Improved chaos-enhanced FOX for clustering-based supervised medical classification.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Improved chaos-enhanced FOX for clustering-based supervised medical classification.
Συγγραφείς: Dağlı İ; Department of Computer Engineering, Institute of Science, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. idagli@erbakan.edu.tr., İnan O; Department of Computer Engineering, Institute of Science, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey., Başçiftçi F; Department of Computer Engineering, Institute of Science, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Πηγή: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2026 May 06; Vol. 16 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 May 06.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Medical Informatics*/methods , Classification Algorithms* , Clustering Algorithms*, Humans ; Algorithms ; Cluster Analysis ; Nonlinear Dynamics
Περίληψη: Despite the widespread use of optimization-based classification methods in medical data analysis, many existing approaches suffer from premature convergence and limited robustness when dealing with complex and heterogeneous datasets. To address these limitations, this study presents a chaos-enhanced, fox-inspired classification framework derived from the Fox Optimization Algorithm. The proposed method employs a Gauss/Mouse chaotic map to regulate the exploration-exploitation balance through the control variable, while preserving the original algorithmic structure without introducing additional parameters. The framework adopts a clustering-based classification strategy in which cluster centers are optimized using the proposed method, and class labels are assigned via distance-based nearest-neighbor analysis. The approach was evaluated on six publicly available medical datasets, including Breast Cancer Wisconsin Diagnostic, Breast Cancer Wisconsin Original, Dermatology, Thyroid, Hepatitis, and Heart, using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity as evaluation metrics. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves statistically significant and consistent classification performance, attaining the best overall average rank (1.16) in the Friedman test (p = 0.0012) and outperforming several baseline methods. Performance improvements over benchmark methods were observed across multiple datasets, while comparable results were obtained on others. The incorporation of chaotic dynamics effectively enhances search behavior by mitigating premature convergence. Statistical analyses, including the Friedman test, further confirm the significance of the observed improvements. Overall, the findings indicate that the proposed framework provides stable and reproducible classification performance across benchmark medical datasets. Future studies may extend this work through external clinical validation and alternative methodological integrations.
(© 2026. The Author(s).)
Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: The authors confirm that the necessary ethical review process has been adhered to in this study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References: Concepts, O. D. M. Oracle. Data Mining Concepts. (2024). https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/datamine.111/b28129/classify.htm#DMCON004 . Accessed 10.06.2024.
Abualigah, L. & Diabat, A. Advances in sine cosine algorithm: A comprehensive survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54(4), 2567–2608 (2021). (PMID: 10.1007/s10462-020-09909-3)
Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R. & Mirjalili, S. A novel whale optimization algorithm integrated with Nelder-Mead simplex for multi-objective optimization problems. Knowl. Based Syst. 212, 106619 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106619)
Kaveh, A., Khodadadi, N. & Talatahari, S. A comparative study for the optimal design of steel structures using CSS and ACSS algorithms. Iran Univ. Sci. Technol. 11(1), 31–54 (2021).
Talbi, E. Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation. John Wiley & Sons google schola 2, 268–308 (2009).
Schaffer, J. D., & Grefenstette, J. J. Multi-Objective Learning via Genetic Algorithms. In Ijcai, (Vol. 85, pp. 593–595) (1985).
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks, (Vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948): ieee (1995).
Abualigah, L., Abd Elaziz, M., Sumari, P., Geem, Z. W. & Gandomi, A. H. Reptile search algorithm (RSA): A nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer. Expert Syst. Appl. 191, 116158 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116158)
Erol, O. K. & Eksin, I. A new optimization method: Big bang–big crunch. Adv. Eng. Softw. 37(2), 106–111 (2006). (PMID: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.04.005)
Khodadadi, N. & Mirjalili, S. Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using generalized normal distribution optimization. Appl. Intell. 52(9), 10384–10397 (2022). (PMID: 10.1007/s10489-021-03051-5)
Kaveh, A., Eslamlou, A. D. & Khodadadi, N. Dynamic water strider algorithm for optimal design of skeletal structures. Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 64(3), 904–916 (2020).
