Academic Journal
Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship and risk factors for failure.
| Τίτλος: | Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship and risk factors for failure. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Patel R; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA., P Kucharik M; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA., Schmidt CM 2nd; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA., Kolakowski L; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Shoulder & Elbow Service, Tampa, FL, USA., Christmas KN; Department of Translational Research, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA., Simon P; Department of Translational Research, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Medical Engineering, University of South Florida College of Engineering & Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA., Frankle MA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Shoulder & Elbow Service, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: mfrankle@floridaortho.com. |
| Πηγή: | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery [J Shoulder Elbow Surg] 2026 Oct; Vol. 35 (10), pp. 2346-2353. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Apr 24. |
| Τύπος έκδοσης: | Journal Article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Στοιχεία περιοδικού: | Publisher: Mosby Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9206499 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-6500 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10582746 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: St. Louis, MO : Mosby Original Publication: St. Louis, MO : Mosby Yearbook, Inc., c1992- |
| Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): | Reoperation*/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder*/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder*/adverse effects , Shoulder Joint*/surgery , Prosthesis Failure*, Humans ; Female ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged ; Male ; Risk Factors ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Failure ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Time Factors |
| Περίληψη: | Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly used as a revision option, but long-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after revision rTSA remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that revision rTSA for failed rTSA would have inferior survivorship and PROs when compared to revision rTSA for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or failed hemiarthroplasty (HA). Moreover, we hypothesized that shoulders undergoing secondary revision would have a higher risk of failure when compared to those undergoing first-time revision surgery. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, single-surgeon institutional database from 2002-2022. Patients undergoing first-time revision rTSA for aseptic mechanical failure of a prior arthroplasty were included if they had ≥12 months of follow-up or required subsequent revision within 12 months. Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. PROs (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] scores and satisfaction) were collected at one year, with subgroup analysis by index failed arthroplasty type: failed HA, failed aTSA, and failed rTSA. Modes of failure after secondary revision were also examined. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: Of 464 first-time revision rTSA for mechanical failure from 2002-2022, 320 revision rTSAs had appropriate follow-up and met inclusion criteria, with mean follow-up of 50.3 ± 45.7 months. Mean age was 67.4 ± 10.0 years; 54.1% were female. Overall survivorship of revision rTSA was 86.4% at 2 years and 71.4% at 10 years. In terms of survivorship stratified by index arthroplasty, the survivorship of failed HA, failed aTSA, and failed rTSA was the following: failed HA: 2-year 93.4% and 10-year 74.2%; failed aTSA: 2-year 88.6% and 10-year 82.1%; failed rTSA: 2-year 74.6% and 10-year 59.5%. Overall survivorship was inferior in shoulders revised from failed rTSA compared with failed HA or failed aTSA (P < .001). At one year, the overall cohort reported mean ASES of 61.3 ± 25.0, with 48.8% achieving Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Shoulders revised from failed rTSA had lower ASES scores (53.3 ± 26.2) than those revised from failed HA (63.3 ± 23.1) or failed aTSA (64.3 ± 25.0) (P = .008). Of the 320 revision rTSAs, 58 (18.1%) required secondary revision; mechanisms of failure included instability (5.0%), humeral loosening (4.1%), infection (4.1%), glenoid failure (3.4%), and periprosthetic fracture (1.6%). Of these, 17 (29.3%) underwent tertiary revision. Secondary revisions due to humeral loosening showed the highest hazard for tertiary failure. Conclusion: Revision rTSA for mechanical failure demonstrates modest long-term durability and functional improvement, with more than 70% survivorship at 10 years. However, less than half of patients achieved acceptable symptom states at short-term follow-up. Specifically, revision from failed rTSA yields inferior survivorship and PROs when compared to failed aTSA or failed HA. Secondary revision procedures carried greater risk of failure, with humeral loosening remaining particularly difficult to manage. These findings highlight the need for careful patient counseling and ongoing investigation into strategies to improve survivorship after revision rTSA. (Copyright © 2026 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Revision shoulder arthroplasty; failed revision shoulder arthroplasty; long-term outcomes; modes of failure; secondary revision; survivorship |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20260426 Date Completed: 20260909 Latest Revision: 20260909 |
| Update Code: | 20260910 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jse.2026.04.028 |
| PMID: | 42036063 |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | MEDLINE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2026.04.028? Name: ScienceDirect (all content) (s7799221) Category: fullText Text: View record from ScienceDirect MouseOverText: View record from ScienceDirect – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:cmedm&genre=article&issn=15326500&ISBN=&volume=35&issue=10&date=20261001&spage=2346&pages=2346-2353&title=Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery&atitle=Revision%20reverse%20shoulder%20arthroplasty%20after%20failed%20shoulder%20arthroplasty%3A%20long-term%20survivorship%20and%20risk%20factors%20for%20failure.&aulast=Patel%20R&id=DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2026.04.028 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: Full Text Finder MouseOverText: Full Text Finder |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: cmedm DbLabel: MEDLINE An: 42036063 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship and risk factors for failure. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Patel+R%22">Patel R</searchLink>; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22P+Kucharik+M%22">P Kucharik M</searchLink>; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Schmidt+CM+2nd%22">Schmidt CM 2nd</searchLink>; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Kolakowski+L%22">Kolakowski L</searchLink>; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Shoulder & Elbow Service, Tampa, FL, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Christmas+KN%22">Christmas KN</searchLink>; Department of Translational Research, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Simon+P%22">Simon P</searchLink>; Department of Translational Research, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Medical Engineering, University of South Florida College of Engineering & Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Frankle+MA%22">Frankle MA</searchLink>; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Shoulder & Elbow Service, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: mfrankle@floridaortho.com. – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%229206499%22">Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</searchLink> [J Shoulder Elbow Surg] 2026 Oct; Vol. 35 (10), pp. 2346-2353. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2026 Apr 24. – Name: TypePub Label: Publication Type Group: TypPub Data: Journal Article – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: TitleSource Label: Journal Info Group: Src Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22Mosby%22">Mosby </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>United States <i>NLM ID: </i>9206499 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1532-6500 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2210582746%22">10582746 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>J Shoulder Elbow Surg <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE – Name: PublisherInfo Label: Imprint Name(s) Group: PubInfo Data: <i>Publication</i>: St. Louis, MO : Mosby<br /><i>Original Publication</i>: St. Louis, MO : Mosby Yearbook, Inc., c1992- – Name: SubjectMESH Label: MeSH Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Reoperation%22">Reoperation*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Reoperation+methods%22">methods</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Arthroplasty%2C+Replacement%2C+Shoulder%22">Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Arthroplasty%2C+Replacement%2C+Shoulder+methods%22">methods</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Arthroplasty%2C+Replacement%2C+Shoulder%22">Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Arthroplasty%2C+Replacement%2C+Shoulder+adverse+effects%22">adverse effects</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Shoulder+Joint%22">Shoulder Joint*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Shoulder+Joint+surgery%22">surgery</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Prosthesis+Failure%22">Prosthesis Failure*</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Female%22">Female</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Retrospective+Studies%22">Retrospective Studies</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Aged%22">Aged</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Male%22">Male</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Risk+Factors%22">Risk Factors</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Middle+Aged%22">Middle Aged</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Treatment+Failure%22">Treatment Failure</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Patient+Reported+Outcome+Measures%22">Patient Reported Outcome Measures</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Time+Factors%22">Time Factors</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly used as a revision option, but long-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after revision rTSA remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that revision rTSA for failed rTSA would have inferior survivorship and PROs when compared to revision rTSA for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or failed hemiarthroplasty (HA). Moreover, we hypothesized that shoulders undergoing secondary revision would have a higher risk of failure when compared to those undergoing first-time revision surgery.<br />Methods: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, single-surgeon institutional database from 2002-2022. Patients undergoing first-time revision rTSA for aseptic mechanical failure of a prior arthroplasty were included if they had ≥12 months of follow-up or required subsequent revision within 12 months. Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. PROs (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] scores and satisfaction) were collected at one year, with subgroup analysis by index failed arthroplasty type: failed HA, failed aTSA, and failed rTSA. Modes of failure after secondary revision were also examined. Statistical significance was set at P &lt; .05.<br />Results: Of 464 first-time revision rTSA for mechanical failure from 2002-2022, 320 revision rTSAs had appropriate follow-up and met inclusion criteria, with mean follow-up of 50.3 ± 45.7 months. Mean age was 67.4 ± 10.0 years; 54.1% were female. Overall survivorship of revision rTSA was 86.4% at 2 years and 71.4% at 10 years. In terms of survivorship stratified by index arthroplasty, the survivorship of failed HA, failed aTSA, and failed rTSA was the following: failed HA: 2-year 93.4% and 10-year 74.2%; failed aTSA: 2-year 88.6% and 10-year 82.1%; failed rTSA: 2-year 74.6% and 10-year 59.5%. Overall survivorship was inferior in shoulders revised from failed rTSA compared with failed HA or failed aTSA (P &lt; .001). At one year, the overall cohort reported mean ASES of 61.3 ± 25.0, with 48.8% achieving Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Shoulders revised from failed rTSA had lower ASES scores (53.3 ± 26.2) than those revised from failed HA (63.3 ± 23.1) or failed aTSA (64.3 ± 25.0) (P = .008). Of the 320 revision rTSAs, 58 (18.1%) required secondary revision; mechanisms of failure included instability (5.0%), humeral loosening (4.1%), infection (4.1%), glenoid failure (3.4%), and periprosthetic fracture (1.6%). Of these, 17 (29.3%) underwent tertiary revision. Secondary revisions due to humeral loosening showed the highest hazard for tertiary failure.<br />Conclusion: Revision rTSA for mechanical failure demonstrates modest long-term durability and functional improvement, with more than 70% survivorship at 10 years. However, less than half of patients achieved acceptable symptom states at short-term follow-up. Specifically, revision from failed rTSA yields inferior survivorship and PROs when compared to failed aTSA or failed HA. Secondary revision procedures carried greater risk of failure, with humeral loosening remaining particularly difficult to manage. These findings highlight the need for careful patient counseling and ongoing investigation into strategies to improve survivorship after revision rTSA.<br /> (Copyright © 2026 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) – Name: SubjectMinor Label: Contributed Indexing Group: Data: <i>Keywords: </i>Revision shoulder arthroplasty; failed revision shoulder arthroplasty; long-term outcomes; modes of failure; secondary revision; survivorship – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date(s) Group: Date Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20260426 <i>Date Completed: </i>20260909 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20260909 – Name: DateUpdate Label: Update Code Group: Date Data: 20260910 – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1016/j.jse.2026.04.028 – Name: AN Label: PMID Group: ID Data: 42036063 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=42036063 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.jse.2026.04.028 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: StartPage: 2346 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Humans Type: general – SubjectFull: Female Type: general – SubjectFull: Retrospective Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Aged Type: general – SubjectFull: Male Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk Factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle Aged Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment Failure Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Reoperation methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder adverse effects Type: general – SubjectFull: Shoulder Joint surgery Type: general – SubjectFull: Prosthesis Failure Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship and risk factors for failure. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Patel R – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: P Kucharik M – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Schmidt CM 2nd – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kolakowski L – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Christmas KN – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Simon P – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Frankle MA IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: 2026 Oct Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1532-6500 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 10 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |