Dataset by Many Teams.” Nature 582: 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586‐020‐2314‐9.
Büchel, C., and K. Friston. 1997. “Modulation of Connectivity in Visual Pathways by Attention: Cortical Interactions Evaluated With Structural Equation Modelling and fMRI.” Cerebral Cortex 7, no. 8: 768–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.8.768.
Buckner, R., J. Andrews‐Hanna, and D. Schacter. 2008. “The Brain's Default Network.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011.
Carp, J. 2012. “On the Plurality of (Methodological) Worlds: Estimating the Analytic Flexibility of fMRI Experiments.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 6: 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149.
Cordes, D., V. Haughton, K. Arfanakis, et al. 2001. “Frequencies Contributing to Functional Connectivity in the Cerebral Cortex in “Resting‐State” Data.” American Journal of Neuroradiology 22, no. 7: 1326–1333.
Cox, R. 1996. “AFNI: Software for Analysis and Visualization of Functional Magnetic Resonance Neuroimages.” Computers and Biomedical Research, an International Journal 29, no. 3: 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014.
Craddock, C., Y. Benhajali, C. Chu, et al. 2013. The Neuro Bureau Preprocessing Initiative: Open Sharing of Preprocessed Neuroimaging Data and Derivatives. Neuroinformatics 2013, Stockholm, Sweden.
Deprez, S., M. de Ruiter, S. Bogaert, et al. 2018. “Multi‐Center Reproducibility of Structural, Diffusion Tensor, and Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures.” Neuroradiology 60, no. 6: 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234‐018‐2017‐1.
Di Martino, A., C.‐G. Yan, Q. Li, et al. 2014. “The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange: Towards a Large‐Scale Evaluation of the Intrinsic Brain Architecture in Autism.” Molecular Psychiatry 19: 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.78.
Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap Mehods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” Annals of Statistics 7, no. 1: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552.
Eickhoff, S., B. Yeo, and S. Genon. 2018. “Imaging‐Based Parcellations of the Human Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 19: 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583‐018‐0071‐7.
Esteban, O., C. Markiewicz, R. Blair, et al. 2019. “fMRIPrep: A Robust Preprocessing Pipeline for Functional MRI.” Nature Methods 16: 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐018‐0235‐4.
Fair, D., A. Cohen, J. Power, et al. 2009. “Functional Brain Networks Develop From a “Local to Distributed” Organization.” PLoS Computational Biology 5, no. 5: e1000381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000381.
Fischl, B. 2012. “FreeSurfer.” NeuroImage 62, no. 2: 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021.
Fortin, J. 2024. Neurocombat: Harmonization of Multi‐Site Imaging Data With Combat [R Package Version 1.0.13].
Fortin, J., N. Cullen, Y. Sheline, et al. 2018. “Harmonization of Cortical Thickness Measurements Across Scanners and Sites.” NeuroImage 167: 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024.
Friston, K. 1994. “Functional and Effective Connectivity in Neuroimaging: A Synthesis.” Human Brain Mapping 2: 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.460020107.
Goelman, G., R. Dan, O. Bezdicek, R. Jech, and D. Ekstein. 2024. “Directed Functional Connectivity of the Default‐Mode‐Network of Young and Older Healthy Subjects.” Scientific Reports 14: 4304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐024‐54802‐6.
Gorgolewski, K., F. Alfaro‐Almagro, T. Auer, et al. 2017. “BIDS Apps: Improving Ease of Use, Accessibility, and Reproducibility of Neuroimaging Data Analysis Methods.” PLoS Computational Biology 13, no. 3: e1005209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209.
Gratton, C., T. Laumann, A. Nielsen, et al. 2018. “Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation.” Neuron 98, no. 2: 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035.
Hlinka, J., M. Paluš, M. Vejmelka, D. Mantini, and M. Corbetta. 2011. “Functional Connectivity in Resting‐State fMRI: Is Linear Correlation Sufficient?” NeuroImage 54, no. 3: 2218–2225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.042.
Jenkinson, M., C. Beckmann, T. Behrens, M. Woolrich, and S. Smith. 2012. “FSL.” NeuroImage 62, no. 2: 782–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015.
Johnson, W., C. Li, and A. Rabinovic. 2007. “Adjusting Batch Effects in Microarray Expression Data Using Empirical Bayes Methods.” Biostatistics 8, no. 1: 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037.
Konopka, T. 2023. umap: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection [R Package Version 0.2.10.0]. https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=umap.