Askari, Q., Younas, I. & Saeed, M. Political optimizer: A novel socio-inspired meta-heuristic for global optimization. Knowl. Based Syst. 195, 105709 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105709)
Yang, X. S. & Hossein Gandomi, A. Bat algorithm: A novel approach for global engineering optimization. Eng. Comput. 29(5), 464–483 (2012). (PMID: 10.1108/02644401211235834)
Agushaka, J. O., Ezugwu, A. E. & Abualigah, L. Dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 391, 114570 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.114570)
Kaveh, A., Khodadadi, N., Azar, B. F. & Talatahari, S. Optimal design of large-scale frames with an advanced charged system search algorithm using box-shaped sections. Eng. Comput. 37, 2521–2541 (2021). (PMID: 10.1007/s00366-020-00955-7)
Cheng, M.-Y. & Prayogo, D. Symbiotic organisms search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput. Struct. 139, 98–112 (2014). (PMID: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007)
Kaveh, A., Talatahari, S. & Khodadadi, N. Hybrid invasive weed optimization-shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for optimal design of truss structures. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 44, 405–420 (2020). (PMID: 10.1007/s40996-019-00280-0)
Coşkun, C. & Baykal, A. Veri madenciliğinde siniflandirma algoritmalarinin bir örnek üzerinde karşilaştirilmasi. Akad. Bil. 11, 51–58 (2011).
Tanyildizi, E. & Cigali, T. Kaotik haritali balina optimizasyon algoritmalari. Firat Univ. Muhendis. Bilim. Derg. 29(1), 307–317 (2017).
Blake, C. L., & Merz, C. UCI repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences. (1998).
Baloochian, H. & Ghaffary, H. R. Multiclass classification based on multi-criteria decision-making. J. Classif. 36(1), 140–151 (2019). (PMID: 10.1007/s00357-018-9286-6)
Turkoglu, B., Uymaz, S. A. & Kaya, E. Binary artificial algae algorithm for feature selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 120, 108630 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108630)
Inan, O. & Uzer, M. S. A method of classification performance improvement via a strategy of clustering-based data elimination integrated with k-fold cross-validation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 46(2), 1199–1212 (2021). (PMID: 10.1007/s13369-020-04972-y)
Yilmaz, N., Inan, O. & Uzer, M. S. A new data preparation method based on clustering algorithms for diagnosis systems of heart and diabetes diseases. J. Med. Syst. 38(5), 48 (2014). (PMID: 2473730710.1007/s10916-014-0048-7)
Al-Kahlout, B. I., Naeem, M. M., & Shepherd, M. J. ANN for the classification of eryhemato-squamous disease. (2021).
Hameed, A. A., Karlik, B., Salman, M. S. & Eleyan, G. Robust adaptive learning approach to self-organizing maps. Knowl. Based Syst. 171, 25–36 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.01.011)
Liu, Q., Xu, X., Tao, Y., & Wang, X. An improved decision tree method base on RELIEFF for medical diagnosis. In 2016 6th International conference on digital home (ICDH), (pp. 133–138): IEEE (2016).
Huang, M.-L., Hung, Y.-H., Lee, W., Li, R.-K. & Jiang, B.-R. SVM-RFE based feature selection and Taguchi parameters optimization for multiclass SVM classifier. Sci. World J. 2014(1), 795624 (2014).
Peng, J. et al. An explainable artificial intelligence framework for the deterioration risk prediction of hepatitis patients. J. Med. Syst. 45(5), 61 (2021). (PMID: 3384785010.1007/s10916-021-01736-5)
Novichasari, S. I. & Wibisono, I. S. Particle swarm optimization for improved accuracy of disease diagnosis. J. Appl. Intell. Syst. 5(2), 57–68 (2020).
Joshi, M., & Jetawat, A. Evaluation of Classification Algorithms used in Medical Decision Support Systems. In 2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4), (pp. 27–31): IEEE (2020).
Mitra, M. & Samanta, R. A study on UCI hepatitis disease dataset using soft computing. Model. Meas. Control C 78(4), 467–477 (2017). (PMID: 10.18280/mmc_c.780405)
Tan, K. C., Teoh, E. J., Yu, Q. & Goh, K. A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for attribute selection in data mining. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4), 8616–8630 (2009). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.013)
Shivastuti, H. K., Manhas, J. & Sharma, V. Performance evaluation of SVM and random forest for the diagnosis of thyroid disorder. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 9, 945–947 (2021). (PMID: 10.22214/ijraset.2021.34381)
Sivasakthivel, A., Shrivakshan, G. & Shrivakshan, G. A comparative study of diagnosing thyroid diseases using classification algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Software Eng. 7(8), 181 (2017). (PMID: 10.23956/ijarcsse.v7i8.47)
Dogantekin, E., Dogantekin, A. & Avci, D. An expert system based on generalized discriminant analysis and wavelet support vector machine for diagnosis of thyroid diseases. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 146–150 (2011). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.029)
Polat, K., Şahan, S. & Güneş, S. A novel hybrid method based on artificial immune recognition system (AIRS) with fuzzy weighted pre-processing for thyroid disease diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 32(4), 1141–1147 (2007). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.007)
Assegie, T. A. An optimized K-nearest neighbor based breast cancer detection. J. Robotics Control (JRC) 2(3), 115–118 (2021). (PMID: 10.18196/jrc.2363)
Yang, M. & Yang, J. Feature selection based on distance measurement. J. New Media. 3(1), 19 (2021). (PMID: 10.32604/jnm.2021.018267)
Abdel-Basset, M., El-Shahat, D., El-Henawy, I., De Albuquerque, V. H. C. & Mirjalili, S. A new fusion of grey wolf optimizer algorithm with a two-phase mutation for feature selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 139, 112824 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112824)
Lavanya, D. & Rani, D. K. U. Analysis of feature selection with classification: breast cancer datasets. Indian J. Computer Sci. Eng. (IJCSE) 2(5), 756–763 (2011).
Jijitha, S., & Amudha, T. Breast cancer prognosis using machine learning techniques and genetic algorithm: experiment on six different datasets. In Evolutionary Computing and Mobile Sustainable Networks: Proceedings of ICECMSN, 2021 (pp. 703–711): Springer. (2020).
Bayrak, E. A., Kirci, P., & Ensari, T. Comparison of machine learning methods for breast cancer diagnosis. In 2019 Scientific meeting on electrical-electronics & biomedical engineering and computer science (EBBT), (pp. 1–3): Ieee. (2019).
Janghorbani, A. & Moradi, M. H. Fuzzy evidential network and its application as medical prognosis and diagnosis models. J. Biomed. Inform. 72, 96–107 (2017). (PMID: 2869005410.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.004)
Das, S. R., Panigrahi, P. K., Das, K. & Mishra, D. Improving rbf kernel function of support vector machine using particle swarm optimization. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res. 2(7), 130–135 (2012).
Abonyi, J. & Szeifert, F. Supervised fuzzy clustering for the identification of fuzzy classifiers. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 24(14), 2195–2207 (2003). (PMID: 10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00047-3)
Khourdifi, Y. & Baha, M. Heart disease prediction and classification using machine learning algorithms optimized by particle swarm optimization and ant colony optimization. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2019.0228.24 (2019). (PMID: 10.22266/ijies2019.0228.24)
Zivkovic, M., Bacanin, N., Rakic, A., Arandjelovic, J., Stanojlovic, S., & Venkatachalam, K. Chaotic binary ant lion optimizer approach for feature selection on medical datasets with covid-19 case study. In 2022 International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS), (pp. 581–588): IEEE. (2022).
Zivkovic, M., Petrovic, A., Venkatachalam, K., Strumberger, I., Jassim, H. S., & Bacanin, N. Novel chaotic best firefly algorithm: Covid-19 fake news detection application. In Advances in swarm intelligence: variations and adaptations for optimization problems (pp. 285–305): Springer. (2022).
Bacanin, N. et al. Performance of a novel chaotic firefly algorithm with enhanced exploration for tackling global optimization problems: application for dropout regularization. Mathematics 9(21), 2705 (2021). (PMID: 10.3390/math9212705)
Basha, J. et al. Chaotic Harris Hawks Optimization with quasi-reflection-based learning: An application to enhance cnn design. Sensors 21(19), 6654 (2021). (PMID: 34640973851212110.3390/s21196654)
Tair, M. & Zivkovic, M. A chaotic oppositional whale optimisation algorithm with firefly search for medical diagnostics. Comput. Mater. Continua https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.024989 (2022). (PMID: 10.32604/cmc.2022.024989)
Zhang, G. P. Neural networks for classification: A survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics, Part C (Appl. Rev.) 30(4), 451–462 (2000). (PMID: 10.1109/5326.897072)
Mohammed, H. & Rashid, T. FOX: A FOX-inspired optimization algorithm. Appl. Intell. 53(1), 1030–1050 (2023). (PMID: 10.1007/s10489-022-03533-0)
McDonald, R. S., Roth, J. D. & Baldwin, F. B. Goose persistence in fall strongly influences Arctic fox diet, but not reproductive success, in the southern Arctic. Polar Res. 36(sup1), 5 (2017). (PMID: 10.1080/17518369.2017.1324652)
Frafjord, K. Do Arctic and red foxes compete for food?. Mamm. Biol. - Z. Säugetierkd. 65(6), 350–359 (2000).
Cervený, J., Begall, S., Koubek, P., Nováková, P., & Burda, H. Directional preference may enhance hunting accuracy in.
Igel, I. Hands-on Activity: Measuring Distance with Sound Waves”. Polytechnic Institute of New York University. (2012).
Dağli, İ, Inan, O. & Başçiftçi, F. Using a binary hybrid Fox optimization algorithm for attribute selection. Cluster Comput. 29(2), 93 (2026). (PMID: 10.1007/s10586-025-05805-z)
Dağli, İ, İnan, O. & Başçi̇ftçi̇, F. A hybrid Fox optimization algorithm with chaotic maps and polynomial mutation for clustering applications. Evolv. Syst. 16(4), 1–27 (2025). (PMID: 10.1007/s12530-025-09750-5)
Nozawa, H. A neural network model as a globally coupled map and applications based on chaos. Chaos 2(3), 377–386 (1992). (PMID: 1277998710.1063/1.165880)
Tan, Y., Tan, G.-z & Deng, S.-g. Hybrid particle swarm optimization with chaotic search for solving integer and mixed integer programming problems. J. Cent. South Univ. 21(7), 2731–2742 (2014). (PMID: 10.1007/s11771-014-2235-6)
Yang, Z., & Shi, Y. Brain storm optimization with chaotic operation. In 2015 Seventh International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI), (pp. 111–115): IEEE. (2015).
Coelho, L. D. S., Mariani, V. C., Guerra, F. A., da Luz, M. V. & Leite, J. V. Multiobjective optimization of transformer design using a chaotic evolutionary approach. IEEE Trans. Magn. 50(2), 669–672 (2014). (PMID: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2285704)
Alataş, B., Akin, E., & Özer, A. B. Kaotik Haritali Parçacik Sürü Optimizasyon Algoritmalari. In ELECO 2007 5th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering. (2007).
Özkaynak, F. A novel method to improve the performance of chaos based evolutionary algorithms. Optik 126(24), 5434–5438 (2015). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.09.098)
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics New-York. (2009).
Bishop, C. M., & Nasrabadi, N. M. Pattern recognition and machine learning (Vol. 4, Vol. 4): Springer. (2006).
Übeyli, E. D. & Güler, I. Automatic detection of erythemato-squamous diseases using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Comput. Biol. Med. 35(5), 421–433 (2005). (PMID: 1613665110.1016/j.compbiomed.2004.03.003)
Danjuma, K., & Osofisan, A. O. Evaluation of predictive data mining algorithms in erythemato-squamous disease diagnosis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.00607 . (2015).
Putatunda, S. A hybrid deep learning approach for diagnosis of the erythemato-squamous disease. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), (pp. 1–6): IEEE. (2020).
Polat, K. & Güneş, S. A novel hybrid intelligent method based on C4. 5 decision tree classifier and one-against-all approach for multi-class classification problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 1587–1592 (2009). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.051)
Rani, K. U. Parallel approach for diagnosis of breast cancer using neural network technique. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 10(3), 1–5 (2010).
