Academic Journal

The role of time in action control: Evidence against anticipation of action-effect intervals and a possible motivational account for delayed-effect costs.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: The role of time in action control: Evidence against anticipation of action-effect intervals and a possible motivational account for delayed-effect costs.
Συγγραφείς: Janczyk M; Department of Psychology, University of Bremen., Dignath D; Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen.
Πηγή: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition [J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn] 2026 Sep; Vol. 52 (9), pp. 1596-1608. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 08.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8207540 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1939-1285 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02787393 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association, [c1982-
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Motivation*/physiology , Anticipation, Psychological*/physiology , Psychomotor Performance*/physiology , Time Perception*/physiology, Reaction Time/physiology ; Humans ; Time Factors ; Female ; Male ; Young Adult
Περίληψη: The ideomotor principle states that actions are selected by anticipating their effects. An abundance of empirical results supports this contention, but whether the effect of an action is delayed by an interval of a particular duration has mostly been a procedural detail in such studies. We will refer to this generically as an action-effect (A-E) delay. Few studies explicitly addressed the interval and its duration and concluded that its duration is a distinct feature of the effect and seems to be anticipated as well: Response times are longer when the interval is predictably longer relative to when it is shorter; hence, we observe delayed-effect costs. We here question this conclusion because the duration of the A-E interval and the total trial duration were confounded in all previous studies on that topic. Experiment 1 dissociated both features by manipulating either the A-E interval, the intertrial interval, or both in a negatively correlated way, yielding the same total trial duration. Results favor the hypothesis that the total trial duration is key to the delayed-effect costs. Experiment 2 manipulated whether participants focus on the effect, and hence the A-E interval duration, or the next fixation cross, and hence the total trial duration. Results again favor the importance of the total trial duration. As a consequence, previous interpretations should be reconsidered, and we here put forward an alternative motivational account as a more general explanation for delayed-effect costs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20251208 Date Completed: 20260806 Latest Revision: 20260806
Update Code: 20260807
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001560
PMID: 41359597
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:cmedm&genre=article&issn=19391285&ISBN=&volume=52&issue=9&date=20260901&spage=1596&pages=1596-1608&title=Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition&atitle=The%20role%20of%20time%20in%20action%20control%3A%20Evidence%20against%20anticipation%20of%20action-effect%20intervals%20and%20a%20possible%20motivational%20account%20for%20delayed-effect%20costs.&aulast=Janczyk%20M&id=DOI:10.1037/xlm0001560
    Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271)
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
Header DbId: cmedm
DbLabel: MEDLINE
An: 41359597
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The role of time in action control: Evidence against anticipation of action-effect intervals and a possible motivational account for delayed-effect costs.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Janczyk+M%22">Janczyk M</searchLink>; Department of Psychology, University of Bremen.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Dignath+D%22">Dignath D</searchLink>; Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%228207540%22">Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</searchLink> [J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn] 2026 Sep; Vol. 52 (9), pp. 1596-1608. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2025 Dec 08.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Journal Article
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22American+Psychological+Association%22">American Psychological Association </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>United States <i>NLM ID: </i>8207540 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1939-1285 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2202787393%22">02787393 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE
– Name: PublisherInfo
  Label: Imprint Name(s)
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: <i>Original Publication</i>: Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association, [c1982-
– Name: SubjectMESH
  Label: MeSH Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Motivation%22">Motivation*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Motivation+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Anticipation%2C+Psychological%22">Anticipation, Psychological*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Anticipation%2C+Psychological+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Psychomotor+Performance%22">Psychomotor Performance*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Psychomotor+Performance+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Time+Perception%22">Time Perception*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Time+Perception+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Reaction+Time%22">Reaction Time</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Reaction+Time+physiology%22">physiology</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Time+Factors%22">Time Factors</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Female%22">Female</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Male%22">Male</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Young+Adult%22">Young Adult</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The ideomotor principle states that actions are selected by anticipating their effects. An abundance of empirical results supports this contention, but whether the effect of an action is delayed by an interval of a particular duration has mostly been a procedural detail in such studies. We will refer to this generically as an action-effect (A-E) delay. Few studies explicitly addressed the interval and its duration and concluded that its duration is a distinct feature of the effect and seems to be anticipated as well: Response times are longer when the interval is predictably longer relative to when it is shorter; hence, we observe delayed-effect costs. We here question this conclusion because the duration of the A-E interval and the total trial duration were confounded in all previous studies on that topic. Experiment 1 dissociated both features by manipulating either the A-E interval, the intertrial interval, or both in a negatively correlated way, yielding the same total trial duration. Results favor the hypothesis that the total trial duration is key to the delayed-effect costs. Experiment 2 manipulated whether participants focus on the effect, and hence the A-E interval duration, or the next fixation cross, and hence the total trial duration. Results again favor the importance of the total trial duration. As a consequence, previous interpretations should be reconsidered, and we here put forward an alternative motivational account as a more general explanation for delayed-effect costs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date(s)
  Group: Date
  Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20251208 <i>Date Completed: </i>20260806 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20260806
– Name: DateUpdate
  Label: Update Code
  Group: Date
  Data: 20260807
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/xlm0001560
– Name: AN
  Label: PMID
  Group: ID
  Data: 41359597
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=41359597
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/xlm0001560
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: 1596
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Reaction Time physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Humans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Time Factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Female
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Male
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Young Adult
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Anticipation, Psychological physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychomotor Performance physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Time Perception physiology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The role of time in action control: Evidence against anticipation of action-effect intervals and a possible motivational account for delayed-effect costs.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Janczyk M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dignath D
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: 2026 Sep
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1939-1285
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 52
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
              Type: main
ResultId 1