Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition.
Συγγραφείς: Pamir Z; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. zahide_pamir@meei.harvard.edu., Canoluk MU; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Jung JH; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Peli E; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Πηγή: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2020 Feb 12; Vol. 10 (1), pp. 2435. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 12.
Τύπος έκδοσης: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Γλώσσα: English
Στοιχεία περιοδικού: Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
Ιατρικοί όροι (MeSH): Blindness*/therapy , Pattern Recognition, Physiological*, Tongue/*physiology, Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Spatial Behavior ; Touch
Περίληψη: Spatial patterns presented on the tongue using electro-tactile sensory substitution devices (SSDs) have been suggested to be recognized better by tracing the pattern with the tip of the tongue. We examined if the functional benefit of tracing is overcoming the poor sensitivity or low spatial resolution at the back of the tongue or alternatively compensating for limited information processing capacity by fixating on a segment of the spatial pattern at a time. Using a commercially available SSD, the BrainPort, we compared letter recognition performance in three presentation modes; tracing, static, and drawing. Stimulation intensity was either constant or increased from the tip to the back of the tongue to partially compensate for the decreasing sensitivity. Recognition was significantly better for tracing, compared to static and drawing conditions. Confusion analyses showed that letters were confused based on their characteristics presented near the tip in static and drawing conditions. The results suggest that recognition performance is limited by the poor spatial resolution at the back of the tongue, and tracing seems to be an effective strategy to overcome this. Compensating for limited information processing capacity or poor sensitivity by drawing or increasing intensity at the back, respectively, does not improve the performance.
References: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Nov;57(11):1324-30. (PMID: 10555797)
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Sep 06;53(10):6004-10. (PMID: 22879420)
Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Oct;55(2):651-3. (PMID: 7155761)
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:515-521. (PMID: 29981764)
J Neural Eng. 2012 Aug;9(4):045007. (PMID: 22832032)
Multisens Res. 2014;27(1):71-90. (PMID: 25102667)
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Nov;30(5):483-91. (PMID: 7329766)
Multisens Res. 2014;27(5-6):293-312. (PMID: 25693298)
J Gen Psychol. 1984 Apr;110(2d Half):243-9. (PMID: 6726202)
Somatosens Mot Res. 2009 Jun;26(2):50-63. (PMID: 19697262)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):382-90. (PMID: 16843702)
Brain Res Bull. 2010 Jul 30;82(5-6):264-70. (PMID: 20466041)
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2361-6. (PMID: 7991127)
Nature. 1969 Mar 8;221(5184):963-4. (PMID: 5818337)
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Jan-Feb;69(1):6901290010p1-8. (PMID: 25553750)
J Opt Soc Am. 1978 Jun;68(6):845-9. (PMID: 702222)
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 7;266(1436):2427-33. (PMID: 10643086)
J Speech Hear Res. 1965 Dec;8(4):389-98. (PMID: 5861365)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 21;11:186. (PMID: 28484380)
Am J Otolaryngol. 1989 Sep-Oct;10(5):342-4. (PMID: 2817250)
Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng. 2011 Dec;18(6):1476-1485. (PMID: 28748231)
Neural Plast. 2012;2012:304045. (PMID: 22779006)
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:559-62. (PMID: 19964939)
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):531-46. (PMID: 2051193)
Neuroreport. 2011 May 11;22(7):342-7. (PMID: 21451425)
Ergonomics. 2005 Feb 22;48(3):302-13. (PMID: 15764328)
Vision Res. 1974 Dec;14(12):1333-7. (PMID: 4446364)
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jun;49(6):551-62. (PMID: 1857630)
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Aug;52(2):201-10. (PMID: 1508627)
Percept Psychophys. 1987 Oct;42(4):309-17. (PMID: 3684486)
Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422. (PMID: 9849112)
Vision Res. 2018 Nov;152:40-50. (PMID: 29258869)
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3543-6. (PMID: 24110494)
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Dec;30(6):540-6. (PMID: 7335449)
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998 Oct;35(4):427-30. (PMID: 10220221)
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):480-6. (PMID: 12930480)
Percept Mot Skills. 1972 Aug;35(1):59-67. (PMID: 5054067)
Scand J Psychol. 2005 Jul;46(3):247-51. (PMID: 15842415)
Grant Information: P30 EY003790 United States EY NEI NIH HHS
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20200214 Date Completed: 20201112 Latest Revision: 20231113
Update Code: 20260130
PubMed Central ID: PMC7015888
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59102-3
PMID: 32051455
Βάση Δεδομένων: MEDLINE
FullText Links:
  – Type: other
    Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com:443/public/rma-ftfapi/ejs/direct?AccessToken=4FC6A6AADDDD659AFAEC&Show=Object
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59102-3
    Name: EDS - Springer Nature Journals (s7799221)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record at Springer
Header DbId: cmedm
DbLabel: MEDLINE
An: 32051455
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Pamir+Z%22">Pamir Z</searchLink>; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. zahide_pamir@meei.harvard.edu.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Canoluk+MU%22">Canoluk MU</searchLink>; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Jung+JH%22">Jung JH</searchLink>; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Peli+E%22">Peli E</searchLink>; The Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22101563288%22">Scientific reports</searchLink> [Sci Rep] 2020 Feb 12; Vol. 10 (1), pp. 2435. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2020 Feb 12.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22Nature+Publishing+Group%22">Nature Publishing Group </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>England <i>NLM ID: </i>101563288 <i>Publication Model: </i>Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>2045-2322 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2220452322%22">20452322 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>Sci Rep <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE
– Name: PublisherInfo
  Label: Imprint Name(s)
  Group: PubInfo
  Data: <i>Original Publication</i>: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
– Name: SubjectMESH
  Label: MeSH Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Blindness%22">Blindness*</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Blindness+therapy%22">therapy</searchLink> <br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Pattern+Recognition%2C+Physiological%22">Pattern Recognition, Physiological*</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Tongue%22">Tongue</searchLink>/<searchLink fieldCode="MM" term="%22Tongue+physiology%22">*physiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Adult%22">Adult</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Female%22">Female</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Humans%22">Humans</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Male%22">Male</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Middle+Aged%22">Middle Aged</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Spatial+Behavior%22">Spatial Behavior</searchLink> ; <searchLink fieldCode="MH" term="%22Touch%22">Touch</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Spatial patterns presented on the tongue using electro-tactile sensory substitution devices (SSDs) have been suggested to be recognized better by tracing the pattern with the tip of the tongue. We examined if the functional benefit of tracing is overcoming the poor sensitivity or low spatial resolution at the back of the tongue or alternatively compensating for limited information processing capacity by fixating on a segment of the spatial pattern at a time. Using a commercially available SSD, the BrainPort, we compared letter recognition performance in three presentation modes; tracing, static, and drawing. Stimulation intensity was either constant or increased from the tip to the back of the tongue to partially compensate for the decreasing sensitivity. Recognition was significantly better for tracing, compared to static and drawing conditions. Confusion analyses showed that letters were confused based on their characteristics presented near the tip in static and drawing conditions. The results suggest that recognition performance is limited by the poor spatial resolution at the back of the tongue, and tracing seems to be an effective strategy to overcome this. Compensating for limited information processing capacity or poor sensitivity by drawing or increasing intensity at the back, respectively, does not improve the performance.
– Name: Ref
  Label: References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Nov;57(11):1324-30. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2210555797%22">10555797)</searchLink><br />Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Sep 06;53(10):6004-10. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2222879420%22">22879420)</searchLink><br />Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Oct;55(2):651-3. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%227155761%22">7155761)</searchLink><br />Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:515-521. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2229981764%22">29981764)</searchLink><br />J Neural Eng. 2012 Aug;9(4):045007. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2222832032%22">22832032)</searchLink><br />Multisens Res. 2014;27(1):71-90. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2225102667%22">25102667)</searchLink><br />Percept Psychophys. 1981 Nov;30(5):483-91. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%227329766%22">7329766)</searchLink><br />Multisens Res. 2014;27(5-6):293-312. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2225693298%22">25693298)</searchLink><br />J Gen Psychol. 1984 Apr;110(2d Half):243-9. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%226726202%22">6726202)</searchLink><br />Somatosens Mot Res. 2009 Jun;26(2):50-63. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2219697262%22">19697262)</searchLink><br />Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):382-90. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2216843702%22">16843702)</searchLink><br />Brain Res Bull. 2010 Jul 30;82(5-6):264-70. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2220466041%22">20466041)</searchLink><br />Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2361-6. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%227991127%22">7991127)</searchLink><br />Nature. 1969 Mar 8;221(5184):963-4. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%225818337%22">5818337)</searchLink><br />Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Jan-Feb;69(1):6901290010p1-8. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2225553750%22">25553750)</searchLink><br />J Opt Soc Am. 1978 Jun;68(6):845-9. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%22702222%22">702222)</searchLink><br />Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 7;266(1436):2427-33. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2210643086%22">10643086)</searchLink><br />J Speech Hear Res. 1965 Dec;8(4):389-98. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%225861365%22">5861365)</searchLink><br />Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 21;11:186. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2228484380%22">28484380)</searchLink><br />Am J Otolaryngol. 1989 Sep-Oct;10(5):342-4. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%222817250%22">2817250)</searchLink><br />Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng. 2011 Dec;18(6):1476-1485. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2228748231%22">28748231)</searchLink><br />Neural Plast. 2012;2012:304045. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2222779006%22">22779006)</searchLink><br />Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:559-62. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2219964939%22">19964939)</searchLink><br />J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):531-46. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%222051193%22">2051193)</searchLink><br />Neuroreport. 2011 May 11;22(7):342-7. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2221451425%22">21451425)</searchLink><br />Ergonomics. 2005 Feb 22;48(3):302-13. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2215764328%22">15764328)</searchLink><br />Vision Res. 1974 Dec;14(12):1333-7. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%224446364%22">4446364)</searchLink><br />Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jun;49(6):551-62. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%221857630%22">1857630)</searchLink><br />Percept Psychophys. 1992 Aug;52(2):201-10. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%221508627%22">1508627)</searchLink><br />Percept Psychophys. 1987 Oct;42(4):309-17. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%223684486%22">3684486)</searchLink><br />Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%229849112%22">9849112)</searchLink><br />Vision Res. 2018 Nov;152:40-50. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2229258869%22">29258869)</searchLink><br />Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3543-6. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2224110494%22">24110494)</searchLink><br />Percept Psychophys. 1981 Dec;30(6):540-6. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%227335449%22">7335449)</searchLink><br />J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998 Oct;35(4):427-30. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2210220221%22">10220221)</searchLink><br />Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):480-6. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2212930480%22">12930480)</searchLink><br />Percept Mot Skills. 1972 Aug;35(1):59-67. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%225054067%22">5054067)</searchLink><br />Scand J Psychol. 2005 Jul;46(3):247-51. (PMID: <searchLink fieldCode="PM" term="%2215842415%22">15842415)</searchLink>
– Name: GrantInfo
  Label: Grant Information
  Group: Grant
  Data: P30 EY003790 United States EY NEI NIH HHS
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date(s)
  Group: Date
  Data: <i>Date Created: </i>20200214 <i>Date Completed: </i>20201112 <i>Latest Revision: </i>20231113
– Name: DateUpdate
  Label: Update Code
  Group: Date
  Data: 20260130
– Name: PubmedCentralID
  Label: PubMed Central ID
  Group: ID
  Data: PMC7015888
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1038/s41598-020-59102-3
– Name: AN
  Label: PMID
  Group: ID
  Data: 32051455
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cmedm&AN=32051455
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1038/s41598-020-59102-3
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: 2435
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Adult
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Female
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Humans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Male
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Middle Aged
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spatial Behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Touch
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Blindness therapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pattern Recognition, Physiological
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tongue physiology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pamir Z
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Canoluk MU
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jung JH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peli E
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 12
              M: 02
              Text: 2020 Feb 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2045-2322
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 10
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Scientific reports
              Type: main
ResultId 1