Andoyo, F. A. & Arifudin, R. Optimization of classification accuracy using K-Means and Genetic Algorithm by integrating C4. 5 algorithm for diagnosis breast cancer disease. J. Adv. Inform. Syst. Technol. 3(1), 1–8 (2021). (PMID: 10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49011)
AKBULUT, A., BALIKÇI ÇİÇEK, İ., & Colak, C. Classification of breast cancer on the strength of potential risk factors with boosting models: a public health informatics application. HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI. (2022).
Roobini, S. & Naomi, J. F. Performance analysis of different classifiers in prediction of breast cancer. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 12, 8 (2019). (PMID: 10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i8/141814)
Muslim, M., Rukmana, S., Sugiharti, E., Prasetiyo, B., & Alimah, S. Optimization of C4. 5 algorithm-based particle swarm optimization for breast cancer diagnosis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (Vol. 983, pp. 012063, Vol. 1): IOP Publishing. (2018).
Kusuma, E. J., Shidik, G. F. & Pramunendar, R. A. Optimization of neural network using Nelder Mead in breast cancer classification. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 13(6), 330–337 (2020).
Pechprasarn, S., Wattanapermpool, O., Warunlawan, M., Homsud, P. & Akarajarasroj, T. Identification of important factors in the diagnosis of breast cancer cells using machine learning models and principal component analysis. J. Curr. Sci. Technol. 13(3), 642–656 (2023). (PMID: 10.59796/jcst.V13N3.2023.700)
Azar, A. T., Member, I., Hassanien, A. E., & Kim, T.-h. Expert system based on neural-fuzzy rules for thyroid diseases diagnosis. In International Conference on Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, (pp. 94–105): Springer (2012).
Chandel, K., Kunwar, V., Sabitha, S., Choudhury, T. & Mukherjee, S. A comparative study on thyroid disease detection using K-nearest neighbor and Naive Bayes classification techniques. CSI Trans. ICT. 4, 313–319 (2016). (PMID: 10.1007/s40012-016-0100-5)
Ozyilmaz, L., & Yildirim, T. Diagnosis of thyroid disease using artificial neural network methods. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, ICONIP’02., 2002 (Vol. 4, pp. 2033–2036): IEEE. (2002).
Temurtas, F. A comparative study on thyroid disease diagnosis using neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(1), 944–949 (2009). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.010)
Tasneem, T., Kabir, M. M. J., Xu, S., & Tasneem, T. An Intelligent Model Based on Data Mining and Machine Learning Approaches for Diagnosing Hepatitis Disease. In 2025 2nd International Conference on Next-Generation Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (NCIM), (pp. 1–6): IEEE. (2025).
Neshat, M., Sargolzaei, M., Nadjaran Toosi, A. & Masoumi, A. Hepatitis disease diagnosis using hybrid case based reasoning and particle swarm optimization. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012(1), 609718 (2012).
Ahmad, W. et al. Intelligent hepatitis diagnosis using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and information gain method. Soft Comput. 23(21), 10931–10938 (2019). (PMID: 10.1007/s00500-018-3643-6)
Akbar, W. et al. Development of hepatitis disease detection system by exploiting sparsity in linear support vector machine to improve strength of adaboost ensemble model. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2020(1), 8870240 (2020).
Polat, K. & Güneş, S. A hybrid approach to medical decision support systems: Combining feature selection, fuzzy weighted pre-processing and AIRS. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 88(2), 164–174 (2007). (PMID: 1788423510.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.013)
Khatun, P., Umam, S., Razzak, R. B., Shamsuddin, I. B. & Salma, N. A study on the effectiveness of machine learning models for hepatitis prediction. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 30659 (2025). (PMID: 408358601236812610.1038/s41598-025-07104-4)
Polat, K. & Güneş, S. Hepatitis disease diagnosis using a new hybrid system based on feature selection (FS) and artificial immune recognition system with fuzzy resource allocation. Digit. Signal Process. 16(6), 889–901 (2006). (PMID: 10.1016/j.dsp.2006.07.005)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Chaotic maps; Classification; Clustering; Fox optimization algorithm; Optimization
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260506 Date Completed: 20260705 Latest Revision: 20260726
Update Code: 20260726
PubMed Central ID: PMC13334007
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-50872-w
PMID: 42091957
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE