PFAS quantitation with diffusive gradients in thin-film passive samplers: Capturing time-weighted average concentrations around maximum contaminant levels to facilitate compliance.

Bibliographic Details
Title: PFAS quantitation with diffusive gradients in thin-film passive samplers: Capturing time-weighted average concentrations around maximum contaminant levels to facilitate compliance.
Authors: Harris BJ; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA., Hodges SD; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA., Wahman DG; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA., Haupert LM; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA., Chimka JR; Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA., Fairey JL; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Electronic address: julianf@uark.edu.
Source: Water research [Water Res] 2026 Aug 01; Vol. 300, pp. 125918. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Apr 12.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Pergamon Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0105072 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-2448 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00431354 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Water Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Oxford, Pergamon Press.
MeSH Terms: Environmental Monitoring*/methods , Environmental Monitoring*/instrumentation , Water Pollutants, Chemical*/analysis , Fluorocarbons*/analysis, Diffusion
Abstract: Diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) passive samplers are used to quantify analytes in water, but their capabilities for capturing time-weighted average concentrations (CDGT) of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at low ng L-1 levels are unknown. For 32 PFAS, DGT passive sampler gel layer diffusion coefficients (DGel) ± 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using two-compartment diffusion cell tests analyzed with a non-steady-state finite difference model (FDM), which was previously shown to produce DGel estimates with less error than traditional methods relying on a pseudo-steady-state flux assumption. For each PFAS, the FDM also determined the normalized weighted sum of squared errors (WSSE × n-1), a goodness of fit measure. Eleven PFAS had adequate FDM fits (WSSE × n-1 < 0.03) and DGel ± 95 % CIs decreased with increasing molecular weight (MW) from 7.1 to 5.1 (± 0.1-0.6) × 10-6 cm2 s-1. For the other 21 PFAS, linear regression models (DGel vs. MW; R2 ≥ 0.967) were used to estimate DGel ± 95 % CIs from 3.4 to 7.6 (± 0.2-1.0) × 10-6 cm2 s-1. Compared to their free water diffusivities, DGel values differed by a median of 6.5 % and first and third quartiles of 4.5 and 8.7 %, respectively. Error in DGel was propagated into CDGT for 5-36-day laboratory-scale DGT deployments, in which CDGT ± 95 % CIs for 20-31 of the 32 PFAS were indistinguishable from grab samples (sign test; α = 0.05). DGTs accurately captured time-weighted average PFAS aqueous phase concentrations at ∼1, 10, 100, and 200 ng L-1. This study demonstrates the utility of DGTs for PFAS quantitation at low ng L-1 levels and establishes methods for PFAS DGel determinations, error propagation into CDGT, and comparisons with grab sampling.
(Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Diffusion coefficients; Environmental sampling; Finite difference model; Time-weighted average
Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Water Pollutants, Chemical)
0 (Fluorocarbons)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20260416 Date Completed: 20260715 Latest Revision: 20260715
Update Code: 20260715
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2026.125918
PMID: 41990621
Database: MEDLINE
FullText Links:
  – Type: other
    Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com:443/public/rma-ftfapi/ejs/direct?AccessToken=424A8920872B3FD198DD&Show=Object
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.125918?
    Name: ScienceDirect (all content) (s7799221)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record from ScienceDirect
    MouseOverText: View record from ScienceDirect
Header DbId: cmedm
DbLabel: MEDLINE
An: 41990621
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: PFAS quantitation with diffusive gradients in thin-film passive samplers: Capturing time-weighted average concentrations around maximum contaminant levels to facilitate compliance.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Harris+BJ%22&quot;&gt;Harris BJ&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Hodges+SD%22&quot;&gt;Hodges SD&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Wahman+DG%22&quot;&gt;Wahman DG&lt;/searchLink&gt;; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Haupert+LM%22&quot;&gt;Haupert LM&lt;/searchLink&gt;; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Chimka+JR%22&quot;&gt;Chimka JR&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AU&quot; term=&quot;%22Fairey+JL%22&quot;&gt;Fairey JL&lt;/searchLink&gt;; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Electronic address: julianf@uark.edu.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%220105072%22&quot;&gt;Water research&lt;/searchLink&gt; [Water Res] 2026 Aug 01; Vol. 300, pp. 125918. &lt;i&gt;Date of Electronic Publication: &lt;/i&gt;2026 Apr 12.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Journal Article
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Publisher: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;PB&quot; term=&quot;%22Pergamon+Press%22&quot;&gt;Pergamon Press &lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;i&gt;Country of Publication: &lt;/i&gt;England &lt;i&gt;NLM ID: &lt;/i&gt;0105072 &lt;i&gt;Publication Model: &lt;/i&gt;Print-Electronic &lt;i&gt;Cited Medium: &lt;/i&gt;Internet &lt;i&gt;ISSN: &lt;/i&gt;1879-2448 (Electronic) &lt;i&gt;Linking ISSN: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;IS&quot; term=&quot;%2200431354%22&quot;&gt;00431354 &lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;i&gt;NLM ISO Abbreviation: &lt;/i&gt;Water Res &lt;i&gt;Subsets: &lt;/i&gt;MEDLINE
– Name: PublisherInfo
  Label: Imprint Name(s)
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Original Publication&lt;/i&gt;: Oxford, Pergamon Press.