Luppi, A., H. Gellersen, Z.‐Q. Liu, et al. 2024. “Systematic Evaluation of fMRI Data‐Processing Pipelines for Consistent Functional Connectomics.” Nature Communications 15: 4745. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐024‐48781‐5.
Mangiafico, S. 2015. An R Companion for the Handbook for Biological Statistics. https://rcompanion.org/rcompanion/d_04.html.
Markiewicz, C. J., K. J. Gorgolewski, F. Feingold, et al. 2021. “The OpenNeuro Resource for Sharing of Neuroscience Data.” eLife 10: 71774. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71774.
Marx, V. 2024. “Seeing Data as t‐SNE and UMAP Do.” Nature Methods 21: 930–933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐024‐02301‐x.
McCormick, E., and E. Telzer. 2018. “Contributions of Default Mode Network Stability and Deactivation to Adolescent Task Engagement.” Scientific Reports 8: 18049. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐018‐36269‐4.
McInnes, L., J. Healy, and J. Melville. 2020. “UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03426. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426.
Messé, A. 2020. “Parcellation Influence on the Connectivity‐Based Structure‐Function Relationship in the Human Brain.” Human Brain Mapping 41, no. 5: 1167–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24866.
Mohanty, R., W. Sethares, V. Nair, and V. Prabhakaran. 2020. “Rethinking Measures of Functional Connectivity via Feature Extraction.” Scientific Reports 10: 1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐020‐57915‐w.
Murphy, K., R. Birn, D. Handwerker, T. Jones, and P. Bandettini. 2009. “The Impact of Global Signal Regression on Resting State Correlations: Are Anti‐Correlated Networks Introduced?” NeuroImage 44, no. 3: 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy, Board on Research Data and Information, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, & Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. 2019. “Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability.” In Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/.
Nieto‐Castanon, A., and S. Whitfield‐Gabrieli. 2020. CONN Functional Connectivity Toolbox: RRID SCR_009550, Release 20. https://doi.org/10.56441/hilbertpress.2048.3738.
Niso, G., R. Botvinik‐Nezer, S. Appelhoff, et al. 2022. “Open and Reproducible Neuroimaging: From Study Inception to Publication.” NeuroImage 263: 119623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119623.
NITRC. 2024. NeuroImaging Analysis Kit. https://www.nitrc.org/projects/niak/.
Orban, P., C. Madjar, M. Savard, et al. 2015. “Test‐Retest Resting‐State fMRI in Healthy Elderly Persons With a Family History of Alzheimer's Disease.” Scientific Data 2: 150043. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.43.
Papo, D., M. Zanin, and J. Buldú. 2014. “Reconstructing Functional Brain Networks: Have We Got the Basics Right?” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00107.
Paret, C., N. Unverhau, F. Feingold, et al. 2022. “Survey on Open Science Practices in Functional Neuroimaging.” NeuroImage 257: 119306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119306.
Poldrack, R. A., C. I. Baker, J. Durnez, et al. 2017. “Scanning the Horizon: Towards Transparent and Reproducible Neuroimaging Research.” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 18, no. 2: 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167.
Pomponio, R., G. Erus, M. Habes, et al. 2020. “Harmonization of Large MRI Datasets for the Analysis of Brain Imaging Patterns Throughout the Lifespan.” NeuroImage 208: 116450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116450.
Pool, E.‐M., A. Rehme, S. Eickhoff, G. Fink, and C. Grefkes. 2015. “Functional Resting‐State Connectivity of the Human Motor Network: Differences Between Right‐ and Left‐Handers.” NeuroImage 109: 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.034.
Power, J., A. Cohen, S. Nelson, et al. 2011. “Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain.” Neuron 72, no. 4: 665–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006.
Raichle, M. 2011. “The Restless Brain.” Brain Connectivity 1, no. 1: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2011.0019.
Sala‐Llonch, R., S. Smith, M. Woolrich, and E. Duff. 2019. “Spatial Parcellations, Spectral Filtering, and Connectivity Measures in fMRI: Optimizing for Discrimination.” Human Brain Mapping 40, no. 2: 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24381.
Seitzman, B., A. Snyder, E. Leuthardt, and J. Shimony. 2019. “The State of Resting State Networks.” Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: TMRI 28, no. 4: 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000214.
Shahhosseini, Y., and M. Miranda. 2022. “Functional Connectivity Methods and Their Applications in fMRI Data.” Entropy 24: 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24030390.
Shirer, W., H. Jiang, C. Price, B. Ng, and M. Greicius. 2015. “Optimization of rs‐fMRI Pre‐Processing for Enhanced Signal‐Noise Separation, Test‐Retest Reliability, and Group Discrimination.” NeuroImage 117: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.01.
Shirer, W., S. Ryali, E. Rykhlevskaia, V. Menon, and M. Greicius. 2012. “Decoding Subject‐Driven Cognitive States With Whole‐Brain Connectivity Patterns.” Cerebral Cortex 22, no. 1: 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr099.
Simmons, J. P., L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn. 2011. “False‐Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22, no. 11: 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
Smith, S., D. Vidaurre, C. Beckmann, et al. 2013. “Functional Connectomics From Resting‐State fMRI.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17, no. 12: 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.016.
Song, X., Z. Dong, X. Long, et al. 2011. “REST: A Toolkit for Resting‐State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Processing.” PLoS One 6, no. 9: e25031. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025031.
Tejavibulya, L., C. Horien, C. Fredricks, B. Ficek‐Tani, M. Westwater, and D. Scheinost. 2025. “Brain Handedness Associations Depend on How and When Handedness Is Measured.” Scientific Reports 15: 9674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐025‐94036‐8.
Tejavibulya, L., H. Peterson, A. Greene, et al. 2022. “Large‐Scale Differences in Functional Organization of Left‐ and Right‐Handed Individuals Using Whole‐Brain, Data‐Driven Analysis of Connectivity.” NeuroImage 252: 119040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119040.
Therriault, J., S. Wang, S. Mathotaarachchi, et al. 2019. “Rostral‐Caudal Hippocampal Functional Convergence Is Reduced Across the Alheimer's Disease Spectrum.” Molecular Neurobiology 56: 8336–8344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035‐019‐01671‐0.
Tomasi, D., and N. Volkow. 2024. “Associations Between Handedness and Brain Functional Connectivity Patterns in Children.” Nature Communications 15: 2355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐024‐46690‐1.
Tustison, N., P. Cook, A. Holbrook, et al. 2021. “The ANTsX Ecosystem for Quantitative Biological and Medical Imaging.” Scientific Reports 11: 9068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐021‐87564‐6.
Weber, R., J. Mangus, and R. Huskey. 2015. “Brain Imaging in Communication Research: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Evaluating fMRI Studies.” Communication Methods and Measures 9: 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2014.999754.
Xing, X.‐X., T. Xu, C. Jiang, Y.‐S. Wang, and X.‐N. Zuo. 2022. “Connectome Computation System: 2015‐2021 Updates.” Science Bulletin 67, no. 5: 448–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.11.021.
Xu, T., Z. Yang, X.‐X. Xing, and X.‐N. Zuo. 2015. “A Connectome Computation System for Discovery Science of Brain.” Science Bulletin 60, no. 1: 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434‐014‐0698‐3.
Yan, C., R. Craddock, X. Zuo, Y. Zang, and M. Milham. 2013. “Standardizing the Intrinsic Brain: Towards Robust Measurement of Inter‐Individual Variation in 1000 Functional Connectomes.” NeuroImage 80: 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.081.
Yan, C., X. Wang, X. Zuo, and Y. Zang. 2016. “DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting‐State) Brain Imaging.” Neuroinformatics 14: 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021‐016‐9299‐4.
Yeo, B., F. Krienen, J. Sepulcre, et al. 2011. “The Organization of the Human Cerebral Cortex Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity.” Journal of Neurophysiology 106, no. 3: 1125–1165. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00338.2011.
Yu, M., K. Linn, P. Cook, et al. 2018. “Statistical Harmonization Corrects Site Effects in Functional Connectivity Measurements From Multi‐Site fMRI Data.” Human Brain Mapping 39, no. 11: 4213–4227. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24241.
Zijdenbos, A., R. Forghani, and A. Evans. 2002. “Automatic “Pipeline” Analysis of 3‐D MRI Data for Clinical Trials: Application to Multiple Sclerosis.” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21, no. 10: 1280–1291.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: band‐pass filtering; brain parcellation; data preprocessing; functional connectivity; functional network; replicability; resting‐state fMRI
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260609 Date Completed: 20260613 Latest Revision: 20260726
Update Code: 20260726
PubMed Central ID: PMC13247136
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70559
PMID: 42260753
Database: MEDLINE
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first