Academic Journal

Asylum Assignment and Burden-Sharing.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Asylum Assignment and Burden-Sharing.
Authors: Caspari, Gian1 (AUTHOR), Khanna, Manshu2 (AUTHOR) manshu@phbs.pku.edu.cn
Source: Economic Theory. Aug2026, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p273-303. 31p.
Subject Terms: *Game theory, *Resource allocation, Matching theory, Assignment problems (Programming), Fairness, Countries, Stated preference methods, Political refugees
Abstract: We analyze the problem of matching asylum seekers to member states, incorporating wait times, preferences of asylum seekers, and the priorities, capacities, and burden-sharing commitments of member states. We identify a unique choice rule that addresses feasibility while balancing priorities and capacities. We examine the effects of both homogeneous and heterogeneous burden-sizes among asylum seekers on the matching process. Our main result shows that when all asylum seekers are treated as having identical burden-sizes, the asylum-seeker-proposing cumulative offer mechanism guarantees both stability and strategy-proofness. In contrast, when burden-sizes vary, there are scenarios where achieving stability or strategy-proofness is no longer possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Economic Theory is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first