– Name: SubjectMESH
  Label: MeSH Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Environmental+Monitoring%22&quot;&gt;Environmental Monitoring*&lt;/searchLink&gt;/&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Environmental+Monitoring+methods%22&quot;&gt;methods&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Environmental+Monitoring%22&quot;&gt;Environmental Monitoring*&lt;/searchLink&gt;/&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Environmental+Monitoring+instrumentation%22&quot;&gt;instrumentation&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Water+Pollutants%2C+Chemical%22&quot;&gt;Water Pollutants, Chemical*&lt;/searchLink&gt;/&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Water+Pollutants%2C+Chemical+analysis%22&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Fluorocarbons%22&quot;&gt;Fluorocarbons*&lt;/searchLink&gt;/&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MM&quot; term=&quot;%22Fluorocarbons+analysis%22&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;MH&quot; term=&quot;%22Diffusion%22&quot;&gt;Diffusion&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) passive samplers are used to quantify analytes in water, but their capabilities for capturing time-weighted average concentrations (C&lt;subscript&gt;DGT&lt;/subscript&gt;) of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at low ng L&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt; levels are unknown. For 32 PFAS, DGT passive sampler gel layer diffusion coefficients (D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt;) &#177; 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using two-compartment diffusion cell tests analyzed with a non-steady-state finite difference model (FDM), which was previously shown to produce D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; estimates with less error than traditional methods relying on a pseudo-steady-state flux assumption. For each PFAS, the FDM also determined the normalized weighted sum of squared errors (WSSE &#215; n&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt;), a goodness of fit measure. Eleven PFAS had adequate FDM fits (WSSE &#215; n&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt; &amp;lt; 0.03) and D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; &#177; 95 % CIs decreased with increasing molecular weight (MW) from 7.1 to 5.1 (&#177; 0.1-0.6) &#215; 10&lt;superscript&gt;-6&lt;/superscript&gt; cm&lt;superscript&gt;2&lt;/superscript&gt; s&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt;. For the other 21 PFAS, linear regression models (D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; vs. MW; R&lt;superscript&gt;2&lt;/superscript&gt; ≥ 0.967) were used to estimate D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; &#177; 95 % CIs from 3.4 to 7.6 (&#177; 0.2-1.0) &#215; 10&lt;superscript&gt;-6&lt;/superscript&gt; cm&lt;superscript&gt;2&lt;/superscript&gt; s&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt;. Compared to their free water diffusivities, D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; values differed by a median of 6.5 % and first and third quartiles of 4.5 and 8.7 %, respectively. Error in D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; was propagated into C&lt;subscript&gt;DGT&lt;/subscript&gt; for 5-36-day laboratory-scale DGT deployments, in which C&lt;subscript&gt;DGT&lt;/subscript&gt; &#177; 95 % CIs for 20-31 of the 32 PFAS were indistinguishable from grab samples (sign test; α = 0.05). DGTs accurately captured time-weighted average PFAS aqueous phase concentrations at ∼1, 10, 100, and 200 ng L&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt;. This study demonstrates the utility of DGTs for PFAS quantitation at low ng L&lt;superscript&gt;-1&lt;/superscript&gt; levels and establishes methods for PFAS D&lt;subscript&gt;Gel&lt;/subscript&gt; determinations, error propagation into C&lt;subscript&gt;DGT&lt;/subscript&gt;, and comparisons with grab sampling.&lt;br /&gt; (Copyright &#169; 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Competing Interests
  Group: Ab
  Data: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
– Name: SubjectMinor
  Label: Contributed Indexing
  Group:
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Keywords: &lt;/i&gt;Diffusion coefficients; Environmental sampling; Finite difference model; Time-weighted average
– Name: NumberCAS
  Label: Substance Nomenclature
  Group: ID
  Data: 0 (Water Pollutants, Chemical)&lt;br /&gt;0 (Fluorocarbons)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date(s)
  Group: Date
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Date Created: &lt;/i&gt;20260416 &lt;i&gt;Date Completed: &lt;/i&gt;20260715 &lt;i&gt;Latest Revision: &lt;/i&gt;20260715
– Name: DateUpdate
  Label: Update Code
  Group: Date
  Data: 20260715
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1016/j.watres.2026.125918
– Name: AN
  Label: PMID
  Group: ID
  Data: 41990621
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=41990621
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.watres.2026.125918
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: 125918
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Diffusion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Environmental Monitoring methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Environmental Monitoring instrumentation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Water Pollutants, Chemical analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fluorocarbons analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: PFAS quantitation with diffusive gradients in thin-film passive samplers: Capturing time-weighted average concentrations around maximum contaminant levels to facilitate compliance.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Harris BJ
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hodges SD
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wahman DG
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Haupert LM
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chimka JR
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fairey JL
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: 2026 Aug 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1879-2448
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 300
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Water research
              Type: main
ResultId 1