Academic Journal
LOST IN TRANSITION: HOW TRANSITIONAL PEACEBUILDING UNDERMINES DEMOCRATIZATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE SUDANS.
| Τίτλος: | LOST IN TRANSITION: HOW TRANSITIONAL PEACEBUILDING UNDERMINES DEMOCRATIZATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE SUDANS. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Abdalla, Hoda1 |
| Πηγή: | Columbia Law Review. May2026, Vol. 126 Issue 4, p771-813. 43p. |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | *Conflict management, Democratization, Human rights, Peacebuilding, Peace treaties, Sudanese, Postwar reconstruction |
| Γεωγραφικοί όροι: | Sudan, South Sudan |
| Περίληψη: | International organizations frequently use democratic transitional agreements as the primary framework for restoring peace after intrastate conflict. These postconflict peacebuilding efforts often result in transitional peace agreements that include a version of interim governance, typically with some power-sharing component, that aims to end armed conflict and usher in democratic elections after a set period. By examining Sudan’s 2022 Political Framework Agreement (PFA) and South Sudan’s 2018 Revitalized Peace Agreement (R-ARCSS), this Note critiques the linear transition logic at the core of transitional peacebuilding. It argues that these transitional agreements tend to entrench conflict, exacerbate human rights violations, and marginalize grassroots demands for democracy. This Note proposes a reorientation of transitional peacebuilding by straying away from the standardized transitional sequence, reframing conceptions of national ownership, and leveraging the UN Peacebuilding Commission to better recognize transitions as ends in themselves, maintaining democratic participation and respect for human rights at every stage of the transition process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Columbia Law Review is the property of Columbia Law Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | Business Source Index |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: http://www.jstor.org/openurl?issn=00101958&date=2026&volume=126&issue=4&spage=771 Name: JSTOR (all content) (s7799221) Category: fullText Text: Icon: https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/jstor/iconJSTOR.gif MouseOverText: Full Text from JSTOR – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/fiv2js/result?sid=EBSCO:bsx&genre=article&issn=00101958&ISBN=&volume=126&issue=4&date=20260501&spage=771&pages=771-813&title=Columbia Law Review&atitle=LOST%20IN%20TRANSITION%3A%20HOW%20TRANSITIONAL%20PEACEBUILDING%20UNDERMINES%20DEMOCRATIZATION%20AND%20HUMAN%20RIGHTS%20IN%20THE%20SUDANS.&aulast=Abdalla%2C%20Hoda&id=DOI: Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (ns324271) Category: fullText Text: Full Text Finder MouseOverText: Full Text Finder |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: bsx DbLabel: Business Source Index An: 195554974 RelevancyScore: 1412 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 1411.61413574219 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: LOST IN TRANSITION: HOW TRANSITIONAL PEACEBUILDING UNDERMINES DEMOCRATIZATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE SUDANS. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Abdalla%2C+Hoda%22">Abdalla, Hoda</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Columbia+Law+Review%22">Columbia Law Review</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 126 Issue 4, p771-813. 43p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conflict+management%22">Conflict management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Democratization%22">Democratization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+rights%22">Human rights</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peacebuilding%22">Peacebuilding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peace+treaties%22">Peace treaties</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sudanese%22">Sudanese</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postwar+reconstruction%22">Postwar reconstruction</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sudan%22">Sudan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22South+Sudan%22">South Sudan</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: International organizations frequently use democratic transitional agreements as the primary framework for restoring peace after intrastate conflict. These postconflict peacebuilding efforts often result in transitional peace agreements that include a version of interim governance, typically with some power-sharing component, that aims to end armed conflict and usher in democratic elections after a set period. By examining Sudan’s 2022 Political Framework Agreement (PFA) and South Sudan’s 2018 Revitalized Peace Agreement (R-ARCSS), this Note critiques the linear transition logic at the core of transitional peacebuilding. It argues that these transitional agreements tend to entrench conflict, exacerbate human rights violations, and marginalize grassroots demands for democracy. This Note proposes a reorientation of transitional peacebuilding by straying away from the standardized transitional sequence, reframing conceptions of national ownership, and leveraging the UN Peacebuilding Commission to better recognize transitions as ends in themselves, maintaining democratic participation and respect for human rights at every stage of the transition process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Columbia Law Review is the property of Columbia Law Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsx&AN=195554974 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 43 StartPage: 771 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Conflict management Type: general – SubjectFull: Democratization Type: general – SubjectFull: Human rights Type: general – SubjectFull: Peacebuilding Type: general – SubjectFull: Peace treaties Type: general – SubjectFull: Sudanese Type: general – SubjectFull: Postwar reconstruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Sudan Type: general – SubjectFull: South Sudan Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: LOST IN TRANSITION: HOW TRANSITIONAL PEACEBUILDING UNDERMINES DEMOCRATIZATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE SUDANS. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Abdalla, Hoda IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00101958 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 126 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Columbia Law Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |